research-article

Quantitative Analysis of Control Flow Checking Mechanisms for Soft Errors

Authors:

Aviral Shrivastava,

Abhishek Rhisheekesan,

Reiley Jeyapaul,

Carole-Jean WuAuthors Info & Claims

DAC '14: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Design Automation Conference

Pages 1 - 6

https://doi.org/10.1145/2593069.2593195

Published: 01 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Control Flow Checking (CFC) based techniques have gained a reputation of providing effective, yet low-overhead protection from soft errors. The basic idea is that if the control flow -- or the sequence of instructions that are executed -- is correct, then most probably the execution of the program is correct. Although researchers claim the effectiveness of the proposed CFC techniques, we argue that their evaluation has been inadequate and can even be wrong! Recently, the metric of vulnerability has been proposed to quantify the susceptibility of computation to soft errors. Laced with this comprehensive metric, we quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of several existing CFC schemes, and obtain surprising results. Our results show that existing CFC techniques are not only ineffective in protecting computation from soft errors, but that they incur additional power and performance overheads. Software-only CFC protection schemes (CFCSS [14], CFCSS+NA [2], and CEDA [18]) increase system vulnerability by 18% to 21% with 17% to 38% performance overhead; Hybrid CFC protection technique, CFEDC [4] also increases the vulnerability by 5%; While the vulnerability remains almost the same for hardware only CFC protection technique, CFCET [15], they cause overheads of design cost, area, and power due to the hardware modifications required for their implementations.

References

[1]

Alkhalifa, Z., Nair, V. S. S., Krishnamurthy, N., and Abraham, J. A. Design and Evaluation of System-Level Checks for On-Line Control Flow Error Detection. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 10, 6 (June 1999), 627--641.

Digital Library

[2]

Chao, W., Zhongchuan, F., Hongsong, C., Wei, B., Bin, L., Lin, C., Zexu, Z., Yuying, W., and Gang, C. CFCSS without Aliasing for SPARC Architecture. In International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT) (29 2010-july 1 2010), pp. 2094--2100.

Digital Library

[3]

Eifert, J., and Shen, J. Processor Monitoring Using Asynchronous Signatured Instruction Streams. In Twenty-Fifth International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing (jun 1995), p. 106.

[4]

Farazmand, N., Fazeli, M., and Miremadi, S. FEDC: Control Flow Error Detection and Correction for Embedded Systems without Program Interruption. In Third International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (march 2008), pp. 33--38.

Digital Library

[5]

Goloubeva, O., Rebaudengo, M., Sonza Reorda, M., and Violante, M. Soft-error detection using control flow assertions. In IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems (nov. 2003), pp. 581--588.

Digital Library

[6]

Guthaus, M. R., Ringenberg, J. S., Ernst, D., Austin, T. M., Mudge, T., and Brown, R. B. MiBench: A free, commercially representative embedded benchmark suite. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Workload Characterization (Washington, DC, USA, 2001), IEEE Computer Society, pp. 3--14.

Digital Library

[7]

Kayali, S. Reliability Considerations for Advanced Microelectronics. In Proceedings of the 2000 Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing (Washington, DC, USA, 2000), PRDC '00, IEEE Computer Society, p. 99.

Digital Library

[8]

Madeira, H., and Silva, J. On-line signature learning and checking: experimental evaluation. In Proceedings of 5th Annual European Computer Conference (may 1991), pp. 642--646.

[9]

May, T. Soft Errors in VLSI: Present and Future. IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology 2, 4 (dec 1979), 377--387.

[10]

Michel, T., Leveugle, R., and Saucier, G. A New Approach to Control Flow Checking without Program Modification. In Twenty-First International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing (jun 1991), pp. 334 --341.

[11]

Mukherjee, S. Architecture Design for Soft Errors. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 2008.

Digital Library

[12]

Mukherjee, S. S., Weaver, C., Emer, J., Reinhardt, S. K., and Austin, T. A Systematic Methodology to Compute the Architectural Vulnerability Factors for a High-Performance Microprocessor. IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture 0 (2003), 29.

Digital Library

[13]

Nicolescu, B., Savaria, Y., and Velazco, R. Software detection mechanisms providing full coverage against single bit-flip faults. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 51, 6 (dec. 2004), 3510--3518.

[14]

Oh, N., Shirvani, P., and McCluskey, E. Control-flow checking by software signatures. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 51, 1 (mar 2002), 111--122.

[15]

Rajabzadeh, A., and Miremadi, S. CFCET: A Hardware-based Control Flow Checking Technique in COTS Processors using Execution Tracing. Microelectronics Reliability 46, 5 (2006), 959--972.

[16]

Saxena, N. R., and McCluskey, W. K. Control-Flow Checking Using Watchdog Assists and Extended-Precision Checksums. IEEE Transactions on Computing 39, 4 (Apr. 1990), 554--559.

Digital Library

[17]

Schuette, M. A., and Shen, J. P. Processor Control Flow Monitoring Using Signatured Instruction Streams. IEEE Trans. Comput. 36, 3 (Mar. 1987), 264--276.

Digital Library

[18]

Vemu, R., and Abraham, J. CEDA: Control-Flow Error Detection Using Assertions. IEEE Transactions on Computers 60, 9 (Sept. 2011), 1233--1245.

Digital Library

[19]

Vemu, R., Gurumurthy, S., and Abraham, J. ACCE: Automatic correction of control-flow errors. In Test Conference, 2007. ITC 2007. IEEE International (oct. 2007), pp. 1--10.

