Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Pedagogical learning supports based on human–systems inclusion applied to rail flow control

Published: 01 May 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The paper presents the new concept on human–systems inclusion for designing, analyzing or evaluating human–machine systems and applied it to two case studies on rail flow control. Human–systems inclusion is related to the development of online learning abilities using pedagogical learning supports and aims at applying both automation-supported human and human-supported automation processes in which a human is supported by automation or automation is supported by a human, respectively. Different learning supports are proposed: accident reports, course supports, internet accesses, simulators, technical systems, etc. People are free to use or not to use them to learn alone, from the other or with the others. The first case study concerns automation-supported driving activities and focuses on the analysis of possible dissonances of use of two automated tools. The second case study consists of designing and validating a human-supported eco-driving assistance system.

References

[1]
Bentivegna DC, Atkeson CG, and Chenga G Learning tasks from observation and practice Robot Auton Syst 2004 47 163-169
[2]
Black JT Design for system success J Manuf Syst 2002 20 6 1-6
[3]
Boakye-Adjei K, Thamma R, and Kirby ED Autonomation: the future of manufacturing Int J Innov Sci Eng Technol 2015 2 10 214-219
[4]
Boy GA and Narkevicius JM Aiguier M, Boulanger F, Krob D, and Marchal C Unifying human centered design and systems engineering for human systems integration Complex systems design and management 2014 Cham Springer 151-162
[5]
Brunner J, Chuang E, Goldzweig C, Cain CL, Sugar C, and Yano EM User-centered design to improve clinical decision support in primary care Int J Med Informatics 2017 104 56-64
[6]
Butler KW, Veltre DE, and Brady D Implementation of active learning pedagogy comparing low-fidelity simulation versus high-fidelity simulation in pediatric nursing education Clin Simul Nurs 2009 5 4 129-136
[7]
Cacciabue P-C and Martinetto M A user-centred approach for designing driving support systems: the case of collision avoidance Cogn Technol Work 2006 8 201-214
[8]
Catmur C Understanding intentions from actions: direct perception, inference, and the roles of mirror and mentalizing systems Conscious Cogn 2015 36 426-433
[9]
Cattaneo LB and Chapman AR The process of empowerment—A model for use in research and practice Am Psychol 2010 65 7 646-659
[10]
Chella A, Dindo H, and Infantino I A cognitive framework for imitation learning Robot Auton Syst 2006 54 403-408
[11]
Christensen T and Laegreid P Governmental autonomisation and control: the Norwegian way Public Adm 2004 24 129-135
[12]
Conway CM and Christiansen MH Sequential learning in non-human primates Trends Cogn Sci 2001 5 12 539-546
[13]
Costa NA, Holder E, and MacKinnon SN Implementing human centred design in the context of a graphical user interface redesign for ship maneuvering Int J Hum Comput Stud 2017 100 55-65
[14]
De Martinis V and Gallo M Models and methods to optimise train speed profiles with and without energy recovery systems: a suburban test case Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 2013 87 222-233
[15]
Enjalbert S and Vanderhaegen F A hybrid reinforced learning system to estimate resilience indicators Eng Appl Artif Intell 2017 64 295-301
[16]
Faustmann G Configuration for adaptation—A human-centered approach to flexible workflow enactment Comput Support Coop Work 2000 9 413-434
[17]
Fénix J, Sagot J-C, Valot C, and Gomes S Operator centred design: example of a new driver aid system in the field of rail transport Cogn Technol Work 2008 10 53-60
[18]
Goodnough K Issues in modified problem-based learning: a self-study in pre-service science-teacher education Can J Sci Math Technol Educ 2005 5 3 289-306
[19]
Guilbault M, Anabelle Viau-Guay A (2017) La classe inversée comme approche pédagogique en enseignement supérieur : état des connaissances scientifiques et recommandations. Revue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur 33(1). http://ripes.revues.org/1193
[20]
Hamani L, Wojak P, Dapsence D, La Delfa S, Vanderhaegen F (2018) Outils numériques pour la pédagogie innovante dans les transports. 21e Congrès de Maîtrise des Risques et Sûreté de Fonctionnement, λµ21, Reims, France, 16–18 octobre 2018
[21]
Hickok G Do mirror neurons subserve action understanding? Neurosci Lett 2013 540 56-58
[22]
Hombert L, Sion S, La Delfa S, Vanderhaegen F (2018) Contrôle mutuel pour l’aide à l’éco-conduite sûre et ponctuelle en simulation ferroviaire. 21e Congrès de Maîtrise des Risques et Sûreté de Fonctionnement, λµ21, Reims, France, 16–18 octobre 2018
[23]
Inagaki T Design of human–machine interactions in light of domain-dependence of human-centered automation Cogn Technol Work 2006 8 3 161-167
[24]
La Delfa S, Enjalbert S, Polet P, and Vanderhagen F Eco-driving command for tram-driver system IFAC-PapersOnLine 2016 49 19 444-449
[25]
Lago-Rodriguez A, Lopez-Alonso V, and Fernández-del-Olmo M Mirror neuron system and observational learning: behavioral and neurophysiological evidence Behav Brain Res 2013 248 104-113
[26]
Millot P, Hoc J-M (1997) Human-machine cooperation: metaphor or possible reality? Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Cognitive Science, April 9–11, Manchester, UK, pp 165–174
[27]
Mondragón E, Alonso E, and Kokkola N Associative learning should go deep Trends Cogn Sci 2017 21 11 822-825
[28]
Oztop E, Kawato M, and Arbib MA Mirror neurons: functions, mechanisms and models Neurosci Lett 2013 540 43-55
[29]
Parmentier FBR, Muaybery MT, Huitson M, and Jones DM The perceptual determinants of repetition learning in auditory space J Memory Lang 2008 58 978-997
[30]
Plaisance E, Belmont B, Vérillon A, and Schneider C Intégration ou inclusion? Éléments pour contribuer au débat La nouvelle revue de l’adaptation et de la scolarisation 2007 37 159-164
[31]
Polet P, Vanderhaegen F, and Zieba S Iterative learning control based tools to learn from human error Eng Appl Artif Intell 2012 25 7 1515-1522
[32]
Tengland P-A Empowerment: a conceptual discussion Health Care Anal 2008 16 77-96
[33]
Vanderhaegen F Toward a model of unreliability to study error prevention supports Interact Comput 1999 11 575-595
[34]
Vanderhaegen F Cooperation and learning to increase the autonomy of ADAS Cogn Technol Work 2012 14 1 61-69
[35]
Vanderhaegen F Dissonance engineering: a new challenge to analyse risky knowledge when using a system Int J Comput Commun Control 2014 9 6 750-759
[36]
Vanderhaegen F (2016a) Is there a need for human engineering in ATO? Some case studies in transport domain. In: ERA human factor seminar, Brussels, Belgium
[37]
Vanderhaegen F A rule-based support system for dissonance discovery and control applied to car driving Expert Syst Appl 2016 65 361-371
[38]
Vanderhaegen F (2016c) Mirror effect based learning systems to predict human errors—application to the air traffic control. In: Proceedings of the 13th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA symposium on analysis, design, and evaluation of human–machine systems, Kyoto, Japan, pp 295–300
[39]
Vanderhaegen F Towards increased systems resilience: new challenges based on dissonance control for human reliability in Cyber-Physical and Human Systems Annu Rev Control 2017 44 316-322
[40]
Vanderhaegen F (2018). Pedagogical control of railway flow based on human-machine symbiosis. Poster presented at the European Rail Human and Organisational Factors Seminar, November, Valenciennes, France, p 14–15
[41]
Vanderhaegen F (2019) Pédagogie active pour l’aide à l’innovation dans les transports. In: Vanderhaegen F, Maaoui C, Sallak M, Berdjag D (Eds) In « Défis de l’automatisation des systèmes sociotechniques » . ISTE Editions Ltd, London, UK, pp 319–338
[42]
Vanderhaegen F and Carsten O Can dissonance engineering improve risk analysis of human–machine systems? Cogn Technol Work 2017 19 1 1-12
[43]
Vanderhaegen F, Jimenez V (2018) The amazing human factors and their dissonances for autonomous cyber-physical and human systems. In: First IEEE conference on industrial cyber-physical systems, Saint-Petersbourg, Russia, 14–18 May 2018, pp 597–602
[44]
Vanderhaegen F, Richard P (2014) MissRail: a platform dedicated to training and research in railway systems. Proceedings of the International Conference HCII, 22–27 June 2014, Creta Maris, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, pp 544–549
[45]
Vanderhaegen F and Zieba S Reinforced learning systems based on merged and cumulative knowledge to predict human actions Inf Sci 2014 276 20 146-159
[46]
Vanderhaegen F, Chalmé S, Anceaux F, and Millot P Principles of cooperation and competition—Application to car driver behavior analysis Cogn Technol Work 2006 8 183-192
[47]
Vanderhaegen F, Polet P, and Zieba S A reinforced iterative formalism to learn from human errors and uncertainty Eng Appl Artif Intell 2009 22 4–5 654-659
[48]
Vanderhaegen F, Zieba S, Enjalbert S, and Polet P A benefit/cost/deficit (BCD) model for learning from human errors Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2011 96 7 757-766
[49]
Vanderhaegen F, Wolff M, Ibarboure S, Mollard R (2019). Heart-computer synchronization interface to control human-machine symbiosis: a new human availability support for cooperative systems. Proceedings of the 14th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium on Analysis, Design, and Evaluation of Human–Machine Systems, Tallinn, Estonia, September pp 16–19
[50]
Vislie L From integration to inclusion: focusing global trends and changes in the western European societies Eur J Spec Needs Educ 2003 18 1 17-35
[51]
Walraven E, Spaan MTJ, and Bakker B Traffic flow optimization: a reinforcement learning approach Eng Appl Artif Intell 2016 52 203-212
[52]
Zhang C, Tang P, Cooke N, Buchanan V, Yilmaz A, St. Germain SW, Boring RL, Akca-Hobbins S, and Gupta A Human-centered automation for resilient nuclear power plant outage control Autom Constr 2017 82 179-192
[53]
Zhang M-Y, Tian G-H, Li C-C, and Gong J Learning to transform service instructions into actions with reinforcement learning and knowledge base Int J Autom Comput 2018 15 5 582-592
[54]
Zhou L, Li Y, and Bai S A human-centered design optimization approach for robotic exoskeletons through biomechanical simulation Robot Auton Syst 2017 91 337-347

