research-article

Designing for engagement: using participatory design to develop a social robot to measure teen stress

Authors:

Elin A. BjörlingAuthors Info & Claims

SIGDOC '17: Proceedings of the 35th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication

Article No.: 7, Pages 1 - 10

https://doi.org/10.1145/3121113.3121212

Published: 11 August 2017 Publication History

Abstract

While scholars in technical communication have examined on theoretical concerns of post humanism, less work has focused on designing for engaging experiences between humans and nonhuman agents like robots. In this research article, we present findings from a project investigating the possibility of designing a social robot to help measure teen stress. To explore design possibilities, we conducted a series of participatory design sessions with teens to envision the design of a social robot to measures stress. The findings from the study include how teens react to existing robots, how teens conceptualize robots that might live in their schools through storyboarding and group discussion, and reactions to an emerging design of a low fidelity robot. In our discussion, we reflect on implications for designing social robots for and with teens, considerations for studying engaging relationships, and reflections on methodological choices of participatory design.

References

[1]

Argyle, M. 1988. Bodily communication.

[2]

Arnsten, A.F. and Shansky, R.M. 2004. Adolescence: Vulnerable Period for Stress- Induced Prefrontal Cortical Function ? Introduction to Part IV. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 147, 1021 (2004), 143--147.

[3]

Association, A.P. 2013. Stress in America 2013 Highlights: Are Teens Adopting Adults' Stress Habits.

[4]

Bainbridge, W.A. et al. 2011. The Benefits of Interactions with Physically Present Robots over Video-Displayed Agents. International Journal of Social Robotics. 3, 1 (Jan. 2011), 41--52.

[5]

Bickmore, T.W. and Picard, R.W. 2005. Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 12, 2 (2005), 293--327.

Digital Library

[6]

Bjertness, E. et al. 2010. Response rates and selection problems, with emphasis on mental health variables and DNA sampling, in large population-based, cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of adolescents in Norway. BMC Public Health. 10, 1 (Dec. 2010), 602.

[7]

Bjögvinsson, E. et al. 2012. Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges. Design Issues. 28, 3 (2012), 101--116.

[8]

Boys, A. et al. 2003. Minimizing respondent attrition in longitudinal research: Practical implications from a cohort study of adolescent drinking. Journal of Adolescence. 26, 3 (Jun. 2003), 363--373.

[9]

Brayton, S. 2008. The Post-White Imaginary in Alex Proyas's "I, Robot." Science Fiction Studies. 35, 1 (2008), 72--87.

[10]

Breazeal, C.L. 2002. Designing sociable robots. MIT Press.

[11]

Buxton, B. 2007. Sketching User Experiences.

[12]

Carpenter, J. et al. 2009. Gender representation and humanoid robots designed for domestic use. International Journal of Social Robotics. 1, 3 (2009), 261--265.

[13]

Cheng, K. 2012. See What I Mean: How to Use Comics to Communicate Ideas. Rosenfeld Media.

[14]

Chung, M. et al. 2015. Exploring the Potential of Information Gathering Robots. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts (New York, New York, USA, 2015), 29--30.

Digital Library

[15]

Collins, C. et al. 2015. Therabot^™. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts - HRI'15 Extended Abstracts (New York, New York, USA, 2015), 307--307.

[16]

Comito, C. et al. 2016. Psychological and symbolic determinants relating to the first meeting with a humanoid robot. Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine. 59S, (Sep. 2016), e87.

[17]

Cornwell, P. 2016. Schools create moments of calm for stressed-out students. Seattle Times.

[18]

Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. 2011. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.

[19]

Duffy, B.R. 2003. Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 42, 3--4 (2003), 177--190.

[20]

Dunton, G. et al. 2016. Momentary Assessment of Psychosocial Stressors, Context, and Asthma Symptoms in Hispanic Adolescents. Behavior modification. 40, 1--2 (Jan. 2016), 257--80.

[21]

Dwyer, L. When Anxiety Hits at School. The Atlantic.

[22]

Eiland, L. and Romeo, R.D. 2013. Stress and the developing adolescent brain. Neuroscience. 249, 212 (2013), 162--71.

[23]

Fong, T. et al. 2003. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 42, 3 (2003), 143--166.

[24]

Freedenberg, V. a. et al. 2015. A Pilot Study of a Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction Program in Adolescents with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators or Pacemakers. Pediatric Cardiology. 36, 4 (2015), 786--795.

[25]

Gee, F.C. et al. 2005. Uncanny valley revisited. Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2005), 151--157.

[26]

Goodrich, M.A. and Schultz, A.C. 2007. Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey. Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction. 1, 3 (2007), 203--275.

[27]

Hamilton, J.L. et al. 2015. Stress and the Development of Cognitive Vulnerabilities to Depression Explain Sex Differences in Depressive Symptoms during Adolescence. Clinical psychological science: a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. 3, 5 (2015), 702--714.

[28]

Hornbæk, K. 2006. Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. International Journal of Human Computer Studies. 64, 2 (2006), 79--102.

Digital Library

[29]

Huang, J. and Lau, T. 2016. Design and Evaluation of a Rapid Programming System for Service Robots. Proceedings of the 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. (2016), 295--302.

[30]

Jokela, T. et al. 2003. The standard of user-centered design and the standard definition of usability: Analyzing ISO 13407 against ISO 9241-11 - University of Washington. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2003), 53--60.

[31]

Jungk, R. and Muller, N. 1987. Future Workshops: How to Create Desirable Futures. Institute for Social Interventions.

[32]

Kanda, T. et al. 2007. A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human-robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics (Oct. 2007), 962--971.

Digital Library

[33]

Kanda, T. et al. 2004. Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial. Human-Computer Interaction. 19, 1 (Jun. 2004), 61--84.

Digital Library

[34]

Kann, L. et al. 2002. An assessment of the effect of data collection setting on the prevalence of health risk behaviors among adolescents. J.Adolesc.Health. 31, 4 (2002), 327--335.

[35]

Kauts, A. and Sharma, N. 2009. Effect of yoga on academic performance in relation to stress. International journal of yoga. 2, 1 (Jan. 2009), 39--43.

[36]

Khor, A.S. et al. 2014. Feasibility and validity of ecological momentary assessment in adolescents with high-functioning autism and Asperger's disorder. Journal of adolescence. 37, 1 (Jan. 2014), 37--46.

[37]

Kim, E.S. et al. 2013. Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 43, 5 (May 2013), 1038--1049.

[38]

Kincheloe, J.L. 2001. Describing the Bricolage: Conceptualizing a New Rigor in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 7, 6 (2001), 679--692.

[39]

Leite, I. 2013. Long-term Interactions with Empathic Social Robots. 1, 3 (2013), 1--228.

[40]

Leonard, N.R. et al. 2015. A multi-method exploratory study of stress, coping, and substance use among high school youth in private schools. Frontiers in Psychology. 6, (Jul. 2015), 1028.

[41]

Leonard, N.R. et al. 2015. A multi-method exploratory study of stress, coping, and substance use among high school youth in private schools. Frontiers in psychology. 6, (2015), 1028.

[42]

Leonard, N.R. et al. 2015. A multi-method exploratory study of stress, coping, and substance use among high school youth in private schools. Frontiers in psychology. 6, (2015), 1028.

[43]

Luger, E. and Sellen, A. 2016. "Like Having a Really Bad PA": The Gulf between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16. (2016), 5286--5297.

Digital Library

[44]

Mara, A. and Hawk, B. 2009. Posthuman Rhetorics and Technical Communication. Technical Communication Quarterly. 19, 1 (Dec. 2009), 1--10.

[45]

McEwen, B. and Dhabhar, F. 2002. Stress in Adolescent Females: Relationship to Autoimmune Diseases. Journal of Adolescent Health. 30S, 1 (2002), 30--36.

[46]

McNely, B.J. and Rivers, N.A. 2014. All of the things: Engaging complex assemblages in communication design. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on The Design of Communication CD-ROM (ACM, Jan. 2014), 7.

Digital Library

[47]

Minnis, A.M. and Padian, N.S. 2001. Reliability of adolescents' self-reported sexual behavior: A comparison of two diary methodologies. Journal of Adolescent Health. 28, 5 (2001), 394--403.

[48]

Moore, G.F. et al. 2015. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 350, mar19 6 (Mar. 2015), h1258--h1258.

[49]

Mori, M. 1970. The uncanny valley. Energy. 7, 4 (1970), 33--35.

[50]

Morreall, J. 1991. Cuteness. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 31, 1 (1991), 39--47.

[51]

Motti, V.G. and Caine, K. 2016. Smart Wearables or Dumb Wearables?: Understanding How Context Impacts the UX in Wrist Worn Interaction. Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 10:1--10:10.

Digital Library

[52]

Muller, M.J. 2003. Participatory design: The third space in HCI. Human-Computer Interaction Handbook. 4235, (2003), 1051--1068.

[53]

Norman, D.A. 2014. Some Observations on Mental Models. Mental Models. 7--14.

[54]

Pope, D.C. and Simon, R. 2005. Help for Stressed Out Teens. Educational Leadership. 62, 7 (2005), 33--37.

