Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/3234847.3234849acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesewsnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Energy neutral operation of vibration energy-harvesting sensor networks for bridge applications

Published: 12 February 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Structural monitoring of critical bridge structures can greatly benefit from the use of wireless sensor networks (WSNs), however energy harvesting for the operation of the network remains a challenge in this setting. While solar and wind power are possible and credible solutions to energy generation, the need for positioning sensor nodes in shaded and sheltered locations, e.g., under a bridge deck, is also often precluding their adoption in real-world deployments. In some scenarios vibration energy harvesting has been shown as an effective solution, instead.This paper presents a multihop vibration energy-harvesting WSN system for bridge applications. The system relies on an ultra-low power wireless sensor node, driven by a novel vibration based energy-harvesting technology. We use a receiver-initiated routing protocol to enable energy-efficient and reliable connectivity between nodes with different energy charging capabilities. By combining real vibration data with an experimentally validated model of the vibration energy harvester, a hardware model, and the COOJA simulator, we develop a framework to conduct realistic and repeatable experiments to evaluate the system before on-site deployment.Simulation results show that the system is able to maintain energy neutral operation, preserving energy with careful management of sleep and communication times. We also validate the system through a laboratory experiment on real hardware against real vibration data collected from a bridge. Besides providing general guidelines and considerations for the development of vibration energy-harvesting systems for bridge applications, this work highlights the limitations of the energy budget made available by traffic-induced vibrations, which clearly shrink the applicability of vibration energy-harvesting technology for WSNs to low traffic applications.

References

[1]
Eurocode 1. Actions on structures. General actions. Thermal actions (BS EN 1991-1-5:2003). CEN, European Committee for Standardization. Bruxelles, Belgium, 2004.
[2]
Source code and relevant data, (accessed December 20, 2017). Web page–http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/srg/mobsys/IKC/.
[3]
Network rail infrastructure limited – annual return 2016, (accessed March 28, 2017). Web page–https://www. networkrail.co.uk/who-we-are/publications-resources/ regulatory-and-licensing/annual-return/.
[4]
M. Buettner, G. V. Yee, E. Anderson, and R. Han. X-MAC: a short preamble MAC protocol for duty-cycled wireless sensor networks. In SenSys, 2006.
[5]
Y. Cao, J. Yim, Y. Zhao, and M. L. Wang. Temperature effects on cable stayed bridge using health monitoring system: a case study. Structural Health Monitoring, 10(5):523–537, 2010.
[6]
M. Ceriotti, L. Mottola, G. P. Picco, A. L. Murphy, S. Guna, M. Corra, M. Pozzi, D. Zonta, and P. Zanon. Monitoring heritage buildings with wireless sensor networks: The Torre Aquila deployment. In IPSN, 2009.
[7]
N. de Battista, J. M. Brownjohn, H. P. Tan, and K.-Y. Koo. Measuring and modelling the thermal performance of the tamar suspension bridge using a wireless sensor network. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(2):176–193, 2015.
[8]
A. H. Dehwah, M. Mousa, and C. G. Claudel. Lessons learned on solar powered wireless sensor network deployments in urban, desert environments. Ad Hoc Networks, 28:52–67, 2015.
[9]
A. Dunkels, B. Grönvall, and T. Voigt. Contiki - a lightweight and flexible operating system for tiny networked sensors. In LCN, 2004.
[10]
A. Dunkels, F. Österlind, N. Tsiftes, and Z. He. Software-based on-line energy estimation for sensor nodes. In Proceedings of the 4th workshop on Embedded networked sensors, 2007.
[11]
S. Duquennoy, B. Al Nahas, O. Landsiedel, and T. Watteyne. Orchestra: Robust mesh networks through autonomously scheduled tsch. In SenSys, 2015.
[12]
J. Eriksson, F. Österlind, N. Finne, N. Tsiftes, A. Dunkels, T. Voigt, R. Sauter, and P. J. Marrón. Cooja/mspsim: Interoperability testing for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques (SIMUTools), 2009.
[13]
X. Fafoutis, A. Di Mauro, M. D. Vithanage, and N. Dragoni. Receiverinitiated medium access control protocols for wireless sensor networks. Computer Networks, 76:55–74, 2015.
[14]
F. Flammini, A. Gaglione, F. Ottello, A. Pappalardo, C. Pragliola, and A. Tedesco. Towards wireless sensor networks for railway infrastructure monitoring. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway and Ship Propulsion (ESARS), 2010.
[15]
O. Gnawali, R. Fonseca, K. Jamieson, D. Moss, and P. Levis. Collection tree protocol. In SenSys, 2009.
[16]
J. Hester, L. Sitanayah, and J. Sorber. Tragedy of the Coulombs: Federating Energy Storage for Tiny, Intermittently-Powered Sensors. In SenSys, 2015.
[17]
N. A. Hoult, P. R. A. Fidler, P. G. Hill, and C. R. Middleton. Long-term wireless structural health monitoring of the ferriby road bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 15(2):153–159, 2010.
[18]
Y. Jia, S. Du, and A. A. Seshia. Twenty-Eight Orders of Parametric Resonance in a Microelectromechanical Device for Multi-band Vibration Energy Harvesting. Scientific Reports, 6:1–8, 2016.
[19]
Y. Jia, J. Yan, S. Du, T. Feng, P. Fidler, C. Middleton, K. Soga, and A. A. Seshia. Real world assessment of an auto-parametric electromagnetic vibration energy harvester. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2017.
[20]
X. Jiang, J. Polastre, and D. Culler. Perpetual environmentally powered sensor networks. In IPSN, 2005.
[21]
R. Karoumi. Response of cable-stayed and suspension bridges to moving vehicles. Analysis methods and practical modelling techniques. Phd thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 1998.
[22]
S. Kim, S. Pakzad, D. Culler, J. Demmel, G. Fenves, S. Glaser, and M. Turon. Health monitoring of civil infrastructures using wireless sensor networks. In IPSN, 2007.
[23]
J. P. Lynch and K. J. Loh. A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring. Shock and Vibration Shock and Vibration Digest, 38(2):91–130, 2006.
[24]
L. Mateu, C. Codrea, N. Lucas, M. Pollak, and P. Spies. Energy harvesting for wireless communication systems using thermogenerators. In Proceedings of the XXI Conference on Design of Circuits and Integrated Systems (DCIS), 2006.
[25]
J. J. McCullagh, T. V. Galchev, R. L. Peterson, R. J. M. Gordenker, Y. Zhang, J. Lynch, and K. Najafi. Long-term testing of a vibration harvesting system for the structural health monitoring of bridges. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 217:139–150, 2014.
[26]
C. R. Middleton, P. R. A. Fidler, and P. J. Vardanega. Bridge Monitoring – A practical guide. ICE Publishing, 2016.
[27]
S. Nabavi and L. Zhang. Portable wind energy harvesters for low-power applications: A survey. Sensors, 16(7), 2016.
[28]
M. Peigney and D. Siegert. Piezoelectric energy harvesting from traffic-induced bridge vibrations. Smart Materials and Structures, 22(9):095019:1–11, 2013.
[29]
V. Raghunathan, A. Kansal, J. Hsu, J. Friedman, and M. Srivastava. Design considerations for solar energy harvesting wireless embedded systems. In IPSN, 2005.
[30]
C. Renner, S. Unterschütz, V. Turau, and K. Römer. Perpetual Data Collection with Energy-Harvesting Sensor Networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 11(1):12:1–12:45, 2014.
[31]
S. Roundy, P. K. Wright, and J. M. Rabaey. Energy Scavenging for Wireless Sensor Networks - With Special Focus on Vibrations. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
[32]
E. Sazonov, H. L. H. Li, D. Curry, and P. Pillay. Self-Powered Sensors for Monitoring of Highway Bridges. IEEE Sensors Journal, 9(11):1422–1429, 2009.
[33]
B. F. Spencer, Jr. and S. Cho. Wireless Smart Sensor Technology for Monitoring Civil Infrastructure: Technological Developments and Full-scale Applications. In Proceedings of the 2011 World Congress on Advances in Structural Engineering and Mechanics (ASEM), 2011.
[34]
Y. Sun, O. Gurewitz, and D. B. Johnson. RI-MAC: a receiver-initiated asynchronous duty cycle MAC protocol for dynamic traffic loads in wireless sensor networks. In SenSys, 2008.
[35]
Y. K. Tan and S. K. Panda. Review of energy harvesting technologies for sustainable wireless sensor network. Sustainable wireless sensor networks, Dec:15–43, 2010.
[36]
S. Unterschütz, C. Renner, and V. Turau. Opportunistic, receiverinitiated data-collection protocol. In EWSN, 2012.
[37]
T. Voigt, H. Ritter, and J. Schiller. Utilizing solar power in wireless sensor networks. In LCN, 2003.
[38]
N. Xu, S. Rangwala, K. K. Chintalapudi, D. Ganesan, A. Broad, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. A Wireless Sensor Network For Structural Monitoring. In SenSys, 2004.
[39]
L. Yerva, B. Campbell, A. Bansal, T. Schmid, and P. Dutta. Grafting energy-harvesting leaves onto the sensornet tree. In IPSN, 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)AsTAR: Sustainable Energy Harvesting for the Internet of Things through Adaptive Task SchedulingACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/346789418:1(1-34)Online publication date: 12-Oct-2021
  • (2020)Deterministic 40 year battery lifetime through a hybrid perpetual sensing platform (HyPer)Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Internet of Things10.1145/3410992.3411028(1-8)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2020
  • (2018)Real-time Distributed In-Situ Benchmarking of Energy Harvesting IoT DevicesProceedings of the 5th Workshop on Middleware and Applications for the Internet of Things10.1145/3286719.3286724(19-24)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2018

Index Terms

  1. Energy neutral operation of vibration energy-harvesting sensor networks for bridge applications

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EWSN ’18: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks
      February 2018
      295 pages
      ISBN:9780994988621

      Sponsors

      • EWSN: International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks
      • SUNY Buffalo: State University of NY at Buffalo
      • IMDEA

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Junction Publishing

      United States

      Publication History

      Published: 12 February 2018

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Data collection
      2. Energy Harvesting
      3. Supercapacitors
      4. Vibrations
      5. Wireless Sensor Networks

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 81 of 195 submissions, 42%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 02 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2021)AsTAR: Sustainable Energy Harvesting for the Internet of Things through Adaptive Task SchedulingACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/346789418:1(1-34)Online publication date: 12-Oct-2021
      • (2020)Deterministic 40 year battery lifetime through a hybrid perpetual sensing platform (HyPer)Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Internet of Things10.1145/3410992.3411028(1-8)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2020
      • (2018)Real-time Distributed In-Situ Benchmarking of Energy Harvesting IoT DevicesProceedings of the 5th Workshop on Middleware and Applications for the Internet of Things10.1145/3286719.3286724(19-24)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2018

      View Options

      View options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media