Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

The influence of eWOM communications

Published: 01 March 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Drawing on Online Social Network (OSN) Framework (Brown, Boderick, & Lee, 2007), this study examines the role of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in consumer review websites by investigating its effects on the decision-making process of consumers. OSN framework postulates that individuals consider the websites to be primary actors and develop social relationships with the websites themselves rather than the other online participants. This study proposes and empirically tests an integrative model of three social network constructs associated with the website (i.e., tie strength, homophily, and source credibility) and their relationship to consumers' evaluations associated with attitudes and perceived influence of eWOM effectiveness. An online survey with a sample size of 793 respondents revealed that the homophily and tie strength between a website and a consumer are important drivers of source credibility, which in turn influence attitude toward the reviews as well as the website. The attitudes formed through the perceptions of tie-strength, homophily and source credibility ultimately determines the influence of eWOM consumers' purchase decisions. There is a lack of social presence in review websites.There is an increasing skepticism about the credibility of eWOM information.Consumers consider the websites to be primary actors and develop social relationships with the websites.Homophily and tie strength between a website and a consumer are important drivers of source credibility.

References

[1]
J. Aaker, Dimensions of brand personality, Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (1997) 347-356.
[2]
J. Anderson, D. Gerbing, Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103 (1988) 411-423.
[3]
J. Arndt, Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product, Journal of Marketing Research, 4 (1967) 291-295.
[4]
J.K. Ayeh, N. Au, R. Law, Do we believe in Tripadvisor? Examining credibility perceptions and online travelers' attitude toward using user-generated content, Journal of Travel Research, 52 (2013) 437-452.
[5]
M.D. Back, J.M. Stopfer, S. Vazire, S. Gaddis, S.C. Schmukle, B. Egloff, Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization, Psychological Science, 21 (2010) 372-374.
[6]
P.M. Bentler, D.G. Bonett, Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures, Psychological Bulletin, 88 (1980) 588-606.
[7]
A. Bilgihan, M. Bujisic, The effect of website features in online relationship marketing: A case of online hotel booking, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14 (2015) 222-232.
[8]
J. Brown, A.J. Broderick, N. Lee, Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21 (2007) 2-20.
[9]
M.W. Browne, R. Cudeck, Alternative ways of assessing model fit, in: Testing structural equation models, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1993, pp. 136-162.
[10]
J.J. Brown, P.H. Reingen, Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (1987) 350-362.
[11]
S.P. Brown, D.M. Stayman, Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: A meta-analysis, Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (1992) 34-51.
[12]
B.M. Byrne, Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2001.
[13]
P. Chatterjee, Online reviews: Do consumers use them?, Advances in Consumer Research, 28 (2001) 129-133.
[14]
W. Chen, W. Wells, Attitude toward the site, Journal of Advertising Research, 39 (1999) 27-37.
[15]
S.C. Chu, Y. Kim, Determinants of customer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites, International Journal of Advertising, 30 (2011) 47-75.
[16]
C. Dellarocas, The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms, Management Science, 49 (2003) 1407-1424.
[17]
Dimensional Research, Customer service and business results: A survey of customer service from mid-size companies, 2013.
[18]
X. Dou, J.A. Walden, S. Lee, J.Y. Lee, Does source matter? Examining source effects in online product reviews, Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (2012) 1555-1563.
[19]
X. Dreze, F. Zyufryden, Interactive advertising: The medium is the difference, Consumption, Markets, and Culture, 4 (2000) 23-37.
[20]
W. Duan, B. Gu, A.B. Whinston, Do online reviews matter?An empirical investigation of panel data, Decision Support Systems, 45 (2008) 1007-1016.
[21]
A. Elwalda, K. L, M. Ali, Perceived derived attributes of online customer reviews, Computers in Human Behavior, 56 (2016) 306-319.
[22]
F.J. Floyd, K.F. Widaman, Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments, Psychological Assessment, 7 (1995) 286-299.
[23]
S. Fournier, Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research, Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (1998) 34-353.
[24]
J. Goldenberg, B. Libai, E. Muller, Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying process of word-of-mouth, Marketing Letters, 12 (2001) 211-223.
[25]
A.L. Gonzales, J.T. Hancock, Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall: Effects of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Networking, 14 (2011) 79-83.
[26]
J.B. Gotlieb, D. Sarel, The influence of type of advertisement, price, and source credibility on perceived quality, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20 (1991) 253-260.
[27]
M.S. Granovetter, The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78 (1973) 1360-1380.
[28]
M. Granovetter, The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited, Sociological Theory, 1 (1983) 201-233.
[29]
U. Gretzel, Consumer generated contentTrends and implications for branding, e-Review of Tourism Research, 4 (2006) 9-11.
[30]
S.J. Grove, R.P. Fisk, The service experience as theater, Advances in Consumer Research, 19 (1992) 455-461.
[31]
T.W. Gruen, T. Osmonbekov, A.J. Czaplewski, eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty, Journal of Business Research, 59 (2006) 449-456.
[32]
J.F. Hair, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, W.C. Black, Multivariate data analysis with readings, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1998.
[33]
L. Harrison-Walker, The measurement of word-of-mouth communication and an investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential antecedents, Journal of Service Research, 4 (2001) 60-75.
[34]
K. Heinonen, Consumer activity in social media: Managerial approaches to consumers' social media behavior, Journal of Consumer Behavior, 10 (2011) 356-364.
[35]
D.L. Hoffman, T.P. Novak, Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations, Journal of Marketing, 60 (1996) 50-68.
[36]
M. Huang, F. Cai, A.S.L. Tsang, N. Zhou, Making your online voice loud: The critical role of WOM information, European Journal of Marketing, 45 (2011) 1277-1297.
[37]
S. Hussain, W. Ahmed, R.M.S. Jafar, A. Rabnawaz, Y. Jianzhou, eWOM source credibility, perceived risk and food product customer's information adoption, Computers in Human Behavior, 66 (2017) 96-102.
[38]
S.S. Hyun, I. Kim, Identifying optimal rapport-building behaviors in inducing patrons' emotional attachment in luxury restaurants, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 38 (2014) 162-198.
[39]
S.Y. Jeon, H.J. Park, The influence of information characteristics on word-of-mouth effect, Journal of Consumer Study, 14 (2003) 21-44.
[40]
N. Katz, D. Lazer, H. Arrow, N. Contractor, Network theory and small groups, Small Group Research, 35 (2004) 307-332.
[41]
S. Kim, X. Lehto, Projected and perceived destination brand personalities: The case of South Korea, Journal of Travel Research, 52 (2012) 117-130.
[42]
W. Kim, H. Lim, R.A. Brymer, The effectiveness of managing social media on hotel performance, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 44 (2015) 165-171.
[43]
N. Kumar, I. Benbasat, Para-social presence: A re-conceptualization of social presence to capture the relationship between a website and her visitors, in: Proceedings of the 35th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, IEEE, 2002, pp. 106-112.
[44]
B. Lea, W. Yu, N. Maguluru, M. Nicholas, Enhancing business networks using social network based virtual communities, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106 (2006) 121-138.
[45]
K.T. Lee, D.M. Koo, Evaluating right versus just evaluating online consumer reviews, Computers in Human Behavior, 45 (2015) 316-327.
[46]
E.J. Lee, S.Y. Shin, When do consumers buy online product reviews? Effects of review quality, product type, and reviewer's photo, Computers in Human Behavior, 31 (2014) 356-366.
[47]
D.Z. Levin, E.M. Whitener, R. Cross, Perceived trustworthiness of knowledge sources: The moderating impact of relationship length, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (2006) 1163-1171.
[48]
S.W. Litvin, R.E. Goldsmith, B. Pan, Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management, Tourism Management, 29 (2008) 458-468.
[49]
R.W. Mack, J.E. Blose, B. Pan, Believe it or not: Credibility of blogs in tourism, Journal of Vacation Marketing, 14 (2008) 133-144.
[50]
S.B. Mackenzie, R.J. Lutz, G.E. Belch, The role of attitude toward the Ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations, Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (1986) 130-143.
[51]
C. Mathwick, E. Rigdon, Play, flow, and the online search experience, Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (2004) 324-332.
[52]
D.J. McAllister, Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organization, Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1995) 24-59.
[53]
A. Mehta, Advertising attitudes and advertising effectiveness, Journal of Advertising Research, 40 (2000) 67-72.
[54]
V. Mittal, J.W. Huppertz, A. Khare, Customer complaining: The role of tie strength and information control, Journal of Retailing, 84 (2008) 195-204.
[55]
N. No, R.M. Whitaker, M.J. Chorley, T.V. Pollet, Birds of a feather locate together? Foursquare checkins and personality homophily, Computers in Human Behavior, 58 (2016) 343-353.
[56]
A.T. Norman, C.A. Russell, The pass-along effect: Investigating word-of-mouth effects on online survey procedures, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (2006) 1085-1103.
[57]
J.C. Nunnally, Psychometric theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
[58]
K. Nusair, A. Bilgihan, F. Okumus, C. Cobanoglu, Generation Y travelers' commitment to online social network websites, Tourism Management, 35 (2013) 13-22.
[59]
R. Ohanian, Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness, Journal of Advertising, 19 (1990) 39-52.
[60]
C. Park, T.M. Lee, Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: A moderating role of product type, Journal of Business Research, 62 (2009) 61-67.
[61]
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo, R. Goldman, Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (1981) 408-419.
[62]
P.-L.P. Rau, Q. Gao, Y. Ding, Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services, Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (2008) 2757-2770.
[63]
W. Rodgers, S. Negash, K. Suk, The moderating effect of online experience on the antecedents and consequences of online satisfaction, Psychology & Marketing, 22 (2005) 313-331.
[64]
E.M. Rogers, Diffusion of innovations, Collier MacMillan Publishers, New York, NY, 1983.
[65]
S. Sharma, S. Mukherjee, A. Kumar, W.R. Dillon, Asimulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models, Journal of Business Research, 58 (2005) 935-943.
[66]
M.J. Sirgy, D. Grewal, T.F. Mangleburg, J. Park, K. Choi, C.B. Claiborne, J.S. Johar, H. Berkman, Assessing the predictive validity of two methods of measuring self-image congruence, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (1997) 229-241.
[67]
M.K. Sohrabi, S. Akbari, Acomprehensive study on the effects of using data mining techniques to predict tie strength, Computers in Human Behavior, 60 (2016) 534-541.
[68]
E.M. Steffes, L.E. Burgee, Social ties and online word of mouth, Internet Research, 19 (2009) 42-59.
[69]
D. Streitfeld, Buy reviews on Yelp, get black mark, The New York Times, 2012, October 18. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/18/technology/yelp-tries-to-halt-deceptive-reviews.html?_r=3&StreitfeldStreitfeld
[70]
B.G. Tabachnick, L.S. Fidell, Using multivariate statistics, Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA, 2001.
[71]
M. Trusov, R.E. Bucklin, K. Pauwels, Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an Internet social networking site, Journal of Marketing, 73 (2009) 90-102.
[72]
P.M. Valkenburg, J. Peter, A.P. Schouten, Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9 (2006) 584-590.
[73]
W.D. Wells, C. Leavitt, M. McConville, Areaction profile for TV commercials, Journal of Advertising Research, 11 (1971) 11-18.
[74]
K. Wilcox, A.T. Stephen, Are close friends the enemy? Online social networks, self-esteem, and self-control, Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (2012) 90-103.
[75]
L.M. Willemsen, P.C. Neijens, F. Bronner, The ironic effect of source identification on the perceived credibility of online product reviews, Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 18 (2012) 16-31.
[76]
P.C.S. Wu, Y. Wang, The influences of electronic word-of-mouth message appeal and message source credibility on brand attitude, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23 (2011) 448-472.
[77]
S. Wu, P. Wei, J. Chen, Influential factors and relational structure of Internet banner advertising in the tourism industry, Tourism Management, 29 (2008) 221-236.
[78]
H. Xie, L. Miao, P. Kuo, B. Lee, Consumers' responses to ambivalent online hotel reviews: The role of perceived source credibility and pre-decisional disposition, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30 (2011) 178-183.
[79]
K.H. Yoo, U. Gretzel, What motivates consumers to write online travel reviews?, Information Technology & Tourism, 10 (2008) 283-295.
[80]
J.Q. Zhang, G. Craciun, D. Shin, When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews, Journal of Business Research, 63 (2010) 1336-1341.
[81]
D. Zhang, L. Zhou, J.L. Kehoe, I.Y. Kilic, What online reviewer behaviors really matter? Effects of verbal and nonverbal behaviors on detection of fake online reviews, Journal of Management Information Systems, 33 (2016) 456-481.
[82]
F. Zhu, X. Zhang, Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics, Journal of Marketing, 74 (2010) 133-148.
[83]
K. Zichuhr, A. Smith, Digital differences. Pew research Center's internet & American life project, 2013. http://pewinternet.org//media/Files/Reports/2012/PIP_Digital_differences_041312.pdf

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Social media or online shopping websitesElectronic Commerce Research and Applications10.1016/j.elerap.2024.10135864:COnline publication date: 1-Mar-2024
  • (2023)E-commerce brand authenticity perception model of territorial characteristic agricultural products based on fuzzy cognitive map and emotional analysisJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology10.3233/JIFS-23025145:3(3807-3822)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Elements of information ecosystems stimulating the online consumer behaviorTelematics and Informatics10.1016/j.tele.2023.10197080:COnline publication date: 1-May-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers in Human Behavior
Computers in Human Behavior  Volume 80, Issue C
March 2018
473 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 March 2018

Author Tags

  1. Attitude toward a website
  2. Attitude toward eWOM
  3. Consumer review websites
  4. Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM)
  5. Homophily
  6. Social network
  7. Source credibility
  8. Tie strength

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Social media or online shopping websitesElectronic Commerce Research and Applications10.1016/j.elerap.2024.10135864:COnline publication date: 1-Mar-2024
  • (2023)E-commerce brand authenticity perception model of territorial characteristic agricultural products based on fuzzy cognitive map and emotional analysisJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology10.3233/JIFS-23025145:3(3807-3822)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Elements of information ecosystems stimulating the online consumer behaviorTelematics and Informatics10.1016/j.tele.2023.10197080:COnline publication date: 1-May-2023
  • (2023)Understanding individual psychological and behavioral responses during COVID-19Telematics and Informatics10.1016/j.tele.2023.10196679:COnline publication date: 1-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Social Commerce Intention, Social Interaction, and Social SupportJournal of Organizational and End User Computing10.4018/JOEUC.30756534:1(1-23)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2022
  • (2022)How Will Electronic Word of Mouth Affect Consumer Purchase Intention?International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy10.4018/IJIDE.29249413:1(1-16)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2022
  • (2022)Construction of Tourism E-Commerce Platform Based on Artificial Intelligence AlgorithmComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience10.1155/2022/55580112022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2020)A conjoint approach to understanding online buyers' decisions towards online marketplacesJournal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research10.4067/S0718-1876202000030010615:3(69-82)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2020
  • (2020)Transformation of Online Consumer Behavior Under the Influence of the Pandemic and the Development of TelecommunicationsInternet of Things, Smart Spaces, and Next Generation Networks and Systems10.1007/978-3-030-65729-1_29(338-347)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2020
  • (2019)How Swift Guanxi Influences Product Evaluation and Repurchase IntentionProceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering10.1145/3335550.3335586(215-219)Online publication date: 24-May-2019
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media