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Every User Has Special Needs for Inclusive MobilityHCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems10.1007/978-3-031-60480-5_15(236-248)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Connected human to study attention with heart-computer interfacesProceedings of the 18th "Ergonomie et Informatique Avancée" Conference10.1145/3624323.3624325(1-7)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2023
  • (2022)An investigation of the relationship between joint visual attention and product quality in collaborative business process modeling: a dual eye-tracking studySoftware and Systems Modeling (SoSyM)10.1007/s10270-022-00974-621:6(2429-2460)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Pedagogical learning supports based on human–systems inclusion applied to rail flow control
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image Cognition, Technology and Work
          Cognition, Technology and Work  Volume 23, Issue 2
          May 2021
          185 pages
          ISSN:1435-5558
          EISSN:1435-5566
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Publisher

          Springer-Verlag

          Berlin, Heidelberg

          Publication History

          Published: 01 May 2021
          Accepted: 13 September 2019
          Received: 05 July 2019

          Author Tags

          1. Learning tool
          2. Human–systems inclusion
          3. Autonomy
          4. Rail traffic flow
          5. Dissonance
          6. Driving support system

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
          Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2024)Every User Has Special Needs for Inclusive MobilityHCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems10.1007/978-3-031-60480-5_15(236-248)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
          • (2023)Connected human to study attention with heart-computer interfacesProceedings of the 18th "Ergonomie et Informatique Avancée" Conference10.1145/3624323.3624325(1-7)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2023
          • (2022)An investigation of the relationship between joint visual attention and product quality in collaborative business process modeling: a dual eye-tracking studySoftware and Systems Modeling (SoSyM)10.1007/s10270-022-00974-621:6(2429-2460)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022
          • (2022)A heartbeat-based study of attention in the detection of digital alarms from focused and distributed supervisory control systemsCognition, Technology and Work10.1007/s10111-022-00720-425:1(119-134)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2022
          • (2022)Developing professional expertise for safety: a learning design frameworkCognition, Technology and Work10.1007/s10111-022-00702-624:3(459-472)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2022
          • (2022)Development of training method for vessel traffic service based on cognitive processCognition, Technology and Work10.1007/s10111-021-00684-x24:2(351-369)Online publication date: 1-May-2022
          • (2022)Leveraging human factors in cybersecurity: an integrated methodological approachCognition, Technology and Work10.1007/s10111-021-00683-y24:2(371-390)Online publication date: 1-May-2022
          • (2022)Explicating user negative behavior toward social media: an exploratory examination based on stressor–strain–outcome modelCognition, Technology and Work10.1007/s10111-021-00665-024:1(183-194)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
          • (2021)A Hybrid Robotics System for Children with Autism: A longitudinal Study of Social Interaction inside the ClassroomProceedings of the 17th “Ergonomie et Informatique Avancée” Conference10.1145/3486812.3486840(1-8)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2021
          • (2021)Formal and modelling frameworks for Social Holonic Control ArchitecturesComputers in Industry10.1016/j.compind.2021.103521132:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2021
          • Show More Cited By

          View Options

          View options

          Figures

          Tables

          Media

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media