Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/3061053.3061250guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Welfare effects of market making in continuous double auctions

Published: 09 July 2016 Publication History

Abstract

We investigate the effects of market making on market performance, focusing on allocative efficiency as well as gains from trade accrued by background traders. We employ empirical simulation-based methods to evaluate heuristic strategies for market makers as well as background investors in a variety of complex trading environments. Our market model incorporates private and common valuation elements, with dynamic fundamental value and asymmetric information. In this context, we compare the surplus achieved by background traders in strategic equilibrium, with and without a market maker. Our findings indicate that the presence of the market maker strongly tends to increase total welfare across a variety of environments. Market-maker profit may or may not exceed the welfare gain, thus the effect on background-investor surplus is ambiguous. We find that market making tends to benefit investors in relatively thin markets, and situations where background traders are impatient, due to limited trading opportunities. Introducing additional market makers increases these benefits, as competition drives market makers to provide liquidity at lower price spreads.

References

[1]
Dan Bernhardt and Eric Hughson. Splitting orders. Review of Financial Studies , 10(1):69-101, 1997.
[2]
Hendrik Bessembinder, Jia Hao, and Michael L. Lemmon. Why designate market makers? Affirmative obligations and market quality. Technical Report 989061, SSRN, 2011.
[3]
Hendrik Bessembinder, Jia Hao, and Kuncheng Zheng. Market making contracts, firm value, and the IPO decision. Journal of Finance , 70(5):1997-2028, 2015.
[4]
Bruno Biais, David Martimort, and Jean-Charles Rochet. Competing mechanisms in a common value environment. Econometrica , 68(4):799-837, 2000.
[5]
Sandro Brusco and Matthew O. Jackson. The optimal design of a market. Journal of Economic Theory , 88(1):1-39, 1999.
[6]
Tanmoy Chakraborty and Michael Kearns. Market making and mean reversion. In 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce , pages 307-314, 2011.
[7]
Sanmay Das and Malik Magdon-Ismail. Adapting to a market shock: Optimal sequential market-making. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 361-368, 2008.
[8]
Rajarshi Das, James E. Hanson, Jeffrey O. Kephart, and Gerald Tesauro. Agent-human interactions in the continuous double auction. In 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages 1169- 1176, 2001.
[9]
Jürgen Dennert. Price competition between market makers. Review of Economic Studies , 60(3):735- 751, 1993.
[10]
Stefan Frey and Joachim Grammig. Liquidity supply and adverse selection in a pure limit order book market. Empirical Economics , 30(4):1007- 1033, 2006.
[11]
Daniel Friedman. The double auction market institution: A survey. In Daniel Friedman and John Rust, editors, The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories, and Evidence , pages 3-25. Addison-Wesley, 1993.
[12]
Lawrence R. Glosten and Paul R. Milgrom. Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. Journal of Financial Economics , 14(1):71-100, 1985.
[13]
Dhananjay K. Gode and Shyam Sunder. Allocative efficiency of markets with zero-intelligence traders: Market as a partial substitute for individual rationality. Journal of Political Economy , 101(1):119-137, 1993.
[14]
Roger D. Huang and Hans R. Stoll. Dealer versus auction markets: A paired comparison of execution costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE. Journal of Financial Economics , 41(3):313-357, 1996.
[15]
Jennifer Huang and Jiang Wang. Market liquidity, asset prices, and welfare. Journal of Financial Economics , 95(1):107-127, 2010.
[16]
Albert S. Kyle. Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica , 53(6):1315-1335, 1985.
[17]
J. Chris Leach and Ananth N. Madhavan. Intertemporal price discovery by market makers: Active versus passive learning. Journal of Financial Intermediation , 2(2):207-235, 1992.
[18]
Gideon Saar. Specialist markets. In Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance . Wiley Online Library, 2010.
[19]
Robert A. Schwartz and Lin Peng. Market makers. In Encyclopedia of Finance , pages 487-489. Springer, 2013.
[20]
Elaine Wah and Michael P. Wellman. Latency arbitrage, market fragmentation, and efficiency: A two-market model. In 14th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce , pages 855-872, 2013.
[21]
Elaine Wah and Michael P. Wellman. Welfare effects of market making in continuous double auctions. In 14th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems , pages 57-66, 2015.
[22]
Michael P. Wellman. Methods for empirical game-theoretic analysis (Extended abstract). In 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages 1552-1555, 2006.
[23]
Michael P. Wellman. Trading Agents . Morgan & Claypool, 2011.
[24]
Wenjie Zhan and Daniel Friedman. Markups in double auction markets. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control , 31(9):2984-3005, 2007.
  1. Welfare effects of market making in continuous double auctions

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Guide Proceedings
      IJCAI'16: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
      July 2016
      4277 pages
      ISBN:9781577357704

      Sponsors

      • Sony: Sony Corporation
      • Arizona State University: Arizona State University
      • Microsoft: Microsoft
      • Facebook: Facebook
      • AI Journal: AI Journal

      Publisher

      AAAI Press

      Publication History

      Published: 09 July 2016

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 0
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      View options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media