Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Modeling use of enterprise resource planning systems: a path analytic study

Published: 01 June 2003 Publication History

Abstract

In this research, we evaluated user participation and involvement in the context of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. Since ERP systems are enterprisewide in scope, these systems have a high level of complexity, and require a different implementation methodology. While most studies analyze implementation at an organization or industry level, there is a dearth in research in ERP system adoption at the individual or user level. In our study, we examine ERP system acceptance at the individual level. In this research, we expected to find differences in the nature of user participation and involvement in ERP compared to other information systems. Using Barki and Hartwick's extension of the theory of reasoned action, a revised model was developed and tested empirically. While Barki and Hartwick's model explains user behavior vis-à-vis user participation and involvement, a more parsimonious model demonstrates that usage dynamics in ERP implementation are different. We complemented our statistical analysis by three case studies. Based on our results we believe that, given the nature of ERP and its implementation, traditionally formalized links between influencers of users' attitude and involvement may need to be revised. We have discussed why we need to seek alternate forms of influencers. In doing so, we suggest that investments be made in preparatory work practices and employee development prior to ERP decisions. Such investments are complementary to information technology and are widespread throughout the firm. We believe that such investments will play a significant role in influencing the attitude of users toward any system and also their involvement.

References

[1]
AJZEN I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50, 179-211.
[2]
ANDERSON JC and GERBNG DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin103, 411-423.
[3]
ASKENÄS L and WESTELIUS A (2000) Five roles of an information system: a social constructionist approach to analyzing the use of ERP systems, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 426-434.
[4]
BARKI H and HARTWICK J (1989) Rethinking the concept of user involvement. MIS Quarterly13(1), 53-64.
[5]
BARKI H and HARTWICK J (1994) Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude. MIS Quarterly18(1), 59-82.
[6]
BENTLER PM (1989) EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. BMDP Statistical Software, Los Angeles.
[7]
BRESNAHAN TF and BRYNJOLFSSON E (2000) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics117(1), 339-376.
[8]
BROWN C and VESSEY I (2000) ERP implementation approaches: toward a contingency framework, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 411-416.
[9]
BRYNJOLFSSON E and HITT L (2000) Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 23-48.
[10]
CHANG S, GABLE G, SMYTHE E and TIMBRELL G (2000) A Delphi examination of public sector ERP implementation issues. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference an Information Systems, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, pp. 494-500.
[11]
CHOE J (1998) The effects of user participation on the design of accounting information systems. Information and Management34(3), 185-198.
[12]
DAVENPORT TH (1998) Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review76(4), 121-131.
[13]
DAVIS F, BAGOZZI R and WARSHAW P (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science35(8), 982-1003.
[14]
DEWAN S and KRAEMER KL (1998) International dimensions of the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM41(9), 56-62.
[15]
DOWNING CE (1999) System usage behavior as a proxy for user satisfaction: an empirical investigation. Information and Management35(4), 203-216.
[16]
FISHBEIN M and AJZEN I (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addision-Wesley, Boston, MA.
[17]
FORNELL C and LARGKER DF (1981) Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18, 39-50.
[18]
GARRITY EJ (1994) User participation, management support and system types. Information Resources Management Journal7(3), 34-43.
[19]
GLORFELD KD and CRONAN TP (1993) Computer information satisfaction: a longitudinal study of computing systems and EUC in a public organization. Journal of End User Computing5(1), 27-36.
[20]
HARTWICK J and BARKI H (1994) Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science40(4), 440-465.
[21]
HUNTON JE and BEELER JD (1997) Effects of user participation in systems development: a longitudinal field experiment. MIS Quarterly21(4), 359-388.
[22]
HWANG MI and THORN RG (1999) The effect of user engagement on system success: a meta-analytical integration of research findings. Information & Management35(4), 229-236.
[23]
JACKSON CM, CHOW S and LEITCH RA (1997) Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decision Sciences28(2), 357-389.
[24]
JENSON RL and JOHNSON IR (1999) The enterprise resource planning system as a strategic solution. Information Strategy15(4), 28-33.
[25]
LU H and WANG J (1997) The relationships between management styles. user participation, and system success over MIS growth stages. Information and Management32(4), 203-213.
[26]
MACCALLUM RC, ROZNOWSKI M and NECOWlTZ LB (1992) Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin111. 490-504.
[27]
MARKUS ML, TANIS C and VAN FENEMA PC (2000) Multisite ERP implementations. Communications of ACM43(4), 42-46.
[28]
MCKEEN JD and GUIMARAES T (1997) Successful strategies for user participation in systems development. Journal of Management Information Systems14(2), 133-150.
[29]
NEWMAN M and NOBLE F (1990) User involvement as an interaction process: a case study. Information Systems Research1(1), 89-113.
[30]
PETERSON WJG, LISA and COOK DP (2001) ERP trends. New York, NY: Conference Board.
[31]
ROBEY D and FARROW D (1982) User involvement in information system development: a conflict model and empirical test. Management Science28(1), 73-85.
[32]
SARKER S and LEE AS (2000) Using a case study to test the role of three key social enablers in ERP implementation. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, pp. 414-425.
[33]
SAWYER S (2001) Information systems development: a market-based perspective. Communications of the ACM44(11), 97-102.
[34]
SCOTT JE and KAINDL L (2000) Enhancing functionality in an enterprise software package. Information and Management37, 111-122.
[35]
TAIT P and VESSEY I (1988) The effect of user involvement on system success. MIS Quarterly12(1), 91-108.
[36]
TAN BW and LO TW (1990) Validation of a user satisfaction instrument for Office Automation success. Information and Management18(4), 203-208.
[37]
VAN EVERDINGEN Y, VAN HILLEGERSBERG J and WAARTS E (2000) Enterprise resource planning: ERP adoption by European midsize companies. Communications of the ACM43(4), 27-31.
[38]
VENKATESH V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research11(4), 342-365.
[39]
WILLCOCKS LP and SYKES R (2000) Enterprise resource planning: the role of the CIO and its function in ERP. Communications of the ACM43(4), 32-38.
[40]
YOON Y, GUIMARAES T and O NEAL Q (1995) Exploring the factors associated with expert systems success. MIS Quarterly19(1), 83-106.
[41]
ZIMBARDO PG (1969) The human choice: individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse and chaos, In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. (Levine W, Ed.), University of Nebraska, Lincoln. pp. 237-307.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Modeling use of enterprise resource planning systems: a path analytic study

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image European Journal of Information Systems
      European Journal of Information Systems  Volume 12, Issue 2
      June 2003
      89 pages

      Publisher

      Macmillan Press Ltd.

      United Kingdom

      Publication History

      Published: 01 June 2003

      Author Tags

      1. enterprise resource planning (ERP)
      2. information system (IS) use
      3. theory of reasoned action (TRA)

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 14 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2015)An Emergent Model of End-users' Acceptance of Enterprise Resource Planning SystemsJournal of Database Management10.4018/JDM.201510010326:4(44-66)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015
      • (2015)The attitude cube-A three-dimensional model of situational factors in IS adoption and their impact on the attitude-behavior relationshipInformation and Management10.1016/j.im.2015.05.00252:6(611-627)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2015
      • (2012)Perceived Audit Quality from ERP ImplementationsInformation Resources Management Journal10.4018/irmj.201201010425:1(61-80)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2012
      • (2012)Testing & quantifying ERP usabilityProceedings of the 1st Annual conference on Research in information technology10.1145/2380790.2380799(31-36)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2012
      • (2010)Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Investigate the Utilization of ERP SystemsInternational Journal of Enterprise Information Systems10.4018/jeis.20101001036:4(38-54)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010
      • (2010)Publicly Available ComputersJournal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations10.4018/jeco.20101030018:1(1-25)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010
      • (2009)Model of acceptance with peer supportMIS Quarterly10.5555/2017424.201743133:2(371-394)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009
      • (2008)TAM-based success modeling in ERPInteracting with Computers10.1016/j.intcom.2008.08.00320:6(515-523)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2008
      • (2005)A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systemsMIS Quarterly10.5555/2017264.201727229:3(525-557)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2005
      • (2005)Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementationsMIS Quarterly10.5555/2017245.201725029:1(59-85)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2005
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      View options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media