Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3267851.3267857acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesivaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Users' perceptions of empathic dialogue cues: A data-driven approach to provide tailored empathy

Published: 05 November 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Understanding how and in what circumstances users respond to different verbal expressions of empathy will be important for designing Intelligent Virtual Agents able to influence the emotions and intrinsic motivations of users. We report a study to teach healthy study habits and tips involving 239 undergraduate students, 161 of which interacted with a character designed to express empathy through dialogue. We elicited participants' personality and psychological state (depression, anxiety and stress levels) and attitudes to study. In this paper we present a detailed analysis of participants' responses to specific empathic dialogue snippets designed to include one or more empathic cues to determine whether they found it helpful, stupid or empathic. We provide an example of how we have used data mining on our dataset to suggest which cues are most appropriate to which user types to enhance user models and improve agent decision-making regarding the expression of empathy.

References

[1]
T. Bickmore, A. Gruber, and R. Picard, 2005. Establishing the computer--patient working alliance in automated health behavior change interventions. Patient education and counseling 59, 1, 21--30.
[2]
T. Bickmore and D. Schulman, 2007. Practical approaches to comforting users with relational agents. In CHI'07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems ACM, 2291--2296.
[3]
T. Bickmore and D. Schulman, 2009. A virtual laboratory for studying long-term relationships between humans and virtual agents. In Proc of 8th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 1 International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 297--304.
[4]
T.W. Bickmore, D. Schulman, and C.L. Sidner, 2011. A reusable framework for health counseling dialogue systems based on a behavioral medicine ontology. Journal of biomedical informatics 44, 2, 183--197.
[5]
Y.-C. Cheng, C.-W. Chang, and G.-D. Chen, 2008. Design an Interactive Agent by Multi-Empathic Strategies to Reduce Student's Negative Emotion. In Advanced Learning Technologies, 2008. ICALT'08. Eighth IEEE International Conference on IEEE, 330--334.
[6]
I. Corp, 2016. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
[7]
M.H. Davis, 1980. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy.
[8]
M.H. Davis, 1983. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44, 1, 113.
[9]
C.M. de Melo and J. Gratch, 2015. Beyond Believability: Quantifying the Differences Between Real and Virtual Humans. In Intelligent Virtual Agents Springer, 109--118.
[10]
F. de Rosis, N. Novielli, V. Carofiglio, A. Cavalluzzi, and B. De Carolis, 2006. User modeling and adaptation in health promotion dialogs with an animated character. Journal of biomedical informatics 39, 5, 514--531.
[11]
J. Dias, W.C. Ho, T. Vogt, N. Beeckman, A. Paiva, and E. André, I Know What I Did Last Summer: Autobiographic Memory in Synthetic Characters. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction.
[12]
J. Dias, S. Mascarenhas, and A. Paiva, 2014. Fatima modular: Towards an agent architecture with a generic appraisal framework. In Emotion modeling Springer, 44--56.
[13]
L.R. Goldberg, 1999. A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality psychology in Europe 7, 1, 7--28.
[14]
J. Han, J. Pei, and M. Kamber, 2011. Data mining: concepts and techniques. Elsevier.
[15]
J.D. Henry and J.R. Crawford, 2005. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British journal of clinical psychology 44, 2, 227--239.
[16]
R. Hogan, 1969. Development of an empathy scale. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 33, 3, 307.
[17]
M. Hojat, 2007. Empathy in patient care: Antecedents, development, measurement, and outcomes. Springer Science & Business Media.
[18]
R. IBM_Corp, 2016. IBM SPSS Modeler for Windows, Version 18.0. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY.
[19]
W.L. Johnson and J.C. Lester, 2016. Face-to-face interaction with pedagogical agents, twenty years later. International Journal of Artificial intelligence in education 26, 1, 25--36.
[20]
J. Klein, Y. Moon, and R.W. Picard, 2002. This computer responds to user frustration:: Theory, design, and results. Interacting with Computers 14, 2, 119--140.
[21]
I. Leite, C. Martinho, A. Pereira, and A. Paiva, 2009. As time goes by: Long-term evaluation of social presence in robotic companions. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2009. ROMAN 2009. The 18th IEEE International Symposium on IEEE, 669--674.
[22]
S.W. McQuiggan and J.C. Lester, 2007. Modeling and evaluating empathy in embodied companion agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65, 4, 348--360.
[23]
H. Nguyen and J. Masthoff, 2009. Designing empathic computers: the effect of multimodal empathic feedback using animated agent. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology ACM, 7.
[24]
A. Niculescu, B. van Dijk, A. Nijholt, H. Li, and S.L. See, 2013. Making social robots more attractive: the effects of voice pitch, humor and empathy. International journal of social robotics 5, 2, 171--191.
[25]
M. Ochs, C. Pelachaud, and D. Sadek, 2008. An empathic virtual dialog agent to improve human-machine interaction. In Proc 7th Int Conf Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Vol 1 (Estoril, Portugal2008), IFMAAS, 1402401, 89--96.
[26]
A. Paiva, J. Dias, D. Sobral, R. Aylett, P. Sobreperez, S. Woods, C. Zoll, and L. Hall, 2004. Caring for agents and agents that care: Building empathic relations with synthetic agents. In Proc 3rd Int. Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 1 IEEE Computer Society, 194--201.
[27]
A. Paiva, J. Dias, D. Sobral, R. Aylett, S. Woods, L. Hall, and C. Zoll, 2005. Learning by feeling: Evoking empathy with synthetic characters. Applied Artificial Intelligence 19, 3-4, 235--266.
[28]
H. Prendinger and M. Ishizuka, 2005. The empathic companion: A character-based interface that addresses users'affective states. Applied Artificial Intelligence 19, 3-4, 267--285.
[29]
D. Richards, 2017. Intimately intelligent virtual agents: knowing the human beyond sensory input. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI International Workshop on Investigating Social Interactions with Artificial Agents ACM, 39--40.
[30]
J. Robison, J. Rowe, S. McQuiggan, and J. Lester, 2009. Predicting User Psychological Characteristics from Interactions with Empathetic Virtual Agents. In Intelligent Virtual Agents, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 330--336.
[31]
S.H. Rodrigues, S.F. Mascarenhas, J. Dias, and A. Paiva, 2009. "I can feel it too!": Emergent empathic reactions between synthetic characters. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops, 2009. ACII 2009. 3rd International Conference on IEEE, 1--7.
[32]
S. Rollnick and W.R. Miller, 1995. What is motivational interviewing? Behavioural and cognitive Psychotherapy 23, 4, 325--334.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Identifying Which Relational Cues Users Find Helpful to Allow Tailoring of e-Coach DialoguesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti71000937:10(93)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Influence of agent’s self-disclosure on human empathyPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.028395518:5(e0283955)Online publication date: 10-May-2023
  • (2023)Influence of Anthropomorphic Agent on Human Empathy Through GamesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.326930111(40412-40429)Online publication date: 2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Users' perceptions of empathic dialogue cues: A data-driven approach to provide tailored empathy

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IVA '18: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
    November 2018
    381 pages
    ISBN:9781450360135
    DOI:10.1145/3267851
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 November 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Intelligent Virtual Agents
    2. data mining
    3. empathic dialog

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    IVA '18
    Sponsor:
    IVA '18: International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
    November 5 - 8, 2018
    NSW, Sydney, Australia

    Acceptance Rates

    IVA '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 17 of 82 submissions, 21%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 53 of 196 submissions, 27%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Identifying Which Relational Cues Users Find Helpful to Allow Tailoring of e-Coach DialoguesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti71000937:10(93)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Influence of agent’s self-disclosure on human empathyPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.028395518:5(e0283955)Online publication date: 10-May-2023
    • (2023)Influence of Anthropomorphic Agent on Human Empathy Through GamesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.326930111(40412-40429)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2022)Agents facilitate one category of human empathy through task difficulty2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900686(22-28)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2022
    • (2022)“I felt her company”: A qualitative study on factors affecting closeness and emotional support seeking with an embodied conversational agentInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102771(102771)Online publication date: Jan-2022
    • (2021)Do you mind if I ask?Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3472306.3478357(167-174)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2021
    • (2021)A systematic mapping study on agent miningJournal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence10.1080/0952813X.2020.186478434:2(189-214)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2021

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media