article

Gender-based behavioral analysis for end-user development and the `RULES' attributes

Authors:

Katerina Tzafilkou,

Nicolaos Protogeros,

Charalampos Karagiannidis,

Adamantios KoumpisAuthors Info & Claims

Education and Information Technologies, Volume 22, Issue 4

Pages 1853 - 1894

Published: 01 July 2017 Publication History

Abstract

This paper addresses the role of gender in End-User Development (EUD) environments and examines whether there are gender differences in performance and in correlations between performance and a set of behavioral attributes. Based on a review of the most prominent EUD-related behavioral Human Computer Interaction (HCI) theories, and the influence of gender on them, it attempts to classify all the gender related behavioral attributes influencing the end-users' performance. Then, it theoretically selects a subset of these attributes, namely Risk-Perception, Usefulness-Perception,Learning Willingness, Ease-of-Use-Perception, and Self-Efficacy, presents an example application and conducts a basic evaluation testing. The proposed attributes (their initials form the word RULES) can form the basis for the design of EUD-oriented user modeling techniques for gender-neutral self-adaptive software EUD environments.

References

[1]

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 8(2), 191-215.

[2]

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

[3]

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York7: W.H. Freeman & Co.

[4]

Batrinca, L., Lepri, B., Mana, N., Pianesi, F., (2012). Multimodal recognition of personality traits in human-computer collaborative tasks. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interaction (ICMI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 39-46.

Digital Library

[5]

Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. In: R. S. Hancock (Ed.), Dynamic marketing for a changing world, Proceedings of the 43rd. Conference of the American Marketing Association, (pp. 389-398).

[6]

Beckwith, L. (2003). Gender HCI issues in end-user software engineering. IEEE Symposium on Human Centric Computing Languages and Environments 2003 Proceedings (pp. 273-274).

Digital Library

[7]

Beckwith, L., & Burnett, M. (2004). Gender: An Important Factor in End-User Programming Environments? IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages - Human Centric Computing, 2004, 107-114.

Digital Library

[8]

Beckwith, L., Burnett, M., (2007). Gender HCI Issues in End-User Software Engineering Environments. End user Software Engineering.

[9]

Beckwith, L., Sorte, S. Burnett, M. Wiedenbeck, S. Chintakovid, T. and Cook, C. (2005). Designing Features for Both Genders in End-User Programming Environments. In Proceedings of the 2005 I.E. Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VLHCC '05). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 153-160.

Digital Library

[10]

Beckwith, L., Burnett, M., Grigoreanu, V., &Wiedenbeck, S. (2006). In 2006 (Ed.), Gender HCI: What about the software? (pp. 83-87). IEEE (Nov: Computer).

Digital Library

[11]

Beckwith, L., Inman, D., Rector, K., & Burnett, M. (2007). In 2007 (Ed.), On to the real world: Gender and self-efficacy in Exce (pp. 119-126). IEEE: In Proc. VLHCC.

Digital Library

[12]

Beckwith, L., Cunha, J., Fernandes, J. P., & Saraiva, J. (2011). End-users productivity in model-based spreadsheets: an empirical study. In Proceedings of the Third international conference on End-user development (IS-EUD'11), Maria Francesca Costabile, Yvonne Dittrich, Gerhard Fischer, and Antonio Piccinno, Eds., pp. 282-288, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.

Digital Library

[13]

Beyer, S., Rynes, K., Perrault, J., Hay, K., & Haller, S. (2003). Gender Differences in Computer Science Students (pp. 49-53). SIGCSE: Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education.

Digital Library

[14]

Bickmore, T.W. and. Picard, R.W. (2005). Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 12:293-327.

Digital Library

[15]

Blackwell, A. (2002). First steps in programming: a rationale for attention investment models. In Proc. IEEE Human-Centric Computing Languages and Environments, 2-10.

Digital Library

[16]

Blackwell, A.F. and Hague, R. (2001). Designing a programming language for home automation. In: G. Kadoda (ed.), Proceedings of the 13th annual Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group (PPIG 2001). pp. 85-103.

[17]

Blackwell, A.F. and Morrison, C., (2010). A logical mind, not a programming mind: Psychology of a professional end-user. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group (PPIG 2010). September 19-22, 2010. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganès, Spain. Published by Maria Paloma Díaz Pérez and Mary Beth Rosson.

[18]

Blackwell, A. F., Rode, J. A., & Toye, E. F. (2009). How do we program the home? Gender, attention investment, and the psychology of programming at home. Int. J. Human Comput. Stud., 67, 324-341.

Digital Library

[19]

Broos, A. (2005). Gender and information and communication technologies anxiety: Male self-assurance and female hesitation. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 8(1), 11-32.

[20]

Burnett, M. (2009). What is end-user software engineering and why does it matter? End-User Development, 15-28.

Digital Library

[21]

Burnett, M., Cook, C., Pendse, O., Rothermel, G., Summet, J. and Wallace, C., (2003) End-user software engineering with assertions in the spreadsheet paradigm. In Proc. of International Conference on Software Engineering. 93-103.

Digital Library

[22]

Burnett, M., Wiedenbeck, S. Grigoreanu, V., Subrahmaniyan, N., Beckwith, L., Kissinger, C., (2008). Gender in end-user software engineering. In Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on End-user software engineering (WEUSE '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 21-24.

Digital Library

[23]

Burnett, M., Fleming, S., Iqbal, S. (2010). Gender differences and programming environments: across programming populations. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement.

Digital Library

[24]

Burnett, M. M., Beckwith, L., Wiedenbeck, S., Fleming, S. D., Cao, J., Park, T. H., Grigoreanu, V., et al. (2011). Gender pluralism in problem-solving software. Interacting with Computers, 23(5), 450-460.

Digital Library

[25]

Burnett, M., Stumpf, S., Macbeth, J., Makri, S., Beckwith, L., Kwan, I., Peters, A., & Jernigan, W. (2016). GenderMag: a method for evaluating software's gender inclusiveness. Interacting with Computers.

[26]

Byrnes, J., Miller, D., & Schafer, W. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367-383.

[27]

Carroll, J.M., (1998). The Nurnberg Funnel. MIT Press, (Ed.) Minimalism Beyond Cambridge, MA.

[28]

Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (1987). Paradox of the active user. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Interfacing thought: cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction (pp. 80-111). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Digital Library

[29]

Chen, Y. H., & Corkindale, D. (2008). Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use online news services: an exploratory study. Internet Research, 18(3), 286-312.

[30]

ClickTale User Manual (2010) V0.5 www.clicktale.com

[31]

Colley, A., & Comber, C. (2003). Age and gender differences in computer use and attitudes among secondary school students: what has changed? Educational Research, 45(2), 155-165.

[32]

Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118-143. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 21-33.

Digital Library

[33]

Costa Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

[34]

Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 322-331.

[35]

Costabile, M.F., Mussio, P., Provenza, L.P., and Piccinno, A., (2008). End users as unwitting software developers. In Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on End-user software engineering (WEUSE '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6-10.

Digital Library

[36]

Cuccurullo, S., Francese, R., Risi, M. and Tortora, G. (2011). "MicroApps development on mobile phones." End-User Development, M. Costabile, Y. Dittrich, G. Fischer, and A. Piccinno, Eds., vol. 6654 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 289-294, Springer, Berlin, Germany.

Digital Library

[37]

Cyr, D., Hassanein, H., Head, M., & Ivanov, A. (2007). The role of social presence in establishing loyalty in eservice environments. Interacting with Computers, 19(1), 43-56.

Digital Library

[38]

Danado, J. and Paternò, F. (2012a). "A prototype for EUD in touch-based mobile devices." in Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC '12), pp. 83-86.

[39]

Danado, J. and Paternò, F. (2012b). "Puzzle: a visual-based environment for end user development in touch-based mobile phone." Human-Centered Software Engineering, vol. 7623 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 199-216.

Digital Library

[40]

Danado, J., Davies, M., Ricca, P. and Fensel, A. (2010) "An authoring tool for user generated mobile services." in Proceedings of the 3rd Future Internet Conference on Future Internet (FIS '10), A. Berre, A. Gomez-Pérez, K. Tutschku, and D. Fensel, Eds., pp. 118-127, Springer.

Digital Library

[41]

Davies, D., Jindal-Snapeb, D., Collier, C., Digbya, R., Haya, P., Howea, A. (2012). Creative learning environments in education--A systematic literature review, Thinking Skills and Creativity 8, pp. 80-91, Elsevier, 2012.

[42]

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.

Digital Library

[43]

Devaraj, S., Easley, R. F., & Crant, J. M. (2008). Research Note--How Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-Factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use. Information Systems Research., 19, 93-105.

Digital Library

[44]

Eachus, P., & Cassidy, S. (2006). Academic journal article from Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology. Vol., 3.

[45]

Featherman, M., & Fuller, M. (2003). Applying TAM to eservices adoption: The moderating role of perceived risk. IEEE: In Proc. of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[46]

Ferreira, S., Arroyo, E., Tarrago, R., & Blat, J. (2010). Applying Mouse Tracking to Investigate Patterns of Mouse Movements in Web Forms. Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

[47]

Finucane, M.L., Slovic, P., Mertz, C.K., Flynn, J., Satterfield, T.A., (2000). Gender, race, and perceived risk: The 'white male' effect. Health, Risk, & Society 2(2), 159-172.

[48]

Ghiani, G., Paternò, F. and Spano, L. D. (2011) "Creating mashups by direct manipulation of existing web applications," End-User Development, vol. 6654 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 42-52, Springer, Berlin, Germany.

Digital Library

[49]

Ghiani, G., Paternò, F., Spano, L. D., Pintori, G. (2016). "An environment for End-User Development of Web mashups." International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Volume 87, March 2016, pp. 38-64.

Digital Library

[50]

Grigoreanu, V., Beckwith, L., Fern, X., Yang, S., Komireddy, C., Narayanan, V., Cook, C., Burnett, M.M., (2006). Gender differences in end-user debugging, revisited: What the miners found. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing. 19-26.

Digital Library

[51]

Grigoreanu, V., Cao J, Kulesza, T., Bogart, C., Rector, K., Burnett, M., Wiedenbeck, S., (2008). Can feature design reduce the gender gap in end-user software development environments? In Proceedings of the 2008 I.E. Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VLHCC '08). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 149-156.

Digital Library

[52]

Harshbarger, N. L., & Rosson, M. B. (2012). wProjects: Data-centric Web Development for Female Nonprogrammers. Proceedings of 2012 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (pp. 67-70).

[53]

Hartzel, K., (2003). How self-efficacy and gender issues affect software adoption and use. Comm. ACM 46, 9. 167-171.

Digital Library

[54]

Hothi, J. & Hall, W. (1998). An evaluation of adapted hypermedia techniques using static user modeling. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia, Pittsburgh, PA, 45-50, June 1998.

[55]

Horvitz, E., Breese, J., Heckerman, D., Hovel, D., Rommelse, K. (1998). Lumiere project: Bayesian user modeling for inferring the goals and needs of software users. Proceedings of the fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in AI.

Digital Library

[56]

Hubona G.S., Shirah G.W., (2004). The Gender Factor Performing Visualization Tasks on Computer Media. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04) - Track 4 - Volume 4 (HICSS '04), Vol. 4. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 40097.3.

Digital Library

[57]

Hui, B., & Boutilier, C. (2006). Who's asking for help?: a bayesian approach to intelligent assistance. In IUI '06: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (pp. 186-193). New York: ACM Press.

Digital Library

[58]

Jason, B., Calitz, A., Greyling, J. (2010). The evaluation of an adaptive user interface model. In Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (SAICSIT '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 132-143.

Digital Library

[59]

Johnson, A., & Niels, T. (2005). User modeling, handbook of human factors in web design, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (pp 424-439).

[60]

Kim, Y. M. (2010). Gender role and the use of university library website resources: A social cognitive theory perspective. Journal of Information Science, 36(5), 603-617.

Digital Library

[61]

Kim, J. K., & Ritter, F. E. (2015). Learning, Forgetting, and Relearning for Keystroke - and Mouse-Driven Tasks: Relearning Is Important. Human-Computer Interaction, 30(1), 1-33.

Digital Library

[62]

Kissinger, C., Burnett, M., Stumpf, S., Subrahmaniyan, N., Beckwith, L., Yang, S., & Rosson, M. (2006). Supporting end user debugging: What do users want to know? (pp. 135-142). Advanced Visual Interfaces: ACM.

Digital Library

[63]

Ko, A. J., Myers, B. A. (2004). Designing the Whyline: A Debugging Interface for Asking Questions About Program Failures. CHI 2004, Vienna, Austria, April 24-29, 151-158.

Digital Library

[64]

Ko, A. J., Myers, B., Rosson, M. B., Rothermel, G., Shaw, M., Wiedenbeck, S., Abraham, R., et al. (2011). The state of the art in end-user software engineering. ACM Computing Surveys, 43(3), 1-44.

Digital Library

[65]

Kobsa, A. (2001). Generic user modeling systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11(1-2), 49-63.

Digital Library

[66]

Kulenza, T., Wong, W., Stumpf, S., Perona, S., White, R., Burnett, M. M., Oberst, I., and Ko, A. J., (2009). Fixing the program my computer learned: barriers for end users, challenges for the machine. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (IUI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 187-196.

Digital Library

[67]

Lakiotaki, K., Matsatsinis, N. F., & Tsoukias, A. (2011). Multicriteria user modeling in recommender systems. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 26(2), 64-76.

Digital Library

[68]

Lee, Y. C. (2008). The role of perceived resources in online learning adoption. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1423-1438.

Digital Library

[69]

Lee, G. and Chen, Z. (2007) Investigating the Differences in Web Browsing Behavior of Chinese and European User Using Mouse Tracking. N. Aykin (Ed.): Usability and Internationalization, Part I, HCII 2007, LNCS 4559, pp. 502-512, 2007. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Digital Library

[70]

Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., & Wulf, V. (2006). End User Development : An emerging paradigm. End User Development, 1-8.

[71]

Lin, J., Wong, J., Nichols, J., Cypher, A. and Lau, T.A. (2010). "End-user programming of mashups with vegemite." in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '09), pp. 97-106, February 2009.

Digital Library

[72]

Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychology Bulletin, 116(1), 75-98.

[73]

Macías, J. A., & Paternò, F. (2008). Customization of Web applications through an intelligent environment exploiting logical interface descriptions. Interacting with Computers, 20(1), 29-47.

Digital Library

[74]

Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2003). Unlocking the Clubhouse. MIT Press.

[75]

Marin, E. (2014). Experiential learning: empowering students to take control of their learning by engaging them in an interactive course simulation environment, The 6th International Conference Edu World 2014 "Education Facing Contemporary World Issues", Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 180, pp. 854-859, November 2014.

[76]

Martins, A. C., Faria, L., Vaz de Carvalho, C., & Carrapatoso, E. (2008). User Modeling in Adaptive Hypermedia Educational Systems. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 194-207.

[77]

Martinson, A. M. (2005). Playing with technology: Designing gender sensitive games to close the gender gap. In Working Paper SLISWP-03-05. School of Library and Information Science: Indiana University.

[78]

Mastor, K. A. (2003). Personality traits and gender differences in the selection of academic major among Malay students. Journal Pendidikan, 28, 3-13.

[79]

McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr., P. T. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139-153). New York: Guilford Press.

[80]

McIlroy, D., Bunting, B., Tierney, K., Gordon, M., (2001). The relation of gender and background experience to self-reported computing anxieties and cognitions. Computers in Human Behavior. 17, 1, (1 January 2001), Pages 21-33.

[81]

McLeod, L., and MacDonell, S.G., (2011). Factors that affect software systems development project outcomes: A survey of research. ACM Comput. Surv. 43, 4, Article 24 (October 2011), 56 pages.

Digital Library

[82]

Mejía, A., Juárez-Ramírez, R., Inzunza, R., & Valenzuela, R. (2012). Implementing adaptive interfaces: a user model for the development of usability in interactive systems. In V. Potdar & D. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Proceedings of the CUBE International Information Technology Conference, 2 (pp. 598-604). New York: ACM.