[55]

Powers, A. et al. 2005. Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot. Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. 2005, (2005), 158--163.

[56]

Quesenbery, W. and Brooks, K. 2010. Storytelling for User experience: Crafting Stories for Better Design.

[57]

Redish, J. 2010. Technical communication and usability: Intertwined strands and mutual influences. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. IEEE.

[58]

Rew, L. et al. 2014. A Systematic Review of Interventions to Reduce Stress in Adolescence. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 35, 11 (2014), 851--863.

[59]

Robins, B. et al. 2005. Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Universal Access in the Information Society. 4, 2 (Dec. 2005), 105--120.

Digital Library

[60]

Rogers, M. 2012. Contextualizing Theories and Practices of Bricolage Research Contextualizing Theories and Practices of Bricolage Research. 17, 48 (2012), 1--17.

[61]

Rose, E.J. and Walton, R. 2015. Factors to Actors: Implications of Posthumanism for Social Justice Work. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference on the Design of Communication. (2015), 33:1--33:10.

Digital Library

[62]

Rosiek, A. et al. 2016. Chronic Stress and Suicidal Thinking Among Medical Students. International journal of environmental research and public health. 13, 2 (Jan. 2016).

[63]

Sabelli, A.M. et al. 2011. A conversational robot in an elderly care center. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction - HRI '11 (New York, New York, USA, 2011), 37.

Digital Library

[64]

Scassellati, B. 2007. How social robots will help us to diagnose, treat, and understand autism. Robotics research. M. Kaneko and Y. Nakamura, eds. Springer. 552--563.

[65]

Scassellati, B. et al. 2012. Robots for Use in Autism Research. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14, (2012), 275--94.

[66]

Severinson-Eklundh, K. et al. 2003. Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 42, 3 (2003), 223--234.

[67]

Siegel, M. et al. 2013. Persuasive Robotics: the influence of robot gender on human behavior The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share Citation Accessed Citable Link Detailed Terms Persuasive Robotics: The Influence of Robot Gender on Human Behavior. (2013).

[68]

Silk, J.S. et al. 2011. Daily emotional dynamics in depressed youth: a cell phone ecological momentary assessment study. Journal of experimental child psychology. 110, 2 (Oct. 2011), 241--57.

[69]

Spies Shapiro, L.A. and Margolin, G. 2014. Growing Up Wired: Social Networking Sites and Adolescent Psychosocial Development. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 17, 1 (2014), 1--18.

[70]

Spinuzzi, C. 2005. The Methodology of Participatory Design. Technical Communication. 52, 2 (2005), 163--174.

[71]

Stress in Schools: Seeking Solutions: 2007.

[72]

Sullivan, P. 1989. Beyond a Narrow Conception of Usability Testing A RATIONALE FOR BROADENING USABILITY. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 32, 4 (Jan. 1989), 256--264.

[73]

Szabó M 2010. The short version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): factor structure in a young adolescent sample. Journal of Adolescence. 1, 33 (2010).

[74]

Tan, P.Z. et al. 2012. Emotional reactivity and regulation in anxious and nonanxious youth: a cell-phone ecological momentary assessment study. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines. 53, 2 (Feb. 2012), 197--206.

[75]

Tham, J.C.K. 2016. Globally Fit: Attending to International Users and Advancing a Sociotechnological Design Agenda for Wearable Technologies. Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 2:1--2:9.

Digital Library

[76]

Trapl, E.S. et al. 2005. Use of audio-enhanced personal digital assistants for school-based data collection. Journal of Adolescent Health. 37, 4 (2005), 296--305.

[77]

Vogel, S. and Schwabe, L. 2016. Learning and memory under stress: implications for the classroom. npj Science of Learning. 1, April (Jun. 2016), 16011.

[78]

Wada, K. et al. 2005. Psychological and social effects of one year robot assisted activity on elderly people at a health service facility for the aged. Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2005), 2785--2790.

[79]

Wada, K. and Shibata, T. 2007. Living With Seal Robots---Its Sociopsychological and Physiological Influences on the Elderly at a Care House. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 23, 5 (Oct. 2007), 972--980.

Digital Library

[80]

Wainer, J. et al. 2006. The role of physical embodiment in human-robot interaction. Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2006), 117--122.

[81]

Ware, J. 2014. Social Norms Influence Student Journalists' Perception of Wearable Technologies. Proceedings of the 32Nd ACM International Conference on The Design of Communication CD-ROM (2014), 23:1--23:2.

Digital Library

[82]

Wood, L.J. et al. 2013. Robot-mediated interviews-how effective is a humanoid robot as a tool for interviewing young children? PloS one. 8, 3 (Mar. 2013), e59448.

[83]

Young, C.C. and Dietrich, M.S. 2015. Stressful Life Events, Worry, and Rumination Predict Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Young Adolescents. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing. 28, 1 (2015), 35--42.

[84]

Young, I. 2008. Mental Models: Aligning Design Strategy with Human Behavior.

[85]

2014. American Psychological Association Survey Shows Teen Stress Rivals That of Adults.

Cited By

Koike ACagiltay BMutlu B(2024)Tangible Scenography as a Holistic Design Method for Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661530(459-475)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661530
Weidmann CRoesler EWiese EGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Designing Social Educational Robots: How User Participation Shapes AcceptanceCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640601(1114-1118)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610978.3640601
Levinson LNippert-Eng CGomez RSabanović SGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Snitches Get Unplugged: Adolescents' Privacy Concerns about Robots in the Home are Relationally SituatedProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634946(423-432)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634946
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Designing for engagement: using participatory design to develop a social robot to measure teen stress
1. Computer systems organization
  1. Embedded and cyber-physical systems
    1. Robotics
      1. External interfaces for robotics
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Interaction design
    1. Interaction design process and methods
      1. Participatory design

Recommendations

Designing Cyberbullying Mitigation and Prevention Solutions through Participatory Design With Teenagers
CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

While social media platforms enable individuals to easily communicate and share experiences, they have also emerged as a tool for cyberbullying. Teenagers represent an especially vulnerable population for negative emotional responses to cyberbullying. ...
Learning through Participatory Design: Designing Digital Badges for and with Teens
IDC '16: Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children

Children and teens have valuable insights to offer in the design of sociotechnical learning tools and environments. Prior work has identified a range of participatory design (PD) techniques that have been used successfully to engage youth of various ...
Designing Social Robots for Learning: HRI Participatory Design Workshop
Innovative Technologies and Learning
Abstract
With the emergence of affordable and open-source AI social robots in education, it is essential to involve the end-users—students—in the development process. To address this, we conducted a pilot participatory design workshop to explore university ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SIGDOC '17: Proceedings of the 35th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication

August 2017

286 pages

ISBN:9781450351607

DOI:10.1145/3121113

Conference Chair:
Rebekka Andersen
University of California, Davis

Copyright © 2017 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 August 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

SIGDOC '17

Sponsor:

SIGDOC

SIGDOC '17: The 35th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication

August 11 - 13, 2017

Nova Scotia, Halifax, Canada

Acceptance Rates

SIGDOC '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 61 of 77 submissions, 79%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 355 of 582 submissions, 61%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

40
Total Citations
View Citations
855
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)122
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Koike ACagiltay BMutlu B(2024)Tangible Scenography as a Holistic Design Method for Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661530(459-475)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661530
Weidmann CRoesler EWiese EGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Designing Social Educational Robots: How User Participation Shapes AcceptanceCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640601(1114-1118)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610978.3640601
Levinson LNippert-Eng CGomez RSabanović SGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Snitches Get Unplugged: Adolescents' Privacy Concerns about Robots in the Home are Relationally SituatedProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634946(423-432)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634946
Coronado EYamanobe NVenture G(2023)NEP+: A Human-Centered Framework for Inclusive Human-Machine Interaction DevelopmentSensors10.3390/s2322913623:22(9136)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/s23229136
Delgado FYang SMadaio MYang Q(2023)The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of PracticeProceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization10.1145/3617694.3623261(1-23)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3617694.3623261
Mara A(2023)Using Value-Sensitive Design Methods to Shape Cross-Species Interface DesignProceedings of the 41st ACM International Conference on Design of Communication10.1145/3615335.3623028(160-166)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3615335.3623028
Nwogu JBuddemeyer AFarzan RStewart AWalker E(2023)Comic-boarding with Children: Understanding the use of Language in Human-Human and Human-Agent DialogueProceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3585088.3593896(667-671)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3585088.3593896
Bacula AMercer JBerger JAdams JKnight H(2023)Integrating Robot Manufacturer Perspectives into Legible Factory Robot Light CommunicationsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/357073212:1(1-33)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3570732
Antony VCho SHuang CCastellano GRiek LCakmak MLeite I(2023)Co-Designing with Older Adults, for Older AdultsProceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3568162.3576995(506-515)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3568162.3576995
Datey ISoper HHossain KLouie WZytko D(2023)Ethical Participatory Design of Social Robots Through Co-Construction of Participatory Design Protocols2023 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN57019.2023.10309539(2454-2461)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN57019.2023.10309539
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents