Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2675133.2675271acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Coming of Age (Digitally): An Ecological View of Social Media Use among College Students

Published: 28 February 2015 Publication History

Abstract

We take an ecological approach to studying social media use and its relation to mood among college students. We conducted a mixed-methods study of computer and phone logging with daily surveys and interviews to track college students' use of social media during all waking hours over seven days. Continual and infrequent checkers show different preferences of social media sites. Age differences also were found. Lower classmen tend to be heavier users and to primarily use Facebook, while upper classmen use social media less frequently and utilize sites other than Facebook more often. Factor analysis reveals that social media use clusters into patterns of content-sharing, text-based entertainment/discussion, relationships, and video consumption. The more constantly one checks social media daily, the less positive is one's mood. Our results suggest that students construct their own patterns of social media usage to meet their changing needs in their environment. The findings can inform further investigation into social media use as a benefit and/or distraction for students.

References

[1]
Ames, M. G. Managing mobile multitasking: the culture of iPhones on Stanford campus. In Proc. CSCW'13, ACM Press (2013), 1487--1498.
[2]
Baumer, E. P., Adams, P., Khovanskaya, V. D., Liao, T. C., Smith, M. E., Schwanda Sosik, V. and Williams, K. Limiting, leaving, and (re) lapsing: an exploration of Facebook non-use practices and experiences. In Proc. CHI'13, ACM Press (2013), 3257--3266.
[3]
Burke, M. and Kraut, R. E. Growing closer on Facebook: changes in tie strength through social network site use. In Proc. of CHI'14, ACM Press (2014), 4187--4196.
[4]
Burke, M., Kraut, R. and Marlow, C. Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In Proc. of CHI'11, ACM Press (2011), 571--580.
[5]
Burke, M., Marlow, C. and Lento, T. Social network activity and social well-being. In Proc. of CHI'10, ACM Press (2010), 1909--1912.
[6]
Collopy, F. Biases in retrospective self-reports of time use: An empirical study of computer users. Management Science. 42 (1996), 758--767.
[7]
Desjarlais, M. and Willoughby, T. A longitudinal study of the relation between adolescent boys and girls' computer use with friends and friendship quality: Support for the social compensation or the rich-getricher hypothesis' Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (2010), 896--905.
[8]
Duggan and Smith, 6% of Online Adults are reddit Users. Pew Research Center. (2013). http://www.pewinternet.org/files/oldmedia//Files/Reports/2013/PIP_reddit_usage_2013.pdf
[9]
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. JCMC 12, 4 (2007), 1143--1168.
[10]
Gartner says the world of work will witness 10 changes during the next 10 years, Gartner, 8.4.2010. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/1416513
[11]
Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K. Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proc. of CHI'09, ACM Press (2009).
[12]
Hew, K. F. Students' and teachers' use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 2 (2011), 662--676.
[13]
Jacovi, M., Guy, I., Kremer-Davidson, S., Porat, S. and Aizenbud-Reshef, N. The perception of others: inferring reputation from social media in the enterprise. In Proc. CSCW'14, ACM Press (2014).
[14]
Junco, R. The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education 58, 1 (2012), 162--171.
[15]
Junco, R. Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 1 (2012), 187--198.
[16]
Junco, R. Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior 29, (2013), 626--631.
[17]
Justice, E. and Dornan, T. Metacognitive differences between traditional-age and nontraditional-age college students. Adult Education Quarterly 51, 3 (2001), 236249.
[18]
Kaplan, A. M. and Haenlein, M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons 53, 1 (2010), 59--68.
[19]
Kramer, A. D. The spread of emotion via Facebook. In Proc. CHI'12, ACM Press (2012), 767--770.
[20]
Lampe, C., Ellison, N. and Steinfeld, C. A Face (book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. In Proc. of CSCW'06, ACM Press (2006).
[21]
Lampe, C., Ellison, N. B. and Steinfield, C. Changes in use and perception of Facebook. In Proc. of CSCW'08, ACM Press (2008), 721--730.
[22]
Lee, U., Lee, J., Ko, M., Lee, C., Kim, Y., Yang, S.,Yatani, K., Gweon, G., Chung, K. and Song, J. Hooked on Smartphones: An Exploratory Study on Smartphone Overuse Among College Students. In Proc. CHI'14, ACM Press (2014).
[23]
Manago, A. M., Taylor, T. and Greenfield, P. M. Me and my 400 friends: the anatomy of college students' Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being. Developmental psychology 48, 2 (2012) 9.
[24]
Mark, G., Guy, I., Kremer-Davidson, S. and Jacovi, M. Most Liked, Fewest Friends: Patterns of Enterprise Social Media Use. In Proc. of CSCW'14, Baltimore, MD, ACM Press (2014).
[25]
Mark, G., Wang, Y. and Niiya, M. Stress and multitasking in everyday college life: an empirical study of online activity. In Proc. of CHI'14, ACM Press (2014), 41--50.
[26]
McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Student empowerment scale. (2006). http://highered.mheducation.com/sites/0070876940/stud ent_view0/chapter6/activity_6_5.html
[27]
Morris, M., Counts, S., Roseway, A., Hoff, A. and Schwarz, J. Tweeting is believing?: understanding microblog credibility perceptions. In Proc. of CSCW'12, ACM Press (2012), 441--450.
[28]
National Science Foundation. NSF STEM classification of instructional programs crosswalk. (2010). https://www.lsamp.org/help/help_stem_cip_2010.cfm
[29]
Nielsen Company. Millennials: Breaking the myths. (2014). http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/reports/2014/millennialsbreaking-the-myths.html
[30]
Ophir, E., Nass, C. and Wagner, A. Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 37 (2009), 15583--15587.
[31]
Pew Research Center. Internet User Demographics. (2014). http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internetuse/latest-stats/
[32]
Pew Research Center. Social Media User Demographics. (2014). http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/socialmedia/social-media-user-demographics/
[33]
Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A. and Calvert, S. L. College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 30, 3 (2009), 227--238.
[34]
Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J. and Witty, J. V. Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and Higher Education 13, 3 (2010), 134--140.
[35]
Saldaña, J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers Sage, (2012).
[36]
Schoenebeck, S. Y., Giving up Twitter for Lent: How and Why We Take Breaks from Social Media. In Proc. of CHI'14, ACM Press (2014), 773--782.
[37]
Schwartz, G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 6, 2 (1978), 461--464.
[38]
Smith, A. Smartphone owners: 2013. (2013). http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/06/05/smartphoneownership-2013/
[39]
Spreitzer, G. M. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1995), 14421465.
[40]
Statista. Number of social network users worldwide from 2010 to 2017. (2014). http://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-ofworldwide-social-network-users/
[41]
Statista. Number of monthly active Facebook users worldwide. (2014). http://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-ofmonthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide/
[42]
Steinberg, L. and Morris, A. Adolescent Development. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52 (2001), 83--110.
[43]
Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S. M., Waechter, N. and Espinoza, G. Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29, 6 (2008), 420433.
[44]
Suchman, L. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. (1987). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[45]
Taylor, P. and Keeter, S. Millennals: A portrait of generation next. Confident. Connected. Open to change. Pew Research Center, (2012).
[46]
Utz, S. Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one's profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites. JCMC, 15 (2010), 314--335.
[47]
Utz, S., Tanis, M. and Vermeulen, I. It is all about being popular: The effects of need for popularity on social network site use. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking 15, 1 (2012), 37--42.
[48]
Valkenburg, P. and Peter, J. Preadolescents' and adolescents' online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology 43, 2 (2007), 267277.
[49]
Vitak, J. Facebook makes the heart grow fonder: relationship maintenance strategies among geographically dispersed and communication-restricted connections. In Proc. of CSCW'14, ACM Press (2014), 842--853.
[50]
Watson, D., Clark, L.A. and Tellegen, A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology 54, 6 (1988), 1063.
[51]
Wood, W. and Neal, D. T. A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychological review 114, 4 (2007), 843.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Finding a Way Through the Social Media Labyrinth: Guiding Design Through User ExpectationsProceedings of the International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3701571.3701605(157-171)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Gen Zers’ Travel-Related Experiential Consumption on Social Media: Integrative Perspective of Uses and Gratification Theory and Theory of Reasoned ActionJournal of International Consumer Marketing10.1080/08961530.2024.2353078(1-28)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2023)For Better or Worse: Understanding Smartphones and Social Media Use Among a New Generation of Young Adults and the Impact of Their Usage on Well-beingMedia Watch10.1177/0976091123121334615:1(30-52)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Coming of Age (Digitally): An Ecological View of Social Media Use among College Students

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
      February 2015
      1956 pages
      ISBN:9781450329224
      DOI:10.1145/2675133
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 28 February 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. college students
      2. computer logging
      3. facebook
      4. in situ study
      5. social media

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      CSCW '15
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 161 of 575 submissions, 28%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '25

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)307
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)25
      Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Finding a Way Through the Social Media Labyrinth: Guiding Design Through User ExpectationsProceedings of the International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3701571.3701605(157-171)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
      • (2024)Gen Zers’ Travel-Related Experiential Consumption on Social Media: Integrative Perspective of Uses and Gratification Theory and Theory of Reasoned ActionJournal of International Consumer Marketing10.1080/08961530.2024.2353078(1-28)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
      • (2023)For Better or Worse: Understanding Smartphones and Social Media Use Among a New Generation of Young Adults and the Impact of Their Usage on Well-beingMedia Watch10.1177/0976091123121334615:1(30-52)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
      • (2023)A Minimalistic Approach to Predict and Understand the Relation of App Usage with Students' Academic PerformanceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042407:MHCI(1-28)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
      • (2023)Social Media Reflection Assignment: a Simple Classroom Intervention To Help Students Examine Scientific Claims in Social MediaJournal of Microbiology & Biology Education10.1128/jmbe.00155-2224:1Online publication date: 20-Apr-2023
      • (2023)Fair privacy: how college students perceive fair privacy protection in online datasetsInformation, Communication & Society10.1080/1369118X.2023.216636126:5(974-989)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2023
      • (2022)Defining Terms and Selecting Metaphors to Understand Technology in the ClassroomDigital Distractions in the College Classroom10.4018/978-1-7998-9243-4.ch002(22-36)Online publication date: 2022
      • (2022)The Same but DifferentResearch Anthology on Remote Teaching and Learning and the Future of Online Education10.4018/978-1-6684-7540-9.ch022(425-448)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2022
      • (2022)The Daily Rhythmic Changes of Undergraduate Students’ Emotions: An Analysis Based on Tencent TweetsFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2022.78563913Online publication date: 11-Mar-2022
      • (2022)Examining Hashtag Use of #blackboyjoy and #theblackmancan and Related Content on Instagram: Descriptive Content AnalysisJMIR Formative Research10.2196/340446:8(e34044)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2022
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media