Digital Library

[83]

Miller, R. C., Bolin, M. L., Chilton, B., Little, G., Webber, M., & Chen-Hsiang, Y. (2010). Rewriting the web with chicken foot. In No Code Required: Giving Users Tools to Transform the Web (pp. 39-62). Burlington, Mass, USA: Elsevier.

[84]

Moolla, A., & Bisschoff, C. (2012). Validating a Model to Measure the Brand Loyalty of Fast Moving Consumer Goods. J. SocSci, 31(2), 101-115.

[85]

Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Information and Management, 38(4), 217-230.

Digital Library

[86]

Moss, G., & Gunn, R. (2009). Gender differences in website production andpreference aesthetics: preliminary implications for ICT in education and beyond. Behaviour & Information Technology 26(5), 447-460.

[87]

Nass, C., & Brave, S. (2005). Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship. MIT Press.

Digital Library

[88]

Nestler, T., Namoun, A. and Schill, A. (2011). "End-user development of service-based interactive web applications at the presentation layer." in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS '11), June 2011, pp. 197-206.

Digital Library

[89]

Nichols J., and Lau, T. (2008). "Mobilization by demonstration: using traces to re-author existing web sites." in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '08), pp. 149-158.

Digital Library

[90]

Nunes, M. A., Cerri S. A., Blanc N. (2008). Improving recommendations by using personality traits in user profiles. International Conferences on Knowledge Management and New Media Technology, Sep 2008, Graz, Austria (pp. 92-100).

[91]

Nunnally, J. (1967). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw.

[92]

Ong, C., & Lai, J. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816-829.

[93]

Osvalder, A.-L., & Ulfvengren, P. (2009). Human-technology systems. In G. Bhgard et al. (Eds.), Work and technology on human terms. Sweden: Prevent.

[94]

Özbek, V., Alniaçik, Ü., Koc, M.F., Akkiliç, E., Kas, E. (2014). The Impact of Personality on Technology Acceptance: A Study on Smart Phone Users, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 150, 15 September 2014.

[95]

Papamitsiou, Z.; Economides, A.A. (2014). The Effect of Personality Traits on Students' Performance during Computer-Based Testing: A Study of the Big Five Inventory with Temporal Learning Analytics, in Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2014 I.E. 14th International Conference on, vol., no., pp.378-382, 7-10 July 2014.

Digital Library

[96]

Paternò, F. (2013). "End User Development: Survey of an Emerging Field for Empowering People." ISRN Software Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 532659, 11 pages.

[97]

Protogeros, N., & Tzafilkou, K. (2015). Simple-talking database development: Let the end-user design a relational schema by using simple words, Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 48. July, 2015, 273-289.

Digital Library

[98]

Rich, E. (1998). User modeling via stereotypes. In M. T. Maybury & W. Wahlster (Eds.), Readings in intelligent user interfaces (pp. 329-342). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

Digital Library

[99]

Robertshon, T.J., Prabhakararao, S., Burnett, M., Cook, C., Ruthruff, J. R., Beckwith, L., Phalgune, A., (2004). Impact of interruption style on end-user debugging. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 287-294.

Digital Library

[100]

Rode, J.A. (2008). An ethnographic examination of the relationship of gender & end-user programming, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California Irvine.

Digital Library

[101]

Rode, J., Rosson, M.B., (2003). Programming at Runtime: Requirements Paradigms for Nonprogrammer Web Application Development. IEEE HCC 2003. Auckland, New Zealand. Oct. 28-31.

Digital Library

[102]

Rode, J., Rosson, M. B., & Quiñones, M. A. P. (2005). End user development of web applications. End User Development. Human-Computer Interaction Series Volume, 9(2006), 161-182.

[103]

Rosson, M. B., Ballin, J., & Nash, H. (2004). Everyday programming: Challenges and opportunities for informal web development. Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing 2004 (pp. 123-130). New York: IEEE.

Digital Library

[104]

Rosson, M. B., Sinha, H., Bhattacharya, M., Zhao, D. (2007). Design planning in end-user web development. In Proceedings of 2007 IEEE symposium on visual languages and human-centric computing (pp. 189-196).

Digital Library

[105]

Rosson, M. B., Sinha, H., Edor, T. (2010). Design planning in end-user web development: gender, feature exploration and feelings of success. In Proceedings of 2010 IEEE symposium on visual languages and human-centric computing (pp. 141-148).

Digital Library

[106]

Ruthruff, J.R., Phalgune, A., Beckwith, L., Burnett, M., Cook, C., (2004). Rewarding "good" behavior: Enduser debugging and rewards. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centered Computing. 115-122.

Digital Library

[107]

Saadé, R. G., Kira, D., & Otrakji, C. A. (2012). Gender Differences in Interface Type Task Analysis. International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change, 3(2), 1-23.

Digital Library

[108]

Saleem, H., Beaudry, A., Croteau, A.M., (2011). Antecedents of computer self-efficacy: A study of the role of personality traits and gender, Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 27, Issue 5, September 2011, Pages 1922-1936.

Digital Library

[109]

Scaffidi, C., Myers, B., Shaw, M. (2008). Topes: reusable abstractions for validating data. International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2008), Leipzig, Germany.

Digital Library

[110]

Scaffidi, C.C., Bogart, M.M., Burnett, A., Cypher, B., Myersm, M.S. (2010). Using Traits of Web Macro Scripts to Predict Reuse. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, vol. 21, issue 5, pp. 277-291.

Digital Library

[111]

Seifert, J., Pfleging, B., Bahamóndez, E., Hermes, M., Rukzio, E. and Schmidt, A. (2011). "Mobidev: a tool for creating apps on mobile phones." in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '11), pp. 109-112, ACM

Digital Library

[112]

Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721-1731.

Digital Library

[113]

Shneiderman, B. (1980). Software Psychology: Human Factors in Computer and Information Systems. Winthrop Publishers.

Digital Library

[114]

Soriano, J., Lizcano, D., Canas, M. A., Reyes, M., Hierro, J. J. (2007). Fostering innovation in a mashuporiented enterprise 2.0 collaboration environment. In Proceedings of the SIWN International Conference on Adaptive Business Systems (ICABS '07) (pp. 62-669). Chengdu, China.

[115]

Sosnovsky, S., & Dicheva, D. (2010). Ontological technologies for user modelling. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 5(1), 32-71.

Digital Library

[116]

Srivastava, S., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1041-1053.

[117]

Stipek, D., & Gralinski, J. H. (1991). Gender differences in children's achievement-related beliefs and emotional responses to success and failure in mathematics. J. of Educational Psychology, 83(3).

[118]

Subrahmaniyan, N., Beckwith, L., Grigoreanu, V., Burnett, M., Wiedenbeck, S., Narayanan, V., Bucht, K., Drummond, R., Fern, X., (2008). Testing vs. code inspection vs.... what else? Male and female end users' debugging strategies, In Proc. CHI, ACM, 617-626.

Digital Library

[119]

Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2008). An exploration of affect factors and their role in user technology acceptance: mediation and causality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(8), 1-12.

Digital Library

[120]

Sundar, S. S., Bellur, S., Oh, J., Xu, Q., & Jia, H. (2014). User Experience of On-Screen Interaction Techniques: An Experimental Investigation of Clicking, Sliding, Zooming, Hovering, Dragging, and Flipping. Human-Computer Interaction, 29(2), 109-152.

Digital Library

[121]

Teo, T., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2015). Technology acceptance among pre-service teachers: Does gender matter? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 235-251.

[122]

Terzis, V., Economides, A.A., (2011). Computer based assessment: Gender differences in perceptions and acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 6, November 2011, 2108-2122.

Digital Library

[123]

Terzis, V., Moridis, C.N., Economides, A.A., (2012). How student's personality traits affect Computer Based Assessment Acceptance: Integrating BFI with CBAAM, Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 28, Issue 5, September 2012, Pages 1985-1996, ISSN 0747-5632

Digital Library

[124]

Thagard, P. (2006). Hot Thought: Machanisms and Applications of Emotional Cognition. Cambridge, MA, USA: A Bradford Book- MIT Press.

[125]

Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J.M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 124-143.

Digital Library

[126]

Trappl, R., Payr, S., Petta, P., (2003). Emotions in Humans and Artifacts. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Digital Library

[127]

Trauth, E. M. (2002). Odd girl out: an individual differences perspective on women in the IT profession. Information Technology and People, 15(2), 98-118.

[128]

Trauth, E. M. (2006a). Encyclopedia of gender and information technology. Hershey: IGI Global.

Digital Library

[129]

Trauth, E. M. (2006b). An agenda for research on gender diversity in the global information economy. In E. M. Trauth (Ed.), The encyclopedia of gender and information technology (pp. xxix-xxiii). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.

[130]

Trauth, E. M. (2006c). Theorizing gender and information technology research. In E. M. Trauth (Ed.), Encyclopedia of gender and information technology (pp. 1154-1159). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.

[131]

Trauth, E. M. (2013). The role of theory in gender and information systems research. Information & Organization, 23(4), 277-293.

Digital Library

[132]

Trauth, E. M., Quesenberry, J. L., & Morgan, A. J. (2004). Understanding the under representation of women in IT: toward a theory of individual differences. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computer Personnel Research. (Tucson, AZ, April): 114-119.

Digital Library

[133]

Trauth, E. M., Quesenberry, J. L. & Huang, H. (2009). Factors influencing career choice for women in the global information technology workforce, in technological advancement in developed and developing countries: discoveries in global information management. G. Hunter and F. Tan, Eds., Hershey, PA: IGI Global

[134]

Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139.

Digital Library

[135]

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.

Digital Library

[136]

Wang, Y.-S., Wu, M.-C., & Wang, H.-Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92-118.

[137]

Wilson, A., Burnett, M., Beckwith, L., Granatir, O., Casburn, L., Cook, C., Durham, M., & Rothermel, G. (2003). Harnessing Curiosity to Increase Correctness in End-User Programming. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New: ACM.

Digital Library

[138]

Zang, N., & Rosson, M. B. (2010). Mashups for Web-active end users. In A. Cypher, M. Dontcheva, T. Lau, & J. Nichols (Eds.), No Code Required: Giving Users Tools to Transform the Web (pp. 409-423). Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco.

[139]

Zbick, J., Jansen, M., and Milrad, M. (2014). "Towards a web-based framework to support end-user programming of mobile learning activities." In: 2014 I.E. 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 204-208. IEEE Press IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

Digital Library

[140]

Zhang, H., Song, Y., & Song, H. -T. (2007). Construction of ontology-based user model for web personalization. In C. Conati, K. Mccoy, & G. Paliouras (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th international conference on User Modeling (UM '07) (pp. 67-76). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Digital Library

Cited By

Turchi TFogli DMalizia A(2019)Fostering computational thinking through collaborative game-based learningMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-019-7229-978:10(13649-13673)Online publication date: 20-Jul-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11042-019-7229-9
Katerina TNicolaos P(2018)Mouse behavioral patterns and keystroke dynamics in End-User DevelopmentComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.01283:C(288-305)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.012

Gender-based behavioral analysis for end-user development and the `RULES' attributes
1. Human-centered computing

Recommendations

Examining gender issues in perception and acceptance in web-based end-user development activities

In the recent years in the End-User Development (EUD) research there is a shift from the study of tools that focus on desktop graphical applications, to the development of EUD for web environments. Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research has shown ...
Mouse behavioral patterns and keystroke dynamics in End-User Development

Studying human behavior is of particular interest within the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) as it can provide insight into human performance. Prior HCI research suggests that mouse and keyboard monitoring may provide a more complete picture ...
Exploring Nuanced Gender Perspectives within the HCI Community
IndiaHCI '14: Proceedings of the 6th Indian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

With the increasing spread and pervasiveness of technologies, the role of gender in the design of these technologies is a topic of growing importance. Several conference panels and journal issues have focused on the contributions feminism, gender theory,...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Education and Information Technologies

Education and Information Technologies Volume 22, Issue 4

July 2017

660 pages

ISSN:1360-2357

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © Copyright © 2017 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2017

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Turchi TFogli DMalizia A(2019)Fostering computational thinking through collaborative game-based learningMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-019-7229-978:10(13649-13673)Online publication date: 20-Jul-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11042-019-7229-9
Katerina TNicolaos P(2018)Mouse behavioral patterns and keystroke dynamics in End-User DevelopmentComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.01283:C(288-305)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.012

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents