Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/2982445.2982457guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Lower bounds for constant query affine-invariant LCCs and LTCs

Published: 29 May 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Affine-invariant codes are codes whose coordinates form a vector space over a finite field and which are invariant under affine transformations of the coordinate space. They form a natural, well-studied class of codes; they include popular codes such as Reed-Muller and Reed-Solomon. A particularly appealing feature of affine-invariant codes is that they seem well-suited to admit local correctors and testers.
In this work, we give lower bounds on the length of locally correctable and locally testable affine-invariant codes with constant query complexity. We show that if a code C ⊂ ΣKn is an r-query locally correctable code (LCC), where K is a finite field and Σ is a finite alphabet, then the number of codewords in C is at most exp(OK,r,|Σ|(nr-1)). Also, we show that if C ⊂ ΣKn is an r-query locally testable code (LTC), then the number of codewords in C is at most exp(OK,r,|Σ|(nr-2)). The dependence on n in these bounds is tight for constant-query LCCs/LTCs, since Guo, Kopparty and Sudan (ITCS'13) construct affine-invariant codes via lifting that have the same asymptotic tradeoffs. Note that our result holds for non-linear codes, whereas previously, Ben-Sasson and Sudan (RANDOM'11) assumed linearity to derive similar results.
Our analysis uses higher-order Fourier analysis. In particular, we show that the codewords corresponding to an affine-invariant LCC/LTC must be far from each other with respect to Gowers norm of an appropriate order. This then allows us to bound the number of codewords, using known decomposition theorems which approximate any bounded function in terms of a finite number of low-degree non-classical polynomials, upto a small error in the Gowers norm.

References

[1]
Sanjeev Arora, Carsten Lund, Rajeev Motwani, Madhu Sudan, and Mario Szegedy. Proof verification and the hardness of approximation problems. J. ACM, 45(3):501--555, 1998.
[2]
Sanjeev Arora and Shmuel Safra. Probabilistic checking of proofs: A new characterization of NP. J. ACM, 45(1):70--122, 1998.
[3]
Boaz Barak, Zeev Dvir, Amir Yehudayoff, and Avi Wigderson. Rank bounds for design matrices with applications to combinatorial geometry and locally correctable codes. In Proc. 43rd Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pages 519--528. ACM, 2011.
[4]
Omer Barkol, Yuval Ishai, and Enav Weinreb. On locally decodable codes, self-correctable codes, and t-private PIR. In Proc. 11th International Workshop on Randomization and Computation, pages 311--325. Springer, 2007.
[5]
Eli Ben-Sasson, Noga Ron-Zewi, and Madhu Sudan. Sparse affine-invariant linear codes are locally testable. In Proc. 53rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 561--570. IEEE, 2012.
[6]
Eli Ben-Sasson and Madhu Sudan. Robust locally testable codes and products of codes. In Proc. 8th International Workshop on Randomization and Computation, pages 286--297, 2004.
[7]
Eli Ben-Sasson and Madhu Sudan. Short PCPs with polylog query complexity. SIAM J. on Comput., 38(2):551--607, 2008.
[8]
Eli Ben-Sasson and Madhu Sudan. Limits on the rate of locally testable affine-invariant codes. In Proc. 15th International Workshop on Randomization and Computation, pages 412--423. Springer, 2011.
[9]
Arnab Bhattacharyya and Abhishek Bhowmick. Using higher-order Fourier analysis over general fields. Preprint arXiv:1505.00619, 2015.
[10]
Arnab Bhattacharyya, Zeev Dvir, Amir Shpilka, and Shubhangi Saraf. Tight lower bounds for 2-query LCCs over finite fields. In Proc. 52nd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 638--647. IEEE, 2011.
[11]
Abhishek Bhowmick and Shachar Lovett. Bias vs structure of polynomials in large fields, and applications in effective algebraic geometry and coding theory. Preprint arXiv:1506.02047, 2015.
[12]
Abhishek Bhowmick and Shachar Lovett. The list decoding radius of Reed-Muller codes over small fields. In Proc. 47th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pages 277--285, 2015.
[13]
Manuel Blum and Sampath Kannan. Designing programs that check their work. J. ACM, 42(1):269--291, 1995.
[14]
Manuel Blum, Michael Luby, and Ronitt Rubinfeld. Self-testing/correcting with applications to numerical problems. J. Comp. Sys. Sci., 47(3):549--595, 1993.
[15]
Benny Chor, Eyal Kushilevitz, Oded Goldreich, and Madhu Sudan. Private information retrieval. J. ACM, 45(6):965--981, 1998.
[16]
Irit Dinur. The PCP theorem by gap amplification. J. ACM, 54(3):12, 2007.
[17]
Zeev Dvir, Shubhangi Saraf, and Avi Wigderson. Breaking the quadratic barrier for 3-LCC's over the reals. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 784--793. ACM, 2014.
[18]
Zeev Dvir and Amir Shpilka. Locally decodable codes with two queries and polynomial identity testing for depth 3 circuits. SIAM J. on Comput., 36(5):1404--1434, 2007.
[19]
Oded Goldreich, Howard Karloff, Leonard J Schulman, and Luca Trevisan. Lower bounds for linear locally decodable codes and private information retrieval. In Proc. 17th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pages 143--151. IEEE, 2002.
[20]
Oded Goldreich and Madhu Sudan. Locally testable codes and PCPs of almost-linear length. J. ACM, 53(4):558--655, July 2006.
[21]
William T Gowers. A new proof of Szemerédi's theorem. Geom. Funct. Anal., 11(3):465--588, 2001.
[22]
Ben Green. Montreal lecture notes on quadratic Fourier analysis. Preprint arXiv:math/0604089, 2006.
[23]
Alan Guo, Swastik Kopparty, and Madhu Sudan. New affine-invariant codes from lifting. In Proc. 4th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, pages 529--540. ACM, 2013.
[24]
Alan Xinyu Guo. Some closure features of locally testable affine-invariant properties. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2013.
[25]
Venkatesan Guruswami, Madhu Sudan, Ameya Velingker, and Carol Wang. Limitations on testable affine-invariant codes in the high-rate regime. In Proc. 26th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 1312--1325. SIAM, 2015.
[26]
T. Kasami, S. Lin, and W. W. Peterson. Some results on cyclic codes which are invariant under the affine group and their applications. Inform. and Comput., 11(5-6):475--496, 1967.
[27]
Jonathan Katz and Luca Trevisan. On the efficiency of local decoding procedures for error-correcting codes. In Proc. 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pages 80--86. ACM, 2000.
[28]
Tali Kaufman and Madhu Sudan. Algebraic property testing: the role of invariance. In Proc. 40th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pages 403--412. ACM, 2008.
[29]
Iordanis Kerenidis and Ronald de Wolf. Exponential lower bound for 2-query locally decodable codes via a quantum argument. In Proc. 35th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pages 106--115. ACM, 2003.
[30]
Richard J Lipton. Efficient checking of computations. In Proc. 7th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, pages 207--215. Springer, 1990.
[31]
Or Meir. Combinatorial construction of locally testable codes. SIAM J. on Comput., 39(2):491--544, 2009.
[32]
Madhu Sudan, Luca Trevisan, and Salil Vadhan. Pseudorandom generators without the XOR lemma. In Proc. 31st Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pages 537--546. ACM, 1999.
[33]
Terence Tao. Higher order Fourier analysis, volume 142. American Mathematical Soc., 2012.
[34]
Terence Tao and Tamar Ziegler. The inverse conjecture for the Gowers norm over finite fields in low characteristic. Ann. Comb., 16(1):121--188, 2012.
[35]
Madhur Tulsiani and Julia Wolf. Quadratic Goldreich-Levin theorems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 43(2):730--766, 2014.
[36]
Michael Viderman. Explicit strong LTCs with inverse poly-log rate and constant soundness. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), 22:20, 2015. URL: http://eccc.hpi-web.de/report/2015/020.
[37]
David Woodruff. New lower bounds for general locally decodable codes. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), 14(006), 2007.
[38]
David P Woodruff. A quadratic lower bound for three-query linear locally decodable codes over any field. J. Comput. Sci. Technol., 27(4):678--686, 2012.
[39]
Sergey Yekhanin. Locally decodable codes. In Computer Science--Theory and Applications, pages 289--290. Springer, 2011.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
CCC '16: Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Computational Complexity
May 2016
843 pages
ISBN:9783959770088
  • Editor:
  • Ran Raz

Sponsors

  • Microsoft Reasearch: Microsoft Reasearch

Publisher

Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik

Dagstuhl, Germany

Publication History

Published: 29 May 2016

Author Tags

  1. affine invariance
  2. gowers uniformity norm
  3. locally correctable code
  4. locally testable code

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media