Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

The cultivation of information infrastructures for international trade: stakeholder challenges and engagement reasons

Published: 01 January 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The development of information infrastructures for international trade to improve supply chain visibility and security has gained momentum due to technological advances. An information infrastructure is a shared, open, and evolving assemblage of interlinked information systems providing distinct information technology capabilities. Examples of information infrastructures are the internet, electronic market places and music platforms. Information infrastructures can be highly beneficial as shown by the aforementioned examples, yet often fail to deliver expected benefits. This research focuses on the cultivation of information infrastructures which refers to a softer, less disruptive design approach compared to traditional design approaches in which systems are defined through specified functional requirements within strict boundaries. Drawing on different stakeholder views within a European Union project for international trade, this research provides a taxonomy of twelve cultivation challenges and four engagement reasons one can expect in the design phase of information infrastructures. Organizational theory is used to discuss underlying explanations. The paper concludes that the cultivation of an information infrastructure for international trade could be highly rewarding, yet is a challenging and long-lasting endeavor which requires multi-disciplinary expertise. Practitioners can use the insights provided by this research to increase their understanding of information infrastructure cultivation to ultimately increase adoption rates.

References

[1]
M. Aanestad and T.B. Jensen, Building Nation-wide Information Infrastructures in Healthcare through Modular Implementation Strategies. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 161-176, 2011.
[2]
M. Avital and D. Te'Eni, From Generative Fit to Generative Capacity: Exploring an Emerging Dimension of Information Systems Design and Task Performance. Information Systems Journal. vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 345-367, 2009.
[3]
M. Barratt, Positioning the Role of Collaborative Planning in Grocery Supply Chains. The International Journal of Logistics Management. vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 53-66, 2003.
[4]
M. Barratt and A. Oke, Antecedents of Supply Chain Visibility in Retail Supply Chains: a Resource-based Theory Perspective. Journal of Operations Management. vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1217-1233, 2007.
[5]
K. Bennett, Legacy Systems: Coping with Success. IEEE Software. vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 19-23, 1995.
[6]
J. Bergqvist and P. Dahlberg, Scalability through Cultivation: Using Co-ordination Theory in Design. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems. vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-18, 1999.
[7]
J.M. Bryson, What To Do When Stakeholders Matter: a Guide to Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques. Public Management Review. vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 21-53, 2004.
[8]
H. Charles and H.C.J. Godfray, Challenges for Taxonomy. Nature. vol. 417, no. 6884, pp. 17-19, 2002.
[9]
D. Chen, G. Doumeingts, and F. Vernadat, Architectures for Enterprise Integration and Interoperability: Past, Present and Future. Computers in Industry. vol. 59, no. pp. 647-659, 2008.
[10]
F. Chen, Z. Drezner, J.K. Ryan, and D. Simchi-Levi, Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in a Simple Supply Chain: the Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information. Management Science. vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 436-443, 2000.
[11]
K. Cool and J. Henderson, Power and Firm Profitability in Supply Chains: French Manufacturing Industry in 1993. Strategic Management Journal. vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 909-926, 1998.
[12]
T.H. Davenport and D.B. Stoddard, Reengineering: Business Change of Mythic Proportions? Management Information Systems Quarterly. vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 121-128, 1994.
[13]
F.D. Davis, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly. vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319-339, 1989.
[14]
R. Drazin and A.H. Van de Ven, Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly. vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 514-539, 1985.
[15]
P.F. Drucker, Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. New York: Truman Talley / E.P. Dutton, 1986.
[16]
V. Francis, Supply Chain Visibility: Lost in Translation? Supply Chain Management. vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 180-184, 2008.
[17]
R.E. Freeman, Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[18]
T.N. Garavan, Global Talent Management in Science-based Firms: an Exploratory Investigation of the Pharmaceutical Industry during the Global Downturn. International Journal of Human Resource Management. vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2428-2449, 2012.
[19]
S. Gregor, The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems. vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 611-642, 2006.
[20]
S. Gregor and D. Jones, The Anatomy of a Design Theory. Journal of the Association of Information Systems. vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 312-335, 2007.
[21]
M. Grisot, O. Hanseth, and A.A. Thorseng, Innovation Of, In, On Infrastructures: Articulating the Role of Architecture in Information Infrastructure Evolution. Journal of the Association of Information Systems. vol. 15, no. Special Issue, pp. 197-219, 2014.
[22]
O. Hanseth and K. Lyytinen, Design Theory for Dynamic Complexity in Information Infrastructures: the Case of Building Internet. Journal of Information Technology. vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1-19, 2010.
[23]
I. Harpaz and I. Meshoulam, Intraorganizational Power in High Technology Organizations. Journal of High Technology Management Research. vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 107-128, 1997.
[24]
S. Henningsson, U. Gal, N. Bjørn-Andersen, and Y. Tan, The Next Generation Information Infrastructure for International Trade. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2011.
[25]
D. Hesketh, Weaknesses in the Supply Chain: Who Packed the Box? World Customs Journal. vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 3-20, 2010.
[26]
M. Holweg, S. Disney, J. Holmström, and J. Småros, Supply Chain Collaboration: Making Sense of the Strategy Continuum. European Management Journal. vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 170-181, 2005.
[27]
