Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/3635637.3663115acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Analyzing Crowdfunding of Public Projects Under Dynamic Beliefs

Published: 06 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

In the last decade, social planners have used crowdfunding to raise funds for public projects. As these public projects are non-excludable, the beneficiaries may free-ride. Thus, there is a need to design incentive mechanisms for such strategic agents to contribute to the project. The existing mechanisms, like PPR or PPRx, assume that the agent's beliefs about the project getting funded do not change over time, i.e., their beliefs are static. Researchers highlight that unless appropriately incentivized, the agents defer their contributions in static settings, leading to a "race'' to contribute at the deadline. In this work, we model the evolution of agents' beliefs as a random walk. We study PPRx - an existing mechanism for the static belief setting - in this dynamic belief setting and refer to it as PPRx-DB for readability. We prove that in PPRx-DB, the project is funded at equilibrium. More significantly, we prove that under certain conditions on agent's belief evolution, agents will contribute as soon as they arrive at the mechanism. Thus, we believe that by incorporating dynamic belief evolution in analysis, the social planner may mitigate the concern of race conditions in many mechanisms.

References

[1]
Saeed Alaei, Azarakhsh Malekian, and Mohamed Mostagir. 2016. A Dynamic Model of Crowdfunding. In ACM EC. 363--363.
[2]
Mark Bagnoli and Barton L Lipman. 1989. Provision of public goods: Fully implementing the core through private contributions. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 56, 4 (1989), 583--601.
[3]
Timothy N Cason, Alex Tabarrok, and Robertas Zubrickas. 2021. Early refund bonuses increase successful crowdfunding. Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 129 (2021), 78--95.
[4]
Praphul Chandra, Sujit Gujar, and Y Narahari. 2016. Crowdfunding Public Projects with Provision Point: A Prediction Market Approach. In ECAI. 778--786.
[5]
Sankarshan Damle and Sujit Gujar. 2024. Analyzing Crowdfunding of Public Projects Under Dynamic Beliefs. arxiv: 2402.00454
[6]
Sankarshan Damle, Moin Hussain Moti, Praphul Chandra, and Sujit Gujar. 2019. Civic Crowdfunding for Agents with Negative Valuations and Agents with Asymmetric Beliefs. In IJCAI. 208--214.
[7]
Sankarshan Damle, Moin Hussain Moti, Praphul Chandra, and Sujit Gujar. 2021. Designing refund bonus schemes for provision point mechanism in civic crowdfunding. In PRICAI. 18--32.
[8]
Sankarshan Damle, Manisha Padala, and Sujit Gujar. 2023. Combinatorial Civic Crowdfunding with Budgeted Agents: Welfare Optimality at Equilibrium and Optimal Deviation. In AAAI. 5582--5590.
[9]
Paul J Healy. 2006. Learning dynamics for mechanism design: An experimental comparison of public goods mechanisms. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 129, 1 (2006), 114--149.
[10]
Kickstarter. 2011. Shortening the Maximum Project Length. kickstarter.com/blog/shortening-the-maximum-project-length
[11]
Jared Soundy, Chenhao Wang, Clay Stevens, and Hau Chan. 2021. Game-theoretic Analysis of Effort Allocation of Contributors to Public Projects. In IJCAI. 405--411.
[12]
Roland Strausz. 2017. A theory of crowdfunding: A mechanism design approach with demand uncertainty and moral hazard. American Economic Review, Vol. 107, 6 (2017), 1430--76.
[13]
Robertas Zubrickas. 2014. The provision point mechanism with refund bonuses. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 120 (2014), 231--234.

Index Terms

  1. Analyzing Crowdfunding of Public Projects Under Dynamic Beliefs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    AAMAS '24: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
    May 2024
    2898 pages
    ISBN:9798400704864

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

    Richland, SC

    Publication History

    Published: 06 May 2024

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. crowdfunding
    2. martingale theory
    3. public projects

    Qualifiers

    • Extended-abstract

    Conference

    AAMAS '24
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 7
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media