A Module-Agnostic Reference Software Development Process for Different Levels of Higher-Education Study
Article No.: 11, Pages 1 - 7
Abstract
Several software development methodologies and practices are taught in computer science and software engineering higher education degrees. This happens through individual modules and capstone projects and sometimes with participation from real clients. Different from industry, where processes are usually prescribed, students encounter company-agnostic artefacts and practises, often having to choose between the available options. Feedback from tutors, students and clients indicates this to be a challenge, with students often confused trying to mix-and-match different practices without the proper consideration of how they would work together. This paper introduces the SHU Development Process, covering all software development stages, that is instantiated into different levels of detail for students as they progress through their degree studies. The SHU Dev Process provides structured guidance to software development practices that can be followed through their chosen process flow or cherry-picked by students as needed. It has been created through a student-led project over multiple years. First applied during the academic year 2021/2 and iterated upon for 2022/3 in a capstone project module at Sheffield Hallam University, the process was evaluated annually by surveying students across different courses and levels of study. In initial surveys, students responded positively, and our experience provides valuable insight that other practitioners may draw upon to implement and evaluate a similar resource in the future.
References
[1]
Sylvia Ashton and Rachel Stone. 2021. An A-Z of creative teaching in higher education (2nd edition. ed.). SAGE, London.
[2]
Terry. Barrett. 2011. New approaches to problem-based learning : revitalising your practice in higher education. Routledge, New York.
[3]
Kent Beck, Mike Beedle, Arie van Bennekum, Alistair Cockburn, Ward Cunningham, Martin Fowler, James Grenning, Jim Highsmith, Andrew Hunt, Ron Jeffries, Jon Kern, Brian Marick, Robert C. Martin, Steve Mellor, Ken Schwaber, Jeff Sutherland, and Dave Thomas. 2001. Manifesto for Agile Software Development. http://www.agilemanifesto.org/
[4]
Orges Cico, Letizia Jaccheri, Anh Nguyen-Duc, and He Zhang. 2020. Exploring the intersection between software industry and Software Engineering education - A systematic mapping of Software Engineering Trends. Journal of Systems and Software 172 (Feb. 2020), 110736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110736
[5]
Radu Constantinescu and Ioan Mihnea Iacob. 2007. Capability maturity model integration. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods 2, 1 (2007), 31–37.
[6]
Maria Lydia Fioravanti, Bruno Sena, Leo Natan Paschoal, Laíza R. Silva, Ana P. Allian, Elisa Y. Nakagawa, Simone R.S. Souza, Seiji Isotani, and Ellen F. Barbosa. 2018. Integrating Project Based Learning and Project Management for Software Engineering Teaching: An Experience Report. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education(SIGCSE ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 806–811. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159599
[7]
Vahid Garousi, Gorkem Giray, Eray Tuzun, Cagatay Catal, and Michael Felderer. 2020. Closing the Gap Between Software Engineering Education and Industrial Needs. IEEE Software 37, 2 (March 2020), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2018.2880823 Conference Name: IEEE Software.
[8]
Johannes Holvitie, Sherlock A. Licorish, Rodrigo O. Spínola, Sami Hyrynsalmi, Stephen G. MacDonell, Thiago S. Mendes, Jim Buchan, and Ville Leppänen. 2018. Technical debt and agile software development practices and processes: An industry practitioner survey. Information and Software Technology 96 (April 2018), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.11.015
[9]
Malin Jansson, Stefan Hrastinski, Stefan Stenbom, and Fredrik Enoksson. 2021. Online question and answer sessions: How students support their own and other students' processes of inquiry in a text-based learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education 51 (Oct. 2021), 100817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100817
[10]
Mohamad Kassab, Joanna DeFranco, and Valdemar Graciano Neto. 2018. An Empirical Investigation on the Satisfaction Levels with the Requirements Engineering Practices: Agile vs. Waterfall. In 2018 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm). IEEE, Toronto, ON, Canada, 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm.2018.00033 ISSN: 2158-1002.
[11]
Henrik Kniberg and Anders Ivarsson. 2012. Scaling Agile @ Spotify with Tribes, Squads, Chapters & Guilds. https://blog.crisp.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/SpotifyScaling.pdf
[12]
Jan Knobloch, Jonas Kaltenbach, and Bernd Bruegge. 2018. Increasing Student Engagement in Higher Education Using a Context-Aware Q&A Teaching Framework. In 2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET). IEEE, Gothenburg, Sweden, 136–145.
[13]
Mike Neary, Gary Saunders, and Dan Derricott. 2014. Student as Producer: Research-Engaged Teaching, an Institutional Strategy. Project Report. The Higher Education Academy, York.
[14]
Maria Paasivaara, Dragoş Vodă, Ville T. Heikkilä, Jari Vanhanen, and Casper Lassenius. 2018. How does participating in a capstone project with industrial customers affect student attitudes?. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training. ACM, Gothenburg Sweden, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183377.3183398
[15]
Roger S. Pressman and Bruce R. Maxim. 2020. Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach. (ninth edition / roger s. pressman, ph.d., bruce r. maxim, ph.d., international student edition. ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
[16]
Beatriz Pérez and Ángel L. Rubio. 2020. A Project-Based Learning Approach for Enhancing Learning Skills and Motivation in Software Engineering. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education(SIGCSE ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366891
[17]
Abdallah Salameh and Julian M. Bass. 2019. Spotify Tailoring for Promoting Effectiveness in Cross-Functional Autonomous Squads. In Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming – Workshops, Rashina Hoda (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 20–28.
[18]
Christopher Scaffidi. 2018. Employers’ needs for computer science, information technology and software engineering skills among new graduates. International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology 8, 1 (2018), 1–12.
[19]
Valeria Seidita, Massimo Cossentino, and Antonio Chella. 2012. A Proposal of Process Fragment Definition and Documentation. In Multi-Agent Systems(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Massimo Cossentino, Michael Kaisers, Karl Tuyls, and Gerhard Weiss (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34799-3_15
[20]
David H Smith IV, Qiang Hao, Vanessa Dennen, Michail Tsikerdekis, Bradly Barnes, Lilu Martin, and Nathan Tresham. 2020. Towards Understanding Online Question & Answer Interactions and their effects on student performance in large-scale STEM classes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 17, 1 (Dec. 2020), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00200-7
[21]
Rafal Włodarski, Aneta Poniszewska-Marańda, and Jean-Remy Falleri. 2022. Impact of software development processes on the outcomes of student computing projects: A tale of two universities. Information and Software Technology 144 (April 2022), 106787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106787
Index Terms
- A Module-Agnostic Reference Software Development Process for Different Levels of Higher-Education Study
Recommendations
Applying virtual reality to teach the software development process to novice software engineers
AbstractSoftware development is a complicated process that requires experienced human resources to produce successful software products. Although this process needs experience from the individuals, it is hard to provide this experience without ...
How Higher-Education Systems Influence Software Engineering Degree Programs
Undergraduate programs that cover knowledge related to software engineering range from software engineering-specific programs to traditional computer science programs, which might teach some subjects related to software engineering. Software engineering-...
Lean software startup practices and software engineering education
ICSE '22: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion ProceedingsIn the modern economy, software drives innovation and economic growth. Studies show how software increasingly influences all industry sectors. Over the past 5 decades, software engineering has also changed significantly to advance the development of ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September 2023
107 pages
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 25 September 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
Conference
UKICER 2023
UKICER 2023: The United Kingdom and Ireland Computing Education Research conference
September 7 - 8, 2023
Swansea, Wales Uk
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 34Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)21
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format