Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/3108760.3108762acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The reference model estimates medical practice improvement in diabetic populations

Published: 23 April 2017 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    The Reference Model for disease progression is a league of disease models that validates simulation results to multiple observed clinical study results. Recent advances allows merging models, that were extracted from different populations in different decades, to be combined into one ensemble model that better validates against different clinical trials across years. Since each model and validation data set has a timestamp, it is possible to account for medical practice improvement during modeling. In the past it was observed that medical practice improvement caused models to become outdated and that adding temporal correction improved model fitness. However, it was unclear how much of the improvement is from prevention and how much from post event treatment. In this paper the rate of medical practice improvement is calculated through optimizing the model mixture considering diabetic populations. Results suggest similar improvement rates for prevention and post event treatment considering accumulated knowledge.

    References

    [1]
    Barhak J. 2014, "The Reference Model for Disease Progression uses MIST to find data fitness". PyData Silicon Valley 2014: Available via: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyvxiljc5vA Presentation: http://sites.google.com/site/jacobbarhak/home/PyData_SV_2014_Upload_2014_05_02.pptx Accessed Dec. 23, 2016.
    [2]
    Barhak J. 2015. "The Reference Model uses Object Oriented Population Generation". SummerSim 2015. Chicago IL, USA. Available via: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2874946 Presentation retrieved from: http://sites.google.com/site/jacobbarhak/home/SummerSim2015_Upload_2015_07_26.pptx
    [3]
    Barhak J. 2016. "The Reference Model for Disease Progression Combines Disease Models". I/IITSEC 2016. Available via: http://www.iitsecdocs.com/volumes/2016 Presentation: http://sites.google.com/site/jacobbarhak/home/IITSEC2016_Upload_2016_11_05.pptx Accessed Dec. 23, 2016.
    [4]
    Barhak J. 2017. "The Reference Model Predicts Life Expectancy for Diabetics". MODSIM World 2017. Apr 25--27, 2017, Virginia Beach, VA.
    [5]
    Barhak J., Garrett A. 2014. "Population Generation from Statistics Using Genetic Algorithms with MIST + INSPYRED". MODSIM World 2014, Available via: http://sites.google.com/site/jacobbarhak/home/MODSIM2014_MIST_INSPYRED_Paper_Submit_2014_03_10.pdf Presentation: http://sites.google.com/site/jacobbarhak/home/MODSIM_World_2014_Submit_2014_04_11.pptx Accessed Dec. 23, 2016.
    [6]
    Barhak J., Garrett A., and Pruett W. A. 2016. "Optimizing Model Combinations", MODSIM world 2016. Available via: http://www.modsimworld.org/papers/2016/Optimizing_Model_Combinations.pdf Presentation: http://sites.google.com/site/jacobbarhak/home/MODSIM2016_Submit_2016_04_25.pptx Accessed Dec. 23, 2016.
    [7]
    Clarke P.M., Gray A.M., Briggs A., Farmer A.J., Fenn P., Stevens R.J., Matthews D. R., Stratton I. M., Holman R. R., &UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKDPS) Group. 2004. A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model (UKPDS no. 68). Diabetologia, Vol. 47(10), pp. 1747--59.
    [8]
    D'Agostino R.B., Vasan R.S., Pencina M.J., Wolf P.A., Cobain M., Massaro J.M., Kannel W.B. 2008. "General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study". Circulation Vol. 117 (6) pp. 743--753.
    [9]
    Gregg E. W., Cheng Y. J., Saydah S., Cowie C., Garfield S., Geiss L., and Barker L. 2012. "Trends in Death Rates Among U.S. Adults With and Without Diabetes Between 1997 and 2006 - Findings from the National Health Interview Survey". Diabetes Care Vol. 35(6) pp. 1252--1257.
    [10]
    Hayes A.J., Leal J., Gray A.M., Holman R.R., & Clarke P.M. 2013. "UKPDS outcomes model 2: a new version of a model to simulate lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using data from the 30 year United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study: UKPDS 82". Diabetologia, Vol. 56(9), pp. 1925--33.
    [11]
    Hippisley-Cox J., Coupland C., Vinogradova Y., Robson J., Minhas R., Sheikh A., Brindle P. 2008. "Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2". BMJ Vol. 336, pp. 26
    [12]
    Stevens R., Kothari V., Adler A., Stratton I. 2001. "The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in type II diabetes UKPDS 56". Clinical Science Vol. 101 pp. 671--679.
    [13]
    UKPDS: UK Prospective Diabetes Study UKPDS Group. 1988. "Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes UKPDS 33." Lancet Vol. 352 pp. 837--853.
    [14]
    Wilson P. W. F., D'Agostino R. B., Levy D., Belanger A. M., Silbershatz H. and Kannel W. B. 1998, "Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease Using Risk Factor Categories". Circulation Vol. 97 pp. 1837--1847.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MSM '17: Proceedings of the Symposium on Modeling and Simulation in Medicine
    April 2017
    111 pages
    ISBN:9781510838253

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Society for Computer Simulation International

    San Diego, CA, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 April 2017

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. diabetes
    2. disease progression
    3. ensemble models
    4. optimization

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SpringSim '17
    SpringSim '17: Spring Simulation Multi-Conference
    April 23 - 26, 2017
    Virginia, Virginia Beach

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 3 of 12 submissions, 25%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 34
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media