Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Approximation via Correlation Decay When Strong Spatial Mixing Fails

Published: 01 January 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Approximate counting via correlation decay is the core algorithmic technique used in the sharp delineation of the computational phase transition that arises in the approximation of the partition function of antiferromagnetic 2-spin models. Previous analyses of correlation-decay algorithms implicitly depended on the occurrence of strong spatial mixing. This, roughly, means that one uses worst-case analysis of the recursive procedure that creates the subinstances. In this paper, we develop a new analysis method that is more refined than the worst-case analysis. We take the shape of instances in the computation tree into consideration and we amortize against certain “bad” instances that are created as the recursion proceeds. This enables us to show correlation decay and to obtain a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS) even when strong spatial mixing fails. We apply our technique to the problem of approximately counting independent sets in hypergraphs with degree upper bound $\Delta$ and with a lower bound $k$ on the arity of hyperedges. Liu and Lin gave an FPTAS for $k\geq2$ and $\Delta\leq5$ (lack of strong spatial mixing was the obstacle preventing this algorithm from being generalized to $\Delta=6$). Our technique gives a tight result for $\Delta=6$, showing that there is an FPTAS for $k\geq3$ and $\Delta\leq6$. The best previously known approximation scheme for $\Delta=6$ is the Markov-chain simulation based fully polynomial-time randomized approximation scheme (FPRAS) of Bordewich, Dyer, and Karpinski, which only works for $k\geq8$. Our technique also applies for larger values of $k$, giving an FPTAS for $k\geq\Delta$. This bound is not substantially stronger than existing randomized results in the literature. Nevertheless, it gives the first deterministic approximation scheme in this regime. Moreover, unlike existing results, it leads to an FPTAS for counting dominating sets in regular graphs with sufficiently large degree. We further demonstrate that in the hypergraph independent set model, approximating the partition function is NP-hard even within the uniqueness regime. Also, approximately counting dominating sets of bounded-degree graphs (without the regularity restriction) is NP-hard.

References

[1]
M. Bordewich, M. E. Dyer, and M. Karpinski, Path coupling using stopping times and counting independent sets and colorings in hypergraphs, Random Struct. Algorithms, 32 (2008), pp. 375--399.
[2]
M. Bordewich, M. E. Dyer, and M. Karpinski, Stopping times, metrics and approximate counting, in Proceedings of the 33rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP), Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 4051, Springer, Berlin, 2006, pp. 108--119.
[3]
M. Dyer and C. Greenhill, On Markov chains for independent sets, J. Algorithms, 35 (2000), pp. 17--49.
[4]
A. Galanis, Q. Ge, D. Štefankovič, E. Vigoda, and L. Yang, Improved inapproximability results for counting independent sets in the hard-core model, Random Struct. Algorithms, 45 (2014), pp. 78--110.
[5]
A. Galanis and L. A. Goldberg, The complexity of approximately counting in 2-spin systems on $k$-uniform bounded-degree hypergraphs, Inform. Comput., 251 (2016), pp. 36--66; full version available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.06146.
[6]
A. Galanis, D. Štefankovič, and E. Vigoda, Inapproximability of the partition function for the antiferromagnetic Ising and hard-core models, Combin. Probab. Comput., 25 (2016), pp. 500--559.
[7]
L. A. Goldberg, R. Gysel, and J. Lapinskas, Approximately counting locally-optimal structures, J. Comput. System Sci., 82 (2016), pp. 1144--1160.
[8]
J. Hermon, A. Sly, and Y. Zhang, Rapid mixing of hypergraph independent set, Random Struct. Algorithms, to appear; full version available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.07999.
[9]
M. Jerrum and A. Sinclair, Polynomial-time approximation algorithms for the Ising model, SIAM J. Comput., 22 (1993), pp. 1087--1116, https://doi.org/10.1137/0222066.
[10]
L. Li, P. Lu, and Y. Yin, Approximate counting via correlation decay in spin systems, in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM--SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2012, pp. 922--940, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611973099.74.
[11]
L. Li, P. Lu, and Y. Yin, Correlation decay up to uniqueness in spin systems, in Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM--SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2013, pp. 67--84; full version available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.7064.
[12]
J. Liu and P. Lu, FPTAS for counting monotone CNF, in Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM--SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2015, pp. 1531--1548; full version available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.3728.
[13]
P. Lu, K. Yang, and C. Zhang, FPTAS for hardcore and Ising models on hypergraphs, in Proceedings of the 33rd Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS), 2016, 51; full version available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.05494.
[14]
M. Luby and E. Vigoda, Fast convergence of the Glauber dynamics for sampling independent sets, Random Struct. Algorithms, 15 (1999), pp. 229--241.
[15]
A. Moitra, Approximate counting, the Lovász local lemma, and inference in graphical models, J. ACM, to appear; full version available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.04317.
[16]
E. Mossel, D. Weitz, and N. Wormald, On the hardness of sampling independent sets beyond the tree threshold, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 143 (2009), pp. 401--439.
[17]
A. Sinclair, P. Srivastava, D. Štefankovič, and Y. Yin, Spatial mixing and the connective constant: Optimal bounds, in Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM--SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2015, pp. 1549--1563, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611973730.102.
[18]
A. Sinclair, P. Srivastava, and M. Thurley, Approximation algorithms for two-state anti-ferromagnetic spin systems on bounded degree graphs, in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM--SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2012, pp. 941--953, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611973099.75.
[19]
A. Sly, Computational transition at the uniqueness threshold, in Proceedings of the 51st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), IEEE, Washington, DC, 2010, pp. 287--296.
[20]
A. Sly and N. Sun, Counting in two-spin models on $d$-regular graphs, Ann. Probab., 42 (2014), pp. 2383--2416.
[21]
A. W. Strzebonski, Cylindrical algebraic decomposition using validated numerics, J. Symbolic Comput., 41 (2006), pp. 1021--1038.
[22]
D. Weitz, Counting independent sets up to the tree threshold, in Proceedings of the 38th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), ACM, New York, 2006, pp. 140--149.
[23]
Y. Yin and C. Zhang, Sampling in Potts model on sparse random graphs, in APPROX-RANDOM, Paris, France, 2016, 47.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Certifying solution geometry in random CSPsProceedings of the 37th Computational Complexity Conference10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2022.11(1-18)Online publication date: 20-Jul-2022
  • (2022)Inapproximability of Counting Hypergraph ColouringsACM Transactions on Computation Theory10.1145/355855414:3-4(1-33)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2022
  • (2021)Sampling constraint satisfaction solutions in the local lemma regimeProceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3406325.3451101(1565-1578)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image SIAM Journal on Computing
SIAM Journal on Computing  Volume 48, Issue 2
DOI:10.1137/smjcat.48.2
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 January 2019

Author Tags

  1. approximate counting
  2. hypergraph independent set
  3. correlation decay

Author Tags

  1. 68W20
  2. 68W40
  3. 68Q87

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Certifying solution geometry in random CSPsProceedings of the 37th Computational Complexity Conference10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2022.11(1-18)Online publication date: 20-Jul-2022
  • (2022)Inapproximability of Counting Hypergraph ColouringsACM Transactions on Computation Theory10.1145/355855414:3-4(1-33)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2022
  • (2021)Sampling constraint satisfaction solutions in the local lemma regimeProceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3406325.3451101(1565-1578)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2021

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media