Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

A new last aggregation fuzzy compromise solution approach for evaluating sustainable third-party reverse logistics providers with an application to food industry

Published: 15 April 2023 Publication History

Highlights

Proposing a new last aggregation fuzzy compromise solution for evaluating 3PRLPs.
Applying a fuzzy-BWM method for addressing weights of sustainable criteria.
Presenting a fuzzy group compromise solution method via new index for DMs weights.
Presenting a new DM-independent ranking index.
Implementing the proposed decision approach to a real case study in food industry.

Abstract

In today’s world, reverse logistics (RLs) activities have become increasingly crucial for companies looking for improved customer service, cost reduction, and sustainability perspectives. Limited resources, and insufficient technology and knowledge, have led manufacturing firms to cooperate with professional RL providers. However, evaluating the right third-party reverse logistics providers (3PRLPs) is a complex, uncertain multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem, which is affected by many conflicting qualifications, the complexity of the human mind, and imprecise and uncertain information. This paper aims to introduce a novel framework that integrates fuzzy best worst method (BWM) and a new last aggregation fuzzy compromise solution for providing systematic decision support for organizations to select the most preferred partner. The reasons behind choosing both methods in an integrated way are that; the fuzzy BWM requires a smaller number of comparisons but can provide more reliable weights due to consistent criteria comparisons. Furthermore, the approaches based on compromise solutions are powerful decision-making tools because a compromise solution is a more feasible solution closest to the ideal that can be efficient in selecting the best alternative in the presence of conflicting decision criteria. Therefore, the fuzzy BWM approach is utilized to investigate the performance criteria of the 3PRLPs from economic, environmental, and social aspects of sustainability as well as risk factor. Expert weights and the preferences of sustainable 3PRLPs are then calculated simultaneously using a new last aggregation fuzzy compromise solution. Compared with the available literature, the proposed framework considers all possible sustainable criteria along with risk factor, which offers greater flexibility for experts to articulate their evaluations. In addition, the last aggregation fuzzy method eliminates distortion and loss of information and allows decision-makers to control the outcome’s precision. Moreover, the applicability of the proposed method is numerically demonstrated by developing a decision-support tool for the food industry. Sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis further illustrate the flexibility and practicability of proposed framework through which the decision-makers can make more accurate judgments regarding the evaluation of 3PRLPs.

References

[1]
M. Abbasi, F. Nilsson, Developing environmentally sustainable logistics: Exploring themes and challenges from a logistics service providers’ perspective, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 46 (2016) 273–283.
[2]
S. Agrawal, R.K. Singh, Q. Murtaza, Disposition decisions in reverse logistics: Graph theory and matrix approach, Journal of Cleaner Production 137 (2016) 93–104.
[3]
A. Aguezzoul, Third-party logistics selection problem: A literature review on criteria and methods, Omega 49 (2014) 69–78.
[4]
E. Aktas, B. Agaran, F. Ulengin, S. Onsel, The use of outsourcing logistics activities: The case of turkey, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 19 (5) (2011) 833–852.
[5]
A. Awasthi, G. Kannan, Green supplier development program selection using NGT and VIKOR under fuzzy environment, Computers and Industrial Engineering 91 (2016) 100–108.
[6]
M. Azadi, R.F. Saen, A new chance-constrained data envelopment analysis for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers in the existence of dual-role factors, Expert Systems with applications 38 (10) (2011) 12231–12236.
[7]
C. Bai, J. Sarkis, Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies, International Journal of Production Economics 124 (1) (2010) 252–264.
[8]
C. Bai, J. Sarkis, Integrating and extending data and decision tools for sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider selection, Computers and Operations Research 110 (2019) 188–207.
[9]
A. Bianchini, 3PL provider selection by AHP and TOPSIS methodology, Benchmarking: An International Journal 25 (1) (2018) 235–252.
[10]
M. Bouzon, K. Govindan, C.M.T. Rodriguez, L.M. Campos, Identification and analysis of reverse logistics barriers using fuzzy Delphi method and AHP, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 108 (2016) 182–197.
[11]
S. Boyson, T. Corsi, M. Dresner, E. Rabinovich, Managing effective third-party logistics relationships: What does it take, Journal of Business Logistics 20 (1) (1999) 73–100.
[12]
C.R. Carter, D.S. Rogers, A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 38 (5) (2008) 360–387.
[13]
C.W. Chang, C.R. Wu, C.T. Lin, H.C. Chen, An application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for selecting the best slicing machine, Computers & Industrial Engineering 52 (2) (2007) 296–307.
[14]
S.J. Chen, S.M. Chen, Fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 11 (1) (2003) 45–56.
[15]
Z.S. Chen, X. Zhang, K. Govindan, X.J. Wang, K.S. Chin, Third-party reverse logistics provider selection: A computational semantic analysis-based multi-perspective multi-attribute decision-making approach, Expert Systems with Applications 166 (2021).
[16]
Y.H. Cheng, F. Lee, Outsourcing reverse logistics of high-tech manufacturing firms by using a systematic decision-making approach: TFT-LCD sector in Taiwan, Industrial Marketing Management 39 (7) (2010) 1111–1119.
[17]
J.K. Cochran, B. Ramanujam, Carrier-mode logistics optimization of inbound supply chains for electronics manufacturing, International Journal of Production Economics 103 (2) (2006) 826–840.
[18]
E.M. Da Silva, M.O. Ramos, A. Alexander, C.J.C. Jabbour, A systematic review of empirical and normative decision analysis of sustainability-related supplier risk management, Journal of Cleaner Production 244 (2020).
[19]
J.L. Da Silveira Guimaraes, V.A.P. Salomon, ANP applied to the evaluation of performance indicators of reverse logistics in footwear industry, Procedia Computer Science 55 (2015) 139–148.
[20]
Y. Dou, J. Sarkis, A joint location and outsourcing sustainability analysis for a strategic offshoring decision, International Journal of Production Research 48 (2) (2010) 567–592.
[21]
S. Ebrahimnejad, S.M. Mousavi, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, M. Heydar, Risk ranking in mega projects by fuzzy compromise approach: A comparative analysis, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 26 (2) (2014) 949–959.
[22]
P. Evangelista, S. Durst, Knowledge management in environmental sustainability practices of third-party logistics service providers, Vine 45 (4) (2015) 509–529.
[23]
A. Eydi, S. Rastgar, A DEA model with dual-role factors and fuzzy data for selecting third-party reverse logistics provider, case study: Hospital waste collection, Ain Shams Engineering Journal 13 (2) (2022).
[24]
R. Farzipoor Saen, A mathematical model for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers, International Journal of Procurement Management 2 (2) (2009) 180–190.
[25]
H. Göl, B. Çatay, Third-party logistics provider selection: Insights from a Turkish automotive company, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12 (6) (2007) 379–384.
[26]
K. Gopalakrishnan, Y.Y. Yusuf, A. Musa, T. Abubakar, H.M. Ambursa, Sustainable supply chain management: A case study of British Aerospace (BAe) Systems, International Journal of Production Economics 140 (1) (2012) 193–203.
[27]
K. Govindan, M. Bouzon, From a literature review to a multi-perspective framework for reverse logistics barriers and drivers, Journal of Cleaner Production 187 (2018) 318–337.
[28]
K. Govindan, V. Agarwal, J.D. Darbari, P.C. Jha, An integrated decision making model for the selection of sustainable forward and reverse logistic providers, Annals of Operations Research 273 (1–2) (2017) 607–650.
[29]
K. Govindan, V. Agarwal, J.D. Darbari, P.C. Jha, An integrated decision making model for the selection of sustainable forward and reverse logistic providers, Annals of Operations Research 273 (1) (2019) 607–650.
[30]
K. Govindan, P.C. Jha, V. Agarwal, J.D. Darbari, Environmental management partner selection for reverse supply chain collaboration: A sustainable approach, Journal of Environmental Management 236 (2019) 784–797.
[31]
K. Govindan, M. Kadziński, R. Ehling, G. Miebs, Selection of a sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider based on the robustness analysis of an outranking graph kernel conducted with ELECTRE I and SMAA, Omega 85 (2019) 1–15.
[32]
K. Govindan, R. Khodaverdi, A. Jafarian, A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach, Journal of Cleaner production 47 (2013) 345–354.
[33]
K. Govindan, M. Palaniappan, Q. Zhu, D. Kannan, Analysis of third party reverse logistics provider using interpretive structural modeling, International Journal of Production Economics 140 (1) (2012) 204–211.
[34]
K. Govindan, S. Rajendran, J. Sarkis, P. Murugesan, Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review, Journal of Cleaner Production 98 (2015) 66–83.
[35]
K. Govindan, J. Sarkis, M. Palaniappan, An analytic network process-based multi criteria decision making model for a reverse supply chain, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 68 (1–4) (2013) 863–880.
[36]
K. Govindan, H. Soleimani, D. Kannan, Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future, European Journal of Operational Research 240 (3) (2015) 603–626.
[37]
J.H. Grimm, J.S. Hofstetter, J. Sarkis, Critical factors for sub-supplier management: A sustainable food supply chains perspective, International Journal of Production Economics 152 (2014) 159–173.
[38]
P. Guarnieri, V.A. Sobreiro, M.S. Nagano, A.L.M. Serrano, The challenge of selecting and evaluating third-party reverse logistics providers in a multicriteria perspective: A Brazilian case, Journal of Cleaner Production 96 (2015) 209–219.
[39]
S. Guo, H. Zhao, Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications, Knowledge-Based Systems 121 (2017) 23–31.
[40]
H. Hashemi, S.M. Mousavi, E.K. Zavadskas, A. Chalekaee, Z. Turskis, A new group decision model based on grey-intuitionistic fuzzy-ELECTRE and VIKOR for contractor assessment problem, Sustainability 10 (5) (2018) 1635.
[41]
S.H. Hashemi, A. Karimi, M. Tavana, An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis, International Journal of Production Economics 159 (2015) 178–191.
[42]
Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., & Hoskisson, R.E., (2019). Strategic management: Concepts and cases: Competitiveness and globalization. Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-1305502208.
[43]
J.T. Hsueh, C.Y. Lin, Constructing a network model to rank the optimal strategy for implementing the sorting process in reverse logistics: Case study of photovoltaic industry, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 17 (1) (2015) 155–174.
[44]
Z. Hu, V. Parwani, G. Hu, Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Design under Uncertainties Using Fuzzy Decision Making, Logistics 5 (1) (2021) 15.
[45]
C.L. Hwang, K. Yoon, Methods for multiple attribute decision making, in: Multiple attribute decision making, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1981, pp. 58–191.
[46]
M.A. Ilgin, An integrated methodology for the used product selection problem faced by third-party reverse logistics providers, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 10 (6) (2017) 399–410.
[47]
V. Jain, S.A. Khan, Application of AHP in reverse logistics service provider selection: A case study, International Journal of Business Innovation and Research 12 (1) (2017) 94–119.
[48]
A. Jayant, P. Gupta, S.K. Garg, M. Khan, TOPSIS-AHP based approach for selection of reverse logistics service provider: A case study of mobile phone industry, Procedia Engineering 97 (2014) 2147–2156.
[49]
A. Jayant, S. Singh, T. Walke, A Robust Hybrid Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approach for Selection of Third-Party Reverse Logistics Service Provider, in: Advances in Production and Industrial Engineering, Springer, Singapore, 2021, pp. 423–443.
[50]
T. Jeon, I. Paek, Design and verification of the LQR controller based on fuzzy logic for large wind turbine, Energies 14 (1) (2021) 230.
[51]
Kafa, N., Hani, Y., & Mhamedi, A.E., (2014), September. A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating sustainability performance of third–party reverse logistics providers. In IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 270-277.
[52]
D. Kannan, A.B.L. De Sousa Jabbour, C.J.C. Jabbour, Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company, European Journal of Operational Research 233 (2) (2014) 432–447.
[53]
K. Kannan, M.L. Praamsma, J.F. Oldi, T. Kunisue, R.K. Sinha, Occurrence of perchlorate in drinking water, groundwater, surface water and human saliva from India, Chemosphere 76 (1) (2009) 22–26.
[54]
M. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M. Amiri, E. Kazimieras Zavadskas, J. Antuchevičienė, Assessment of third-party logistics providers using a CRITIC–WASPAS approach with interval type-2 fuzzy sets, Transport 32 (1) (2017) 66–78.
[55]
S. Khan, A. Haleem, M.I. Khan, January. Assessment of risk in the management of Halal supply chain using fuzzy BWM method. In Supply Chain Forum: An, International Journal 22 (1) (2021) 57–73.
[56]
M. Ko, A. Tiwari, J. Mehnen, A review of soft computing applications in supply chain management, Applied Soft Computing 10 (3) (2010) 661–674.
[57]
R.J. Kuo, Y.C. Wang, F.C. Tien, Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection, Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (12) (2010) 1161–1170.
[58]
A.O. Kuşakcı, B. Ayvaz, E. Cin, N. Aydın, Optimization of reverse logistics network of End of Life Vehicles under fuzzy supply: A case study for Istanbul Metropolitan Area, Journal of Cleaner Production 215 (2019) 1036–1051.
[59]
S. Lambert, D. Riopel, W. Abdul-Kader, A reverse logistics decisions conceptual framework, Computers & Industrial Engineering 61 (3) (2011) 561–581.
[60]
W. Li, H. Wu, M. Jin, M. Lai, Two-stage remanufacturing decision makings considering product life cycle and consumer perception, Journal of Cleaner Production 161 (2017) 581–590.
[61]
Y. Li, D. Kannan, K. Garg, S. Gupta, K. Gandhi, P.C. Jha, Business orientation policy and process analysis evaluation for establishing third party providers of reverse logistics services, Journal of Cleaner Production 182 (2018) 1033–1047.
[62]
Y.L. Li, C.S. Ying, K.S. Chin, H.T. Yang, J. Xu, Third-party reverse logistics provider selection approach based on hybrid-information MCDM and cumulative prospect theory, Journal of Cleaner Production 195 (2018) 573–584.
[63]
F.R. Lima-Junior, L.C.R. Carpinetti, A multicriteria approach based on fuzzy QFD for choosing criteria for supplier selection, Computers & Industrial Engineering 101 (2016) 269–285.
[64]
A. Liu, X. Ji, H. Lu, H. Liu, The selection of 3PRLs on self-service mobile recycling machine: Interval-valued pythagorean hesitant fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria group decision-making, Journal of Cleaner Production 230 (2019) 734–750.
[65]
S. Luthra, K. Govindan, D. Kannan, S.K. Mangla, C.P. Garg, An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains, Journal of Cleaner Production 140 (2017) 1686–1698.
[66]
F. Mafakheri, M. Breton, A. Ghoniem, Supplier selection-order allocation: A two-stage multiple criteria dynamic programming approach, International Journal of Production Economics 132 (1) (2011) 52–57.
[67]
A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, K. Nor, Z. Khalifah, N. Zakwan, A. Valipour, Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications–a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014, Economic Research-Ekonomska istraživanja 28 (1) (2015) 516–571.
[68]
R.K. Mavi, M. Goh, N. Zarbakhshnia, Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 91 (5) (2017) 2401–2418.
[69]
I. McCarthy, A. Anagnostou, The impact of outsourcing on the transaction costs and boundaries of manufacturing, International Journal of Production Economics 88 (1) (2004) 61–71.
[70]
A. Mihi Ramirez, V.J.G. Morales, Improving organisational performance through reverse logistics, Journal of the Operational Research Society 65 (6) (2014) 954–962.
[71]
R. Millen, A. Sohal, P. Dapiran, R. Lieb, L.N. Van Wassenhove, Benchmarking Australian firms’ usage of contract logistics services: A comparison with American and Western European practice, Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology 4 (1) (1997) 34–46.
[72]
A.R. Mishra, P. Rani, K. Pandey, Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC-EDAS approach for the selection of sustainable third-party reverse logistics providers using improved generalized score function, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 13 (1) (2022) 295–311.
[73]
E. Momeni, M. Azadi, R.F. Saen, Measuring the efficiency of third party reverse logistics provider in supply chain by multi objective additive network DEA model, International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 7 (1) (2015) 21–41.
[74]
S.M. Mousavi, F. Jolai, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, A fuzzy stochastic multi-attribute group decision-making approach for selection problems, Group Decision and Negotiation 22 (2) (2013) 207–233.
[75]
S.M. Mousavi, S. Mirdamadi, A. Siadat, J. Dantan, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, An intuitionistic fuzzy grey model for selection problems with an application to the inspection planning in manufacturing firms, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 39 (2015) 157–167.
[76]
S.M. Mousavi, B. Vahdani, S.S. Behzadi, Designing a model of intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR in multi-attribute group decision-making problems, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems 13 (1) (2016) 45–65.
[77]
S. Opricovic, G.H. Tzeng, Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research 156 (2) (2004) 445–455.
[78]
Opricovic, S., (1994). Preference stability of compromise solution in multiple decision making. In XIth International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Coimbra, Portugal.
[79]
S. Opricovic, Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (10) (2011) 12983–12990.
[80]
D. Pamucar, K. Chatterjee, E.K. Zavadskas, Assessment of third-party logistics provider using multi-criteria decision-making approach based on interval rough numbers, Computers and Industrial Engineering 127 (2019) 383–407.
[81]
A. Paul, M.A. Moktadir, S.K. Paul, An innovative decision-making framework for evaluating transportation service providers based on sustainable criteria, International Journal of Production Research 58 (24) (2020) 7334–7352.
[82]
S. Perçin, An integrated fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy AD approach for outsourcing provider selection, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 30 (2) (2019) 531–552.
[83]
H. Prajapati, R. Kant, R. Shankar, Bequeath life to death: State-of-art review on reverse logistics, Journal of Cleaner Production 211 (2019) 503–520.
[84]
C. Prakash, M.K. Barua, An analysis of integrated robust hybrid model for third-party reverse logistics partner selection under fuzzy environment, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 108 (2016) 63–81.
[85]
C. Prakash, M.K. Barua, A combined MCDM approach for evaluation and selection of third-party reverse logistics partner for Indian electronics industry, Sustainable Production and Consumption 7 (2016) 66–78.
[86]
V. Ravi, Selection of third-party reverse logistics providers for End-of-Life computers using TOPSIS-AHP based approach, International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management 11 (1) (2012) 24–37.
[87]
J. Rezaei, Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method, Omega 53 (2015) 49–57.
[88]
D.S. Rogers, R.S. Tibben-Lembke, Going backwards: Reverse logistics trends and practices, Pittsburgh, PA, Reverse Logistics Executive Council 2 (1999) 1–6.
[89]
R. Rostamzadeh, A. Esmaeili, H. Sivilevičius, H.B.K. Nobard, A fuzzy decision-making approach for evaluation and selection of third-party reverse logistics provider using fuzzy ARAS, Transport 35 (6) (2020) 635–657.
[90]
R.F. Saen, A new model for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers in the presence of multiple dual-role factors, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 46 (1–4) (2010) 405–410.
[91]
C. Samantra, N.K. Sahu, S. Datta, S.S. Mahapatra, Decision-making in selecting reverse logistics alternative using interval-valued fuzzy sets combined with VIKOR approach, International Journal of Services and Operations Management 14 (2) (2013) 175–196.
[92]
F.J. Santos, H.A. Camargo, Fuzzy systems for multicriteria decision making, CLEI Electronic Journal 13 (3) (2010) 1–8.
[93]
P. Sasikumar, A.N. Haq, Integration of closed loop distribution supply chain network and 3PRLP selection for the case of battery recycling, International Journal of Production Research 49 (11) (2011) 3363–3385.
[94]
K. Selviaridis, M. Spring, Third party logistics: A literature review and research agenda, The International Journal of Logistics Management 18 (1) (2007) 125–150.
[95]
A. Sharafati, M. Haghbin, N.K. Tiwari, S.K. Bhagat, N. Al-Ansari, K.W. Chau, Z.M. Yaseen, Performance evaluation of sediment ejector efficiency using hybrid neuro-fuzzy models, Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 15 (1) (2021) 627–643.
[96]
M. Tavana, M. Zareinejad, D. Di Caprio, M.A. Kaviani, An integrated intuitionistic fuzzy AHP and SWOT method for outsourcing reverse logistics, Applied Soft Computing 40 (2016) 544–557.
[97]
M. Tavana, M. Zareinejad, F.J. Santos-Arteaga, M.A. Kaviani, A conceptual analytic network model for evaluating and selecting third-party reverse logistics providers, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 86 (5) (2016) 1705–1721.
[98]
G. Tian, X. Liu, M. Zhang, Y. Yang, H. Zhang, Y. Lin, …., Z. Li, Selection of take-back pattern of vehicle reverse logistics in China via Grey-DEMATEL and Fuzzy-VIKOR combined method, Journal of Cleaner Production 220 (2019) 1088–1100.
[99]
M.L. Tseng, Green supply chain management with linguistic preferences and incomplete information, Applied Soft Computing 11 (8) (2011) 4894–4903.
[100]
S. Turki, C. Sauvey, N. Rezg, Modelling and optimization of a manufacturing/remanufacturing system with storage facility under carbon cap and trade policy, Journal of Cleaner Production 193 (2018) 441–458.
[101]
B. Vahdani, M. Salimi, S.M. Mousavi, A new compromise decision-making model based on TOPSIS and VIKOR for solving multi-objective large-scale programming problems with a block angular structure under uncertainty, International Journal of Engineering Transactions B: Applications 27 (11) (2014) 1673–1680.
[102]
Vahdani, B., Salimi, M., & Mousavi, S.M. (2015). A compromise decision-making model based on VIKOR for multi-objective large-scale nonlinear programming problems with a block angular structure under uncertainty. Scientia Iranica, 22(6), 22571-2584.
[103]
P.J. Van Laarhoven, W. Pedrycz, A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11 (1–3) (1983) 229–241.
[104]
C.N. Wang, T.T. Dang, N.A.T. Nguyen, Outsourcing reverse logistics for e-commerce retailers: A two-stage fuzzy optimization approach, Axioms 10 (1) (2021) 34.
[105]
C. Yang, Q. Wang, M. Pan, J. Hu, W. Peng, J. Zhang, L. Zhang, A linguistic Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy MULTIMOORA method for third-party reverse logistics provider selection of electric vehicle power battery recycling, Expert Systems with Applications 198 (2022).
[106]
M. Yazdani, P. Zarate, E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems, Management Decision 57 (2019) 2501–2519.
[107]
A.E. Youssef, An integrated MCDM approach for cloud service selection based on TOPSIS and BWM, IEEE Access 8 (2020) 71851–71865.
[108]
H. Yu, W.D. Solvang, Incorporating flexible capacity in the planning of a multi-product multi-echelon sustainable reverse logistics network under uncertainty, Journal of Cleaner Production 198 (2018) 285–303.
[109]
Z. Yue, An avoiding information loss approach to group decision making, Applied Mathematical Modeling 37 (1–2) (2013) 112–126.
[110]
L.A. Zadeh, The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I, Information Sciences 8 (3) (1975) 199–249.
[111]
N. Zarbakhshnia, H. Soleimani, H. Ghaderi, Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider evaluation and selection using fuzzy SWARA and developed fuzzy COPRAS in the presence of risk criteria, Applied Soft Computing 65 (2018) 307–319.
[112]
N. Zarbakhshnia, Y. Wu, K. Govindan, H. Soleimani, A novel hybrid multiple attribute decision-making approach for outsourcing sustainable reverse logistics, Journal of Cleaner Production 242 (2020).
[113]
M. Zareinejad, H. Javanmard, I. Arak, Evaluation and selection of a third-party reverse logistics provider using ANP and IFG-MCDM methodology, Life Science Journal 10 (6s) (2013) 350–355.
[114]
M.E. Zayed, J. Zhao, W. Li, A.H. Elsheikh, M. Abd Elaziz, A hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system integrated with equilibrium optimizer algorithm for predicting the energetic performance of solar dish collector, Energy 235 (2021).
[115]
G. Zhang, J. Shang, W. Li, An information granulation entropy-based model for third-party logistics providers evaluation, International Journal of Production Research 50 (1) (2012) 177–190.
[116]
R. Zhang, H. Zhang, B. Liu, Selection of reverse logistics servicer for electronic products with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, Grey Systems: Theory and Application 2 (2) (2012) 207–216.
[117]
X. Zhang, Z. Li, Y. Wang, A review of the criteria and methods of reverse logistics supplier selection, Processes 8 (6) (2020) 705.

Index Terms

  1. A new last aggregation fuzzy compromise solution approach for evaluating sustainable third-party reverse logistics providers with an application to food industry
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
          Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal  Volume 216, Issue C
          Apr 2023
          1126 pages

          Publisher

          Pergamon Press, Inc.

          United States

          Publication History

          Published: 15 April 2023

          Author Tags

          1. Third-party reverse logistics providers
          2. Sustainable supply chain management
          3. Multi-criteria decision making
          4. Fuzzy sets
          5. Fuzzy best-worst method
          6. Fuzzy extended VIKOR method

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • 0
            Total Citations
          • 0
            Total Downloads
          • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
          Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          View Options

          View options

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media