Hyperscanning speaks to the need to revise our understanding of the mind‒brain relation
Abstract
Several research labs around the world have been developing and applying hyperscanning, an innovative methodology that allows to observe what happens in the brains of two or more people when they interact in different social/interpersonal settings. Hyperscanning findings seem to point to the fact that synchronized interbrain activity may be caused by cooperative social interaction, showing that traditionally dominant perspectives about the mind‒brain relation (in particular, supervenience and internalism regarding mental contents) should be revised or replaced by others that adequately integrate the influence of human interactions on the neurobiological underpinnings of cognition (e.g., contextual emergence, externalism regarding mental contents, 4E cognition). This shift would undeniably also have important implications in the fields of mental health (e.g., opening avenues for the design of diagnoses and treatments for social skill conditions) and the social sciences (regarding aspects such as sociocultural interplay, collective decision-making and public participation, social conflict and polarization, interpersonal curiosity, and autonomy).
References
[1]
Bijsterbosch J. D., Valk S. L., Wang D., and Glasser M. F. (2021). Recent developments in representations of the connectome. NeuroImage, 243, Article 118533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118533
[2]
Bishop R. C. and Atmanspacher H. (2006). Contextual emergence in the description of properties. Foundations of Physics, 36(12), 1753–1777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-006-9082-8
[3]
Czeszumski A., Eustergerling S., Lang A., Menrath D., Gerstenberger M., Schuberth S., Schreiber F., Rendon Z. Z., and König P. (2020). Hyperscanning: A valid method to study neural inter-brain underpinnings of social interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00039
[4]
De Jaegher H. and Froese T. (2009). On the role of social interaction in individual agency. Adaptive Behavior, 17(5), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712309343822
[5]
Kim J. (2010). Essays in the metaphysics of mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199585878.001.0001
[6]
Kohler N., Novembre G., Gugnowska K., Keller P. E., Villringer A., and Sammler D. (2023). Cortico-cerebellar audio-motor regions coordinate self and other in musical joint action. Cerebral Cortex, 33(6), 2804–2822. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac243
[7]
Koike T., Sumiya M., Nakagawa E., Okazaki S., and Sadato N. (2019). What makes eye contact special? Neural substrates of on-line mutual eye-gaze: A hyperscanning fMRI study. eNeuro, 6(1), Article e0284. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0284-18.2019
[8]
Koike T., Tanabe H. C., and Sadato N. (2015). Hyperscanning neuroimaging technique to reveal the “two-in-one” system in social interactions. Neuroscience Research, 90, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2014.11.006
[9]
Krassowski M., Das V., Sahu S. K., and Misra B. B. (2020). State of the field in multi-omics research: From computational needs to data mining and sharing. Frontiers in Genetics, 11, Article 610798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.610798
[10]
Litman J. A. and Pezzo M. V. (2012). Interpersonal curiosity. In Seel N. M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 1634–1635). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1644
[11]
Lyreskog D. M., Zohny H., Savulescu J., and Singh I. (2023). Merging minds: The conceptual and ethical impacts of emerging technologies for collective minds. Neuroethics, 16(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-023-09516-3
[12]
McLaughlin B. and Bennett K. (2023). Supervenience. In Zalta E. N. and Nodelman U. (Eds.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/supervenience/
[13]
Newen A., De Bruin L., and Gallagher S. (Eds.), (2018). The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.001.0001
[14]
Nguyen T., Schleihauf H., Kayhan E., Matthes D., Vrtička P., and Hoehl S. (2021). Neural synchrony in mother–child conversation: Exploring the role of conversation patterns. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(1-2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa079
[15]
Osaka N., Minamoto T., Yaoi K., Azuma M., Shimada Y. M., and Osaka M. (2015). How two brains make one synchronized mind in the inferior frontal cortex: fNIRS-based hyperscanning during cooperative singing. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1811. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01811
[16]
Pan Y., Cheng X., and Hu Y. (2023). Three heads are better than one: Cooperative learning brains wire together when a consensus is reached. Cerebral Cortex, 33(4), 1155–1169. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac127
[17]
Sievers B., Welker C., Hasson U., Kleinbaum A. M., and Wheatley T. (2024). Consensus-building conversation leads to neural alignment. Nature Communications, 15(1), 3936. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43253-8
[18]
Smith B. (nd). Internalism and externalism in the philosophy of mind and language. In Fieser J. and Dowden B. (Eds.), Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/int-ex-ml/
[19]
van Prooijen J.-W. (Ed.), (2021). The psychology of political polarization. Routledge.
Index Terms
- Hyperscanning speaks to the need to revise our understanding of the mind‒brain relation
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Can naturalism explain consciousness? A critique
The problem of consciousness is one of the most important problems both in cognitive science and in philosophy. There are different philosophers and different scientists who define consciousness and explain it differently. In philosophy, `consciousness' ...
A micro-phenomenological and semiotic approach to cognition in practice: a path toward an integrative approach to studying cognition-in-the-world and from within
The article presents the course-of-experience framework and how it contributes to studying cognition in practice. The aim is twofold: (a) to argue for a phenomenologically and semiotically inspired enactivist approach to practice and cognition in ...
Brainjacking in deep brain stimulation and autonomy
'Brainjacking' refers to the exercise of unauthorized control of another's electronic brain implant. Whilst the possibility of hacking a Brain---Computer Interface (BCI) has already been proven in both experimental and real-life settings, there is ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
© The Author(s) 2024.
Publisher
Sage Publications, Inc.
United States
Publication History
Published: 07 January 2025
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Editorial
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025