Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
Skip header Section
Skip Bibliometrics Section
Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024Bibliometrics
Abstract

No abstract available.

Skip Table Of Content Section

Chapters

References

  1. Atchison, W. F., Conte, S. D., Hamblen, J. W., Hull, T. E., Keenan, T. A., Kehl, W. B., McCluskey, E. J., Navarro, S. O., Rheinboldt, W. C., Schweppe, E. J., Viavant, W., and Young, D. "Curriculum 68: Recommendations for academic programs in computer science." Communications of the ACM, 11, 3 (1968): 151--197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Austing, R. H., Barnes, B. H., Bonnette, D. T., Engel, G. L., and Stokes, G. "Curriculum '78: Recommendations for the undergraduate program in computer science." Communications of the ACM, 22, 3 (1979): 147--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force. "Computing Curricula 1991." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force. "Computing Curricula 2001 Computer Science." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ACM/IEEE-CS Interim Review Task Force. "Computer Science Curriculum 2008: An interim revision of CS 2001." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula. "Computing Science Curricula 2013." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sabin, M., Alrumaih, H., Impagliazzo, J., Lunt, B., Zhang, M., Byers, B., Newhouse, W., Paterson, W., Tang, C., van der Veer, G. and Viola, B. Information Technology Curricula 2017: Curriculum Guidelines for Baccalaureate Degree Programs in Information Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Clear, A., Parrish, A., Impagliazzo, J., Wang, P., Ciancarini, P., Cuadros-Vargas, E., Frezza, S., Gal-Ezer, J., Pears, A., Takada, S., Topi, H., van der Veer, G., Vichare, A., Waguespack, L. and Zhang, M. Computing Curricula 2020 (CC2020): Paradigms for Future Computing Curricula. Technical Report. Association for Computing Machinery / IEEE Computer Society, New York, NY, USA, (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Leidig, P. and Salmela, H. A Competency Model for Undergraduate Programs in Information Systems (IS2020). Technical Report. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Danyluk, A. and Leidig, P. Computing Competencies for Undergraduate Data Science Curricula (DS2021). Technical Report. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. https://iiitd.ac.in/sites/default/files/docs/aicte/AICTE-CSE-Curriculum-Recommendations-July2022.pdf, accessed July 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Prasad, S. K., Estrada, T., Ghafoor, S., Gupta, A., Kant, K., Stunkel, C., Sussman, A., Vaidyanathan, R., Weems, C., Agrawal, K., Barnas, M., Brown, D. W., Bryant, R., Bunde, D. P., Busch, C., Deb, D., Freudenthal, E., Jaja, J., Parashar, M., Phillips, C., Robey, B., Rosenberg, A., Saule, E., Shen, C. 2020. NSF/IEEE-TCPP Curriculum Initiative on Parallel and Distributed Computing - Core Topics for Undergraduates, Version II-beta, Online: http://tcpp.cs.gsu.edu/curriculum/, 53 pages, accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. https://ccecc.acm.org/files/publications/Cyber2yr2020.pdf, accessed July 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. https://www.computer.org/volunteering/boards-and-committees/professional-educational-activities/software-engineering-competency-model, accessed July 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar, A. N., Becker, B. A., Pias, M., Oudshoorn, M., Jalote, P., Servin, C., Aly, S.G., Blumenthal, R. L., Epstein, S. L., and Anderson, M.D. 2023. A Combined Knowledge and Competency (CKC) Model for Computer Science Curricula. ACM Inroads 14, 3 (September 2023), 22--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu, Y., Xiang, Q., Chen, J., Zhang, M., Xu, J., and Luo, Y. Undergraduate Computer Science Education in China. ACM Inroads, Vol 15, 1, March 2024, 28--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force. "Computing Curricula 2001 Computer Science." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. ACM/IEEE-CS Interim Review Task Force. "Computer Science Curriculum 2008: An interim revision of CS 2001." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula. "Computing Science Curricula 2013." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sabin, M., Alrumaih, H., Impagliazzo, J., Lunt, B., Zhang, M., Byers, B., Newhouse, W., Paterson, W., Tang, C., van der Veer, G. and Viola, B. Information Technology Curricula 2017: Curriculum Guidelines for Baccalaureate Degree Programs in Information Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Clear, A., Parrish, A., Impagliazzo, J., Wang, P., Ciancarini, P., Cuadros-Vargas, E., Frezza, S., Gal-Ezer, J., Pears, A., Takada, S., Topi, H., van der Veer, G., Vichare, A., Waguespack, L. and Zhang, M. Computing Curricula 2020 (CC2020): Paradigms for Future Computing Curricula. Technical Report. Association for Computing Machinery / IEEE Computer Society, New York, NY, USA, (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Leidig, P. and Salmela, H. A Competency Model for Undergraduate Programs in Information Systems (IS2020). Technical Report. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Danyluk, A. and Leidig, P. Computing Competencies for Undergraduate Data Science Curricula (DS2021). Technical Report. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R., eds. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman. ISBN 978-0-8013-1903-7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Bamkole, A., Geissler, M., Koumadi, K., Servin, C., Tang, C., and Tucker, C. S., "Bloom's for Computing: Enhancing Bloom's Revised Taxonomy with Verbs for Computing Disciplines". The Association for Computing Machinery. (January 2023). https://ccecc.acm.org/files/publications/Blooms-for-Computing-20230119.pdf, accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Sabin, M., Alrumaih, H., Impagliazzo, J., Lunt, B., Zhang, M., Byers, B., Newhouse, W., Paterson, W., Tang, C., van der Veer, G. and Viola, B. Information Technology Curricula 2017: Curriculum Guidelines for Baccalaureate Degree Programs in Information Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Clear, A., Parrish, A., Impagliazzo, J., Wang, P., Ciancarini, P., Cuadros-Vargas, E., Frezza, S., Gal-Ezer, J., Pears, A., Takada, S., Topi, H., van der Veer, G., Vichare, A., Waguespack, L. and Zhang, M. Computing Curricula 2020 (CC2020): Paradigms for Future Computing Curricula. Technical Report. Association for Computing Machinery / IEEE Computer Society, New York, NY, USA, (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumar, A. N., Becker, B. A., Pias, M., Oudshoorn, M., Jalote, P., Servin, C., Aly, S.G., Blumenthal, R. L., Epstein, S. L., and Anderson, M.D. 2023. A Combined Knowledge and Competency (CKC) Model for Computer Science Curricula. ACM Inroads 14, 3 (September 2023), 22--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Clear, A., Clear, T., Vichare, A., Charles, T., Frezza, S., Gutica, M., Lunt, B., Maiorana, F., Pears, A., Pitt, F., Riedesel, C. and Szynkiewicz, J. Designing Computer Science Competency Statements: A Process and Curriculum Model for the 21st Century. In Proceedings of the Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE-WGR '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2020), 211--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Clear, A., Clear, T., Impagliazzo, J. and Wang, P. From Knowledge-based to Competency-based Computing Education: Future Directions. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, New York, (2020), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics; accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. https://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html; accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. https://aaai.org/about-aaai/ethics-and-diversity/#ethics-conduct; accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Simha, R., Kumar, A.N., and Raj. R. K. 2024. Undergraduate Computer Science Curricula. Commun. ACM 67, 2 (February 2024), 29--31Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. The 2022 Undergraduate Database Course in Computer Science: What to Teach?. Michael Goldweber, Min Wei, Sherif Aly, Rajendra K. Raj, and Mohamed Mokbel. ACM Inroads, 13, 3, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Jon Quast, Clay Bruning, and Sanmeet Deo. "Markets: This Opportunity for Investors Is Bigger Than Movies and Music Combined." https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/this-opportunity-for-investors-is-bigger-than-movies-and-music-combined-2021-10-03. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula. "Computing Science Curricula 2013." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Richard D. De Veaux, Mahesh Agarwal, Maia Averett, Benjamin S. Baumer, Andrew Bray, Thomas C. Bressoud, Lance Bryant, Lei Z. Cheng, Amanda Francis, Robert Gould, Albert Y. Kim, Matt Kretchmar, Qin Lu, Ann Moskol, Deborah Nolan, Roberto Pelayo, Sean Raleigh, Ricky J. Sethi, Mutiara Sondjaja, Neelesh Tiruviluamala, Paul X. Uhlig, Talitha M. Washington, Curtis L. Wesley, David White, Ping Ye, Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Programs in Data Science, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 4, 1 (2017): 15--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Prasad, S. K., Estrada, T., Ghafoor, S., Gupta, A., Kant, K., Stunkel, C., Sussman, A., Vaidyanathan, R., Weems, C., Agrawal, K., Barnas, M., Brown, D. W., Bryant, R., Bunde, D. P., Busch, C., Deb, D., Freudenthal, E., Jaja, J., Parashar, M., Phillips, C., Robey, B., Rosenberg, A., Saule, E., Shen, C. 2020. NSF/IEEE-TCPP Curriculum Initiative on Parallel and Distributed Computing - Core Topics for Undergraduates, Version II-beta, Online: http://tcpp.cs.gsu.edu/curriculum/, 53 pages. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Joint Task Force on Cybersecurity Education. 2017. Cybersecurity Curricula 2017. ACM, IEEE-CS, AIS SIGSEC, and IFIP WG 11.8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force. "Computing Curricula 1991." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force. "Computing Curricula 2001 Computer Science." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. ACM/IEEE-CS Interim Review Task Force. "Computer Science Curriculum 2008: An interim revision of CS 2001." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Randy Connolly. 2020. Why computing belongs within the social sciences. Commun. ACM 63, 8 (August 2020), 54--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. www.acm.org/about/code-of-ethicsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. IEEE Code of Ethics. https://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html; accessed March 12, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. AAAI Code of Professional Ethics and Conduct. https://aaai.org/Conferences/code-of-ethics-and-conduct.php; accessed March 12, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion - Welcoming All to Computing https://www.acm.org/diversity-inclusion; accessed March 12, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Diversity, Equity & Inclusion at IEEE. https://www.ieee.org/about/diversity-index.html; accessed March 12, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. AAAI Diversity Statement. https://aaai.org/about-aaai/ethics-and-diversity/#diversity-statement; accessed March 12, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. A Framework for Ethical Decision Making. https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/a-framework-for-ethical-decision-making/ accessed March 12, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Sustainability | United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/academic-impact/sustainability; accessed March 12, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. What is Sustainability? https://www.sustain.ucla.edu/what-is-sustainability; accessed March 12, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Catherine Caldwell-Harris, & Chloe Jordan. 2014. Systemizing and special interests: Characterizing the continuum from neurotypical to autism spectrum disorder. Learning and Individual Differences. Volume 29, Issue 2014, 98--105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. CAIR: RIT Center for Accessibility and Inclusion Research; http://cair.rit.edu/projects.html. accessed September 7, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Robert F. Cohen, Alexander V. Fairley, David Gerry, and Gustavo R. Lima. 2005. Accessibility in introductory computer science. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Robert F. Dugan Jr (2011) A survey of computer science capstone course literature, Computer Science Education, 21:3, 201--267, Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Kristen Shinohara, Saba Kawas, Amy J. Ko, and Richard E. Ladner. 2018. Who Teaches Accessibility? A Survey of U.S. Computing Faculty. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 197--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Stephanie Ludi, Matt Huenerfauth, Vicki Hanson, Nidhi Rajendra Palan, and Paula Conn. 2018. Teaching Inclusive Thinking to Undergraduate Students in Computing Programs. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 717--722.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Alannah Oleson, Amy J. Ko, Richard Ladner (Eds.) (2023). Teaching Accessible Computing. Self-Published. https://bookish.press/tac. Accessed November 28, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. PEAT; https://www.peatworks.org/. Accessed January 5, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Teach Access website, http://www.teachaccess.org. Accessed September 10, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Kendra Walther and Richard E. Ladner. 2021. Broadening participation by teaching accessibility. Communications of the ACM 64, 10 (October 2021), 19--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. WCAG https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/ Accessed November 6, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Shaun K. Kane, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Susumu Harada, and Jon Froehlich. 2011. Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 3, 3, Article 9 (April 2011), 27 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Grant Braught, Steven Huss-Lederman, Stoney Jackson, Wes Turner, and Karl R. Wurst. 2023. Engagement Models in Education-Oriented H/FOSS Projects. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. (SIGCSE 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 409--415.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Michael Goldweber, John Barr, Tony Clear, Renzo Davoli, Samuel Mann, Elizabeth Patitsas, and Scott Portnoff. 2012. A framework for enhancing the social good in computing education: a values approach. In Proceedings of the final reports on Innovation and technology in computer science education 2012 working groups (ITiCSE-WGR '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 16--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Mikey Goldweber, Lisa Kaczmarczyk, and Richard Blumenthal. Computing for the social good in education. ACM Inroads, 10, 4 (Dec 2019): 24--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Janice L. Pearce. Requiring outreach from a CS0-level robotics course. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 26, 5 (May 2011), 205--212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Lori Postner, Darci Burdge, Stoney Jackson, Heidi Ellis, George W. Hislop, and Sean Goggins. Using humanitarian free and open source software (HFOSS) to introduce computing for the social good. SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 45, 2 (June 2015), 35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Computer Science GCSE Subject Content. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7e3cb440f0b62305b81b02/Computer_Science_GCSE_-_subject_content_-_final.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov. 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. ACM Engage CSEdu Ethics Repository. https://www.engage-csedu.org/ethics-and-computing/repository. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Embedded EthiCS @ Harvard University - Modules Repository. https://embeddedethics.seas.harvard.edu/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Computing Ethics Narratives and Modules Repository at Bowdoin College and Colby College. https://computingnarratives.com. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Embedded Ethics in Computer Science at Stanford University - Modules Repository. https://embeddedethics.stanford.edu/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Embedded EthiCS Modules Repository at University of Toronto. https://www.cs.toronto.edu/embedded-ethics/modules/index.html. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Responsible Computer Science Repository at Bemidji State University. https://www.bemidjistate.edu/academics/departments/mathematics-computer-science/rcs/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Integrating Social Responsibility into Core CS. https://evanpeck.github.io/projects/responsibleCS. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Internet Rules Lab University of Colorado Boulder. https://www.internetruleslab.com/responsible-computing. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Responsible Computer Science at Washington University at St. Louis. https://www.cse.wustl.edu/~cytron/RCS/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. University of Miami Dade Responsible Computing Role Playing Lesson. https://news.mdc.edu/role-playing-scenario-developed-at-entec/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Georgia Tech Responsible Computing Science. https://sites.gatech.edu/responsiblecomputerscience/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Mozilla Responsible Computing Playbook. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Teaching Responsible Computing at University of Buffalo. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/https://c4sg.cse.buffalo.edu/projects/Teaching%20Responsible%20Computing.html. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Human Context and Ethics at UC Berkeley. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/ https://data.berkeley.edu/academics/human-contexts-and-ethics. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Social & Ethical Responsibilities of Computing at MIT. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/ https://computing.mit.edu/cross-cutting/social-and-ethical-responsibilities-of-computing. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Socially Responsible Computing @ Brown University. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/ http://ethics.cs.brown.edu/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Embedded Ethics Program at Georgetown University. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/ https://ethicslab.georgetown.edu/embedded-ethics. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Ethical Computer Science at Allegheny College. Accessed Feb 28, 2024. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/ https://csethics.allegheny.edu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Ethics 4 EU - Educational Resources. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/ https://ascnet.ie/ethics4eu-website/welcome-to-the-bricks/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Human Context and Ethics at UC Berkeley. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/ https://data.berkeley.edu/academics/human-contexts-and-ethics. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University- Technology Ethics. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/ https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/technology-ethics/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Colleen Greer & Marty J. Wolf. 2020. Overcoming barriers to including ethics and social responsibility in computing courses. In Societal Challenges in the Smart Society, 131--144. Universidad de La Rioja.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Rodrigo Ferreira & Moshe Y. Vardi. 2021. Deep tech ethics: An approach to teaching social justice in computer science. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 1041--1047.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Michelle Trim & Paige Gulley. 2023. Imagining, generating, and creating: Communication as feminist pedagogical method for teaching computing ethics. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, 206--209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. Nina Zuber, Jan Gogoll, Severin Kacianka, Alexander Pretschner, & Julian Nida-Rümelin. Empowered and embedded: ethics and agile processes. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 9, 1 (2022): 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Shamika Klassen & Casey Fiesler. Run Wild a Little with Your Imagination: Ethical Speculation in Computing Education with Black Mirror." In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 1, (2022): 836--842.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Barbara J. Grosz, David Gray Grant, Kate Vredenburgh, Jeff Behrends, Lily Hu, Alison Simmons, & Jim Waldo. 2019. Embedded EthiCS: Integrating ethics across CS education. Communications of the ACM, 62, 8 (2019): 54--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Fostering Responsible Computing Research: Foundations and Practices.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Trystan S. Goetze. 2023. Integrating ethics into computer science education: Multi-, inter-, and transdisciplinary approaches. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 1, (2023): 645--651.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. Beleicia B. Bullock, Fernando L. Nascimento, & Stacy A. Doore. Computing ethics narratives: Teaching computing ethics and the impact of predictive algorithms. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2021: 1020--1026.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Nora McDonald, Adegboyega Akinsiku, Jonathan Hunter-Cevera, Maria Sanchez, Kerrie Kephart, Mark Berczynski, and Helena M. Mentis. Responsible computing: A longitudinal study of a peer-led ethics learning framework. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 22,4 (2022): 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Alexandra Gillespie. 2023. Designing an ethical tech developer. Communications of the ACM, 66, 3 (2023): 38--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Ruha Benjamin. Race after technology, Social Theory Re-Wired, 405--415. Routledge (2023).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  105. Rachel Charlotte Smith, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Daria Loi, Rogério Abreu de Paula, Asnath Paula Kambunga, Marly Muudeni Samuel, & Tariq Zaman. Decolonizing design practices: towards pluriversality. In Extended abstracts of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Sasha Costanza-Chock. Design Justice: Community-led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. The MIT Press, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  107. Ben Shneiderman. Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: guidelines for reliable, safe, and trustworthy human-centered AI systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 10,4 (2020): 1--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Cansu Canca. 2020. Operationalizing AI ethics principles. Communications of the ACM, 63, 12 (2020): 18--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. International Organization for Standardization. Information Technology-Artificial Intelligence - Management Systems (ISO/IEC Standard 42001-2023). https://www.iso.org/standard/81230.html Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. John M. Carroll. Encountering others: Reciprocal openings in participatory design and user-centered design. Human-computer Interaction 11,3 (1996), 285--290. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. David G. Hendry, Batya Friedman, & Stephanie Ballard. Value sensitive design as a formative framework. Ethics and Information Technology 23, 23 (2021): 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. Janet Hughes, Ethan Plaut, Feng Wang, Elizabeth von Briesen, Cheryl Brown, Gerry Cross, Viraj Kumar, and Paul Myers. Global and local agendas of computing ethics education. In Proceedings of the Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 2020; (ACM, New York, NY, 2020) 239--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  113. Christopher Frauenberger and Peter Purgathofer. 2019. Responsible thinking educating future technologists. In Proceedings of CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. Wong-Villacres, M., Kutay, C., Lazem, S., Ahmed, N., Abad, C., Collazos, C., ... & Bidwell, N. J. Making ethics at home in Global CS Education: Provoking stories from the Souths. ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies. (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. William Bares, Bill Manaris, and Renée McCauley. Gender equity in computer science through Computing in the Arts - A six-year longitudinal study. Computer Science Education Journal 28, 3 (September 2018), 191--210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. William H. Bares, Bill Manaris, Renée McCauley, and Christine Moore. Achieving gender balance through creative expression. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Minneapolis, MN, USA) (SIGCSE 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 293--299.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  117. Carla E. Brodley, Benjamin J. Hescott, Jessica Biron, Ali Ressing, Melissa Peiken, Sarah Maravetz, and Alan Mislove. Broadening participation in computing via ubiquitous combined majors (CS+X). In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (Providence, RI, USA) (SIGCSE 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 544--550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. Zachary Dodds, Malia Morgan, Lindsay Popowski, Henry Coxe, Caroline Coxe, Kewei Zhou, Eliot Bush, and Ran Libeskind-Hadas. A Biology-based CS1: Results and reflections, ten years in. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 796--801.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  119. Manfred Broy, Achim D. Brucker, Alessandro Fantechi, Mario Gleirscher, Klaus Havelund, Cliff Jones, Markus Kuppe, Alexandra Mendes, André Platzer, Jan Oliver Ringert, and Allison Sullivan. Does Every Computer Scientist Need to Know Formal Methods? Submitted to Form. Asp. Comput. (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Brijesh Dongol, Catherine Dubois, Stefan Hallerstede, Eric Hehner, Daniel Jackson, Carroll Morgan, Peter Müller, Leila Ribeiro, Alexandra Silva, Graeme Smith, and Erik de Vink. On Formal Methods Thinking in Computer Science Education. Submitted to Form. Asp. Comput. (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Emil Sekerinski, Marsha Chechik, João F. Ferreira, John Hatcliff, Michael Hicks, and Kevin Lano.. Should We Teach Formal Methods or Algorithmic Problem Solving, Design Patterns, Model-Driven Engineering, Software Architecture, Software Product Lines, Requirements Engineering, and Security? In preparation 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. Maurice H. ter Beek, Rod Chapman, Rance Cleaveland, Hubert Garavel, Rong Gu, Ivo ter Horst, Jeroen J. A. Keiren, Thierry Lecomte, Michael Leuschel, Kristin Y. Rozier, Augusto Sampaio, Cristina Seceleanu, Martyn Thomas, Tim A. C. Willemse, and Lijun Zhang. 2023. Formal Methods in Industry. Submitted to Form. Asp. Comput. (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. Hubert Garavel, Maurice H. ter Beek, and Jaco van de Pol. 2020. The 2020 Expert Survey on Formal Methods. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems (FMICS'20) (LNCS, Vol. 12327), Maurice H. ter Beek and Dejan Ničković (Eds.). Springer, Germany, 3--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. Antonio Cerone, Markus Roggenbach, James Davenport, Casey Denner, Marie Farrell, Magne Haveraaen, Faron Moller, Philipp Körner, Sebastian Krings, Peter Csaba Ölveczky, Bernd-Holger Schlingloff, Nikolay Shilov, and Rustam Zhumagambetov. 2021. Rooting Formal Methods Within Higher Education Curricula for Computer Science and Software Engineering - A White Paper. In Revised Selected Papers of the 1st International Workshop on Formal Methods - Fun for Everybody (FMFun'19) (CCIS, Vol. 1301), Antonio Cerone and Markus Roggenbach (Eds.). Springer, Germany, 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, et al. Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays. In Nature. (6 Dec. 2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  126. Bob Coecke. https://medium.com/quantinuum/everyone-can-learn-quantum-now-even-at-a-cutting-edge-level-and-we-have-the-test-scores-to-prove-49e7fdc5c509 (21 Dec. 2023). Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  127. Bob Coecke and Stefano Gogioso. Quantum in Pictures: A New Way to Understand the Quantum World. Cambridge Quantum, 1st edition (3 Feb. 2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  128. John Preskill. Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum 2, 79 (2018). https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2018-08-06-79/. Accessed March 2024; Preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00862. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  129. John Preskill. Quantum technology in the short term and long term: the search for applications. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSzpz8N7Xw4 (Q2B 2018 Keynote Address). Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  130. John Preskill. Crossing the Quantum Chasm: From NISQ to Fault Tolerance. Q2B 2023 (6 Dec 2023) http://theory.caltech.edu/~preskill/talks/Preskill-Q2B-2023 (slides, video not yet available).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  131. Terry Rudolph. What is the logical gate speed of a photonic quantum computer? (June 21, 2023, via John Preskill's Twitter account and the Quantum Frontiers blog at the Institute for Quantum Information and Matter at Caltech) https://quantumfrontiers.com/2023/06/21/what-is-the-logical-gate-speed-of-a-photonic-quantum-computer/. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. John Russell. PsiQuantum's Path to 1 Million Qubits.(21 April 2022, in hpcwire.com) https://www.hpcwire.com/2022/04/21/psiquantums-path-to-1-million-qubits-by-the-middle-of-the-decade/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  133. John Russell. Atom Computing Wins the Race to 1000 Qubits. (24 Oct. 2023 in hpcwire.com) https://www.hpcwire.com/2023/10/24/atom-computing-wins-the-race-to-1000-qubits/ Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  134. The Quantum Mechanic. IBM and UC Berkeley Usher in New Era of Quantum Computing with 1,121 Qubit Machine. Hello IBM Condor. (4 Dec. 2023) https://quantumzeitgeist.com/ibm-and-uc-berkeley-usher-in-new-era-of-quantum-computing-with-1121-qubit-machine-hello-ibm-condor/. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. Aleks Kissinger. Research unveils new picture-based approach to teaching physics. (20 Dec. 2023) https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/news/2280-full.html. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  136. Brett A. Becker, Paul Denny, James Finnie-Ansley, et al. Programming Is Hard - Or at Least It Used to Be: Educational Opportunities and Challenges of AI Code Generation. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, 2023. (Toronto, ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 500--506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  137. Paul Denny, James Prather, Brett A Becker, James Finnie-Ansley, Arto Hellas, Juho Leinonen, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Brent N Reeves, Eddie Antonio Santos, and Sami Sarsa. 2024. Computing Education in the Era of Generative AI. Commun. ACM 67, 2 (Feb. 2024). Preprint available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02608. Accessed March 2024).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  138. Paul Denny, Juho Leinonen, James Prather, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Thezyrie Amarouche, Brett Becker, and Brent Reeves. 2024. Prompt Problems: A New Programming Exercise for the Generative AI Era. In Proceedings of the 55th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Portland, OR USA) (SIGCSE '24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. Preprint available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05943. Accessed March 2024).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  139. Katie E. Ismael, Ioana Patringenaru, and Kimberley Clementi. In This Era of AI, Will Everyone Be a Programmer? UC San Diego Today (Dec 2023). https://today.ucsd.edu/story/in-this-era-of-ai-will-everyone-be-a-programmer. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  140. Sam Lau and Philip Guo. 2023. From "Ban It Till We Understand It" to "Resistance is Futile": How University Programming Instructors Plan to Adapt as More Students Use AI Code Generation and Explanation Tools Such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1 (Chicago, IL, USA) (ICER '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 106--121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  141. Juho Leinonen, Arto Hellas, Sami Sarsa, et al. Using Large Language Models to Enhance Programming Error Messages. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (Toronto, ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 563--569.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  142. Stephen MacNeil, Andrew Tran, Dan Mogil, Seth Bernstein, Erin Ross, and Ziheng Huang. Generating Diverse Code Explanations using the GPT-3 Large Language Model. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 2 (ICER '22), Vol. 2. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 37--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  143. Leo Porter and Daniel Zingaro. 2023. Learn AI-Assisted Python Programming with GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT. Manning, Shelter Island, NY, USA. https://www.manning.com/books/learn-ai-assisted-python-programming. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  144. James Prather, Paul Denny, Juho Leinonen, Brett A. Becker, Ibrahim Albluwi, Michelle Craig, Hieke Keuning, Natalie Kiesler, Tobias Kohn, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Stephen MacNeil, Andrew Petersen, Raymond Pettit, Brent N. Reeves, and Jaromir Savelka. The Robots Are Here: Navigating the Generative AI Revolution in Computing Education. In Proceedings of the 2023 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Turku, Finland) (ITiCSE-WGR '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 108--159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  145. James Prather, Brent N. Reeves, Paul Denny, Brett A. Becker, Juho Leinonen, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Garrett Powell, James Finnie-Ansley, and Eddie Antonio Santos. 2023. "It's Weird That It Knows What I Want": Usability and Interactions with Copilot for Novice Programmers. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 31, 1, Article 4 (Nov 2023), 31 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  146. Sami Sarsa, Paul Denny, Arto Hellas, and Juho Leinonen. Automatic Generation of Programming Exercises and Code Explanations Using Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1 (Lugano and Virtual Event, Switzerland) (ICER '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 27-- 43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  147. ABET (2022). ABET Computing Accreditation Commission: Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-computing-programs-2022-2023/. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  148. ACM (2013). Computer Science Curricula 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science, Association for Computing Machinery and IEEE Computer Society.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  149. Mikey Goldweber, Min Wei, Sherif Aly, Rajendra K. Raj, and Mohamed Mokbel. The 2022 undergraduate database course in computer science: what to teach? ACM Inroads 13, 3 (September 2022), 16--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  150. Kim B. Bruce, Robert D. Cupper, and Robert L. Scot Drysdale. A History of the Liberal Arts Computer Science Consortium and Its Model Curricula. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 10,1, Article 3 (March 2010), 12 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  151. Liberal Arts Computer Science Consortium. A 2007 Model Curriculum for a Liberal Arts Degree in Computer Science. J. Educ. Resour. Comput. 7,2 (June 2007), 2-es.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  152. Henry M. Walker and G. Michael Schneider. A Revised Model Curriculum for a Liberal Arts Degree in Computer Science. Commun. ACM 39,12 (Dec. 1996), 85--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  153. Norman E. Gibbs and Allen B. Tucker. A Model Curriculum for a Liberal Arts Degree in Computer Science. Commun. ACM 29, 3 (March 1986), 202--210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  154. Amanda Holland-Minkley, Jakob Barnard, Valerie Barr, Grant Braught, Janet Davis, David Reed, Karl Schmitt, Andrea Tartaro, and James D. Teresco. Computer Science Curriculum Guidelines: A New Liberal Arts Perspective. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (SIGCSE 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 617--623.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  155. James D. Teresco, Andrea Tartaro, Amanda Holland-Minkley, Grant Braught, Jakob Barnard, and Douglas Baldwin. CS Curricular Innovations with a Liberal Arts Philosophy. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (Providence, RI, USA) (SIGCSE 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 537--543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  156. Henry M. Walker and Samuel A. Rebelsky. Using CS2013 for a Department's Curriculum Review: A Case Study. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 29,5 (May 2014), 138--144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  157. David Reed. Spiraling CS2013 Knowledge Units across a Small CS Curriculum. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 32,5 (May 2017), 125--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  158. Amanda Holland-Minkley, Andrea Tartaro, and Jakob Barnard. Innovations and Opportunities in Liberal Arts Computing Education, https://computing-in-the-liberal-arts.github.io/SIGCSE2023-Affiliated-Event/. URL. SIGCSE 2023 Affiliated Event by the SIGCSE Committee on Computing Education in Liberal Arts Colleges.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  159. Jakob Barnard, Grant Braught, Janet Davis, Amanda Holland-Minkley, David Reed, Karl Schmitt, Andrea Tartaro, and James Teresco. Developing Identity-Focused Program-Level Learning Outcomes for Liberal Arts Computing Programs. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 39,4 (October 2023), 97--98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  160. Jakob Barnard, Grant Braught, Janet Davis, Amanda Holland-Minkley, David Reed, Karl Schmitt, Andrea Tartaro, and James Teresco. Reflective Curriculum Review for Liberal Arts Computing Programs. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 38, 3 (November 2022), 178--179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  161. SIGCSE Committee on Computing Education in Liberal Arts Colleges. 2023. CS2023 Activity: The Curricular Practices Workbook. https://computing-in-the-liberal-arts.github.io/CS2023/. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  162. "ABET Accredits 54 Additional Programs in 2021, Including First Associate Cybersecurity programs." https://www.abet.org/abet-accredits-54-new-programs-in-2021-including-first-associate-cybersecurity-programs/. Accessed Feb 29, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  163. William F. Atchison, Samuel D. Conte, John W. Hamblen, Thomas E. Hull, Thomas A. Keenan, William B. Kehl, Edward J. McCluskey, Silvio O. Navarro, Werner C. Rheinboldt, Earl J. Schweppe, William Viavant, and David M. Young. "Curriculum 68: Recommendations for Academic Programs in Computer Science: A Report of the ACM Curriculum Committee on Computer Science." Communications of the ACM 11,3 (1968), 151--197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  164. Jill Denner, Paul Tymann, and Huihui Wang. "Community College Pathways." In Proceedings of the 2023 CISE EWF PI Meeting. Georgia Tech Conference Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  165. Dennis Foley, Leslie Milan, and Karen Hamrick. 2020. "The Increasing Role of Community Colleges among Bachelor's Degree Recipients: Findings from the 2019 National Survey of College Graduates." Technical Report NSF 21-309. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES), Alexandria, VA. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21309/. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  166. ACM Committee for Computing Education in Community Colleges (CCECC). 2017. "ACM Computer Science Curricular Guidance for Associate-Degree Transfer Programs with Infused Cybersecurity." 2017. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  167. The Community College Presidents Initiative in STEM. 2023. "Community college presidents initiative - STEM - achieving excellence in workforce education." https://www.ccpi-stem.org/. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  168. Robin G Isserles. "The Costs of Completion: Student Success in Community College." JHU Press, 2021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  169. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula and IEEE Computer Society. "Computer Science Curricula 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science." ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  170. A. Kahlon, D. Boisvert, L.A. Lyon, M. Williamson, and C. Calhoun. "The Authentic Inclusion and Role of Community Colleges in National Efforts to Broaden Participation in Computing." In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '18). ACM, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  171. Amruth N. Kumar and Rajendra K. Raj. "Computer Science Curricula 2023 (CS2023): Community Engagement by the ACM/IEEE-CS/AAAI Joint Task Force." In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2 (Toronto, ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1212--1213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  172. Joyce Currie Little, Richard H. Austing, Harice Seeds, John Maniotes, and Gerald L. Engel.. "Curriculum recommendations and guidelines for the community and junior college career program in computer programming: a working paper of the ACM committee on curriculum in computer sciences by the subcommittee on community and junior college curriculum." ACM SIGCSE Bulletin - Special issue on computer science curricula 9, 2 (1977), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  173. B. Morrison and A. Settle. "Celebrating SIGCSE's 50th Anniversary!" SIGCSE Bulletin 50,1 (2018), 2--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  174. American Association of Community Colleges. 2022. "The Economic Value of America's Community Colleges." https://www.aacc.nche.edu/2022/11/29/the-economic-value-of-americas-community-colleges-report/. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  175. Christian Servín. "Fuzzy Information Processing Computing Curricula: A Perspective from the First Two-Years in Computing Education." In Explainable AI and Other Applications of Fuzzy Techniques: Proceedings of the 2021 Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, NAFIPS 2021. Springer, 453--460.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  176. Christian Servin, Elizabeth K. Hawthorne, Lori Postner, Cara Tang, and Cindy Tucker. "Community Colleges Perspectives: From Challenges to Considerations in Curricula Development (SIGCSE 2023)." Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  177. Christian Servin, Elizabeth K. Hawthorne, Lori Postner, Cara Tang, and Cindy S. Tucker. "Mathematical Considerations in Two-Year Computing Degrees: The Evolution of Math in Curricular Guidelines." In The 24th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE '23) (Marietta, GA, USA). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  178. Cara Tang. 2017. "Community College Corner Community colleges in the United States and around the world." ACM Inroads 8,1 (2017), 21--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  179. Cara Tang. 2018. "Community Colleges and SIGCSE: A Legacy Fueling the Future." ACM Inroads 9,4 (2018), 49--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  180. Cara Tang, Elizabeth K Hawthorne, Cindy S Tucker, Ernesto Cuadros-Vargas, Diana Cukierman, and Ming Zhang. "Global Perspectives on the Role of Two-Year/Technical/Junior Colleges in Computing Education." In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 204--205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  181. "Celebrating 40++ years of service to computing education communities." [n.d.]. ACM CCECC. https://ccecc.acm.org/correlations/all. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  182. Stuart Zweben, Jodi L.Tims, Cindy Tucker, and Yan Timanovsky. "ACM-NDC Study 2021--2022: Tenth Annual Study of Non-Doctoral-Granting Departments in Computing." ACM Inroads 13,3 (2022), 38--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  183. Stuart Zweben and Cindy Tucker. "How Well Did We Keep Students in Computing Programs, Pre-COVID and COVID?" ACM Inroads 13,4 (2022), 32--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  184. Atchison, W. F., Conte, S. D., Hamblen, J. W., Hull, T. E., Keenan, T. A., Kehl, W. B., McCluskey, E. J., Navarro, S. O., Rheinboldt, W. C., Schweppe, E. J., Viavant, W., and Young, D. "Curriculum 68: Recommendations for academic programs in computer science." Communications of the ACM, 11, 3 (1968): 151--197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  185. Austing, R. H., Barnes, B. H., Bonnette, D. T., Engel, G. L., and Stokes, G. "Curriculum '78: Recommendations for the undergraduate program in computer science." Communications of the ACM, 22, 3 (1979): 147--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  186. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force. "Computing Curricula 1991." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  187. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force. "Computing Curricula 2001 Computer Science." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  188. ACM/IEEE-CS Interim Review Task Force. "Computer Science Curriculum 2008: An interim revision of CS 2001." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  189. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula. "Computing Science Curricula 2013." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  190. Sabin, M., Alrumaih, H., Impagliazzo, J., Lunt, B., Zhang, M., Byers, B., Newhouse, W., Paterson, W., Tang, C., van der Veer, G. and Viola, B. Information Technology Curricula 2017: Curriculum Guidelines for Baccalaureate Degree Programs in Information Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  191. Clear, A., Parrish, A., Impagliazzo, J., Wang, P., Ciancarini, P., Cuadros-Vargas, E., Frezza, S., Gal-Ezer, J., Pears, A., Takada, S., Topi, H., van der Veer, G., Vichare, A., Waguespack, L. and Zhang, M. Computing Curricula 2020 (CC2020): Paradigms for Future Computing Curricula. Technical Report. Association for Computing Machinery / IEEE Computer Society, New York, NY, USA, (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  192. Leidig, P. and Salmela, H. A Competency Model for Undergraduate Programs in Information Systems (IS2020). Technical Report. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  193. Danyluk, A. and Leidig, P. Computing Competencies for Undergraduate Data Science Curricula (DS2021). Technical Report. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  194. https://iiitd.ac.in/sites/default/files/docs/aicte/AICTE-CSE-Curriculum-Recommendations-July2022.pdf, accessed July 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  195. Prasad, S. K., Estrada, T., Ghafoor, S., Gupta, A., Kant, K., Stunkel, C., Sussman, A., Vaidyanathan, R., Weems, C., Agrawal, K., Barnas, M., Brown, D. W., Bryant, R., Bunde, D. P., Busch, C., Deb, D., Freudenthal, E., Jaja, J., Parashar, M., Phillips, C., Robey, B., Rosenberg, A., Saule, E., Shen, C. 2020. NSF/IEEE-TCPP Curriculum Initiative on Parallel and Distributed Computing - Core Topics for Undergraduates, Version II-beta, Online: http://tcpp.cs.gsu.edu/curriculum/, 53 pages, accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  196. https://ccecc.acm.org/files/publications/Cyber2yr2020.pdf, accessed July 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  197. https://www.computer.org/volunteering/boards-and-committees/professional-educational-activities/software-engineering-competency-model, accessed July 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  198. Kumar, A. N., Becker, B. A., Pias, M., Oudshoorn, M., Jalote, P., Servin, C., Aly, S.G., Blumenthal, R. L., Epstein, S. L., and Anderson, M.D. 2023. A Combined Knowledge and Competency (CKC) Model for Computer Science Curricula. ACM Inroads 14, 3 (September 2023), 22--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  199. Liu, Y., Xiang, Q., Chen, J., Zhang, M., Xu, J., and Luo, Y. Undergraduate Computer Science Education in China. ACM Inroads, Vol 15, 1, March 2024, 28--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  200. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force. "Computing Curricula 2001 Computer Science." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  201. ACM/IEEE-CS Interim Review Task Force. "Computer Science Curriculum 2008: An interim revision of CS 2001." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  202. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula. "Computing Science Curricula 2013." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  203. Sabin, M., Alrumaih, H., Impagliazzo, J., Lunt, B., Zhang, M., Byers, B., Newhouse, W., Paterson, W., Tang, C., van der Veer, G. and Viola, B. Information Technology Curricula 2017: Curriculum Guidelines for Baccalaureate Degree Programs in Information Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  204. Clear, A., Parrish, A., Impagliazzo, J., Wang, P., Ciancarini, P., Cuadros-Vargas, E., Frezza, S., Gal-Ezer, J., Pears, A., Takada, S., Topi, H., van der Veer, G., Vichare, A., Waguespack, L. and Zhang, M. Computing Curricula 2020 (CC2020): Paradigms for Future Computing Curricula. Technical Report. Association for Computing Machinery / IEEE Computer Society, New York, NY, USA, (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  205. Leidig, P. and Salmela, H. A Competency Model for Undergraduate Programs in Information Systems (IS2020). Technical Report. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  206. Danyluk, A. and Leidig, P. Computing Competencies for Undergraduate Data Science Curricula (DS2021). Technical Report. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  207. Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R., eds. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman. ISBN 978-0-8013-1903-7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  208. Bamkole, A., Geissler, M., Koumadi, K., Servin, C., Tang, C., and Tucker, C. S., "Bloom's for Computing: Enhancing Bloom's Revised Taxonomy with Verbs for Computing Disciplines". The Association for Computing Machinery. (January 2023). https://ccecc.acm.org/files/publications/Blooms-for-Computing-20230119.pdf, accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  209. Sabin, M., Alrumaih, H., Impagliazzo, J., Lunt, B., Zhang, M., Byers, B., Newhouse, W., Paterson, W., Tang, C., van der Veer, G. and Viola, B. Information Technology Curricula 2017: Curriculum Guidelines for Baccalaureate Degree Programs in Information Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  210. Clear, A., Parrish, A., Impagliazzo, J., Wang, P., Ciancarini, P., Cuadros-Vargas, E., Frezza, S., Gal-Ezer, J., Pears, A., Takada, S., Topi, H., van der Veer, G., Vichare, A., Waguespack, L. and Zhang, M. Computing Curricula 2020 (CC2020): Paradigms for Future Computing Curricula. Technical Report. Association for Computing Machinery / IEEE Computer Society, New York, NY, USA, (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  211. Kumar, A. N., Becker, B. A., Pias, M., Oudshoorn, M., Jalote, P., Servin, C., Aly, S.G., Blumenthal, R. L., Epstein, S. L., and Anderson, M.D. 2023. A Combined Knowledge and Competency (CKC) Model for Computer Science Curricula. ACM Inroads 14, 3 (September 2023), 22--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  212. Clear, A., Clear, T., Vichare, A., Charles, T., Frezza, S., Gutica, M., Lunt, B., Maiorana, F., Pears, A., Pitt, F., Riedesel, C. and Szynkiewicz, J. Designing Computer Science Competency Statements: A Process and Curriculum Model for the 21st Century. In Proceedings of the Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE-WGR '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2020), 211--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  213. Clear, A., Clear, T., Impagliazzo, J. and Wang, P. From Knowledge-based to Competency-based Computing Education: Future Directions. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, New York, (2020), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  214. https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics; accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  215. https://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html; accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  216. https://aaai.org/about-aaai/ethics-and-diversity/#ethics-conduct; accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  217. Simha, R., Kumar, A.N., and Raj. R. K. 2024. Undergraduate Computer Science Curricula. Commun. ACM 67, 2 (February 2024), 29--31Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  218. The 2022 Undergraduate Database Course in Computer Science: What to Teach?. Michael Goldweber, Min Wei, Sherif Aly, Rajendra K. Raj, and Mohamed Mokbel. ACM Inroads, 13, 3, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  219. Jon Quast, Clay Bruning, and Sanmeet Deo. "Markets: This Opportunity for Investors Is Bigger Than Movies and Music Combined." https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/this-opportunity-for-investors-is-bigger-than-movies-and-music-combined-2021-10-03. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  220. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula. "Computing Science Curricula 2013." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  221. Richard D. De Veaux, Mahesh Agarwal, Maia Averett, Benjamin S. Baumer, Andrew Bray, Thomas C. Bressoud, Lance Bryant, Lei Z. Cheng, Amanda Francis, Robert Gould, Albert Y. Kim, Matt Kretchmar, Qin Lu, Ann Moskol, Deborah Nolan, Roberto Pelayo, Sean Raleigh, Ricky J. Sethi, Mutiara Sondjaja, Neelesh Tiruviluamala, Paul X. Uhlig, Talitha M. Washington, Curtis L. Wesley, David White, Ping Ye, Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Programs in Data Science, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 4, 1 (2017): 15--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  222. Prasad, S. K., Estrada, T., Ghafoor, S., Gupta, A., Kant, K., Stunkel, C., Sussman, A., Vaidyanathan, R., Weems, C., Agrawal, K., Barnas, M., Brown, D. W., Bryant, R., Bunde, D. P., Busch, C., Deb, D., Freudenthal, E., Jaja, J., Parashar, M., Phillips, C., Robey, B., Rosenberg, A., Saule, E., Shen, C. 2020. NSF/IEEE-TCPP Curriculum Initiative on Parallel and Distributed Computing - Core Topics for Undergraduates, Version II-beta, Online: http://tcpp.cs.gsu.edu/curriculum/, 53 pages. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  223. Joint Task Force on Cybersecurity Education. 2017. Cybersecurity Curricula 2017. ACM, IEEE-CS, AIS SIGSEC, and IFIP WG 11.8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  224. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force. "Computing Curricula 1991." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  225. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force. "Computing Curricula 2001 Computer Science." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  226. ACM/IEEE-CS Interim Review Task Force. "Computer Science Curriculum 2008: An interim revision of CS 2001." (New York, USA: ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  227. Randy Connolly. 2020. Why computing belongs within the social sciences. Commun. ACM 63, 8 (August 2020), 54--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  228. ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. www.acm.org/about/code-of-ethicsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  229. IEEE Code of Ethics. https://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html; accessed March 12, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  230. AAAI Code of Professional Ethics and Conduct. https://aaai.org/Conferences/code-of-ethics-and-conduct.php; accessed March 12, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  231. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion - Welcoming All to Computing https://www.acm.org/diversity-inclusion; accessed March 12, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  232. Diversity, Equity & Inclusion at IEEE. https://www.ieee.org/about/diversity-index.html; accessed March 12, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  233. AAAI Diversity Statement. https://aaai.org/about-aaai/ethics-and-diversity/#diversity-statement; accessed March 12, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  234. A Framework for Ethical Decision Making. https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/a-framework-for-ethical-decision-making/ accessed March 12, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  235. Sustainability | United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/academic-impact/sustainability; accessed March 12, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  236. What is Sustainability? https://www.sustain.ucla.edu/what-is-sustainability; accessed March 12, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  237. Catherine Caldwell-Harris, & Chloe Jordan. 2014. Systemizing and special interests: Characterizing the continuum from neurotypical to autism spectrum disorder. Learning and Individual Differences. Volume 29, Issue 2014, 98--105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  238. CAIR: RIT Center for Accessibility and Inclusion Research; http://cair.rit.edu/projects.html. accessed September 7, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  239. Robert F. Cohen, Alexander V. Fairley, David Gerry, and Gustavo R. Lima. 2005. Accessibility in introductory computer science. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  240. Robert F. Dugan Jr (2011) A survey of computer science capstone course literature, Computer Science Education, 21:3, 201--267, Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  241. Kristen Shinohara, Saba Kawas, Amy J. Ko, and Richard E. Ladner. 2018. Who Teaches Accessibility? A Survey of U.S. Computing Faculty. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 197--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  242. Stephanie Ludi, Matt Huenerfauth, Vicki Hanson, Nidhi Rajendra Palan, and Paula Conn. 2018. Teaching Inclusive Thinking to Undergraduate Students in Computing Programs. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 717--722.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  243. Alannah Oleson, Amy J. Ko, Richard Ladner (Eds.) (2023). Teaching Accessible Computing. Self-Published. https://bookish.press/tac. Accessed November 28, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  244. PEAT; https://www.peatworks.org/. Accessed January 5, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  245. Teach Access website, http://www.teachaccess.org. Accessed September 10, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  246. Kendra Walther and Richard E. Ladner. 2021. Broadening participation by teaching accessibility. Communications of the ACM 64, 10 (October 2021), 19--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  247. WCAG https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/ Accessed November 6, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  248. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Shaun K. Kane, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Susumu Harada, and Jon Froehlich. 2011. Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 3, 3, Article 9 (April 2011), 27 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  249. Grant Braught, Steven Huss-Lederman, Stoney Jackson, Wes Turner, and Karl R. Wurst. 2023. Engagement Models in Education-Oriented H/FOSS Projects. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. (SIGCSE 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 409--415.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  250. Michael Goldweber, John Barr, Tony Clear, Renzo Davoli, Samuel Mann, Elizabeth Patitsas, and Scott Portnoff. 2012. A framework for enhancing the social good in computing education: a values approach. In Proceedings of the final reports on Innovation and technology in computer science education 2012 working groups (ITiCSE-WGR '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 16--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  251. Mikey Goldweber, Lisa Kaczmarczyk, and Richard Blumenthal. Computing for the social good in education. ACM Inroads, 10, 4 (Dec 2019): 24--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  252. Janice L. Pearce. Requiring outreach from a CS0-level robotics course. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 26, 5 (May 2011), 205--212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  253. Lori Postner, Darci Burdge, Stoney Jackson, Heidi Ellis, George W. Hislop, and Sean Goggins. Using humanitarian free and open source software (HFOSS) to introduce computing for the social good. SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 45, 2 (June 2015), 35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  254. Computer Science GCSE Subject Content. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7e3cb440f0b62305b81b02/Computer_Science_GCSE_-_subject_content_-_final.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov. 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  255. ACM Engage CSEdu Ethics Repository. https://www.engage-csedu.org/ethics-and-computing/repository. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  256. Embedded EthiCS @ Harvard University - Modules Repository. https://embeddedethics.seas.harvard.edu/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  257. Computing Ethics Narratives and Modules Repository at Bowdoin College and Colby College. https://computingnarratives.com. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  258. Embedded Ethics in Computer Science at Stanford University - Modules Repository. https://embeddedethics.stanford.edu/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  259. Embedded EthiCS Modules Repository at University of Toronto. https://www.cs.toronto.edu/embedded-ethics/modules/index.html. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  260. Responsible Computer Science Repository at Bemidji State University. https://www.bemidjistate.edu/academics/departments/mathematics-computer-science/rcs/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  261. Integrating Social Responsibility into Core CS. https://evanpeck.github.io/projects/responsibleCS. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  262. Internet Rules Lab University of Colorado Boulder. https://www.internetruleslab.com/responsible-computing. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  263. Responsible Computer Science at Washington University at St. Louis. https://www.cse.wustl.edu/~cytron/RCS/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  264. University of Miami Dade Responsible Computing Role Playing Lesson. https://news.mdc.edu/role-playing-scenario-developed-at-entec/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  265. Georgia Tech Responsible Computing Science. https://sites.gatech.edu/responsiblecomputerscience/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  266. Mozilla Responsible Computing Playbook. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  267. Teaching Responsible Computing at University of Buffalo. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/https://c4sg.cse.buffalo.edu/projects/Teaching%20Responsible%20Computing.html. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  268. Human Context and Ethics at UC Berkeley. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/ https://data.berkeley.edu/academics/human-contexts-and-ethics. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  269. Social & Ethical Responsibilities of Computing at MIT. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/ https://computing.mit.edu/cross-cutting/social-and-ethical-responsibilities-of-computing. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  270. Socially Responsible Computing @ Brown University. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/ http://ethics.cs.brown.edu/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  271. Embedded Ethics Program at Georgetown University. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/ https://ethicslab.georgetown.edu/embedded-ethics. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  272. Ethical Computer Science at Allegheny College. Accessed Feb 28, 2024. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/ https://csethics.allegheny.edu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  273. Ethics 4 EU - Educational Resources. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/ https://ascnet.ie/ethics4eu-website/welcome-to-the-bricks/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  274. Human Context and Ethics at UC Berkeley. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/ https://data.berkeley.edu/academics/human-contexts-and-ethics. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  275. Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University- Technology Ethics. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/ https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/technology-ethics/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  276. Colleen Greer & Marty J. Wolf. 2020. Overcoming barriers to including ethics and social responsibility in computing courses. In Societal Challenges in the Smart Society, 131--144. Universidad de La Rioja.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  277. Rodrigo Ferreira & Moshe Y. Vardi. 2021. Deep tech ethics: An approach to teaching social justice in computer science. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 1041--1047.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  278. Michelle Trim & Paige Gulley. 2023. Imagining, generating, and creating: Communication as feminist pedagogical method for teaching computing ethics. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, 206--209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  279. Nina Zuber, Jan Gogoll, Severin Kacianka, Alexander Pretschner, & Julian Nida-Rümelin. Empowered and embedded: ethics and agile processes. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 9, 1 (2022): 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  280. Shamika Klassen & Casey Fiesler. Run Wild a Little with Your Imagination: Ethical Speculation in Computing Education with Black Mirror." In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 1, (2022): 836--842.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  281. Barbara J. Grosz, David Gray Grant, Kate Vredenburgh, Jeff Behrends, Lily Hu, Alison Simmons, & Jim Waldo. 2019. Embedded EthiCS: Integrating ethics across CS education. Communications of the ACM, 62, 8 (2019): 54--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  282. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Fostering Responsible Computing Research: Foundations and Practices.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  283. Trystan S. Goetze. 2023. Integrating ethics into computer science education: Multi-, inter-, and transdisciplinary approaches. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 1, (2023): 645--651.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  284. Beleicia B. Bullock, Fernando L. Nascimento, & Stacy A. Doore. Computing ethics narratives: Teaching computing ethics and the impact of predictive algorithms. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2021: 1020--1026.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  285. Nora McDonald, Adegboyega Akinsiku, Jonathan Hunter-Cevera, Maria Sanchez, Kerrie Kephart, Mark Berczynski, and Helena M. Mentis. Responsible computing: A longitudinal study of a peer-led ethics learning framework. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 22,4 (2022): 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  286. Alexandra Gillespie. 2023. Designing an ethical tech developer. Communications of the ACM, 66, 3 (2023): 38--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  287. Ruha Benjamin. Race after technology, Social Theory Re-Wired, 405--415. Routledge (2023).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  288. Rachel Charlotte Smith, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Daria Loi, Rogério Abreu de Paula, Asnath Paula Kambunga, Marly Muudeni Samuel, & Tariq Zaman. Decolonizing design practices: towards pluriversality. In Extended abstracts of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  289. Sasha Costanza-Chock. Design Justice: Community-led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. The MIT Press, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  290. Ben Shneiderman. Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: guidelines for reliable, safe, and trustworthy human-centered AI systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 10,4 (2020): 1--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  291. Cansu Canca. 2020. Operationalizing AI ethics principles. Communications of the ACM, 63, 12 (2020): 18--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  292. International Organization for Standardization. Information Technology-Artificial Intelligence - Management Systems (ISO/IEC Standard 42001-2023). https://www.iso.org/standard/81230.html Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  293. John M. Carroll. Encountering others: Reciprocal openings in participatory design and user-centered design. Human-computer Interaction 11,3 (1996), 285--290. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/responsible-computing-challenge-playbook/. Accessed Feb 28, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  294. David G. Hendry, Batya Friedman, & Stephanie Ballard. Value sensitive design as a formative framework. Ethics and Information Technology 23, 23 (2021): 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  295. Janet Hughes, Ethan Plaut, Feng Wang, Elizabeth von Briesen, Cheryl Brown, Gerry Cross, Viraj Kumar, and Paul Myers. Global and local agendas of computing ethics education. In Proceedings of the Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 2020; (ACM, New York, NY, 2020) 239--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  296. Christopher Frauenberger and Peter Purgathofer. 2019. Responsible thinking educating future technologists. In Proceedings of CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  297. Wong-Villacres, M., Kutay, C., Lazem, S., Ahmed, N., Abad, C., Collazos, C., ... & Bidwell, N. J. Making ethics at home in Global CS Education: Provoking stories from the Souths. ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies. (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  298. William Bares, Bill Manaris, and Renée McCauley. Gender equity in computer science through Computing in the Arts - A six-year longitudinal study. Computer Science Education Journal 28, 3 (September 2018), 191--210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  299. William H. Bares, Bill Manaris, Renée McCauley, and Christine Moore. Achieving gender balance through creative expression. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Minneapolis, MN, USA) (SIGCSE 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 293--299.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  300. Carla E. Brodley, Benjamin J. Hescott, Jessica Biron, Ali Ressing, Melissa Peiken, Sarah Maravetz, and Alan Mislove. Broadening participation in computing via ubiquitous combined majors (CS+X). In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (Providence, RI, USA) (SIGCSE 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 544--550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  301. Zachary Dodds, Malia Morgan, Lindsay Popowski, Henry Coxe, Caroline Coxe, Kewei Zhou, Eliot Bush, and Ran Libeskind-Hadas. A Biology-based CS1: Results and reflections, ten years in. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 796--801.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  302. Manfred Broy, Achim D. Brucker, Alessandro Fantechi, Mario Gleirscher, Klaus Havelund, Cliff Jones, Markus Kuppe, Alexandra Mendes, André Platzer, Jan Oliver Ringert, and Allison Sullivan. Does Every Computer Scientist Need to Know Formal Methods? Submitted to Form. Asp. Comput. (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  303. Brijesh Dongol, Catherine Dubois, Stefan Hallerstede, Eric Hehner, Daniel Jackson, Carroll Morgan, Peter Müller, Leila Ribeiro, Alexandra Silva, Graeme Smith, and Erik de Vink. On Formal Methods Thinking in Computer Science Education. Submitted to Form. Asp. Comput. (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  304. Emil Sekerinski, Marsha Chechik, João F. Ferreira, John Hatcliff, Michael Hicks, and Kevin Lano.. Should We Teach Formal Methods or Algorithmic Problem Solving, Design Patterns, Model-Driven Engineering, Software Architecture, Software Product Lines, Requirements Engineering, and Security? In preparation 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  305. Maurice H. ter Beek, Rod Chapman, Rance Cleaveland, Hubert Garavel, Rong Gu, Ivo ter Horst, Jeroen J. A. Keiren, Thierry Lecomte, Michael Leuschel, Kristin Y. Rozier, Augusto Sampaio, Cristina Seceleanu, Martyn Thomas, Tim A. C. Willemse, and Lijun Zhang. 2023. Formal Methods in Industry. Submitted to Form. Asp. Comput. (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  306. Hubert Garavel, Maurice H. ter Beek, and Jaco van de Pol. 2020. The 2020 Expert Survey on Formal Methods. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems (FMICS'20) (LNCS, Vol. 12327), Maurice H. ter Beek and Dejan Ničković (Eds.). Springer, Germany, 3--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  307. Antonio Cerone, Markus Roggenbach, James Davenport, Casey Denner, Marie Farrell, Magne Haveraaen, Faron Moller, Philipp Körner, Sebastian Krings, Peter Csaba Ölveczky, Bernd-Holger Schlingloff, Nikolay Shilov, and Rustam Zhumagambetov. 2021. Rooting Formal Methods Within Higher Education Curricula for Computer Science and Software Engineering - A White Paper. In Revised Selected Papers of the 1st International Workshop on Formal Methods - Fun for Everybody (FMFun'19) (CCIS, Vol. 1301), Antonio Cerone and Markus Roggenbach (Eds.). Springer, Germany, 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  308. D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, et al. Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays. In Nature. (6 Dec. 2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  309. Bob Coecke. https://medium.com/quantinuum/everyone-can-learn-quantum-now-even-at-a-cutting-edge-level-and-we-have-the-test-scores-to-prove-49e7fdc5c509 (21 Dec. 2023). Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  310. Bob Coecke and Stefano Gogioso. Quantum in Pictures: A New Way to Understand the Quantum World. Cambridge Quantum, 1st edition (3 Feb. 2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  311. John Preskill. Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum 2, 79 (2018). https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2018-08-06-79/. Accessed March 2024; Preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00862. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  312. John Preskill. Quantum technology in the short term and long term: the search for applications. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSzpz8N7Xw4 (Q2B 2018 Keynote Address). Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  313. John Preskill. Crossing the Quantum Chasm: From NISQ to Fault Tolerance. Q2B 2023 (6 Dec 2023) http://theory.caltech.edu/~preskill/talks/Preskill-Q2B-2023 (slides, video not yet available).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  314. Terry Rudolph. What is the logical gate speed of a photonic quantum computer? (June 21, 2023, via John Preskill's Twitter account and the Quantum Frontiers blog at the Institute for Quantum Information and Matter at Caltech) https://quantumfrontiers.com/2023/06/21/what-is-the-logical-gate-speed-of-a-photonic-quantum-computer/. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  315. John Russell. PsiQuantum's Path to 1 Million Qubits.(21 April 2022, in hpcwire.com) https://www.hpcwire.com/2022/04/21/psiquantums-path-to-1-million-qubits-by-the-middle-of-the-decade/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  316. John Russell. Atom Computing Wins the Race to 1000 Qubits. (24 Oct. 2023 in hpcwire.com) https://www.hpcwire.com/2023/10/24/atom-computing-wins-the-race-to-1000-qubits/ Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  317. The Quantum Mechanic. IBM and UC Berkeley Usher in New Era of Quantum Computing with 1,121 Qubit Machine. Hello IBM Condor. (4 Dec. 2023) https://quantumzeitgeist.com/ibm-and-uc-berkeley-usher-in-new-era-of-quantum-computing-with-1121-qubit-machine-hello-ibm-condor/. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  318. Aleks Kissinger. Research unveils new picture-based approach to teaching physics. (20 Dec. 2023) https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/news/2280-full.html. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  319. Brett A. Becker, Paul Denny, James Finnie-Ansley, et al. Programming Is Hard - Or at Least It Used to Be: Educational Opportunities and Challenges of AI Code Generation. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, 2023. (Toronto, ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 500--506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  320. Paul Denny, James Prather, Brett A Becker, James Finnie-Ansley, Arto Hellas, Juho Leinonen, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Brent N Reeves, Eddie Antonio Santos, and Sami Sarsa. 2024. Computing Education in the Era of Generative AI. Commun. ACM 67, 2 (Feb. 2024). Preprint available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02608. Accessed March 2024).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  321. Paul Denny, Juho Leinonen, James Prather, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Thezyrie Amarouche, Brett Becker, and Brent Reeves. 2024. Prompt Problems: A New Programming Exercise for the Generative AI Era. In Proceedings of the 55th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Portland, OR USA) (SIGCSE '24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. Preprint available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05943. Accessed March 2024).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  322. Katie E. Ismael, Ioana Patringenaru, and Kimberley Clementi. In This Era of AI, Will Everyone Be a Programmer? UC San Diego Today (Dec 2023). https://today.ucsd.edu/story/in-this-era-of-ai-will-everyone-be-a-programmer. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  323. Sam Lau and Philip Guo. 2023. From "Ban It Till We Understand It" to "Resistance is Futile": How University Programming Instructors Plan to Adapt as More Students Use AI Code Generation and Explanation Tools Such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1 (Chicago, IL, USA) (ICER '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 106--121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  324. Juho Leinonen, Arto Hellas, Sami Sarsa, et al. Using Large Language Models to Enhance Programming Error Messages. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (Toronto, ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 563--569.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  325. Stephen MacNeil, Andrew Tran, Dan Mogil, Seth Bernstein, Erin Ross, and Ziheng Huang. Generating Diverse Code Explanations using the GPT-3 Large Language Model. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 2 (ICER '22), Vol. 2. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 37--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  326. Leo Porter and Daniel Zingaro. 2023. Learn AI-Assisted Python Programming with GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT. Manning, Shelter Island, NY, USA. https://www.manning.com/books/learn-ai-assisted-python-programming. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  327. James Prather, Paul Denny, Juho Leinonen, Brett A. Becker, Ibrahim Albluwi, Michelle Craig, Hieke Keuning, Natalie Kiesler, Tobias Kohn, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Stephen MacNeil, Andrew Petersen, Raymond Pettit, Brent N. Reeves, and Jaromir Savelka. The Robots Are Here: Navigating the Generative AI Revolution in Computing Education. In Proceedings of the 2023 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Turku, Finland) (ITiCSE-WGR '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 108--159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  328. James Prather, Brent N. Reeves, Paul Denny, Brett A. Becker, Juho Leinonen, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Garrett Powell, James Finnie-Ansley, and Eddie Antonio Santos. 2023. "It's Weird That It Knows What I Want": Usability and Interactions with Copilot for Novice Programmers. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 31, 1, Article 4 (Nov 2023), 31 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  329. Sami Sarsa, Paul Denny, Arto Hellas, and Juho Leinonen. Automatic Generation of Programming Exercises and Code Explanations Using Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1 (Lugano and Virtual Event, Switzerland) (ICER '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 27-- 43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  330. ABET (2022). ABET Computing Accreditation Commission: Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-computing-programs-2022-2023/. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  331. ACM (2013). Computer Science Curricula 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science, Association for Computing Machinery and IEEE Computer Society.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  332. Mikey Goldweber, Min Wei, Sherif Aly, Rajendra K. Raj, and Mohamed Mokbel. The 2022 undergraduate database course in computer science: what to teach? ACM Inroads 13, 3 (September 2022), 16--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  333. Kim B. Bruce, Robert D. Cupper, and Robert L. Scot Drysdale. A History of the Liberal Arts Computer Science Consortium and Its Model Curricula. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 10,1, Article 3 (March 2010), 12 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  334. Liberal Arts Computer Science Consortium. A 2007 Model Curriculum for a Liberal Arts Degree in Computer Science. J. Educ. Resour. Comput. 7,2 (June 2007), 2-es.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  335. Henry M. Walker and G. Michael Schneider. A Revised Model Curriculum for a Liberal Arts Degree in Computer Science. Commun. ACM 39,12 (Dec. 1996), 85--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  336. Norman E. Gibbs and Allen B. Tucker. A Model Curriculum for a Liberal Arts Degree in Computer Science. Commun. ACM 29, 3 (March 1986), 202--210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  337. Amanda Holland-Minkley, Jakob Barnard, Valerie Barr, Grant Braught, Janet Davis, David Reed, Karl Schmitt, Andrea Tartaro, and James D. Teresco. Computer Science Curriculum Guidelines: A New Liberal Arts Perspective. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (SIGCSE 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 617--623.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  338. James D. Teresco, Andrea Tartaro, Amanda Holland-Minkley, Grant Braught, Jakob Barnard, and Douglas Baldwin. CS Curricular Innovations with a Liberal Arts Philosophy. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (Providence, RI, USA) (SIGCSE 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 537--543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  339. Henry M. Walker and Samuel A. Rebelsky. Using CS2013 for a Department's Curriculum Review: A Case Study. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 29,5 (May 2014), 138--144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  340. David Reed. Spiraling CS2013 Knowledge Units across a Small CS Curriculum. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 32,5 (May 2017), 125--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  341. Amanda Holland-Minkley, Andrea Tartaro, and Jakob Barnard. Innovations and Opportunities in Liberal Arts Computing Education, https://computing-in-the-liberal-arts.github.io/SIGCSE2023-Affiliated-Event/. URL. SIGCSE 2023 Affiliated Event by the SIGCSE Committee on Computing Education in Liberal Arts Colleges.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  342. Jakob Barnard, Grant Braught, Janet Davis, Amanda Holland-Minkley, David Reed, Karl Schmitt, Andrea Tartaro, and James Teresco. Developing Identity-Focused Program-Level Learning Outcomes for Liberal Arts Computing Programs. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 39,4 (October 2023), 97--98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  343. Jakob Barnard, Grant Braught, Janet Davis, Amanda Holland-Minkley, David Reed, Karl Schmitt, Andrea Tartaro, and James Teresco. Reflective Curriculum Review for Liberal Arts Computing Programs. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 38, 3 (November 2022), 178--179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  344. SIGCSE Committee on Computing Education in Liberal Arts Colleges. 2023. CS2023 Activity: The Curricular Practices Workbook. https://computing-in-the-liberal-arts.github.io/CS2023/. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  345. "ABET Accredits 54 Additional Programs in 2021, Including First Associate Cybersecurity programs." https://www.abet.org/abet-accredits-54-new-programs-in-2021-including-first-associate-cybersecurity-programs/. Accessed Feb 29, 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  346. William F. Atchison, Samuel D. Conte, John W. Hamblen, Thomas E. Hull, Thomas A. Keenan, William B. Kehl, Edward J. McCluskey, Silvio O. Navarro, Werner C. Rheinboldt, Earl J. Schweppe, William Viavant, and David M. Young. "Curriculum 68: Recommendations for Academic Programs in Computer Science: A Report of the ACM Curriculum Committee on Computer Science." Communications of the ACM 11,3 (1968), 151--197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  347. Jill Denner, Paul Tymann, and Huihui Wang. "Community College Pathways." In Proceedings of the 2023 CISE EWF PI Meeting. Georgia Tech Conference Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  348. Dennis Foley, Leslie Milan, and Karen Hamrick. 2020. "The Increasing Role of Community Colleges among Bachelor's Degree Recipients: Findings from the 2019 National Survey of College Graduates." Technical Report NSF 21-309. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES), Alexandria, VA. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21309/. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  349. ACM Committee for Computing Education in Community Colleges (CCECC). 2017. "ACM Computer Science Curricular Guidance for Associate-Degree Transfer Programs with Infused Cybersecurity." 2017. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  350. The Community College Presidents Initiative in STEM. 2023. "Community college presidents initiative - STEM - achieving excellence in workforce education." https://www.ccpi-stem.org/. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  351. Robin G Isserles. "The Costs of Completion: Student Success in Community College." JHU Press, 2021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  352. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula and IEEE Computer Society. "Computer Science Curricula 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science." ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  353. A. Kahlon, D. Boisvert, L.A. Lyon, M. Williamson, and C. Calhoun. "The Authentic Inclusion and Role of Community Colleges in National Efforts to Broaden Participation in Computing." In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '18). ACM, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  354. Amruth N. Kumar and Rajendra K. Raj. "Computer Science Curricula 2023 (CS2023): Community Engagement by the ACM/IEEE-CS/AAAI Joint Task Force." In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2 (Toronto, ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1212--1213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  355. Joyce Currie Little, Richard H. Austing, Harice Seeds, John Maniotes, and Gerald L. Engel.. "Curriculum recommendations and guidelines for the community and junior college career program in computer programming: a working paper of the ACM committee on curriculum in computer sciences by the subcommittee on community and junior college curriculum." ACM SIGCSE Bulletin - Special issue on computer science curricula 9, 2 (1977), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  356. B. Morrison and A. Settle. "Celebrating SIGCSE's 50th Anniversary!" SIGCSE Bulletin 50,1 (2018), 2--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  357. American Association of Community Colleges. 2022. "The Economic Value of America's Community Colleges." https://www.aacc.nche.edu/2022/11/29/the-economic-value-of-americas-community-colleges-report/. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  358. Christian Servín. "Fuzzy Information Processing Computing Curricula: A Perspective from the First Two-Years in Computing Education." In Explainable AI and Other Applications of Fuzzy Techniques: Proceedings of the 2021 Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, NAFIPS 2021. Springer, 453--460.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  359. Christian Servin, Elizabeth K. Hawthorne, Lori Postner, Cara Tang, and Cindy Tucker. "Community Colleges Perspectives: From Challenges to Considerations in Curricula Development (SIGCSE 2023)." Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  360. Christian Servin, Elizabeth K. Hawthorne, Lori Postner, Cara Tang, and Cindy S. Tucker. "Mathematical Considerations in Two-Year Computing Degrees: The Evolution of Math in Curricular Guidelines." In The 24th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE '23) (Marietta, GA, USA). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  361. Cara Tang. 2017. "Community College Corner Community colleges in the United States and around the world." ACM Inroads 8,1 (2017), 21--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  362. Cara Tang. 2018. "Community Colleges and SIGCSE: A Legacy Fueling the Future." ACM Inroads 9,4 (2018), 49--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  363. Cara Tang, Elizabeth K Hawthorne, Cindy S Tucker, Ernesto Cuadros-Vargas, Diana Cukierman, and Ming Zhang. "Global Perspectives on the Role of Two-Year/Technical/Junior Colleges in Computing Education." In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 204--205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  364. "Celebrating 40++ years of service to computing education communities." [n.d.]. ACM CCECC. https://ccecc.acm.org/correlations/all. Accessed March 2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  365. Stuart Zweben, Jodi L.Tims, Cindy Tucker, and Yan Timanovsky. "ACM-NDC Study 2021--2022: Tenth Annual Study of Non-Doctoral-Granting Departments in Computing." ACM Inroads 13,3 (2022), 38--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  366. Stuart Zweben and Cindy Tucker. "How Well Did We Keep Students in Computing Programs, Pre-COVID and COVID?" ACM Inroads 13,4 (2022), 32--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Contributors
  • Ramapo College of New Jersey
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
  • The American University in Cairo
  • The University of Alabama
  • University College Dublin
  • Regis University
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Denison University
  • High Point University
  • Federal University of Rio Grande
  • The University of North Carolina Asheville
  • El Paso County Community College
  • Google LLC

Recommendations