Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/3505288.3505317guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article
Free access

A generalized multidimensional evaluation framework for player goal recognition

Published: 08 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Recent years have seen a growing interest in player modeling, which supports the creation of player-adaptive digital games. A central problem of player modeling is goal recognition, which aims to recognize players' intentions from observable gameplay behaviors. Player goal recognition offers the promise of enabling games to dynamically adjust challenge levels, perform procedural content generation, and create believable NPC interactions. A growing body of work is investigating a wide range of machine learning-based goal recognition models. In this paper, we introduce GOALIE, a multidimensional framework for evaluating player goal recognition models. The framework integrates multiple metrics for player goal recognition models, including two novel metrics, n-early convergence rate and standardized convergence point. We demonstrate the application of the GOALIE framework with the evaluation of several player goal recognition models, including Markov logic network-based, deep feedforward neural network-based, and long short-term memory network-based goal recognizers on two different educational games. The results suggest that GOALIE effectively captures goal recognition behaviors that are key to next-generation player modeling.

References

[1]
Baikadi, A., Rowe, I, Mott, B. and Lester, J. 2014. Generalizability of Goal Recognition Models in Narrative-Centered Learning Environments. In Proceedings of the 22nd User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, 278–289. Springer International Publishing.
[2]
Baker, C, Saxe, R. and Tenenbaum, J. 2009. Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition 113(3): 329–349.
[3]
Bengio, Y., Ducharme, R., Vincent, P. and Janvin, C. 2003. A Neural Probabilistic Language Model. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 3: 1137–1155.
[4]
Bisson, F., Larochelle, H. and Kabanza, F. 2015. Using a Recursive Neural Network to Learn an Agent's Decision Model for Plan Recognition. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 918–924.
[5]
Blaylock, N. and Allen, J. 2003. Corpus-based, statistical goal recognition. In Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1303–1308.
[6]
Domingos, P., Kok, S., Poon, H., Richardson, M. and Singla, P. 2006. Unifying Logical and Statistical AI. In Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2–7.
[7]
Fagan, M. and Cunningham, P. 2003. Case-based plan recognition in computer games. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, 161–170. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[8]
Geib, C. and Goldman, R. 2009. A probabilistic plan recognition algorithm based on plan tree grammars. Artificial Intelligence 173(11): 1101–1132.
[9]
Graves, A. 2012. Supervised sequence labelling with recurrent neural networks. Vol. 385. Springer.
[10]
Ha, E. Y., Rowe, J. P., Mott, B. W. and Lester, J. C. 2011. Goal Recognition with Markov Logic Networks for Player-Adaptive Games. In Proceedings of the 7th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, 32–39.
[11]
Harrison, B., Ware, S., Fendt, M. and Roberts, D. 2015. A Survey and Analysis of Techniques for Player Behavior Prediction in Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing 3(2): 260–274.
[12]
Kingma, D. P. and Ba, J. L. 2015. Adam: a Method for Stochastic Optimization. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations.
[13]
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. and Hinton, G. 2015. Deep Learning. Nature 521(7553): 436–144.
[14]
Lester, J. C, Spires, H. A., Nietfeld, J. L., Minogue, L, Mott, B. W. and Lobene, E. V. 2014. Designing game-based learning environments for elementary science education: A narrative-centered learning perspective. Information Sciences 264: 4–18.
[15]
Lopes, R. and Bidarra, R. 2011. Adaptivity challenges in games and simulations: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 3(2): 85–99.
[16]
Min, W., Ha, E. Y., Rowe, J., Mott, B. and Lester, J. 2014. Deep Learning-Based Goal Recognition in Open-Ended Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 10th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, 37–13.
[17]
Min, W., Mott, B., Rowe, J., Liu, B. and Lester, J. 2016. Player Goal Recognition in Open-World Digital Games with Long Short-Term Memory Networks. In Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2590–2596.
[18]
Mott, B., Lee, S. and Lester, J. 2006. Probabilistic goal recognition in interactive narrative environments. In Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 187–192. Menlo Park, CA; Cambridge, MA; London; AAAI Press; MIT Press; 1999.
[19]
Ramirez, M. and Geffner, H. 2011. Goal recognition over POMDPs: Inferring the intention of a POMDP agent. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2009–2014.
[20]
Riedl, M. O. and Bulitko, V. 2013. Interactive Narrative: An Intelligent Systems Approach. AI Magazine 34(1): 67–77.
[21]
Rowe, J., Shores, L., Mott, B. and Lester, J. 2011. Integrating learning, problem solving, and engagement in narrative-centered learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 21(1-2): 115–133.
[22]
Shaker, N., Togelius, J. and Nelson, M. J. 2015. Procedural Content Generation in Games: A Textbook and an Overview of Current Research. Springer.
[23]
Srivastava, N., Hinton, G. E., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. and Salakhutdinov, R. 2014. Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR) 15:1929–1958.
[24]
Sukthankar, G., Geib, C, Bui, H., Pynadath, D. and Goldman, R. P. 2014. Plan, Activity, and Intent Recognition. Elsevier.
[25]
Synnaeve, G. and Bessière, P. 2011. A Bayesian model for opening prediction in RTS games with application to StarCraft. In 2011 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, 281–288. IEEE.
[26]
Yannakakis, G., Spronck, P., Loiacono, D. and Andre, E. 2013. Player Modeling. In Lucas, S. M., Mateas, M., Preuss, M., Spronck, P. and Togelius, J. (eds.) Dagstuhl Follow-Ups. Schloss Dagstuhl—Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)”And then they died”: Using Action Sequences for Data Driven, Context Aware Gameplay AnalysisProceedings of the 15th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games10.1145/3402942.3402962(1-12)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
AIIDE'16: Proceedings of the Twelfth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment
October 2016
255 pages
ISBN:978-1-57735-772-8

Sponsors

  • Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

AAAI Press

Publication History

Published: 08 October 2016

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)”And then they died”: Using Action Sequences for Data Driven, Context Aware Gameplay AnalysisProceedings of the 15th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games10.1145/3402942.3402962(1-12)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2020

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media