M. Janssen, A.E. Chun, and J.R. Gil-Garcia, Building the Next Generation of Digital Government Infrastructures. Government Information Quarterly. vol. 26, no. pp. 233-237, 2009.
[28]
U. Jüttner and S. Maklan, Supply Chain Resilience in the Global Financial Crisis: an Empirical Study. Supply Chain Management. vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 246-259, 2011.
[29]
A.J. Klievink, E. Van Stijn, D. Hesketh, H. Aldewereld, S. Overbeek, F. Heijman, and Y. Tan, Enhancing Visibility in International Supply Chains: the Data Pipeline Concept. International Journal of Electronic Government Research. vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 14-33, 2012.
[30]
A.J. Knol, M. Janssen, and H.G. Sol, A Decision Enhancement Service for Stakeholder Analysis to Achieve Transformations in the Public Sector, in The Fourty-Eigth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), IEEE Computer Society Press. p. 2466-2475, 2015.
[31]
A.J. Knol, A.J. Klievink, and Y. Tan, Data Sharing Issues and Potential Solutions for Adoption of Information Infrastructures: Evidence from a Data Pipeline Project in the Global Supply Chain over Sea, in The 27th Bled eConference (BLED), A. Pucihar, et al., Editors, Bled eCommerce Conference: Bled. p. 267-278, 2014.
[32]
H.L. Lee, V. Padmanabhan, and S. Whang, Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: the Bullwhip Effect. Management Science. vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 546-558, 1997.
[33]
M.L. Markus and N.B. Quang, Going Concerns: The Governance of Interorganizational Coordination Hubs. Journal of Management Information Systems. vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 163-197, 2012.
[34]
A. Matopoulos, M. Vlachopoulou, V. Manthou, and B. Manos, A Conceptual Framework for Supply Chain Collaboration: Empirical Evidence from the Agri-Food Industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 177-186, 2007.
[35]
S. Min, A.S. Roath, P.J. Daugherty, S.E. Genchev, H. Chen, and A.D. Arndt, Supply Chain Collaboration: What's Happening? The International Journal of Logistics Management. vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 237-256, 2005.
[36]
E. Monteiro, N. Pollock, and R. Williams, Innovation in Information Infrastructures: Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of the Association of Information Systems. vol. 15, no. Special Issue, pp. i-x, 2014.
[37]
S. Overbeek, M. Janssen, and Y. Tan, An Event-driven Architecture for Integrating Information, Processes and Services in a Plastic Toys Supply Chain. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems. vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 343-381, 2012.
[38]
G.S.C. Pan, Information Systems Project Abandonment: a Stakeholder Analysis. International Journal of Information Management. vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 173-184, 2005.
[39]
J. Pfeffer and G. Salancik, The External Control of Organizations: a Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row, 1978.
[40]
D. Robey, G. Im, and J.D. Wareham, Theoretical Foundations of Empirical Research on Interorganizational Systems: Assessing Past Contributions and Guiding Future Directions. Journal of the Association of Information Systems. vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 497-518, 2008.
[41]
J. Rowley, E-government Stakeholders - Who Are They and What Do They Want? International Journal of Information Management. vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 53-62, 2011.
[42]
R.E. Sabath and J. Fontanella, The Unfulfilled Promise of Supply Chain Collaboration. Supply Chain Management Review. vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 24-29, 2002.
[43]
H.J. Scholl, Applying Stakeholder Theory to E-government, in Towards the E-Society, B. Schmid, K. Stanoevska-Slabeva, and V. Tschammer, Editors, Springer US: Boston, MA. p. 735-747, 2001.
[44]
T.A. Schwandt, Constructivist, Interpretivist Approaches to Human Inquiry, in Handbook of Qualitative Research, N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, Editors, Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks. p. 118-137, 1994.
[45]
W.R. Scott, Organizations: Rational National and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1981.
[46]
R.S. Sharma, S. Foo, and M. Morales-Arroyo, Developing Corporate Taxonomies for Knowledge Auditability: a Framework for Good Practices. Knowledge Organization. vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 30-46, 2008.
[47]
U. Soni, V. Jain, and S. Kumar, Measuring Supply Chain Resilience Using a Deterministic Modeling Approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering. vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 11-25, 2014.
[48]
Y. Tan, N. Bjørn-Andersen, S. Klein, and B. Rukanova, Accelerating Global Supply Chains with IT-Innovation: ITAIDE Tools and Methods. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2011.
[49]
D. Tilson, K. Lyytinen, and C. Sørensen, Digital Infrastructures: the Missing IS Research Agenda. Information Systems Research. vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 748-759, 2010.
[50]
D. Ulrich and J.B. Barney, Perspectives in Organizations: Resource Dependence, Efficiency, and Population. The Academy of Management Review. vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 471-481, 1984.
[51]
W.M.P. van der Aalst, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and M. Weske, Business Process Management: a Survey, in Business Process Management, W.M.P. van der Aalst and M. Weske, Editors, Springer: Berlin Heidelberg. p. 1-12, 2003.
[52]
Y. Wand and R.Y. Wang, Anchoring Data Quality Dimensions in Ontological Foundations. Communications of the ACM. vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 86-95, 1996.
[53]
O.E. Williamson, The Economics of Organization: the Transaction Cost Approach. American Journal of Sociology. vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 548-577, 1981.

Index Terms

  1. The cultivation of information infrastructures for international trade: stakeholder challenges and engagement reasons

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research
      Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research  Volume 13, Issue 1
      January 2018
      126 pages
      ISSN:0718-1876
      • Editor:
      • Mirjana Pejic Bach
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Publisher

      Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Talca

      Talca, Chile

      Publication History

      Published: 01 January 2018

      Author Tags

      1. challenges
      2. cultivation
      3. information infrastructure
      4. interests
      5. international trade
      6. issues
      7. supply chain

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 0
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 18 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      View options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media