Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3576050.3576078acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Detecting the Disengaged Reader - Using Scrolling Data to Predict Disengagement during Reading

Published: 13 March 2023 Publication History

Abstract

When reading long and complex texts, students may disengage and miss out on relevant content. In order to prevent disengaged behavior or to counteract it by means of an intervention, it is ideally detected an early stage. In this paper, we present a method for early disengagement detection that relies only on the classification of scrolling data. The presented method transforms scrolling data into a time series representation, where each point of the series represents the vertical position of the viewport in the text document. This time series representation is then classified using time series classification algorithms. We evaluated the method on a dataset of 565 university students reading eight different texts. We compared the algorithm performance with different time series lengths, data sampling strategies, the texts that make up the training data, and classification algorithms. The method can classify disengagement early with up to 70% accuracy. However, we also observe differences in the performance depending on which of the texts are included in the training dataset. We discuss our results and propose several possible improvements to enhance the method.

References

[1]
Anthony Bagnall, Jason Lines, Aaron Bostrom, James Large, and Eamonn Keogh. 2017. The great time series classification bake off: a review and experimental evaluation of recent algorithmic advances. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 31, 3 (May 2017), 606–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-016-0483-9
[2]
Daniel Biedermann, Jan Schneider, and Hendrik Drachsler. 2021. Digital self‐control nterventions for distracting media multitasking ‐ A systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 37, 5 (Oct. 2021), 1217–1231. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12581
[3]
Marc Brysbaert. 2019. How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta-analysis of reading rate. Journal of Memory and Language 109 (Dec. 2019), 104047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104047
[4]
Charles Calderwood, Phillip L. Ackerman, and Erin Marie Conklin. 2014. What else do college students “do” while studying? An investigation of multitasking. Computers & Education 75 (June 2014), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.004
[5]
Lucy Chipchase, Megan Davidson, Felicity Blackstock, Ros Bye, Peter Colthier, Nerida Krupp, Wendy Dickson, Deborah Turner, and Mark Williams. 2017. Conceptualising and Measuring Student Disengagement in Higher Education: A Synthesis of the Literature. International Journal of Higher Education 6, 2 (March 2017), 31. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n2p31
[6]
Mihaela Cocea and Stephan Weibelzahl. 2011. Disengagement Detection in Online Learning: Validation Studies and Perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 4, 2 (April 2011), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2010.14
[7]
Angus Dempster, Daniel F. Schmidt, and Geoffrey I. Webb. 2021. MINIROCKET: A Very Fast (Almost) Deterministic Transform for Time Series Classification. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447548.3467231 arXiv:2012.08791 [cs, stat].
[8]
Sidney K. D’Mello and Caitlin S. Mills. 2021. Mind wandering during reading: An interdisciplinary and integrative review of psychological, computing, and intervention research and theory. Language and Linguistics Compass 15, 4 (2021), e12412. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12412 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/lnc3.12412.
[9]
Noah D. Forrin, Caitlin Mills, Sidney K. D’Mello, Evan F. Risko, Daniel Smilek, and Paul Seli. 2021. TL;DR: Longer Sections of Text Increase Rates of Unintentional Mind-Wandering. The Journal of Experimental Education 89, 2 (April 2021), 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1751578 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1751578.
[10]
Patricia Goedecke, Daqi Dong, Genghu Shi, Shi Feng, Evan Risko, Andrew Olney, Sidney mello, and Arthur Graesser. 2015. Breaking Off Engagement: Readers’ Disengagement as a Function of Reader and Text Characteristics.
[11]
Max Grusky, Jeiran Jahani, Josh Schwartz, Dan Valente, Yoav Artzi, and Mor Naaman. 2017. Modeling Sub-Document Attention Using Viewport Time. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6475–6480. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025916
[12]
Vitomir Kovanović, Dragan Gašević, Shane Dawson, Srećko Joksimović, Ryan S. Baker, and Marek Hatala. 2015. Penetrating the Black Box of Time-on-task Estimation. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge(LAK ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723623 event-place: Poughkeepsie, New York.
[13]
Dmitry Lagun, Chih-Hung Hsieh, Dale Webster, and Vidhya Navalpakkam. 2014. Towards better measurement of attention and satisfaction in mobile search. In Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval. ACM, Gold Coast Queensland Australia, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/2600428.2609631
[14]
Dmitry Lagun and Mounia Lalmas. 2016. Understanding User Attention and Engagement in Online News Reading. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, San Francisco California USA, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/2835776.2835833
[15]
Markus Löning, Anthony Bagnall, Sajaysurya Ganesh, Viktor Kazakov, Jason Lines, and Franz J. Király. 2019. sktime: A Unified Interface for Machine Learning with Time Series. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1909.07872 arXiv:1909.07872 [cs, stat].
[16]
Markus Löning, Franz Király, Tony Bagnall, Matthew Middlehurst, Sajaysurya Ganesh, George Oastler, Jason Lines, Martin Walter, ViktorKaz, Lukasz Mentel, chrisholder, RNKuhns, Leonidas Tsaprounis, Taiwo Owoseni, Patrick Rockenschaub, danbartl, jesellier, eenticott shell, Ciaran Gilbert, Guzal Bulatova, Lovkush, Mirae Parker, Kejsi Take, Patrick Schäfer, Stanislav Khrapov, Svea Marie Meyer, AidenRushbrooke, oleskiewicz, Yi-Xuan Xu, and Afzal Ansari. 2022. alan-turing-institute/sktime: v0.13.2. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7017832
[17]
Caitlin Mills, Nigel Bosch, Art Graesser, and Sidney D’Mello. 2014. To Quit or Not to Quit: Predicting Future Behavioral Disengagement from Reading Patterns. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, David Hutchison, Takeo Kanade, Josef Kittler, Jon M. Kleinberg, Alfred Kobsa, Friedemann Mattern, John C. Mitchell, Moni Naor, Oscar Nierstrasz, C. Pandu Rangan, Bernhard Steffen, Demetri Terzopoulos, Doug Tygar, Gerhard Weikum, Stefan Trausan-Matu, Kristy Elizabeth Boyer, Martha Crosby, and Kitty Panourgia (Eds.). Vol. 8474. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_3 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[18]
Caitlin Mills and Sidney D’Mello. 2015. Toward a Real-Time (Day) Dreamcatcher: Sensor-Free Detection of Mind Wandering during Online Reading. International Educational Data Mining Society. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED560533 Publication Title: International Educational Data Mining Society.
[19]
Alejandro Pasos Ruiz, Michael Flynn, James Large, Matthew Middlehurst, and Anthony Bagnall. 2021. The great multivariate time series classification bake off: a review and experimental evaluation of recent algorithmic advances. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 35, 2 (March 2021), 401–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-020-00727-3
[20]
Lennard Schmidt and Erik Maier. 2020. Assessing Ad Attention through Clustering Viewport Trajectories.
[21]
John Talburt. 1985. The Flesch index: An easily programmable readability analysis algorithm. In Proceedings of the 4th annual international conference on Systems documentation - SIGDOC ’85. ACM Press, Ithaca, New York, United States, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/10563.10583
[22]
Maryanne Wolf and Mirit Barzillai. 2009. The importance of deep reading. Educational Leadership 66, 6 (March 2009).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)To Read or Not to Read: Predicting Student Engagement in Interactive ReadingArtificial Intelligence in Education10.1007/978-3-031-64299-9_15(209-222)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024

Index Terms

  1. Detecting the Disengaged Reader - Using Scrolling Data to Predict Disengagement during Reading
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      LAK2023: LAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference
      March 2023
      692 pages
      ISBN:9781450398657
      DOI:10.1145/3576050
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 13 March 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      LAK 2023

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 236 of 782 submissions, 30%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)42
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
      Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)To Read or Not to Read: Predicting Student Engagement in Interactive ReadingArtificial Intelligence in Education10.1007/978-3-031-64299-9_15(209-222)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media