Orchestrating digital technologies with incumbent enterprise systems for attaining innovation
References
[1]
E.J. Altman, F. Nagle, M.L. Tushman, Innovating without information constraints: organizations, communities, and innovation when information costs approach zero, in: Shalley C., Hitt M., Zhou J. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship: Multilevel Linkages, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2015.
[2]
A. Annarelli, C. Battistella, F. Nonino, V. Parida, E. Pessot, Literature review on digitalization capabilities: Co-citation analysis of antecedents, conceptualization and consequences, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change (166) (2021).
[3]
J.A. Aragon-Correa, S. Sharma, A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy, Acad. Manag. Rev. 28 (1) (2003) 71–88.
[4]
J.G. Avedillo, D. Begonha, A. Peyracchia, Two ways to modernize it systems for the digital era, Insights & Publications, McKinsey & Company, 2015, http://www.mckinsey.com/.
[5]
J.B. Barney, Is the resource-based “View” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes, Acad. Manag. Rev. 26 (1) (2001) 41–56.
[6]
I. Benbasat, D.K. Goldstein, M. Mead, The case study research strategy in studies of information systems, MIS Q. 11 (3) (1987) 369–386.
[7]
C. Bonina, K. Koskinen, B. Eaton, A. Gawer, Digital platforms for development: foundations and research agenda, Inf. Syst. J. 31 (6) (2021) 869–902.
[8]
A. Booth, N. Mohr, P. Peters, The Digital Utility: New Opportunities and Challenges, McKinsey&Company, 2016, http://www.mckinsey.com/.
[9]
S. Brinker, L. McLellan, The rise of the chief marketing technologist, Harv. Bus. Rev. 92 (7) (2014) 82–85.
[10]
E. Brynjolfsson, Wired for Innovation: How Information Technology is Reshaping the Economy, MIT Press, 2011.
[11]
M. Ceccagnoli, C. Forman, P. Huang, D. Wu, Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem: the case of enterprise software, MIS Q. 36 (1) (2012) 263–290.
[12]
A. Chakravarty, R. Grewal, V. Sambamurthy, Information Technology Competencies, Organizational Agility, and Firm Performance: Enabling and Facilitating Roles, Inf. Syst. Res. 24 (4) (2013) 976–997.
[13]
C.M. Chan, S.Y. Teoh, A. Yeow, G. Pan, Agility in responding to disruptive digital innovation: case study of an Sme, Inf. Syst. J. 29 (2) (2019) 436–455.
[14]
T. Ciarli, M. Kenney, S. Massini, L. Piscitello, Digital technologies, innovation, and skills: emerging trajectories and challenges, Res. Policy. 50 (7) (2021).
[15]
R.G. Cooper, Perspective: the stage-gate idea-to-launch process – update, what's new, and Nexgen system, J. Prod. Innovat. Manag. 25 (3) (2008) 213–232.
[16]
J.M. Corbin, A. Strauss, Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria, Qual. Sociol. 13 (1) (1990) 3–21.
[17]
M.M. Crossan, M. Apaydin, A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature, J. Manag. Stud. 47 (6) (2010) 1154–1191.
[18]
M. Cui, S.L. Pan, L. Cui, Developing community capability for E-commerce development in rural China: a resource orchestration perspective, Inf. Syst. J. 29 (4) (2019) 953–988.
[19]
M. Cui, S.L. Pan, S. Newell, L. Cui, Strategy, resource orchestration and e-commerce enabled social innovation in rural China, J. Strategic Inf. Syst. 26 (1) (2017) 3–21.
[20]
R.L. Daft, Organizational Theory and Design, West Publishing, St. Paul, 1995.
[21]
T.H. Davenport, Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system, Harv. Bus. Rev. 76 (4) (1998) 121–131.
[22]
M. Del Giudice, V. Scuotto, A. Papa, S. Tarba, S. Bresciani, M. Warkentin, A self-tuning model for smart manufacturing Smes: effects on digital innovation, J. Prod. Innovat. Manag. 38 (1) (2020) 68–89.
[23]
P. Drijvers, M. Doorman, P. Boon, H. Reed, K. Gravemeijer, The teacher and the tool: instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom, Educ. Stud. Math. 75 (2) (2010) 213–234.
[24]
K.M. Eisenhardt, M.E. Graebener, Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges, Acad. Manag. J. 58 (1) (2007) 25–32.
[25]
G.G. Gable, D. Sedera, T. Chan, Re-conceptualizing information system success: the is-impact measurement model, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 9 (7) (2008) 377–408.
[26]
R. Garcia, R. Calantone, A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review, J. Prod. Innovat. Manag. 19 (2) (2002) 110–132.
[27]
R. Garud, P. Tuertscher, A. Van de ven, Perspectives on innovation processes, Acad. Manag. Annal. 7 (1) (2013) 773–817.
[28]
A. Gawer, Platforms, Markets, and Innovation, Edward Elgar Publishing, Gloucestershire, UK, 2009.
[29]
A. Gawer, Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: toward an integrative framework, Res. Policy. 43 (7) (2014) 1239–1249.
[30]
A. Gawer, M.A. Cusumano, How companies become platform leaders, MIT. Sloan. Manage Rev. 49 (2) (2012) 28–35.
[31]
R. Ghazali, M.N. Ahmad, D. Sedera, N.H. Zakaria, The mediating role of knowledge integration model for enterprise systems success, J. Enterpr. Inf. Manag. (2018).
[32]
K.B. Hendricks, V.R. Singhal, J.K. Stratman, The impact of enterprise systems on corporate performance: a study of Erp, Scm, and Crm system implementations, J. Oper. Manag. 25 (1) (2007) 65–82.
[33]
O. Henfridsson, J. Nandhakumar, H. Scarbrough, N. Panourgias, Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation, Inf. Org. 28 (2) (2018) 89–100.
[34]
D. Henschen, Can sap master cloud & on-premises?, InformationWeek, 2014, www.informationweek.com.
[35]
C. Hickman, C. Raia, Incubating innovation, J. Bus. Strategy 23 (3) (2002) 14–18.
[36]
R. Hornyak, A. Rai, J.Q. Dong, Incumbent system context and job outcomes of effective enterprise system use, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 21 (2) (2020) 364–387.
[37]
K.S. Im, V. Grover, J.T. Teng, Research note-do large firms become smaller by using information technology?, Inf. Syst. Res. 24 (2) (2013) 470–491.
[38]
A. Kharabe, K. Lyytinen, V. Grover, Do Organizational Competencies Influence How Enterprise Systems Foster Organizational Agility?, in: International Conference On Information Systems (ICIS 2013), Milan, Italy, 2013.
[39]
A.A. Kirilenko, A.W. Lo, Moore's law versus murphy's law: algorithmic trading and its discontents, J. Econ. Perspect. 27 (2) (2013) 51–72.
[40]
H.K. Klein, M.D. Myers, A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems, MIS Q. 23 (1) (1999) 67–93.
[41]
R. Kohli, N.P. Melville, Digital innovation: a review and synthesis, Inf. Syst. J. 29 (1) (2019) 200–223.
[42]
R. Kordal, D. Cahoy, S. Minkabo, E. Sherer, Discovery process–R&D lead time needed for innovation, Technol. Transf. Entrepreneur. 3 (1) (2016) 32–39.
[43]
M. Kowalkiewicz, N. Safrudin, B. Schulze, The business consequences of a digitally transformed economy, Shaping the Digital Enterprise, Springer, 2017, pp. 29–67.
[44]
S. Laforet, Organizational innovation outcomes in Smes: effects of age, size, and sector, J. World Bus. (48) (2013) 490–502.
[45]
C. Leong, F.T.C. Tan, B. Tan, F. Faisal, The emancipatory potential of digital entrepreneurship: a study of financial technology-driven inclusive growth, Inf. Manag. 59 (3) (2022).
[46]
M. Li, S. Jia, Resource orchestration for innovation: the dual role of information technology, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage 30 (10) (2018) 1136–1147.
[47]
S. Lokuge, S.X. Duan, Exploring the enablers of digital transformation in small and medium-sized enterprises, in: Rasmussen E.S., Petersen N.H. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Business Model Innovation through Disruption and Digitalization, 2023, pp. 136–156.
[48]
S. Lokuge, D. Sedera, Is your it eco-system ready to facilitate organizational innovation? Deriving an IT Eco-system readiness measurement model, in: International Conference on Information Systems, Dublin, Ireland, AIS, 2016.
[49]
S. Lokuge, D. Sedera, The role of enterprise systems in fostering innovation in contemporary firms, J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. (JITTA) 19 (2) (2018) 7–30.
[50]
S. Lokuge, D. Sedera, Fifty shades of digital innovation: how firms innovate with digital technologies, in: Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Dubai, UAE, AIS, 2020, p. 91.
[51]
S. Lokuge, D. Sedera, V. Grover, D. Xu, Organizational readiness for digital innovation: development and empirical calibration of a construct, Inf. Manag. 56 (3) (2019) 445–461.
[52]
R.F. Lusch, S. Nambisan, Service innovation: a service-dominant (Sd) logic perspective, MIS Q. 39 (1) (2014) 155–175.
[53]
K. Lyytinen, C. Sørensen, D. Tilson, Generativity in digital infrastructures: a research note, in: Galliers R.G., Stein M.-K. (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems, Routledge, Abingdon, United Kingdom, 2017, pp. 253–275.
[54]
L. Markus, C. Tanis, The enterprise systems experience - from adoption to success, in: Zmud R.W. (Ed.), Framing the Domains of It Management: Projecting the Future through the Past, Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 2000, pp. 173–207.
[55]
L.M. Markus, S. Axline, D. Petrie, C. Tanis, Learning from experiences with Erp: problems encountered and success achieved, in: Graeme Shanks P.B.S.a.L.P.W. (Ed.), Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Implementing for Effectiveness, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
[56]
A. McAfee, E. Brynjolfsson, Investing in the it that makes a competitive difference, Harv. Bus. Rev. 86 (7/8) (2008) 98–107.
[57]
S. Nambisan, Information technology and product/service innovation: a brief assessment and some suggestions for future research, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14 (4) (2013) 215–226.
[58]
S. Nambisan, Digital entrepreneurship: toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship, Entrepreneur. Theory Practice 41 (6) (2017) 1029–1055.
[59]
S. Nambisan, R.A. Baron, On the costs of digital entrepreneurship: role conflict, stress, and venture performance in digital platform-based ecosystems, J. Bus. Res. 125 (1) (2021) 520–532.
[60]
S. Nambisan, K. Lyytinen, Y. Yoo, Digital Innovation: Towards a Transdisciplinary Perspective, Handbook of Digital Innovation, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020, pp. 2–12.
[61]
D. Nylén, Digital innovation and changing identities, Swedish Center for Digital Innovation, Department of Informatics, Umea University, Umea, Sweden, 2015.
[62]
D. Nylén, J. Holmström, Digital innovation strategy: a framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation, Bus. Horiz. 58 (1) (2015) 57–67.
[63]
S.L. Pan, B. Tan, Demystifying case research: a structured–pragmatic–situational (Sps) approach to conducting case studies, Inf. Org. 21 (3) (2011) 161–176.
[64]
G. Piccoli, J. Rodriguez, V. Grover, Digital strategic initiatives and digital resources: construct definition and future research directions, MIS Q. 46 (4) (2022) 2289–2316.
[65]
L. Rothschild, A. Darr, Technological incubators and the social construction of innovation networks: an Israeli case study, Technovation 25 (1) (2005) 59–67.
[66]
P.B. Seddon, C. Calvert, S. Yang, A multi-project model of key factors affecting organizational benefits from enterprise systems, MIS Q. 34 (2) (2010) 305–328.
[67]
D. Sedera, S. Lokuge, The role of enterprise systems in innovation in the contemporary organization, in: Galliers R.G., Stein M.-K. (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems, The Routledge, Abingdon, United Kingdom, 2017, p. 608.
[68]
D. Sedera, S. Lokuge, V. Grover, S. Sarker, S. Sarker, Innovating with enterprise systems and digital platforms: a contingent resource-based theory view, Inf. Manag. 53 (3) (2016) 366–379.
[69]
E. Segelod, G. Jordan, The use and importance of external sources of knowledge in the software development process, R&D Manag. 34 (3) (2004) 239–252.
[70]
P.K. Senyo, K. Liu, J. Effah, Digital business ecosystem: literature review and a framework for future research, Int. J. Inf. Manage (47) (2019) 52–64.
[71]
D.G. Sirmon, M. Hitt, R.D. Ireland, Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box, Acad. Manag. Rev. 32 (1) (2007) 273–292.
[72]
D.G. Sirmon, M.A. Hitt, R.D. Ireland, B.A. Gilbert, Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage breadth, depth, and life cycle effects, J. Manage 37 (5) (2011) 1390–1412.
[73]
T. Srivardhana, S.D. Pawlowski, Erp systems as an enabler of sustained business process innovation: a knowledge-based view, J. Strategic Inf. Syst. 16 (1) (2007) 51–69.
[74]
C. Stedman, What's next for Erp?, ComputerWorld 33 (33) (1999) 48–49.
[75]
D.M. Strong, O. Volkoff, Understanding organization–enterprise system fit: a path to theorizing the information technology artifact, MIS Q. 34 (4) (2010) 731–756.
[76]
N.A. Sultan, Reaching for the “Cloud”: how Smes Can Manage, Int. J. Inf. Manage 31 (3) (2011) 272–278.
[77]
R. Sun, S. Gregor, E. Fielt, Generativity and the paradox of stability and flexibility in a platform architecture: a case of the oracle cloud platform, Inf. Manag. 58 (8) (2021).
[78]
F.P. Tajudeen, D. Nadarajah, N.I. Jaafar, A. Sulaiman, The impact of digitalisation vision and information technology on organisations' innovation, Eur. J. Innovat. Manag. 25 (2) (2022) 607–629.
[79]
F.T.C. Tan, D. Ky, B. Tan, Toward a process theory of it-enabled frugal innovation: the role of organizational Bricolage in Koufu Singapore, in: Pacific Asian Conference on Information Systems, Taiwan, AIS, 2016.
[80]
J. Tang, L.G. Pee, J. Iijima, Investigating the effects of business process orientation on organizational innovation performance, Inf. Manag. 50 (8) (2013) 650–660.
[81]
D.J. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strateg. Manage J. 18 (7) (1997) 509–533.
[82]
L. Trouche, Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn. 9 (3) (2004) 281–307.
[83]
A. Urbinati, D. Chiaroni, V. Chiesa, F. Frattini, The role of digital technologies in open innovation processes: an exploratory multiple case study analysis, R&D Manag. 50 (1) (2020) 136–160.
[84]
J.M. Utterback, The process of technological innovation within the firm, Acad. Manag. J. 14 (1) (1971) 75–88.
[85]
A.H. Van de Ven, D. Polley, R. Garud, S. Venkataraman, The Innovation Journey, Oxford University Press, New York, 1999.
[86]
J. Van den Bergh, S. Viaene, Process innovation: redesigning an enterprise backbone system, in: Poels G. (Ed.), Enterprise Information Systems of the Future: 6th Ifip Wg 8.9 Working Conference, Confenis 2012, Ghent, Belgium, September 19-21, 2012, Revised Selected Papers, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 1–17.
[87]
J. Van Lancker, K. Mondelaers, E. Wauters, G. Van Huylenbroeck, The organizational innovation system: a systemic framework for radical innovation at the organizational level, Technovation (52) (2016) 40–50.
[88]
G. Vial, Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda, J. Strategic Inf. Syst. 28 (2) (2019) 118–144.
[89]
J. Vom Brocke, W. Maaß, P. Buxmann, A. Maedche, J.M. Leimeister, G. Pecht, Future work and enterprise systems, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 60 (4) (2018) 357–366.
[90]
D.W. Vorhies, N.A. Morgan, A configuration theory assessment of marketing organization fit with business strategy and its relationship with marketing performance, J. Mark. 67 (1) (2003) 100–115.
[91]
E.L. Wagner, S.V. Scott, R.D. Galliers, The creation of ‘Best Practice’ Software: Myth, Reality and Ethics, Inf. Org. 16 (3) (2006) 251–275.
[92]
G. Walsham, Interpretive case studies in is research: nature and method, Eur. J. Inf. Systems 4 (2) (1995) 74–81.
[93]
R.A. Wolfe, Organizational innovation: review, critique and suggested research directions, The Journal of Management Studies 31 (3) (1994) 405–431.
[94]
L.D. Xu, Enterprise systems: state-of-the-art and future trends, IEEe Trans. Industr. Inform. 7 (4) (2011) 630–640.
[95]
Y. Yoo, The tables have turned: how can the information systems field contribute to technology and innovation management research?, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14 (5) (2013) 227–236.
[96]
Y. Yoo, R.J. Boland Jr, K. Lyytinen, A Majchrzak, Organizing for innovation in the digitized world, Org. Sci. 23 (5) (2012) 1398–1408.
[97]
M. Zhang, S. Sarker, S. Sarker, Unpacking the effect of it capability on the performance of export-focused Smes: a report from China, Inf. Syst. J. 18 (4) (2008) 357–380.
[98]
X. Zhu, Y. Li, The use of data-driven insight in ambidextrous digital transformation: how do resource orchestration, organizational strategic decision-making, and organizational agility matter?, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change (196) (2023).
Index Terms
- Orchestrating digital technologies with incumbent enterprise systems for attaining innovation
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Innovating with enterprise systems and digital platforms
In an era of new technological advances and hyper-competition, it is no surprise that organizational innovation enabled through information systems in order to achieve competitive parity will remain a core topic of interest for both scholars and ...
Characterizing Multiple Institutional Logics for Innovation with Digital Technologies
HICSS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System SciencesInnovating with digital technologies is important for organizations in order to stay competitive in the market. Today, diverse actors drawing on multiple institutions drive such innovations, ranging from engineers, designers and customer facing units, ...
Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: how volvo cars managed competing concerns
Past research provides instructive yet incomplete answers as to how incumbent firms can address competing concerns as they embrace digital innovation. In particular, it offers only partial explanations of why different concerns emerge, how they manifest,...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
The Author(s).
Publisher
Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.
Netherlands
Publication History
Published: 01 January 2025
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025