research-article

Effects of temporal features and product image zooming in online time scarcity deals: : A construal fit account

Authors:

Candy K. Y. Ho,

Weiling KeAuthors Info & Claims

Volume 61, Issue 7

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2024.104019

Published: 01 November 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Time scarcity deals, which offer time-limited discounts, are prevalent in online shopping. These deals have two temporal aspects: deal time and lead time. Deal time, the remaining duration before the discount expires, signals scarcity and enhances the deal's appeal. In contrast, lead time, the delay between purchase and receipt/consumption, postpones gratification and diminishes the deal's attractiveness. This study proposes that as deal time and lead time fluctuate, they progressively bring consumers psychologically closer to the act of purchase/consumption. Drawing on construal level theory, we contend that firms can use image zooming as a digital tool to generate product images at various zoom levels and align with the psychological distances induced by deal time or lead time throughout the deal's availability. This strategy amplifies the positive effects of deal time and mitigates the negative impacts of lead time. Our research model is validated by data from three experiments. We discovered that (1) product image zooming affects consumers’ psychological proximity to an online deal; (2) when a deal with a short (long) deal/lead time is paired with a zoom-in (zoom-out) product image, deal evaluation and purchase intention increase; and (3) these effects are mediated by consumers’ “feeling right” experience during deal evaluation, which arises from a match between the construal levels prompted by the temporal feature and the product image. Theoretical contributions and managerial implications are discussed.

References

[1]

R.B. Cialdini, Influence: The psychology of Persuasion, Harper Collins, 2007.

[2]

J. Hmurovic, C. Lamberton, K. Goldsmith, Examining the Efficacy of Time Scarcity Marketing Promotions in Online Retail, Journal of Marketing Research 60 (2) (2023) 299–328.

[3]

E. Levenbach, Zulily Case Study, Opinion Stage (2022) https://www.opinionstage.com/blog/zulily-case-study/ Accessed 14 June, 2024.

[4]

R. Iyengar, C. Van den Bulte, T.W. Valente, Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion, Marketing Science 30 (2) (2011) 195–212.

[5]

B. Jing, Social learning and dynamic pricing of durable goods, Marketing Science 30 (5) (2011) 851–865.

[6]

Y. Liu, Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue, J. Mark. 70 (3) (2006) 74–89.

[7]

X. Luo, M. Andrews, Z. Fang, C.W. Phang, Mobile targeting, Management Science 60 (7) (2014) 1738–1756.

Digital Library

[8]

Ubal, V., & Canayaz, K. (2023). The decline of limited-time offer effectiveness [e-commerce trends]. https://www.ama.org/2023/11/08/limited-time-offers-are-a-marketing-mainstay-but-online-consumers-arent-interested/. American Marketing Association. Accessed 14 June, 2024.

[9]

M.L. Roehm, H.A. Roehm, The influence of redemption time frame on responses to incentives, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 39 (2011) 363–375.

[10]

Y. Trope, N. Liberman, Temporal construal, Psychol. Rev. 110 (3) (2003) 403–421.

[11]

Y. Trope, N. Liberman, Construal-level theory of psychological distance, Psychol. Rev. 117 (2) (2010) 440–463.

[12]

T. Jai, M.W. O'Boyle, D. Fang, Neural correlates of sensory-enabling presentation: An fMRI study of image zooming and rotation video effects on online apparel shopping, Journal of Consumer Behavior 13 (5) (2014) 342–350.

[13]

H. Kim, S.J. Lennon, E-atmosphere, emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 14 (3) (2010) 412–428.

[14]

S.S. Sundar, S. Bellur, J. Oh, Q. Xu, H. Jia, User experience of on-screen interaction techniques: An experimental investigation of clicking, sliding, zooming, hovering, dragging, and flipping, Hum. Comput. Interact. 29 (2014) 109–152.

[15]

P. Aggarwal, R. Vaidyanathan, Use it or lose it: Purchase acceleration effects of time-limited promotions, Journal of Consumer Behaviour 2 (4) (2003) 393–403.

[16]

J. Inman, L. McAlister, Do coupon expiration dates affect consumer behavior?, Journal of Marketing Research 31 (3) (1994) 423–428.

[17]

K.S. Coulter, A. Roggeveen, Deal or no deal? How number of buyers, purchase limit, and time-to-expiration impact purchase decisions on group buying websites, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 6 (2) (2012) 78–95.

[18]

N. Schwarz, G.L. Clore, Mood as information: 20 years later, Psychol. Inq. 14 (3-4) (2003) 296–303.

[19]

T. Song, C. Yi, J. Huang, Whose recommendations do you follow? An investigation of tie strength, shopping stage, and deal scarcity, Information & Management 54 (8) (2017) 1072–1083.

[20]

R.E. Petty, J.T. Cacioppo, The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion, Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 19 (1986) 123–205.

[21]

K.B. Monroe, Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002.

[22]

T. Bornemann, C. Homburg, Psychological distance and the dual role of price, Journal of Consumer Research 38 (3) (2011) 490–504.

[23]

L. Lee, C.I. Tsai, How price promotions influence postpurchase consumption experience over time, Journal of Consumer Research 40 (5) (2014) 943–959.

[24]

J. Dewey, How We Think, Heath and Company, 1910.

[25]

J.F. Engel, D.T. Kollat, R.D. Blackwell, Consumer Behavior, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.

[26]

R. Hamilton, A. Chernev, The impact of product line extensions and consumer goals on the formation of price image, Journal of Marketing Research 47 (1) (2010) 51–62,.

[27]

A. Humphreys, M.S. Isaac, R.J.H. Wang, Construal Matching in Online Search: Applying Text Analysis to Illuminate the Consumer Decision Journey, Journal of Marketing Research 58 (6) (2021) 1101–1119.

[28]

A.S. Kelton, R.R. Pennington, B.M. Tuttle, The effects of information presentation format on judgment and decision making: A review of the information systems research, Journal of Information Systems 24 (2) (2010) 79–105.

[29]

Y. Ha, W. Kwon, S.J. Lennon, Online visual merchandising (VMD) of apparel web sites, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 11 (4) (2007) 477–493.

[30]

Adobe Scene7. (2010). Adobe Scene7 viewer study: What shoppers want.

[31]

N.H. Lurie, C.H. Mason, Visual representation: Implications for decision making, J. Mark. 71 (1) (2007) 160–177.

[32]

Z. Jiang, I. Benbasat, Virtual product experience : Effects of visual and functional control of products on perceived diagnosticity and flow in electronic shopping, Journal of Management Information Systems 21 (3) (2005) 111–147.

[33]

N. Schwarz, Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making, Journal of Consumer Psychology 14 (4) (2004) 332–348.

[34]

N. Liberman, Y. Trope, The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75 (1) (1998) 5–18.

[35]

N. Liberman, M.D. Sagristano, Y. Trope, The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38 (6) (2002) 523–534.

[36]

S.A. Malkoc, G. Zauberman, C. Ulu, Consuming now or later? The interactive effect of timing and attribute alignability, Psychol. Sci. 16 (5) (2005) 411–417.

[37]

E. Stephan, N. Liberman, Y. Trope, Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 98 (2) (2010) 268–280.

[38]

C.W. Phang, A. Kankanhalli, B.C.Y. Tan, What Motivates Contributors vs. Lurkers? An Investigation of Online Feedback Forums, Information Systems Research 26 (4) (2015) 773–792.

[39]

S.W. Schuetz, P.B. Lowry, D.A. Pienta, J.B. Thatcher, Improving the Design of Information Security Messages by Leveraging the Effects of Temporal Distance and Argument Nature, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 22 (5) (2021) 1376–1428.

[40]

C.F. Köhler, E. Breugelmans, B.G.C. Dellaert, Consumer acceptance of recommendations by interactive decision aids: The joint role of temporal distance and concrete versus abstract communications, Journal of Management Information Systems 27 (4) (2011) 231–260.

[41]

J. Wu, H. Zhao, H. Chen, Coupons or free shipping? Effects of price promotion strategies on online review ratings, Information Systems Research 32 (2) (2021) 633–652.

[42]

L. Huang, C.H. Tan, W. Ke, K.K. Wei, Helpfulness of online review content: The moderating effects of temporal and social cues, Journal of Association for Information Systems 19 (6) (2018) 503–522.

[43]

C.H. Peng, D. Yin, H. Zhang, More than Words in Medical Question-and-Answer Sites: A Content-Context Congruence Perspective, Information Systems Research 31 (3) (2020) 913–928.

Digital Library

[44]

L. Shmueli, I. Benbasat, R.T. Cenfetelli, A construal-level approach to persuasion by personalization, in: ICIS 2016 Proceedings, 2016, p. 7.

[45]

A. Kankanhalli, H.(Jonathan) Ye, H.H. Teo, Comparing Potential and Actual Innovators: An Empirical Study of Mobile Data Services Innovation, MIS Quarterly 39 (3) (2015) 667–682.

[46]

K.Y.C. Ho, W. Ke, H. Liu, Choice decision of e-learning system: Implications from construal level theory, Information and Management 52 (2) (2015) 160–169.

[47]

K.Y.C. Ho, W. Ke, H. Liu, P.Y.K. Chau, Separate versus joint evaluation: The roles of evaluation mode and construal level in technology adoption, MIS Quarterly 44 (2) (2020) 725–746.

[48]

C. Wendt, D. Werner, M. Adam, A. Benlian, Influencing crowding at locations with decision support systems: The role of information timeliness and location recommendations, Decis. Support. Syst. 160 (2022) Article 113817.

[49]

N. Benschop, C.A.R. Hilhorst, A.L.P. Nuijten, M. Keil, Detection of early warning signals for overruns in IS projects: linguistic analysis of business case language, European Journal of Information Systems 29 (2) (2020) 190–202.

[50]

J.S. Lee, M. Keil, E. Shalev, Seeing the trees or the forest? The effect of IT project managers’ mental construal on IT project risk management activities, Information Systems Research 30 (3) (2019) 1051–1072.

[51]

S.W. Schuetz, P. Benjamin Lowry, D.A. Pienta, J. Bennett Thatcher, The effectiveness of abstract versus concrete fear appeals in information security, Journal of Management Information Systems 37 (3) (2020) 723–757,.

[52]

K.K. Lee, M. Zhao, The Effect of Price on Preference Consistency over Time, Journal of Consumer Research 41 (1) (2014) 109–118,.

[53]

M. Zhao, S. Hoeffler, G. Zauberman, Mental simulation and preference consistency over time: The role of process- versus outcome-focused thoughts, Journal of Marketing Research 44 (3) (2007) 379–388,.

[54]

H. Kim, A.R. Rao, A.Y. Lee, It's time to vote: The effect of matching message orientation and temporal frame on political persuasion, Journal of Consumer Research 35 (6) (2009) 877–889.

[55]

D. Dubois, A. Bonezzi, M. De Angelis, Sharing with Friends versus Strangers: How Interpersonal Closeness Influences Word-of-Mouth Valence, Journal of Marketing Research 53 (5) (2016) 712–727,.

[56]

M. Zhao, J. Xie, Effects of social and temporal distance on consumers’ responses to peer recommendations, Journal of Marketing Research 48 (3) (2011) 486–496.

[57]

S. Edwards, J. Lee, C. Ferle, Does place matter when shopping online? Perceptions of similarity and familiarity as indicators of psychological distance, Journal of Interactive Advertising 10 (2009) 35–50,.

[58]

E. Emmert, Grössenverhältnisse der Nachbilder, Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 19 (1881) 443–450.

[59]

R.L. Gregory, On how so little information controls so much behaviour, in: A.T. Welford, L. Houssiadas (Eds.), Contemporary Problems in Perception, Taylor & Francis, 1970, pp. 25–35.

[60]

M. Mon-Williams, J.R. Tresilian, The size-distance paradox is a cognitive phenomenon, Exp. Brain Res. 126 (4) (1999) 578–582.

[61]

C.J. Wakslak, The where and when of likely and unlikely events, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 117 (2012) 150–157.

[62]

D. Yan, Future events are far away: Exploring the distance-on-distance effect, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 106 (4) (2014) 514–525.

[63]

S.J. Maglio, Y. Trope, N. Liberman, Distance from a distance: Psychological distance reduces sensitivity to any further psychological distance, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142 (3) (2013) 644–657.

[64]

S.J. Maglio, E. Polman, Spatial orientation shrinks and expands psychological distance, Psychol. Sci. 25 (7) (2014) 1345–1352.

[65]

M. Zhang, J. Wang, Psychological distance asymmetry: The spatial dimension vs. other dimensions, Journal of Consumer Psychology 19 (3) (2009) 497–507.

[66]

Y. Bar-Anan, N. Liberman, Y. Trope, D. Algom, Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136 (4) (2007) 610–622.

[67]

J. Park, W.M. Hedgcock, Thinking concretely or abstractly: The influence of fit between goal progress and goal construal on subsequent self-regulation, Journal of Consumer Psychology 26 (3) (2016) 395–409.

[68]

K. White, R. MacDonnell, D.W. Dahl, It's the mindset that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors, Journal of Marketing Research 48 (2011) 472–485.

[69]

Y. Berson, N. Halevy, Hierarchy, leadership, and construal fit, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 20 (3) (2014) 232–246.

[70]

E.T. Higgins, Value from hedonic experience and engagement, Psychol. Rev. 113 (3) (2006) 439–460.

[71]

A.Y. Lee, P.A. Keller, B. Sternthal, Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness, Journal of Consumer Research 36 (5) (2010) 735–747.

[72]

E.W. Wan, J. Hong, B. Sternthal, The effect of regulatory orientation and decision strategy on brand judgments, Journal of Consumer Research 35 (6) (2009) 1026–1038,.

[73]

E.T. Higgins, Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience, in: Higgins E.T., Kruglanski A. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, Guilford, New York, 1996, pp. 133–168.

[74]

R.S. Wyer, T.K. Srull, Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ, 1989.

[75]

E.T. Higgins, L.C. Idson, A.L. Freitas, S. Spiegel, D.C. Molden, Transfer of value from fit, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84 (6) (2003) 1140–1153.

[76]

N. Huang, G. Burtch, Y. Hong, E. Polman, Effects of multiple psychological distances on construal and consumer evaluation: A field study of online reviews, Journal of Consumer Psychology 26 (4) (2016) 474–482.

[77]

E. Amit, D. Algom, Y. Trope, Distance-dependent processing of pictures and words, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138 (3) (2009) 400–415,.

[78]

R.R. Vallacher, D.M. Wegner, Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57 (1989) 660–671.

[79]

K. Kim, M. Zhang, X. Li, Effects of temporal and social distance on consumer evaluations, Journal of Consumer Research 35 (4) (2008) 706–713.

[80]

H.F. Adams, The memory value of mixed sizes of advertisement, J. Exp. Psychol. 2 (6) (1917) 448–465.

[81]

E.K. Strong Jr., The effect of size of advertising and frequency of their presentation, Psychol. Rev. 21 (2) (1914) 136–152.

[82]

C.J. Camacho, E.T. Higgins, L. Luger, Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: What feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84 (3) (2003) 498–510.

[83]

P. Malaviya, B. Sternthal, Parity product features can enhance or dilute brand evaluation: The influence of goal orientation and presentation format, Journal of Consumer Research 36 (1) (2009) 112–121.

[84]

A.F. Hayes, Introduction to mediation, moderation, and Conditional Process analysis: A regression-Based Approach, Guilford Press, 2013.

[85]

Y. Liu, J. Sutanto, Buyers’ purchasing time and herd behavior on deal-of-the-day group-buying websites, Electron. Mark. 22 (2) (2012) 83–93.

[86]

A.S. Lo, J. Wu, R. Law, N. Au, Which promotion time frame works best for restaurant group-buying deals?, Tourism Recreation Research 39 (2) (2014) 203–219.

[87]

X. Li, L. Wu, Herding and social media word-of-mouth: Evidence from Groupon, MIS Quarterly 42 (4) (2018) 1331–1351.

[88]

X. Jing, J. Xie, Group buying: A new mechanism for selling through social interactions, Management Science 57 (8) (2011) 1354–1372.

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Online Product Reviews: Implications for Retailers and Competing Manufacturers

This paper studies the effect of online product reviews on different players in a channel structure. We consider a retailer selling two substitutable products produced by different manufacturers, and the products differ in both their qualities and fits ...
Strategies to Predict E-Commerce Inventory and Order Planning

This study examines the characteristics of a prediction model for businesses in the online marketplace by considering the market trend, prior sales and decision maker's preference on potential demand estimate. With the rapid growth of the electronic ...
Price Promotions and Trade Deals with Multiproduct Retailers

In this paper we study retail price promotions and manufacturer trade deals in markets with multiproduct retailers. We find that in situations where retailers carry more than one competing brand, the promotions across brands can be positively or ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Information and Management

Information and Management Volume 61, Issue 7

Nov 2024

236 pages

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2024.

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2024

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

0
Total Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 04 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents