research-article

Strategic Temporality on Social Media During the General Election of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Campaign

Authors:

Sikana Tanupabrungsun,

Jerry Lamont Robinson,

Jennifer Stromer-Galley,

Yatish HegdeAuthors Info & Claims

#SMSociety17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society

Article No.: 25, Pages 1 - 10

https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097311

Published: 28 July 2017 Publication History

Abstract

To date, little attention has been paid to the temporal nature of campaigns as they respond to events or react to the different stages of a political election -- what we define as strategic temporality. This article seeks to remedy this lack of research by examining campaign Facebook and Twitter messaging shifts during the 2016 U.S. Presidential general election. We used supervised machine-learning techniques to predict the types of messages that campaigns employed via social media and analyzed time-series data to identify messaging shifts over the course of the general election. We also examined how social media platforms and candidates' party affiliation shape campaign messaging. Results suggest differences exist in the types of campaign messages produced on different platforms during the general election. As election day drew closer, campaigns generated more calls-to-action and informative messages on both Facebook and Twitter. This trend existed in advocacy campaign messages as well, but only on Twitter. Both advocacy and attack tweets were posted more frequently around Presidential and Vice-Presidential debate dates.

References

[1]

Al-Ani, B., Mark, G., Chung, J. and Jones, J. 2012. The Egyptian Blogosphere: A Counter-narrative of the Revolution. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 17--26.

Digital Library

[2]

Bennett, W.L. and Segerberg, A. 2012. The Logic of Connective Action. Information, Communication & Society 15, 5 (Jun. 2012), 739--768.

[3]

Borah, P. 2016. Political Facebook use: Campaign strategies used in 2008 and 2012 presidential elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13, 4 (Oct. 2016), 326--338.

[4]

Bronstein, J. 2013. Like me! Analyzing the 2012 presidential candidates' Facebook pages. Online Information Review 37, 2 (Apr. 2013), 173--192.

[5]

Ceron, A. and d'Adda, G. 2016. E-campaigning on Twitter: The effectiveness of distributive promises and negative campaign in the 2013 Italian election. New Media & Society 18, 9 (Oct. 2016), 1935--1955.

[6]

Chadwick, A. 2013. The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.

[7]

Denton, R.E., Jr. and Woodward, G.C. 1998. Political communication in America. Praeger.

[8]

Dewan, S. and Ramaprasad, J. 2014. Social Media, Traditional Media, and Music Sales. Management Information Systems Quarterly 38, 1 (Mar. 2014), 101--121.

Digital Library

[9]

Druckman, J.N., Kifer, M.J. and Parkin, M. 2009. Campaign communications in US congressional elections. American Political Science Review 103, 3 (2009), 343--366.

[10]

Enli, G.S. and Skogerbø, E. 2013. Personalized Campaigns in Party-Centred Politics. Information, Communication & Society 16, 5 (Jun. 2013), 757--774.

[11]

Evans, H.K., Cordova, V. and Sipole, S. 2014. Twitter style: An analysis of how house candidates used twitter in their 2012 campaigns. PS: Political Science & Politics. 47, 2 (2014), 454--462.

[12]

Faraway, J.J. 2004. Linear models with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC.

[13]

Gainous, J. and Wagner, K.M. 2013. Tweeting to Power: The Social Media Revolution in American Politics. Oxford University Press.

[14]

Gorard, S. 2013. Research Design: Creating Robust Approaches for the Social Sciences. SAGE Publications Ltd.

[15]

Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K. and van't Haar, G. 2013. Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters: The use of Twitter during the 2010 UK general election campaign. Information, Communication & Society. 16, 5 (2013), 692--716.

[16]

Greenwood, S., Perrin, A. and Duggan, M. 2016. Social Media Update 2016. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/

[17]

Gujarati, D. and Porter, D.C. 1992. Essentials of econometrics. McGraw-Hill New York.

[18]

Hegde, Y. 2016. fb-page-scraper: Version 1.33 Released. (2016).

[19]

Hemsley, J., Ceskavich, B. and Tanupabrungsun, S. 2014. Syracuse Social Media Collection Toolkit. https://github.com/bitslabsyr/stack

[20]

Hemsley, J., Stromer-Galley, J., Tanupabrungsun, S., Hegde, Y., Zhang, F. and McCracken, N. 2016. Collection and Classification of Illuminating 2016 Social Media Data. Illuminating 2016. http://illuminating.ischool.syr.edu/blog

[21]

Jamieson, K.H., Waldman, P. and Sherr, S. 2000. Eliminate the negative? Categories of analysis for political advertisements. Crowded airwaves: Campaign advertising in elections. J.A. Thurber, C.J. Nelson, and D.A. Dulio, eds. Brookings Institution Press. 44--64.

[22]

Jungherr, A. 2014. The Logic of Political Coverage on Twitter: Temporal Dynamics and Content. Journal of Communication. 64, 2 (Apr. 2014), 239--259.

[23]

Jungherr, A. and Jürgens, P. 2013. Forecasting the pulse: How deviations from regular patterns in online data can identify offline phenomena. Internet Research. 23, 5 (Oct. 2013), 589--607.

[24]

Kreiss, D. 2016. Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns' use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media & Society. 18, 8 (Sep. 2016), 1473--1490.

[25]

Krippendorff, K. 2004. Reliability in Content Analysis. Human Communication Research. 30, 3 (Jul. 2004), 411--433.

[26]

Lau, R.R. and Pomper, G.M. 2004. Negative campaigning: An analysis of US Senate elections. Rowman & Littlefield.

[27]

Lombard, M., Snyder - Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human communication research. 28(4), 587--604.

[28]

Monroy-Hernández, A., boyd, danah, Kiciman, E., De Choudhury, M. and Counts, S. 2013. The New War Correspondents: The Rise of Civic Media Curation in Urban Warfare. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 1443--1452.

Digital Library

[29]

Olteanu, A., Vieweg, S. and Castillo, C. 2015. What to Expect When the Unexpected Happens: Social Media Communications Across Crises. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2015), 994--1009.

Digital Library

[30]

Papacharissi, Z. and de Fatima Oliveira, M. 2012. Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication. 62, 2 (Apr. 2012), 266--282.

[31]

Parmelee, J.H. and Bichard, S.L. 2013. Politics and the Twitter Revolution: How Tweets Influence the Relationship between Political Leaders and the Public. Lexington Books.

[32]

Pedregosa, F. et al. 2011. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 12, (Oct. 2011), 2825--2830.

Digital Library

[33]

Qu, Y., Huang, C., Zhang, P. and Zhang, J. 2011. Microblogging After a Major Disaster in China: A Case Study of the 2010 Yushu Earthquake. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 25--34.

Digital Library

[34]

Robertson, S.P., Douglas, S., Maruyama, M. and Semaan, B. 2013. Political Discourse on Social Networking Sites: Sentiment, In-group/Out-group Orientation and Rationality. Inf. Polity. 18, 2 (Apr. 2013), 107--126.

[35]

Ross, K. and Bürger, T. 2014. Face to face(book): Social media, political campaigning and the unbearable lightness of being there. Political Science. 66, 1 (Jun. 2014), 46--62.

[36]

Rossini, P., Stromer-Galley, J., Dobreski, B., Kenski, K., Hemsley, J. and Semaan, B. 2016. 2014 Gubernatorial Online Campaigns in Context: The interplay between public opinion polls and campaign communication strategies on Facebook and Twitter. 69th Annual Conference of the World Association for Public Opinion Research (WAPOR) (Austin, Texas, 2016).

[37]

Ruiz, E.J., Hristidis, V., Castillo, C., Gionis, A. and Jaimes, A. 2012. Correlating Financial Time Series with Microblogging Activity. Proceedings of the Fifth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 513--522.

Digital Library

[38]

Serazio, M. 2014. The New Media Designs of Political Consultants: Campaign Production in a Fragmented Era. Journal of Communication. 64, 4 (Aug. 2014), 743--763.

[39]

Shaw, D.R. 1999. A study of presidential campaign event effects from 1952 to 1992. Journal of Politics. 61, 2 (May 1999), 387--422.

[40]

Small, T.A. 2011. What the Hashtag? Information, Communication & Society. 14, 6 (Sep. 2011), 872--895.

[41]

Starbird, K. and Palen, L. 2011. "Voluntweeters": Self-organizing by Digital Volunteers in Times of Crisis. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 1071--1080.

Digital Library

[42]

Stieglitz, S. and Dang-Xuan, L. 2012. Political Communication and Influence through Microblogging--An Empirical Analysis of Sentiment in Twitter Messages and Retweet Behavior. 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS) (Jan. 2012), 3500--3509.

Digital Library

[43]

Stromer-Galley, J. 2000. On-line interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication. 50, 4 (2000), 111--132.

[44]

Stromer-Galley, J. 2014. Presidential Campaigning in the Internet Age. Oxford University Press.

[45]

Stromer-Galley, J., Zhang, F., Tanupabrungsun, S., Hemsley, J. and Semaan, B. 2016. Tweeting the attack: Predicting gubernatorial candidate attack messaging and its spread. Proceedings of the 66th annual conference of the International Communication Association (Fukuoka, Japan, 2016).

[46]

Tarrance, L.V. 2016. Fear of the "Greater of Two Evils" Could Spur High Turnout. Gallup. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/194138/fear-greater-two-evils-spur-high-turnout.aspx?g_source=Blog&g_medium=sidebottom&g_campaign=tiles

[47]

Trent, J.S. and Friedenberg, R.V. 1995. Political Campaign Communication. Praeger.

[48]

Tufekci, Z. and Wilson, C. 2012. Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations From Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication. 62, 2 (Apr. 2012), 363--379.

[49]

Vaccari, C. 2008. From the air to the ground: the internet in the 2004 US presidential campaign. New Media & Society. 10, 4 (Aug. 2008), 647--665.

[50]

Verser, R. and Wicks, R.H. 2006. Managing Voter Impressions: The Use of Images on Presidential Candidate Web Sites During the 2000 Campaign. Journal of Communication. 56, 1 (Mar. 2006), 178--197.

[51]

Wicks, R.H. and Souley, B. 2003. Going Negative: Candidate Usage of Internet Web Sites during the 2000 Presidential Campaign. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 80, 1 (Mar. 2003), 128--144.

[52]

Wlezien, C. and Erikson, R.S. 2002. The Timeline of Presidential Election Campaigns. The Journal of Politics. 64, 4 (2002), 969--993.

[53]

Zhang, F., Stromer-Galley, J., Tanupabrungsun, S., Hegde, Y., McCracken, N. and Hemsley, J. 2017. Understanding Discourse Acts: Political Campaign Messages Classification on Facebook and Twitter. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling & Prediction and Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation (D.C., USA, Jul. 2017), 1--6. Springer International Publishing.

Cited By

Borrell AJadot ALefébure P(2022)Getting More Intense: Quantitative and Qualitative Dynamics of Political Communication on FacebookThe 2019 European Electoral Campaign10.1007/978-3-030-98993-4_3(43-61)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98993-4_3

Index Terms

Strategic Temporality on Social Media During the General Election of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Campaign

Recommendations

Social Media, U.S. Presidential Campaigns, and Public Opinion Polls: Disentangling Effects
#SMSociety17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society

The use of digital technologies by political campaigns has been a topic of scholarly concern for over two decades. However, these studies have been mostly focused on analyzing the use of digital platforms without considering contextual factors of the ...
Social Media and Presidential Campaigns – Preliminary Results of the 2018 Brazilian Presidential Election
dg.o '19: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research

The use of social media within modern political activities is a new phenomenon that reshapes election races and the way in which politicians communicate with voters. During the last presidential campaign in Brazil, the elected candidate had almost no ...
Online Fund-Raising and Contributors in the 2004 Presidential Campaign

Online fund-raising for political campaigns has grown substantially in recent election cycles, raising new and important questions about how this phenomenon is affecting the composition of the donor pool. In this article, the authors use data from a ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

#SMSociety17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society

July 2017

414 pages

ISBN:9781450348478

DOI:10.1145/3097286

Copyright © 2017 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 July 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

#SMSociety17

#SMSociety17: 2017 International Conference on Social Media & Society

July 28 - 30, 2017

ON, Toronto, Canada

Acceptance Rates

#SMSociety17 Paper Acceptance Rate 58 of 142 submissions, 41%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 78 of 189 submissions, 41%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
263
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)26
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Borrell AJadot ALefébure P(2022)Getting More Intense: Quantitative and Qualitative Dynamics of Political Communication on FacebookThe 2019 European Electoral Campaign10.1007/978-3-030-98993-4_3(43-61)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98993-4_3

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents