Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3514105.3514120acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicwcsnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fairness Metrics for Recommender Systems

Published: 01 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Fairness is a hot topic in recommender system research in recent years. Researchers have resorted to regularization and other techniques to reduce fairness problems. However, a lot of research literature adopts classic evaluation metrics for recommender system results. There has been little attention paid to the fairness metrics for recommender system evaluation. In this paper and for the first time in the research history of recommender systems, we propose a set of fairness metrics based on extreme value theory. In the experiment section, we evaluate different classic algorithms and fair AI technologies with our newly invented fairness metrics.

References

[1]
Covington, P., Adams, J., & Sargin, E., 2016, Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations. Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems.
[2]
Guo, H., Tang, R., Ye, Y., Li, Z., He. X., 2017, DeepFM: a factorization-machine based neural network for CTR prediction, Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[3]
Chen, L., Shi, H., 2021, DexDeepFM: Ensemble Diversity Enhanced Extreme Deep Factorization Machine Model.
[4]
Cañamares, R., Castells P., 2018, Should I Follow the Crowd? A Probabilistic Analysis of the Effectiveness of Popularity in Recommender Systems. The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval.
[5]
Kiswanto, D., Nurjanah, D., and Rismala, R., 2018, Fairness Aware Regularization on a Learning-to-Rank Recommender System for Controlling Popularity Bias in E-Commerce Domain. International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI)
[6]
Yadav, H., Du, Z., Joachims, T., 2020, Fair Learning-to-Rank from Implicit Feedback. SIGIR.
[7]
Xiaoyuan, S. and Taghi, M.K., 2009, A Survey of Collaborative Filtering Techniques, Advances in Artificial Intelligence
[8]
Sarwar, B., Karypis. G., Konstan. J., Riedl., J., 2010, Item-Based Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Algorithms, International World Wide Web Conference.
[9]
Salakhutdinov, R., Mnih A., 2015, Probabilistic Matrix Factorization, NIPS.
[10]
Takacs, G., Tikk, D., 2012, Alternating Least Squares for Personalized Ranking. The 6th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems.
[11]
Koren, Y., 2008, Factorization Meets the Neighborhood: a Multifaceted Collaborative Filtering Model. KDD.
[12]
Chen, T., Zhang. W, Lu Q, K. Chen, Y. Yu., 2012, SVDFeature : A Toolkit for Feature-based Collaborative Filtering. The Journal of Machine Learning Research
[13]
Dai, C., Qian, F., Jiang W., et. al., 2014, A Personalized Recommendation System for NetEase Dating Site.
[14]
Chen, T., Cai, J., Wang, H., Yu, D., 2014, Instant Expert Hunting: Building an Answerer Recommender System for a Large Scale Q&A Website”, ACM Symposium on Applied Computing.
[15]
He, X., Pan, J., Ou, J., et.al., 2014, Practical Lessons from Predicting Clicks on Ads at Facebook, ADKDD.
[16]
Sedhain S, Menon A K, Sanner S, 2015, AutoRec: Autoencoders Meet Collaborative Filtering, International Conference on World Wide Web.
[17]
Song, W., Shi, C., Xiao, Z., et.al., 2019, AutoInt: Automatic Feature Interaction Learning via Self-Attentive Neural Networks, The Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.
[18]
Cheng, H., Koc.L., Harmsen, J., et.al., 2016, Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systems, Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Deep Learning for Recommender Systems
[19]
Trigeorgis, G., Bousmalis K., Zafeiriou S., et.al., 2015, A Deep Matrix Factorization Method for Learning Attribute Representations
[20]
Pan, W., Hao, Z., Xu, C., 2015, Adaptive Bayesian personalized ranking for heterogeneous implicit feedbacks. Knowledge-Based Systems.
[21]
Yue, S., Larson, M., Karatzoglou, A., 2012, CLiMF: Collaborative Less-Is-More Filtering, Proceedings of the Twenty- Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence .
[22]
Beutel, A., Chi E., Cheng Z., et. al., 2017, Beyond Globally Optimal: Focused Learning for Improved Recommendations. The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, International Conference on World Wide Web.
[23]
Wang, H., 2021, Zipf Matrix Factorization: Matrix Factorization with Matthew Effect Reduction. The 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data.
[24]
Wang, H., Wang, Z., Zhang, W., 2018, Quantitative Analysis of Matthew Effect and Sparsity Problem of Recommender Systems, IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analysis.
[25]
Segers J ., 2002, Generalized Pickands estimators for the extreme value index[J]. Journal of Statistical Planning & Inference.
[26]
Caeiro F, Gomes I, Pestana D ., 2005, Direct reduction of bias of the classical Hill estimator. Revstat - Statistical Journal.
[27]
Gomes M I ., 1999, Generalized jackknife moment estimator of the tail index.
[28]
Kratz M, Resnick S I . The QQ-estimator and heavy tails. Comm.statist.stochastic Models, 1996.
[29]
Paulauskas V, Vai Vciulis M ., 2011, Once more on comparison of tail index estimators. Statistics
[30]
Harper F., Konstan J. 2016, The MovieLens Datasets: History and Context, ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
[31]
Wang, H., Ruan, B., 2020, MatRec: Matrix Factorization for Highly Skewed Dataset. The 3rd International Conference on Big Data Technologies.
[32]
Požrl T. 2012, LDOS-CoMoDa dataset.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)LogitMat: Zeroshot Learning Algorithm for Recommender Systems without Transfer Learning or Pretrained Models2023 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analytics (ICCCBDA)10.1109/ICCCBDA56900.2023.10154697(138-142)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
icWCSN '22: Proceedings of the 2022 9th International Conference on Wireless Communication and Sensor Networks
January 2022
159 pages
ISBN:9781450396219
DOI:10.1145/3514105
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 April 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. extreme value theory
  2. fairness
  3. recommender system

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

icWCSN 2022

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)33
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 31 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)LogitMat: Zeroshot Learning Algorithm for Recommender Systems without Transfer Learning or Pretrained Models2023 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analytics (ICCCBDA)10.1109/ICCCBDA56900.2023.10154697(138-142)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2023

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media