{BAF01} E. Blanton, M. Allman, and K. Fall. A Conservative SACK-based Loss Recovery Algorithm for TCP. Internet draft "draft-allman-tcp-sack-08.txt", November 2001. Work in progress.]]

Google Scholar

[4]

{BBJ92} D. Borman, R. Braden, and V. Jacobson. TCP Extensions for High Performance. RFC 1323, May 1992.]]

Google Scholar

[5]

{Cla82} D. D. Clark. Window and Acknowledgement Strategy in TCP. RFC 813, July 1982.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

{FF96} K. Fall and S. Floyd. Simulation-based Comparisons of Tahoe, Reno, and SACK TCP. ACM Computer Communication Review , 26(3), July 1996.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

{FH99} S. Floyd and T. Henderson. The NewReno Modification to TCP's Fast Recovery Algorithm. RFC 2582, April 1999.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[8]

{FMMP00} S. Floyd, J. Mahdavi, M. Mathis, and M. Podolsky. An Extension to the Selective Acknowledgment (SACK) Option for TCP. RFC 2883, July 2000.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[9]

{Hoe95} J. Hoe. Start-up Dynamics of TCP's Congestion Control and Avoidance Schemes. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 1995.]]

Google Scholar

[10]

{HPF00} M. Handley, J. Padhye, and S. Floyd. TCP Congestion Window Validation. RFC 2861, June 2000.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[11]

{Jac88} V. Jacobson. Congestion Avoidance and Control. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM '88, pages 314-329, August 1988.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[12]

{KGM⁺01} M. Kojo, A. Gurtov, J. Manner, P. Sarolahti, T. Alanko, and K. Raatikainen. Seawind: a Wireless Network Emulator. In Proceedings of 11th GI/ITG Conference on Measuring, Modelling and Evaluation of Computer and Communication Systems, pages 151-166, Aachen, Germany, September 2001. VDE Verlag.]]

Google Scholar

[13]

{LK00} R. Ludwig and R. H. Katz. The Eifel Algorithm: Making TCP Robust Against Spurious Retransmissions. ACM Computer Communication Review, 30(1), January 2000.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[14]

{LS00} R. Ludwig and K. Sklower. The Eifel Retransmission Timer. ACM Computer Communication Review, 30(3), July 2000.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[15]

{MM96} M. Mathis and J. Mahdavi. Forward acknowledgement: Refining TCP Congestion Control. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM '96, October 1996.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[16]

{MMFR96} M. Mathis, J. Mahdavi, S. Floyd, and A. Romanow. TCP Selective Acknowledgement Options. RFC 2018, October 1996.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[17]

{PA00} V. Paxson and M. Allman. Computing TCP's Retransmission Timer. RFC 2988, November 2000.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[18]

{Pos81a} J. Postel. Internet Control Message Protocol. RFC 792, September 1981.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[19]

{Pos81b} J. Postel. Transmission Control Protocol. RFC 793, September 1981.]]

Google Scholar

[20]

{RFB01} K. Ramakrishnan, S. Floyd, and D. Black. The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP. RFC 3168, September 2001.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[21]

{Ste95} W. Stevens. TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 1; The Protocols. Addison Wesley, 1995.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Singh KGupta SVerma SPandey MHansdah RKrishnaswamy DVaidya N(2019)Improving performance of TCP for wireless network using SDNProceedings of the 20th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking10.1145/3288599.3288626(267-276)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3288599.3288626
Cheng LLau FLuwei Cheng Lau F(2016)Revisiting TCP Congestion Control in a Virtual Cluster EnvironmentIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2015.245116124:4(2154-2167)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TNET.2015.2451161
Flach TDukkipati NTerzis ARaghavan BCardwell NCheng YJain AHao SKatz-Bassett EGovindan R(2013)Reducing web latencyACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/2534169.248601443:4(159-170)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2534169.2486014
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Congestion Control in Linux TCP
1. General and reference
  1. Cross-computing tools and techniques
    1. Performance
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software organization and properties
    1. Contextual software domains
      1. Operating systems
        Communications management
    2. Extra-functional properties
      1. Software performance

Recommendations

Performance evaluation of Westwood+ TCP congestion control
Internet performance symposium (IPS 2002)

Westwood+ TCP is a sender-side only modification of the classic Tahoe/Reno TCP that has been recently proposed to improve fairness and efficiency of TCP. The key idea of Westwood+ TCP is to perform an end-to-end estimate of the bandwidth available for a ...
TCP-friendly Congestion Control for HighSpeed Network
SAINT '07: Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Applications and the Internet

The currently used TCP congestion control, TCP Reno, has two weaknesses. To solve this TCP Reno drawback, HighSpeed TCP and Scalable TCP were proposed. However, the fairness between these proposed TCP and TCP Reno is not considered, when both ...
TCP and explicit congestion notification

This paper discusses the use of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) mechanisms in the TCP/IP protocol. The first part proposes new guidelines for TCP's response to ECN mechanisms (e.g., Source Quench packets, ECN fields in packet headers). Next, ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

Proceedings of the FREENIX Track: 2002 USENIX Annual Technical Conference

June 2002

299 pages

ISBN:1880446014

Editor:
Chris G. Demetriou

Publisher

USENIX Association

United States

Publication History

Published: 10 June 2002

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

26
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Singh KGupta SVerma SPandey MHansdah RKrishnaswamy DVaidya N(2019)Improving performance of TCP for wireless network using SDNProceedings of the 20th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking10.1145/3288599.3288626(267-276)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3288599.3288626
Cheng LLau FLuwei Cheng Lau F(2016)Revisiting TCP Congestion Control in a Virtual Cluster EnvironmentIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2015.245116124:4(2154-2167)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TNET.2015.2451161
Flach TDukkipati NTerzis ARaghavan BCardwell NCheng YJain AHao SKatz-Bassett EGovindan R(2013)Reducing web latencyACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/2534169.248601443:4(159-170)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2534169.2486014
Huang JQian FGuo YZhou YXu QMao ZSen SSpatscheck O(2013)An in-depth study of LTEACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/2534169.248600643:4(363-374)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2534169.2486006
Chen YLim YGibbens RNahum EKhalili RTowsley DPapagiannaki KGummadi KPartridge C(2013)A measurement-based study of MultiPath TCP performance over wireless networksProceedings of the 2013 conference on Internet measurement conference10.1145/2504730.2504751(455-468)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2504730.2504751
Flach TDukkipati NTerzis ARaghavan BCardwell NCheng YJain AHao SKatz-Bassett EGovindan RChiu DWang JBarford PSeshan S(2013)Reducing web latencyProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2013 conference on SIGCOMM10.1145/2486001.2486014(159-170)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2486001.2486014
Huang JQian FGuo YZhou YXu QMao ZSen SSpatscheck OChiu DWang JBarford PSeshan S(2013)An in-depth study of LTEProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2013 conference on SIGCOMM10.1145/2486001.2486006(363-374)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2486001.2486006
Dukkipati NMathis MCheng YGhobadi MThiran PWillinger W(2011)Proportional rate reduction for TCPProceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference10.1145/2068816.2068832(155-170)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2011
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2068816.2068832
Caini CFirrincieli RLacamera D(2009)Comparative performance evaluation of TCP variants on satellite environmentsProceedings of the 2009 IEEE international conference on Communications10.5555/1817770.1818232(5161-5165)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2009
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1817770.1818232
Zagorodnov DMarzullo KAlvisi LBressoud T(2009)Practical and low-overhead masking of failures of TCP-based serversACM Transactions on Computer Systems10.1145/1534909.153491127:2(1-39)Online publication date: 29-May-2009
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1534909.1534911
Show More Cited By

Abstract

References

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Performance evaluation of Westwood+ TCP congestion control

TCP-friendly Congestion Control for HighSpeed Network

TCP and explicit congestion notification

Comments

Information

Published In

Publisher

Publication History

Qualifiers

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View options

Figures

Other

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations