Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Nice-looking obstacles: parkour as urban practice of deterritorialization

Published: 01 May 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Most academic publications refer to Parkour as a subversive and embodied tactic that challenges hegemonic discourses of discipline and control. Architecture becomes the playful ground where new ways to move take form. These approaches rarely address the material and embodied relations that occur in these practices and remain on the discursive plane of cultural signifiers. A theory of movement between bodies as the founding aspect of Parkour unfolds alternative concepts of body, space, time and movement beyond the discursive. Movement becomes the leitmotif for a re-conceptualization of the relations between subjects and objects and abandons their division. With the example of Parkour, I will challenge anthropocentric approaches toward embodiment and instead foreground open-ended shifting configurations of places and their relation to movement. Parkour re-shapes rigid concepts of places and their human encounter through movement. Through its encounter with obstacles Parkour activates the silent potential for movement located in the relation between bodies and thus reaches beyond material boundaries (e.g., a wall). As a deterritorializing practice, I will use Parkour to re-consider the relations between different bodies such as architectural configurations, subjects and their urban ecologies to develop a relational model for movement to shape our everyday encounters with matter.

References

[1]
Baviton N (2007) From obstacle to opportunity: Parkour, leisure, and the reinterpretation of constraints. Ann Leis Res 10(3/4):391-412.
[2]
Bergson H (1910) Time and free will: an essay on the immediate data of consciousness. Humanities Press, New York.
[3]
Borden I (2001) Skateboarding, space and the city: architecture and the body. Berg, Oxford.
[4]
Daskalaki M, Stara A, Imas M (2008) The 'Parkour Organisation': inhabitation of corporate spaces. Culture Organ 14(1):49-64.
[5]
De Certeau M (1984) The practice of everyday life. University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles.
[6]
Deleuze G (1988) Bergsonism. Zone Books, Cambridge/Mass.
[7]
Deleuze G (1994) Difference and repetition. Columbia University Press, New York.
[8]
Deleuze G (2004) Desert Island and other texts, 1963-1974. Semiotext(e), New York.
[9]
Deleuze G (2004b) The logic of sense. Continuum, New York/London.
[10]
Deleuze G, Guattari F (2004) A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Continuum, London/New York.
[11]
Feireiss L (2007) Urban free flow: the individual as an active performer. In: Borries vF, Walz SP, Böttiger M (eds) Space time play: computer games, architecture and urbanism: the next level. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 280-281.
[12]
Fuggle S (2008) Discourses of subversion: the ethics and aesthetics of capoeira and parkour. Dance Res 26(2):204-222.
[13]
Gins M, Arakawa (1997) Reversible destiny. Guggenheim Museum Publications, New York.
[14]
Gins M, Arakawa (2002) Architectural body. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa/London.
[15]
Latour B (1987) Science in action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
[16]
Latour B (1993) We have never been modern. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
[17]
Laughlin Z (2008) La Matérialité du Parkour. In: Catalogue for the exhibition actions: comment S'approprier la Ville. SUN, Amsterdam, pp 42-46.
[18]
Leibniz GW (1956) Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. In: Alexander (ed) Manchester University Press, Manchester.
[19]
Massumi B (2001) Not determinately nothing. ANC Archit Culture (Seoul) 244:84-87.
[20]
Massumi B (2002) Parables for the virtual: movement, affect, sensation. Duke University Press, Durham/London.
[21]
Massumi B (2004) Building experience: the architecture of perception. In: Spuybroeck L (ed) NOX: machining architecture. Thames and Hudson, London, pp 322-331.
[22]
Mister Parkour (2009) Archive. http://www.misterparkour.com/category/articles/. Accessed 20 Feb 2009.
[23]
Saville SJ (2008) Playing with fear: parkour and the mobility of emotion. Soc Cult Geogr 9(8):891-914.
[24]
Simondon G (1980) On the mode of existence of technical objects. Hart J (trans.) University of Western Ontario.
[25]
Spinoza B (1992) The ethics. Hackett Pub, Indianapolis.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image AI & Society
AI & Society  Volume 26, Issue 2
May 2011
79 pages

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 01 May 2011

Author Tags

  1. Affect
  2. Embodiment
  3. Movement
  4. Parkour
  5. Place
  6. Urban ecologies

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media