[20]

Venkatasubramanian, R., Hayes, J., and Murray, B. Low-cost on-line fault detection using control flow assertions. In On-Line Testing Symposium, 2003. IOLTS 2003. 9th IEEE (july 2003), pp. 137--143.

[21]

Wilken, K., and Shen, J. P. Continuous Signature Monitoring: Efficient Concurrent-Detection of Processor Control Errors. In Proceedings of the 1988 International Conference on Test (Washington, DC, USA, 1988), ITC'88, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 914--925.

Digital Library

[22]

Wu, Y., Gu, G., Huang, S., and Ni, J. Control Flow Checking Algorithm using Soft-based Intra-/Inter-block Assigned-Signature. In Computer and Computational Sciences, 2007. IMSCCS 2007. Second International Multi-Symposiums on (Aug.), pp. 412--415.

Digital Library

Cited By

Didehban MSo HGali PShrivastava ALee K(2024)Generic Soft Error Data and Control Flow Error Detection by Instruction DuplicationIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing10.1109/TDSC.2023.324584221:1(78-92)Online publication date: Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2023.3245842
So HKo YJung JLee KShrivastava A(2023)gemV-tool: A Comprehensive Soft Error Reliability Estimation Tool for Design Space ExplorationElectronics10.3390/electronics1222457312:22(4573)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12224573
Ko YBradbury ABurgstaller BMullins RGrosser TLee K(2022)Trace-and-brace (TAB): bespoke software countermeasures against soft errorsProceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGPLAN/SIGBED International Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems10.1145/3519941.3535070(73-85)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3519941.3535070
Show More Cited By

Quantitative Analysis of Control Flow Checking Mechanisms for Soft Errors
1. Hardware

Recommendations

Control Flow Checking or Not? (for Soft Errors)
Special Issue on MEMOCODE 2017 and Regular Papers

Huge leaps in performance and power improvements of computing systems are driven by rapid technology scaling, but technology scaling has also rendered computing systems susceptible to soft errors. Among the soft error protection techniques, Control Flow ...
Soft errors: the hardware-software interface
CODES+ISSS '12: Proceedings of the eighth IEEE/ACM/IFIP international conference on Hardware/software codesign and system synthesis

A recent report from the ITRS identifies soft errors, as one of the most important reliability challenges for the coming decades. Soft errors are transient errors caused by several effects e.g., voltage fluctuations, wire-cross talks, and cosmic ...
Soft Errors: Technology Trends, System Effects, and Protection Techniques
IOLTS '07: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International On-Line Testing Symposium

Radiation-induced soft errors are getting worse in digital systems manufactured in advanced technologies. Stringent data integrity and availability requirements of enterprise computing and networking applications demand special attention to soft errors ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

DAC '14: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Design Automation Conference

June 2014

1249 pages

ISBN:9781450327305

DOI:10.1145/2593069

Copyright © 2014 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

EDAC: Electronic Design Automation Consortium
SIGBED: ACM Special Interest Group on Embedded Systems
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
IEEE-CEDA

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 June 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

DAC '14

DAC '14: The 51st Annual Design Automation Conference 2014

June 1 - 5, 2014

CA, San Francisco, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,770 of 5,499 submissions, 32%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

28
Total Citations
View Citations
311
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)10
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Didehban MSo HGali PShrivastava ALee K(2024)Generic Soft Error Data and Control Flow Error Detection by Instruction DuplicationIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing10.1109/TDSC.2023.324584221:1(78-92)Online publication date: Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2023.3245842
So HKo YJung JLee KShrivastava A(2023)gemV-tool: A Comprehensive Soft Error Reliability Estimation Tool for Design Space ExplorationElectronics10.3390/electronics1222457312:22(4573)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12224573
Ko YBradbury ABurgstaller BMullins RGrosser TLee K(2022)Trace-and-brace (TAB): bespoke software countermeasures against soft errorsProceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGPLAN/SIGBED International Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems10.1145/3519941.3535070(73-85)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3519941.3535070
Dar GNatale GKeren O(2022)Nonlinear Code-Based Low-Overhead Fine-Grained Control Flow CheckingIEEE Transactions on Computers10.1109/TC.2021.305713271:3(658-669)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2021.3057132
So HDidehban MKo YJeyapaul RKim JKim YLee KShrivastava A(2021)Revisiting Symptom-Based Fault Tolerant Techniques against Soft ErrorsElectronics10.3390/electronics1023302810:23(3028)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2021
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10233028
Ko Y(2021)An Ultra-Low-Cost Soft Error Protection Scheme Based on the Selection of Critical VariablesElectronics10.3390/electronics1017210110:17(2101)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2021
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10172101
James BWirthlin MGoeders J(2021)Investigating How Software Characteristics Impact the Effectiveness of Automated Software Fault ToleranceIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science10.1109/TNS.2021.307325968:5(1014-1022)Online publication date: May-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2021.3073259
Zhang ZPark SMahlke SXue JJung C(2020)Path Sensitive Signatures for Control Flow Error DetectionThe 21st ACM SIGPLAN/SIGBED Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems10.1145/3372799.3394360(62-73)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3372799.3394360
James BQuinn HWirthlin MGoeders J(2020)Applying Compiler-Automated Software Fault Tolerance to Multiple Processor PlatformsIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science10.1109/TNS.2019.295997567:1(321-327)Online publication date: Jan-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2019.2959975
Hoppe ABecker JKastensmidt F(2020)Fine Grained Control Flow Checking with Dedicated FPGA Monitors2020 IEEE 33rd International System-on-Chip Conference (SOCC)10.1109/SOCC49529.2020.9524751(219-224)Online publication date: 8-Sep-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/SOCC49529.2020.9524751
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents