Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2696454.2696486acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Will People Keep the Secret of a Humanoid Robot?: Psychological Intimacy in HRI

Published: 02 March 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Will people keep the secret of a socially compelling robot who shares, in confidence, a "personal" (robot) failing? Toward answering this question, 81 adults participated in a 20-minute interaction with (a) a humanoid robot (Robovie) interacting in a highly social way as a lab tour guide, and (b) with a human being interacting in the same highly social way. As a baseline comparison, participants also interacted with (c) a humanoid robot (Robovie) interacting in a more rudimentary social way. In each condition, the tour guide asks for the secret keeping behavior. Results showed that the majority of the participants (59%) kept the secret of the highly social robot, and did not tell the experimenter when asked directly, with the robot present. This percentage did not differ statistically from the percentage who kept the human's secret (67%). It did differ statistically when the robot engaged in the more rudimentary social interaction (11%). These results suggest that as humanoid robots become increasingly social in their interaction, that people will form increasingly intimate and trusting psychological relationships with them. Discussion focuses on design principles (how to engender psychological intimacy in human-robot interaction) and norms (whether it is even desirable to do so, and if so in what contexts).

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (hrifp2370-file3.avi)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychology study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[2]
Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231--260. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381376
[3]
Bainbridge, W. A., Hart, J., Kim, E. S., & Scassellati, B. (2008). The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 701706.
[4]
Belpaeme, T., Baxter, P., Read, R., Wood, R., Cuayáhuitl, H., Kiefer, B., -- Humbert, R. (2012). Multimodal childrobot interaction: Building social bonds. Journal of HumanRobot Interaction, 1, 33--53.
[5]
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
[6]
Dautenhahn, K. (2004). Socially intelligent agents in human primate culture. In R. Trappl & S. Payr (Eds.), Agent culture: Human-agent interaction in a multicultural world (pp. 4571). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[7]
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York, NY: Norton.
[8]
Hoffman, G., & Vanunu, K. (2013). Effects of robotic companionship on music enjoyment and agent perception. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on HumanRobot Interaction, 317--324.
[9]
Kahn, P. H., Jr. (2011). Technological nature: Adaptation and the future of human life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[10]
Kahn, P. H., Jr., Freier, N. G., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Ruckert, J. H., Severson, R., & Kane, S. K. (2008). Design patterns for sociality in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 97--104.
[11]
Kahn, P. H., Jr., Gary, H. E., & Shen S. (2013). Children's social relationship with current and near-future robots. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 32--37.
[12]
Kahn, P. H., Jr., Ishiguro, H., Friedman, B., Kanda, T., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., & Miller, J. (2007). What is a human? Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human-robot interaction. Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 8(3), 363--390.
[13]
Kahn, P. H., Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., Gill, B. T., -- Shen, S. (2012). "Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now": Children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48, 303--314.
[14]
Kahn, P. H., Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Gill, B. T., Ruckert, J. H., Shen, S., -- Severson, R. L. (2012). Do people hold a humanoid robot morally accountable for the harm it causes? Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on HumanRobot Interaction, 33--40.
[15]
Kahn, P. H., Jr., & Turiel, E. (1988). Children's conceptions of trust in the context of social expectations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 403--419.
[16]
Kaniarasu, P., & Steinfeld, A. M. (2014). Effects of blame on trust in human robot interaction. Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 850--855.
[17]
Kidd, C. D., & Breazeal, C. (2007). A robotic weight loss coach. Proceedings of the 22nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1985--1986. Retrieved from AAAI: http://www.aaai.org/Papers/AAAI/2007/AAAI07--366.pdf
[18]
Levy, D. N. (2007). Love + sex with robots: The evolution of human-robot relations. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
[19]
Nakagawa, K., Shiomi, M., Shinozawa, K., Matsumura, R., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2011). Effect of robot's active touch on people's motivation. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 465472.
[20]
Nie, J., Pak, M., Marin, A. L., & Sundar, S. S. (2012). Can you hold my hand? Physical warmth in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 201--202.
[21]
Rotenberg, K. J. (Ed.). (2010). Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
[22]
Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1--7.
[23]
Stanton, C. M., Kahn, P. H., Jr., Severson, R. L., Ruckert, J. H., & Gill, B. T. (2008). Robotic animals might aid in the social development of children with autism. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 271--278.
[24]
Turiel, E. (1998). The development of morality. In W. Damon (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 863932). New York, NY: Wiley.
[25]
Velonaki, M., Silvera-Tawil, D., & Rye, D. (2013). Affective Human-Robot Interactions in Social Spaces: Two Case Studies. Proceedings of the Workshop on Applications for Emotional Robots, 8th International Conference on HumanRobot Interaction.
[26]
Wada, K., & Shibata, T. (2007). Living with seal robots-Its socio psychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5), 972--980.
[27]
Williams, V. S. L., Jones, L. V., & Tukey, J. W. (1999). Controlling error in multiple comparisons, with examples from state-to-state differences in educational achievement. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 42--69.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The effect of conversation on altruism: A comparative study with different media and generationsPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.030176919:6(e0301769)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2024
  • (2024)The effect of different types of virtual influencers on consumers’ emotional attachmentJournal of Business Research10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114646177(114646)Online publication date: Apr-2024
  • (2024)The Effects of Intimacy and Proactivity on Trust in Human-Humanoid Robot InteractionInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-022-10324-y26:1(75-90)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Will People Keep the Secret of a Humanoid Robot?: Psychological Intimacy in HRI

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '15: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      March 2015
      368 pages
      ISBN:9781450328838
      DOI:10.1145/2696454
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 02 March 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. human-robot interaction
      2. interaction patterns
      3. psychological intimacy
      4. robot having secret
      5. sociality
      6. trust

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      HRI '15
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      HRI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 43 of 169 submissions, 25%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)86
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16
      Reflects downloads up to 30 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)The effect of conversation on altruism: A comparative study with different media and generationsPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.030176919:6(e0301769)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2024
      • (2024)The effect of different types of virtual influencers on consumers’ emotional attachmentJournal of Business Research10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114646177(114646)Online publication date: Apr-2024
      • (2024)The Effects of Intimacy and Proactivity on Trust in Human-Humanoid Robot InteractionInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-022-10324-y26:1(75-90)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
      • (2024)On the moral permissibility of robot apologiesAI & Society10.1007/s00146-023-01782-239:6(2829-2839)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
      • (2023)Virtual reality check: a comparison of virtual reality, screen-based, and real world settings as research methods for HRIFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2023.115671510Online publication date: 27-Jun-2023
      • (2023)Assessing the effect of dialogue on altruism toward future generations: A preliminary studyFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2023.11293405Online publication date: 31-Mar-2023
      • (2023)The Effect on User Impression of Household Robots’ Clothing Changes家事ロボットの服装変化がユーザの印象に与える影響Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics10.3156/jsoft.35.4_76935:4(769-779)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2023
      • (2023)The Robot-Gender Divide: How and Why Men and Women Differ in Their Attitudes Toward Social RobotsSocial Science Computer Review10.1177/0894439323115567441:6(2230-2248)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2023
      • (2023) Defining Interaction as Coordination Benefits both HRI Research and Robot Development: Entering Service Interactions * 2023 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN57019.2023.10309642(213-219)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
      • (2023)Designing an AR Facial Expression System for Human-Robots Collaboration2023 28th International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC)10.1109/ICAC57885.2023.10275175(1-6)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2023
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media