research-article

What shall I learn? Two-stage decision making under social influence on corporate E-learning platforms

Authors:

Yiping Amy Song,

Lingling Zhang,

Indranil BoseAuthors Info & Claims

Volume 171, Issue C

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2023.113978

Published: 01 August 2023 Publication History

Abstract

E-learning platforms have increasingly been adopted by corporate employees in the workplace. On these platforms, users typically follow a two-stage decision-making process: they first choose which content to learn and then decide how much to continue learning. The decisions of individual employee users are influenced by members of the same workplace organization (group influence) and general users on the platform from other organizations (mass influence). Extant research has not shown how different types of social influence impact different decisions. Using data from a corporate e-learning platform, this study examines how group influence and mass influence support employees' learning decisions, from the perspective of the elaboration likelihood model (ELM). The results reveal that mass users' past choices only influence low-elaborative choice decisions but not high-elaborative engagement decisions. In contrast, workgroup members' past choices influence both the low-elaborative choice and high-elaborative engagement decisions. Furthermore, positive synergy exists between the two types of social influence for the choice decision, but the synergy dissipates for the engagement decision. These findings can help online content platforms design appropriate information-sharing systems to influence users' choice and engagement decisions. The results can also help corporates take advantage of social influence to motivate employees to engage in work-related online learning.

Highlights

•

E-learning employees are impacted by mass and work group.

•

Group affects both choice and engagement.

•

Mass and group positively interact on choice.

References

[1]

R.A. Noe, A.D. Clarke, H.J. Klein, Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace, Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1 (1) (2014) 245–275.

[2]

Bersin, J. (2017): Watch Out, corporate Learning: Here Comes Disruption. https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshbersin/2017/03/28/watch-out-corporate-learning-here-comes-disruption/?sh=149d5bacdc59 Accessed January 20, 2023.

[3]

Business Wire (2020): Corporate e-Learning Market to Grow by $ 38.09 bn During 2020-2024. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20201119005930/en/Corporate-E-Learning-Market-to-grow-by-38.09-bn-during-2020-2024Industry-Analysis-Market-Trends-Market-Growth-Opportunities-and-Forecast-2024-Technavio Accessed August 20, 2022.

[4]

R.A. Noe, M.J. Tews, A. McConnell Dachner, Learner engagement: a new perspective for enhancing our understanding of learner motivation and workplace learning, Acad. Manag. Ann. 4 (1) (2010) 279–315.

[5]

J. Benitez, L. Ruiz, A. Castillo, J. Llorens, How corporate social responsibility activities influence employer reputation: the role of social media capability, Decis. Support. Syst. 129 (2020).

[6]

W. Zhou, W. Duan, S. Piramuthu, A social network matrix for implicit and explicit social network plates, Decis. Support. Syst. 68 (2014) 89–97.

Digital Library

[7]

B. Von Helversen, K. Abramczuk, W. Kopeć, R. Nielek, Influence of consumer reviews on online purchasing decisions in older and younger adults, Decis. Support. Syst. 113 (2018) 1–10.

[8]

S. Bhattacharyya, I. Bose, S-commerce: influence of Facebook likes on purchases and recommendations on a linked e-commerce site, Decis. Support. Syst. 138 (2020).

[9]

H.C. Kelman, Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change, J. Confl. Resolut. 2 (1) (1958) 51–60.

[10]

C.M. Cheung, B.S. Xiao, I.L. Liu, Do actions speak louder than voices? The signaling role of social information cues in influencing consumer purchase decision, Decis. Support. Syst. 65 (2014) 50–58.

[11]

V. Sadovykh, D. Sundaram, S. Piramuthu, Do online social networks support decision-making?, Decis. Support. Syst. 70 (2015) 15–30.

Digital Library

[12]

C.J. Chen, S.W. Hung, To give or to receive? Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities, Inf. Manag. 47 (4) (2010) 226–236.

[13]

J. Zhou, M. Zuo, Y. Yu, W. Chai, How fundamental and supplemental interactions affect users’ knowledge sharing in virtual communities? A social cognitive perspective, Internet Res. 24 (5) (2014) 566–586.

[14]

Y. Sun, C. Yang, X.L. Shen, N. Wang, When digitalized customers meet digitalized services: a digitalized social cognitive perspective of omnichannel service usage, Int. J. Inf. Manag. 54 (2020).

[15]

X. Luo, M. Andrews, Y. Song, J. Aspara, Group-buying deal popularity, J. Mark. 78 (2) (2014) 20–33.

[16]

L. Ma, R. Krishnan, A.L. Montgomery, Latent homophily or social influence? An empirical analysis of purchase within a social network, Manag. Sci. 61 (2) (2015) 454–473.

[17]

C. Wang, X. Zhang, I.H. Hann, Socially nudged: a quasi-experimental study of friends’ social influence in online product ratings, Inf. Syst. Res. 29 (3) (2018) 641–655.

Digital Library

[18]

C.W. Liu, G. Gao, R. Agarwal, Unraveling the “social” in social norms: the conditioning effect of user connectivity, Inf. Syst. Res. 30 (4) (2019) 1272–1295.

[19]

J. Lin, Z. Luo, J. Benitez, X.R. Luo, A. Popovič, Why do organizations leverage social media to create business value? An external factor-centric empirical investigation, Decis. Support. Syst. 151 (2021).

[20]

A. Castillo, J. Benitez, J. Llorens, X.R. Luo, Social media-driven customer engagement and movie performance: theory and empirical evidence, Decis. Support. Syst. 145 (2021).

[21]

Y.C. Chou, H.H.C. Chuang, T.P. Liang, Elaboration likelihood model, endogenous quality indicators, and online review helpfulness, Decis. Support. Syst. 153 (2022).

[22]

C. Forman, A. Ghose, B. Wiesenfeld, Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: the role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets, Inf. Syst. Res. 19 (3) (2008) 291–313.

[23]

A. Bhattacherjee, C. Sanford, The intention–behaviour gap in technology usage: the moderating role of attitude strength, Behav. Inform. Technol. 28 (4) (2009) 389–401.

[24]

L. Huang, C.H. Tan, W. Ke, K.K. Wei, Helpfulness of online review content: the moderating effects of temporal and social cues, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 19 (6) (2018) 503–522.

[25]

S.G. Cohen, D.E. Bailey, What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite, J. Manag. 23 (3) (1997) 239–290.

[26]

I.D. Steiner, Group Process and Productivity, Academic press, New York, 1972.

[27]

E. Sundstrom, K.P. De Meuse, D. Futrell, Work teams: applications and effectiveness, Am. Psychol. 45 (2) (1990) 120–133.

[28]

M. Lee, H.S. Choi, D. Cho, H. Lee, Can digital consumption boost physical consumption? The effect of online music streaming on record sales, Decis. Support. Syst. 135 (2020).

[29]

K. Zhao, P. Zhang, H.M. Lee, Understanding the impacts of user-and marketer-generated content on free digital content consumption, Decis. Support. Syst. 154 (2022).

[30]

L. Wu, J.Y. Li, C.Y. Fu, The adoption of mobile healthcare by hospital’s professionals: an integrative perspective, Decis. Support. Syst. 51 (3) (2011) 587–596.

[31]

H. Hoehle, E. Scornavacca, S. Huff, Three decades of research on consumer adoption and utilization of electronic banking channels: a literature analysis, Decis. Support. Syst. 54 (1) (2012) 122–132.

[32]

N. Hu, N.S. Koh, S.K. Reddy, Ratings lead you to the product, reviews help you clinch it? The mediating role of online review sentiments on product sales, Decis. Support. Syst. 57 (2014) 42–53.

Digital Library

[33]

K.F. McCardle, Information acquisition and the adoption of new technology, Manag. Sci. 31 (11) (1985) 1372–1389.

[34]

J.C. Moore, A.B. Whinston, A model of decision-making with sequential information-acquisition (part 1), Decis. Support. Syst. 2 (4) (1986) 285–307.

[35]

A. Bandura, Human agency in social cognitive theory, Am. Psychol. 44 (9) (1989) 1175.

[36]

J. Jin, Y. Li, X. Zhong, L. Zhai, Why users contribute knowledge to online communities: an empirical study of an online social Q&a community, Inf. Manag. 52 (7) (2015) 840–849.

[37]

A. Bandura, R.H. Walters, Social Learning Theory, vol. 1, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1977.

[38]

C.M. Cheung, I.L. Liu, M.K. Lee, How online social interactions influence customer information contribution behavior in online social shopping communities: a social learning theory perspective, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66 (12) (2015) 2511–2521.

[39]

G.A. Akerlof, The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism, in: Uncertainty in Economics, Academic Press, 1978, pp. 235–251.

[40]

J. Zhang, The sound of silence: observational learning in the US kidney market, Mark. Sci. 29 (2) (2010) 315–335.

[41]

G.Z. Jin, A. Kato, Price, quality, and reputation: evidence from an online field experiment, RAND J. Econ. 37 (4) (2006) 983–1005.

[42]

C.M. Cheung, D.R. Thadani, The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: a literature analysis and integrative model, Decis. Support. Syst. 54 (1) (2012) 461–470.

Digital Library

[43]

R.E. Petty, J.T. Cacioppo, R. Goldman, Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 41 (5) (1981) 847–855.

[44]

R.E. Petty, J.T. Cacioppo, The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion, in: Communication and Persuasion, Springer, New York, NY, 1986, pp. 1–24.

[45]

A. Bhattacherjee, C. Sanford, Influence processes for information technology acceptance: an elaboration likelihood model, MIS Q. 30 (4) (2006) 805–825.

[46]

D. Cyr, M. Head, E. Lim, A. Stibe, Using the elaboration likelihood model to examine online persuasion through website design, Inf. Manag. 55 (7) (2018) 807–821.

[47]

Y.Y. Mun, J.J. Yoon, J.M. Davis, T. Lee, Untangling the antecedents of initial trust in web-based health information: the roles of argument quality, source expertise, and user perceptions of information quality and risk, Decis. Support. Syst. 55 (1) (2013) 284–295.

[48]

K.Z. Zhang, S.J. Zhao, C.M. Cheung, M.K. Lee, Examining the influence of online reviews on consumers’ decision-making: a heuristic–systematic model, Decis. Support. Syst. 67 (2014) 78–89.

Digital Library

[49]

S.P. Eslami, M. Ghasemaghaei, K. Hassanein, Understanding consumer engagement in social media: the role of product lifecycle, Decis. Support. Syst. 113707 (2021).

[50]

W. Duan, B. Gu, A.B. Whinston, Informational cascades and software adoption on the internet: an empirical investigation, MIS Q. 33 (1) (2009) 23–48.

[51]

J. Gu, Y.C. Xu, H. Xu, C. Zhang, H. Ling, Privacy concerns for mobile app download: an elaboration likelihood model perspective, Decis. Support. Syst. 94 (2017) 19–28.

Digital Library

[52]

M.T. Lee, C. Theokary, The superstar social media influencer: exploiting linguistic style and emotional contagion over content?, J. Bus. Res. 132 (2021) 860–871.

[53]

M. Brucks, V.A. Zeithaml, G. Naylor, Price and brand name as indicators of quality dimensions for consumer durables, J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 28 (3) (2000) 359–374.

[54]

Y.C. Xu, S. Cai, H.W. Kim, Cue consistency and page value perception: implications for web-based catalog design, Inf. Manag. 50 (1) (2013) 33–42.

[55]

R.S. Wyer Jr., Information redundancy, inconsistency, and novelty and their role in impression formation, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 6 (1) (1970) 111–127.

[56]

J.R. Bettman, M.F. Luce, J.W. Payne, Constructive consumer choice processes, J. Consum. Res. 25 (3) (1998) 187–217.

[57]

Y. Goldberg, O. Levy, Word2vec explained: deriving Mikolov et al.’s negative-sampling word-embedding method, arXiv (2014) preprint arXiv: 1402.3722.

[58]

J.J. Schlesselman, Case-Control Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis, vol. 2, Oxford University Press, 1982.

[59]

M.H. Gail, J.H. Lubin, L.V. Rubinstein, Likelihood calculations for matched case-control studies and survival studies with tied death times, Biometrika 68 (3) (1981) 703–707.

[60]

J.A. Logan, A multivariate model for mobility tables, Am. J. Sociol. 89 (2) (1983) 324–349.

[61]

T.M. Therneau, P.M. Grambsch, Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model, Springer, New York, 2000, ISBN 0–387–98784-3. Accessed August 20, 2022.

[62]

R.Y. Du, W.A. Kamakura, Measuring contagion in the diffusion of consumer packaged goods, J. Mark. Res. 48 (1) (2011) 28–47.

[63]

Therneau, T.M. (2021): A Package for Survival Analysis in R. R package version 3.2-13. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival.

[64]

B. Bollinger, K. Gillingham, Peer effects in the diffusion of solar photovoltaic panels, Mark. Sci. 31 (6) (2012) 900–912.

[65]

S. Narayanan, H.S. Nair, Estimating causal installed-base effects: a bias-correction approach, J. Mark. Res. 50 (1) (2013) 70–94.

[66]

V. Narayan, V.R. Rao, C. Saunders, How peer influence affects attribute preferences: a bayesian updating mechanism, Mark. Sci. 30 (2) (2011) 368–384.

[67]

W.H. Bommer, E.W. Miles, S.L. Grover, Does one good turn deserve another? Coworker influences on employee citizenship, J. Organiz. Behav. Int. J. Industr. Occup. Organiz. Psychol. Behav. 24 (2) (2003) 181–196.

[68]

R. Takeuchi, S. Yun, K.F.E. Wong, Social influence of a coworker: a test of the effect of employee and coworker exchange ideologies on employees’ exchange qualities, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 115 (2) (2011) 226–237.

[69]

M. Sherif, A study of some social factors in perception, Arch. Psychol. 27 (187) (1935) 23–46.

[70]

S.E. Asch, H. Guetzkow, Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments, in: Robert W. Allen (Ed.), Organizational Influence Processes, Sharpe, Inc., M. E, 1951, pp. 295–303.

[71]

J.C. Wimbush, The effect of cognitive moral development and supervisory influence on subordinates’ ethical behavior, J. Bus. Ethics 18 (4) (1999) 383–395.

[72]

J.A. Chevalier, D. Mayzlin, The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews, J. Mark. Res. 43 (3) (2006) 345–354.

[73]

W.W. Moe, D.A. Schweidel, Online product opinions: incidence, evaluation, and evolution, Mark. Sci. 31 (3) (2012) 372–386.

[74]

A. Lambrecht, C. Tucker, C. Wiertz, Advertising to early trend propagators: evidence from twitter, Mark. Sci. 37 (2) (2018) 177–199.

Recommendations

Problem restructuring for better decision making in recurring decision situations

This paper proposes the use of restructuring information about choices to improve the performance of computer agents on recurring sequentially dependent decisions. The intended situations of use for the restructuring methods it defines are website ...
The Influence of Corporate Culture on Corporate Wellness Program Participation
Information Technology Process Improvement Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study from the Perspective of Process Owners and Process Manager

This article is derived from a qualitative multicase study with two settings that explored the way decisions are made in two IT organizations regarding process improvement initiatives by using face-to-face semi-structured interviews with 20 IT process ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Decision Support Systems

Decision Support Systems Volume 171, Issue C

Aug 2023

104 pages

ISSN:0167-9236

Issue’s Table of Contents

Elsevier B.V.

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 August 2023

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

0
Total Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents