Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Intelligent Process Adaptation in the SmartPM System

Published: 02 November 2016 Publication History

Abstract

The increasing application of process-oriented approaches in new challenging dynamic domains beyond business computing (e.g., healthcare, emergency management, factories of the future, home automation, etc.) has led to reconsider the level of flexibility and support required to manage complex knowledge-intensive processes in such domains. A knowledge-intensive process is influenced by user decision making and coupled with contextual data and knowledge production, and involves performing complex tasks in the “physical” real world to achieve a common goal. The physical world, however, is not entirely predictable, and knowledge-intensive processes must be robust to unexpected conditions and adaptable to unanticipated exceptions, recognizing that in real-world environments it is not adequate to assume that all possible recovery activities can be predefined for dealing with the exceptions that can ensue. To tackle this issue, in this paper we present SmartPM, a model and a prototype Process Management System featuring a set of techniques providing support for automated adaptation of knowledge-intensive processes at runtime. Such techniques are able to automatically adapt process instances when unanticipated exceptions occur, without explicitly defining policies to recover from exceptions and without the intervention of domain experts at runtime, aiming at reducing error-prone and costly manual ad-hoc changes, and thus at relieving users from complex adaptations tasks. To accomplish this, we make use of well-established techniques and frameworks from Artificial Intelligence, such as situation calculus, IndiGolog and classical planning. The approach, which is backed by a formal model, has been implemented and validated with a case study based on real knowledge-intensive processes coming from an emergency management domain.

Supplementary Material

a25-marrella-apndx.pdf (marrella.zip)
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, Intelligent Process Adaptation in the SmartPM System

References

[1]
Michael James Adams. 2007. Facilitating Dynamic Flexibility and Exception Handling for Workflows. Ph.D. Dissertation. Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, Australia.
[2]
Vikas Agarwal, Girish Chafle, Koustuv Dasgupta, Neeran M. Karnik, Arun Kumar, Sumit Mittal, and Biplav Srivastava. 2005. Synthy: A system for end to end composition of web services. Journal on Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 3, 4 (2005), 311--339. 10.1016/j.websem.2005.09.002
[3]
Clemens Beckstein and Joachim Klausner. 1999. A meta level architecture for workflow management. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science 3, 1 (1999), 15--26.
[4]
Daniela Berardi, Diego Calvanese, Giuseppe De Giacomo, Maurizio Lenzerini, and Massimo Mecella. 2003. Automatic composition of e-services that export their behavior. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing (ICSOC’03). Springer, 43--58. 978-3-540-24593-3_4
[5]
BPMI.org and OMG. 2011. Business Process Modeling Notation - Final Specification Ver.2.0. Retrieved from http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/PDF/.
[6]
Ronald Brachman and Hector Levesque. 2004. Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Elsevier.
[7]
Antonio Bucchiarone, Marco Pistore, Heorhi Raik, and Raman Kazhamiakin. 2011. Adaptation of service-based business processes by context-aware replanning. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA’11). IEEE, 1--8.
[8]
Andrea Capata, Andrea Marella, and Ruggero Russo. 2008. A geo-based application for the management of mobile actors during crisis situations. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM’08).
[9]
Fabio Casati, Stefano Ceri, Stefano Paraboschi, and Guiseppe Pozzi. 1999. Specification and implementation of exceptions in workflow management systems. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS) 24, 3 (1999), 405--451.
[10]
Fabio Casati and Gianpaolo Cugola. 2001. Error handling in process support systems. In Advances in Exception Handling Techniques. Springer-Verlag, 251--270.
[11]
Tiziana Catarci, Massimiliano De Leoni, Andrea Marrella, Massimo Mecella, Alessandro Russo, Renate Steinmann, and Manfred Bortenschlager. 2013. WORKPAD: Process management and geo-collaboration help disaster response. In Using Social and Information Technologies for Disaster and Crisis Management. 33--51.
[12]
Dickson K. W. Chiu, Qing Li, and Kamalakar Karlapalem. 2000. A logical framework for exception handling in ADOME workflow management system. In Proccedings of the 12th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE’00). Springer-Verlag, 110--125.
[13]
Jens Claßen, Patrick Eyerich, Gerhard Lakemeyer, and Bernhard Nebel. 2007a. Towards an integration of golog and planning. In Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’07). 1846--1851.
[14]
Jens Claßen, Yuxiao Hu, and Gerhard Lakemeyer. 2007b. A situation-calculus semantics for an expressive fragment of PDDL. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’07). 956--961.
[15]
Giuseppe De Giacomo, Yves Lespérance, Hector Levesque, and Sebastian Sardina. 2009. IndiGolog: A high-level programming language for embedded reasoning agents. Multi-Agent Programming: Languages, Tools and Applications. Springer US, 31--72.
[16]
Giuseppe De Giacomo, Yves Lespérance, and Hector J. Levesque. 2000. ConGolog, a concurrent programming language based on the situation calculus. Artificial Intelligence 121, 1 (2000), 109--169.
[17]
Giuseppe De Giacomo, Massimo Mecella, and Fabio Patrizi. 2014. Automated service composition based on behaviors: The roman model. In Web Services Foundations. Springer, 189--214. 10.1007/978-1-4614-7518-7_8
[18]
Giuseppe De Giacomo, Raymond Reiter, and Mikhail Soutchanski. 1998. Execution monitoring of high-level robot programs. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’98). 453--465.
[19]
Claudio Di Ciccio, Andrea Marrella, and Alessandro Russo. 2014. Knowledge-intensive processes: Characteristics, requirements and analysis of contemporary approaches. Journal on Data Semantics 4, 1 (2014), 1--29.
[20]
Marlon Dumas, Marcello La Rosa, Jan Mendling, and Hajo A. Reijers. 2013. Fundamentals of Business Process Management (1st ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
[21]
Marlon Dumas, Wil M. P. van der Aalst, and Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede. 2005. Process-Aware Information Systems: Bridging People and Software through Process Technology (1st ed.). John Wiley 8 Sons.
[22]
Stefan Edelkamp and Jorg Hoffmann. 2004. PDDL2.2: The Language for the Classical Part of the 4th International Planning Competition. Technical Report. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Institut für Informatik.
[23]
Johann Eder and Walter Liebhart. 1995. The workflow activity model WAMO. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS-95). 87--98.
[24]
Johann Eder and Walter Liebhart. 1996. Workflow recovery. In Proceedings of the 1st IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS’96). IEEE Computer Society, 124--134.
[25]
Clarence A. Ellis, Simon J. Gibbs, and Gail Rein. 1991. Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM 34, 1 (1991), 39--58.
[26]
Hugo M. Ferreira and Diogo R. Ferreira. 2006. An integrated life cycle for workflow management based on learning and planning. International Journal on Cooperative Information Systems 15 (2006), 485--505.
[27]
Christian Fritz, Jorge A. Baier, and Sheila A. McIlraith. 2008. ConGolog, sin trans: Compiling congolog into basic action theories for planning and beyond. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’08). 600--610.
[28]
Michal Gajewski, Harald Meyer, Mariusz Momotko, Hilmar Schuschel, and Mathias Weske. 2005. Dynamic failure recovery of generated workflows. In Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA’05). IEEE Computer Society Press, 982--986.
[29]
Hector Geffner and Blai Bonet. 2013. A Concise Introduction to Models and Methods for Automated Planning. Morgan 8 Claypool Publishers.
[30]
Alfonso Gerevini, Alessandro Saetti, Ivan Serina, and Paolo Toninelli. 2004. LPG-TD: A fully automated planner for PDDL2.2 domains. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS-04).
[31]
Debanjan Ghosh, Raj Sharman, H. Raghav Rao, and Shambhu J. Upadhyaya. 2007. Self-healing systems - survey and synthesis. Decision Support Systems 42, 4 (2007), 2164--2185. 10.1016/j.dss.2006.06.011
[32]
Paul Grefen, Jochem Vonk, and Peter Apers. 2001. Global transaction support for workflow management systems: From formal specification to practical implementation. The VLDB Journal 10 (2001), 316--333.
[33]
Claus Hagen and Gustavo Alonso. 2000. Exception handling in workflow management systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26, 10 (2000), 943--958.
[34]
Keith Harrison-Broninski. 2013. Human Processes: Capturing Knowledge with Processes. Retrieved from www.bptrends.com.
[35]
Sumi Helal, William Mann, Hicham El-Zabadani, Jeffrey King, Youssef Kaddoura, and Erwin Jansen. 2005. The gator tech smart house: A programmable pervasive space. Computer 38, 3 (2005). doi.org/10.1109/MC.2005.107
[36]
Malte Helmert. 2006. The fast downward planning system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 26, 1 (2006), 191--246.
[37]
Malte Helmert. 2009. Concise finite-domain representations for PDDL planning tasks. Artificial Intelligence 173, 5 (2009), 503--535.
[38]
Shah Rukh Humayoun, Tiziana Catarci, Massimiliano de Leoni, Andrea Marrella, Massimo Mecella, Manfred Bortenschlager, and Renate Steinmann. 2009a. Designing mobile systems in highly dynamic scenarios: The WORKPAD methodology. Knowledge, Technology 8 Policy 22, 1 (2009), 25--43.
[39]
Shah Rukh Humayoun, Tiziana Catarci, Massimiliano de Leoni, Andrea Marrella, Massimo Mecella, Manfred Bortenschlager, and Renate Steinmann. 2009b. The WORKPAD user interface and methodology: Developing smart and effective mobile applications for emergency operators. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (UAHCI’09). Springer, Berlin, 343--352.
[40]
Peter Jarvis, Jonathan Moore, Jussi Stader, Ann Macintosh, Andrew Casson du Mont, and Paul Chung. 1999. Exploiting AI technologies to realise adaptive workflow systems. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Agent-Based Systems in the Business Context.
[41]
Nicholas R. Jennings, Peyman Faratin, Timothy J. Norman, P. O’Brien, Brian Odgers, and James L. Alty. 2000. Implementing a business process management system using ADEPT: A real-world case study. Applied Artificial Intelligence: An International Journal 14, 5 (2000), 421--463. 10.1080/088395100403379
[42]
Kurt Jensen and Lars Michael Kristensen. 2009. Coloured Petri Nets -- Modelling and Validation of Concurrent Systems. Springer.
[43]
Sandy Kemsley. 2011. The changing nature of work: From structured to unstructured, from controlled to social. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM’11).
[44]
Mark Klein and Chrysanthos Dellarocas. 2000. A knowledge-based approach to handling exceptions in workflow systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 9, 3--4 (2000), 399--412.
[45]
Andreas Lanz, Manfred Reichert, and Peter Dadam. 2011. Robust and flexible error handling in the aristaflow BPM suite. In Information Systems Evolution: CAiSE Forum 2010. Springer, Berlin, 174--189.
[46]
Edward A Lee. 2008. Cyber physical systems: Design challenges. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC’08). IEEE, 363--369.
[47]
Richard Lenz and Manfred Reichert. 2007. IT support for healthcare processes—premises, challenges, perspectives. Data 8 Knowledge Engineering 61, 1 (April 2007), 39--58.
[48]
Barbara Staudt Lerner, Stefan Christov, Leon J. Osterweil, Reda Bendraou, Udo Kannengiesser, and Alexander Wise. 2010. Exception handling patterns for process modeling. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 36, 2 (2010), 162--183.
[49]
Frank Leymann. 2001. Managing business processes via workflow technology. In Proceedings of 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB’01). Morgan Kaufmann.
[50]
Zongwei Luo, Amit Sheth, Krys Kochut, and John Miller. 2000. Exception handling in workflow systems. Applied Intelligence 13, 2 (2000), 125--147.
[51]
Andrea Marrella and Yves Lespérance. 2013a. Synthesizing a library of process templates through partial-order planning algorithms. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support (BPMDS’13). 277--291.
[52]
Andrea Marrella and Yves Lespérance. 2013b. Towards a goal-oriented framework for the automatic synthesis of underspecified activities in dynamic processes. In Proccedings of the 6th International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing (SOCA’13). 361--365.
[53]
Andrea Marrella, Massimo Mecella, and Alessandro Russo. 2011. Collaboration On-the-field: Suggestions and beyond. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM’11).
[54]
Andrea Marrella, Massimo Mecella, and Sebastian Sardina. 2014. SmartPM: An adaptive process management system through situation calculus, indigolog, and classical planning. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’14).
[55]
Andrea Marrella, Alessandro Russo, and Massimo Mecella. 2012. Planlets: Automatically recovering dynamic processes in YAWL. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS’12). Springer, Berlin, 268--286.
[56]
Drew McDermott, Malik Ghallab, Adele Howe, Craig Knoblock, Ashwin Ram, Manuela Veloso, Daniel Weld, and David Wilkins. 1998. PDDL - The Planning Domain Definition Language. Technical Report.
[57]
Andreas Meyer, Sergey Smirnov, and Mathias Weske. 2011. Data in Business Processes. Technical Report 50. Hasso Plattner Institute at the University of Potsdam.
[58]
Mirjam Minor, Ralph Bergmann, and Sebastian Görg. 2014. Case-based adaptation of workflows. Information Systems 40 (2014), 142--152.
[59]
Robert Müller, Ulrike Greiner, and Erhard Rahm. 2004. AGENT WORK: A workflow system supporting rule-based workflow adaptation. Data 8 Knowledge Engineering 51, 2 (Nov. 2004), 223--256.
[60]
Nicolas Mundbrod, Jens Kolb, and Manfred Reichert. 2013. Towards a system support of collaborative knowledge work. In Proceedings of the 2012 Business Process Management Workshops. Springer, Berlin, 31--42.
[61]
Karen L. Myers and Pauline M. Berry. 1999. Workflow management systems: An AI perspective. Technical Note, Artificial Intelligence Center (AIC), SRI International (Jan. 1999).
[62]
Dana Nau, Tsz-Chiu Au, Okhtay Ilghami, Ugur Kuter, William Murdock, Dan Wu, and Fusun Yaman. 2003. SHOP2: An HTN planning system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 20 (2003), 379--404.
[63]
Dana Nau, Malik Ghallab, and Paolo Traverso. 2004. Automated Planning: Theory 8 Practice. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA.
[64]
Marco Pistore, Paolo Traverso, Piergiorgio Bertoli, and Annapaola Marconi. 2005a. Automated synthesis of composite BPEL4WS web services. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS’05). IEEE Computer Society, 293--301.
[65]
Marco Pistore, Paolo Traverso, Piergiorgio Bertoli, and Annapaola Marconi. 2005b. Automated synthesis of executable web service compositions from BPEL4WS processes. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’05). ACM, 1186--1187. 1062745.1062931
[66]
Harald Psaier and Schahram Dustdar. 2011. A survey on self-healing systems: Approaches and systems. Computing 91, 1 (2011), 43--73.
[67]
Frank Puhlmann and Mathias Weske. 2005. Using the π-calculus for formalizing workflow patterns. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM’05). Springer, Berlin, 153--168.
[68]
María Dolores R-Moreno and Paul Kearney. 2002. Integrating AI planning techniques with workflow management system. Knowledge-Based Systems 15, 5--6 (2002).
[69]
Ragunathan Raj Rajkumar, Insup Lee, Lui Sha, and John Stankovic. 2010. Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution. In Proceedings of the 47th Design Automation Conference (DAC’10). IEEE, 731--736.
[70]
Anand S. Rao and Michael P. Georgeff. 1995. BDI agents: From theory to practice. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Multiagent Systems (ICMAS’95). 312--319.
[71]
Manfred Reichert and Peter Dadam. 1998. ADEPTflex -- Supporting dynamic changes of workflows without losing control. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 10, 2 (1998), 93--129.
[72]
Manfred Reichert, Stefanie Rinderle, and Peter Dadam. 2003. ADEPT workflow management system. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM’03). Springer, Berlin, 370--379.
[73]
Manfred Reichert, Stefanie Rinderle, Ulrich Kreher, and Peter Dadam. 2005. Adaptive process management with ADEPT2. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’05). 1113--1114.
[74]
Manfred Reichert and Barbara Weber. 2012. Enabling Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems— Challenges, Methods, Technologies. Springer, Berlin.
[75]
Han Reichgelt. 1991. Knowledge Representation: An AI Perspective. Greenwood Publishing Group Inc.
[76]
Raymond Reiter. 2001. Knowledge in Action: Logical Foundations for Specifying and Implementing Dynamical Systems. MIT Press.
[77]
Stefanie Rinderle, Manfred Reichert, and Peter Dadam. 2004. Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems: A survey. Data 8 Knowledge Engineering 50, 1 (2004), 9--34. 10.1016/j.datak.2004.01.002
[78]
Stefanie Rinderle, Barbara Weber, Manfred Reichert, and Werner Wild. 2005. Integrating process learning and process evolution—a semantics based approach. In Proccedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM’05). Springer, Berlin, 252--267.
[79]
Austin Rosenfeld. 2011. BPM: Structured vs. Unstructured. Retrieved from www.bptrends.com.
[80]
Nick Russell, Wil M. P. van der Aalst, and Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede. 2006. Workflow exception patterns. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE’06). Springer, Berlin, 288--302.
[81]
Shazia W. Sadiq, Wasim Sadiq, and Maria E. Orlowska. 2001. Pockets of flexibility in workflow specification. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER’01). Springer, Berlin, 513--526.
[82]
Ronny Seiger, Christine Keller, Florian Niebling, and Thomas Schlegel. 2014. Modelling complex and flexible processes for smart cyber-physical environments. Journal of Computational Science (2014), 137--148.
[83]
Bart Selman, Henry A. Kautz, and Bram Cohen. 1994. Noise strategies for improving local search. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial intelligence (AAAI’94). American Association for Artificial Intelligence, 337--343.
[84]
Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede, Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Michael Adams, and Nick Russell. 2009. Modern Business Process Automation: YAWL and Its Support Environment. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-642-03121-2
[85]
Nick R. T. P. van Beest, Eirini Kaldeli, Pavel Bulanov, Johan C. Wortmann, and Alexander Lazovik. 2014. Automated runtime repair of business processes. Information Systems 39 (2014), 45--79.
[86]
Wil M. P. van Der Aalst. 1996. Three good reasons for using a petri-net-based workflow management system. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Information and Process Integration in Enterprises (IPIC’96). 179--201.
[87]
Wil M. P. van der Aalst. 1998. The application of petri nets to workflow management. Journal of Circuits, Systems, and Computers 8, 1 (1998), 21--66.
[88]
Wil M. P. van der Aalst. 2013. Business process management: A comprehensive survey. ISRN Software Engineering 2013 (2013), 1--37.
[89]
Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede, Bartek Kiepuszewski, and Alistair P. Barros. 2003. Workflow patterns. Distributed Parallel Databases 14, 1 (2003).
[90]
Barbara Weber, Manfred Reichert, and Stefanie Rinderle. 2008. Change patterns and change support features - enhancing flexibility in process-aware information systems. Data 8 Knowledge Engineering 66, 3 (2008), 438--466.
[91]
Barbara Weber, Werner Wild, and Ruth Breu. 2004. CBRFlow: Enabling adaptive workflow management through conversational case-based reasoning. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Advances in Case-Based Reasoning.
[92]
Mathias Weske. 2001. Formal foundation and conceptual design of dynamic adaptations in a workflow management system. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’01). IEEE.
[93]
Mathias Weske. 2012. Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures (2nd ed.). Springer Science 8 Business Media.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Semantic-Rich Recommendation System for Medical Emergency Response SystemInternational Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems10.4018/IJSWIS.34123120:1(1-18)Online publication date: 9-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Towards Flexible Control of Production Processes: A Requirements Analysis for Adaptive Workflow Management and Evaluation of Suitable Process Modeling LanguagesProcesses10.3390/pr1212271412:12(2714)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)RBPMN: the value of roles for business process modelingSoftware and Systems Modeling10.1007/s10270-024-01202-z23:6(1375-1406)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 8, Issue 2
Survey Paper, Special Issue: Intelligent Music Systems and Applications and Regular Papers
March 2017
407 pages
ISSN:2157-6904
EISSN:2157-6912
DOI:10.1145/3004291
  • Editor:
  • Yu Zheng
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 November 2016
Accepted: 01 May 2016
Revised: 01 March 2015
Received: 01 June 2014
Published in TIST Volume 8, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Classical planning
  2. indiGolog
  3. knowledge-intensive processes
  4. pervasive applications
  5. process adaptation
  6. process modeling and execution
  7. situation calculus

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • Italian Sapienza grant SUPER
  • Italian Sapienza grant TESTMED
  • Sapienza 2014 Visiting Grant
  • Italian Sapienza award SPIRITLETS
  • Italian project RoMA - Resilence of Metropolitan Areas
  • Italian project Social Museum e Smart Tourism
  • Italian project NEPTIS

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Semantic-Rich Recommendation System for Medical Emergency Response SystemInternational Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems10.4018/IJSWIS.34123120:1(1-18)Online publication date: 9-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Towards Flexible Control of Production Processes: A Requirements Analysis for Adaptive Workflow Management and Evaluation of Suitable Process Modeling LanguagesProcesses10.3390/pr1212271412:12(2714)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)RBPMN: the value of roles for business process modelingSoftware and Systems Modeling10.1007/s10270-024-01202-z23:6(1375-1406)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2024
  • (2024)On the application of process management and process mining to Industry 4.0Software and Systems Modeling10.1007/s10270-024-01175-z23:6(1407-1419)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Digital Twins Tools and Technologies in Smart ManufacturingArtificial Intelligence‐Enabled Digital Twin for Smart Manufacturing10.1002/9781394303601.ch7(125-141)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2024
  • (2023)DataStream XES Extension: Embedding IoT Sensor Data into Extensible Event Stream LogsFuture Internet10.3390/fi1503010915:3(109)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Abstraction of nondeterministic situation calculus action theoriesProceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.24963/ijcai.2023/347(3112-3122)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2023
  • (2023)A framework for AI-based self-adaptive cyber-physical process systemsit - Information Technology10.1515/itit-2023-000165:3(113-128)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Converting semantic web services into formal planning domain descriptions to enable manufacturing process planning and scheduling in industry 4.0Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106727126(106727)Online publication date: Nov-2023
  • (2023)Web service adaptation: A decade’s overviewComputer Science Review10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.10053548(100535)Online publication date: May-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media