Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/2675983.2676355acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Utilizing simulation derived quantitative formulas for accurate excavator Hauler fleet selection

Published: 08 December 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Discrete event simulation (DES) produces models of greater granularity and higher accuracy in analysis of heavy construction operations than classic quantitative techniques; specifically utilizing average production rates for determining the fleet required for and duration of earthmoving operations. Nonetheless, the application of DES is not readily applied beyond academic work for high level analysis in the heavy construction industry. Field level planners default to the use of average production rates, which can be easily applied with simple spreadsheet tools and allows quick recalculations to be performed when existing input data is changed or more data becomes available. To aid in fleet selection and determination of the duration of site grading earthworks operations where one fleet is applied, this research presents a new approach by developing quantitative formulas from DES analysis. The approach simplifies DES application and reduces the barrier to access simulation-generalized and field-applicable knowledge, while providing greater accuracy than simply relying on average production rates.

References

[1]
Alshibani, A. and Moselhi, O. (2012). "Fleet selection for earthmoving projects using optimization-based simulation." Can. J. Civ. Eng., 39, 619--630.
[2]
Cheng, F. F, Wang, Y. W., Ling, X. Z. and Bai, Y. (2011). "A Petri net simulation model for virtual construction of earthmoving operations." Automat. Constr., 20, 181--188.
[3]
Christian, J. and Xie, T. X. (1996). "Improving earthmoving estimating by more realistic knowledge." Can. J. Civ. Eng., 23, 250--259.
[4]
Gransberg, D. D. (1996). "Optimizing haul unit size and number based on loading facility characteristics." J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 122(3), 248--253.
[5]
Hajjar, D. and AbouRizk, S. (1997). "AP2-Earth: a simulation based system for the estimating and planning of earth moving operations." Proc., 29th Winter Simulation Conf., IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1103--1110.
[6]
Han, S., Hong, T. and Lee, S. (2008). "Production prediction of conventional and global positioning system-based earthmoving systems using simulation and multiple regression analysis." Can. J. Civ. Eng., 35, 574--587.
[7]
Martinez, J. (1998). "Earthmover-simulation tool for earthwork planning." Proc., 30th Winter Simulation Conf., IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1263--1272.
[8]
Marzouk, M. and Moselhi, O. (2002a). "Simulation optimization for earthmoving operations using genetic algorithms." Const. Manag. Econ., 20, 535--543.
[9]
Marzouk, M. and Moselhi, O. (2002b). "Bid preparation for earthmoving operations." Can. J. Civ. Eng., 29, 517--532.
[10]
Marzouk, M. and Moselhi, O. (2003a). "Constraint-based genetic algorithm for earthmoving fleet selection." Can. J. Civ. Eng., 30, 673--683.
[11]
Marzouk, M. and Moselhi, O. (2003b). "Object-oriented simulation model for earthmoving operations." J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(2), 173--181.
[12]
Marzouk, M. and Moselhi, O. (2004). "Multiobjective optimization of earthmoving operations." J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(1), 105--113.
[13]
Moselhi, O. and Alshibani, A. (2009). "Optimization of earthmoving operations in heavy civil engineering projects." J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(10), 948--954.
[14]
Peurifoy, R. L., and Oberlender, G. D. (2004). "Earthwork and Excavation". Estimating Construction Costs, Fifth Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York.
[15]
Schabowicz, K. and Hola, B. (2007). "Mathematical-neural model for assessing productivity of earthmoving machinery." J. Civ. Eng. Manag., 13(1), 47--54.
[16]
Shi, J. and AbouRizk, S. M. (1994). "A resource based simulation approach with application in earthmoving/strip mining." Proc., 26th Winter Simulation Conf., IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1124--1129.
[17]
Shi, J. and AbouRizk, S. S. (1998). "An automated modeling system for simulating earthmoving operations." Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 13, 121--130.
[18]
Shi, J. J. (1999). "A neural network based system for predicting earthmoving production." Const. Manag. Econ., 17, 463--471.
[19]
Simphony .NET 4.0 version 4.0.0.106, (2012), (computer software), The University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
[20]
Smith, S. D. (1999). "Earthmoving productivity estimation using linear regression techniques." J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(3), 133--141.
[21]
Touran, A. and Taher, K. A. H. (1988). "Optimum fleet size determination by queuing and simulation." Const. Manag. Econ., 6, 295--306.
[22]
Zhang, H. (2008). "Multi-objective simulation-optimization for earthmoving operations." Automat. Constr., 18, 79--86.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WSC '13: Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation Conference: Simulation: Making Decisions in a Complex World
December 2013
4386 pages
ISBN:9781479920778

Sponsors

  • IIE: Institute of Industrial Engineers
  • INFORMS-SIM: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences: Simulation Society
  • ASA: American Statistical Association
  • SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
  • SCS: Society for Modeling and Simulation International
  • ASIM: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Simulation
  • IEEE/SMCS: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society
  • NIST: National Institute of Standards & Technology

Publisher

IEEE Press

Publication History

Published: 08 December 2013

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WSC '13
Sponsor:
  • IIE
  • INFORMS-SIM
  • ASA
  • SIGSIM
  • SCS
  • ASIM
  • IEEE/SMCS
  • NIST
WSC '13: Winter Simulation Conference
December 8 - 11, 2013
D.C., Washington

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 3,413 of 5,075 submissions, 67%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 29
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media