Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3643650.3658605acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescodaspyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Synthetic Data Digital Twins and Data Trusts Control for Privacy in Health Data Sharing

Published: 19 June 2024 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Health data sharing is very valuable for medical research since it has the propensity to improve diagnostics, policy, medication, and so on. At the same time, sharing health data needs to be done without compromising the privacy of patients and stakeholders. However, recent advances in AI/ML and sophisticated analytics have proven to introduce biases that can easily identify patients based on their healthcare data, which violates privacy. In this work, we sort to address this major issue by exploring two emerging topics that are gaining attention from industry, academia, and governments, i.e., digital twins and data trusts. First, we proposed the use of digital twins (DTs) to generate synthetic records of patient's heart rate data. DTs are virtual replicas of the actual data and were created using two synthetic data generative models - Gaussian Copula (GC) and Tabular Variational Autoencoder (TVAE). The GC and TVAE achieved a maximum data quality score of 88% and 96% respectively. Next, we posit that the DTs should be shared with a data trusts layer. Data trusts are fiduciary frameworks that govern multi-party data sharing. The data trusts enforce access controls (based on metrics such as location, role-based, and policy-based) to the synthetic health data and reports to the data subject. The preliminary evaluations of the work show that merging the two techniques (i.e., synthetic data digital twins and data trusts) enforces better privacy for health data access. The synthetic data ensures more anonymization while the data trusts provide easy auditing, tracking, and efficient reporting to the patient or data subject. The paper also detailed the architectural design of the data trusts and evaluated the efficiency of the access control techniques.

    References

    [1]
    Attaran, M., & Celik, B. G. (2023). Digital Twin: Benefits, use cases, challenges, and opportunities. Decision Analytics Journal, 100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100165
    [2]
    Coorey, G., Figtree, G. A., Fletcher, D. F., & Redfern, J. (2021). The health digital twin: advancing precision cardiovascular medicine. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 18(12), 803--804.
    [3]
    Rinik, C. (2020). Data trusts: more data than trust? The perspective of the data subject in the face of a growing problem. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 34(3), 342--363.
    [4]
    Hall, W., & Pesenti, J. (2017). Growing the artificial intelligence industry in the UK. Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport and Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. Part of the Industrial Strategy UK and the Commonwealth.
    [5]
    Lomotey, R. K., Kumi, S., & Deters, R. (2022). Data Trusts as a Service: Providing a platform for multi?party data sharing. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(1), 100075.
    [6]
    Vallée, A. (2023). Digital twin for healthcare systems. Frontiers in Digital Health, 5, 1253050.
    [7]
    AWS. (2023). What is Digital Twin technology? https://aws.amazon.com/what-is/digital-twin/, Last Accessed: 12/05/2023
    [8]
    Nomura, A. (2023). Digital health, digital medicine, and digital therapeutics in cardiology: current evidence and future perspective in Japan. Hypertension Research, 1--9.
    [9]
    SDV, https://sdv.dev/, Last Accessed: 12/05/2023
    [10]
    Lehne, M., Sass, J., Essenwanger, A., Schepers, J., & Thun, S. (2019). Why digital medicine depends on interoperability. NPJ digital medicine, 2(1), 79.
    [11]
    Marwaha, J. S., Landman, A. B., Brat, G. A., Dunn, T., & Gordon, W. J. (2022). Deploying digital health tools within large, complex health systems: key considerations for adoption and implementation. NPJ digital medicine, 5(1), 13.
    [12]
    Bayoumy, K., Gaber, M., Elshafeey, A., Mhaimeed, O., Dineen, E. H., Marvel, F. A., ... & Elshazly, M. B. (2021). Smart wearable devices in cardiovascular care: where we are and how to move forward. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 18(8), 581--599.
    [13]
    De Benedictis, A., Mazzocca, N., Somma, A., & Strigaro, C. (2022). Digital Twins in Healthcare: an architectural proposal and its application in a social distancing case study. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.
    [14]
    SVD SD Metrics, https://docs.sdv.dev/sdmetrics/.
    [15]
    Volkov, I., Radchenko, G., & Tchernykh, A. (2021). Digital twins, internet of things and mobile medicine: a review of current platforms to support smart healthcare. Programming and Computer Software, 47, 578--590.
    [16]
    Milne, R., Sorbie, A., & Dixon-Woods, M. (2022). What can data trusts for health research learn from participatory governance in biobanks?. Journal of medical ethics, 48(5), 323--328.
    [17]
    Radosevic, N., Duckham, M., Saiedur Rahaman, M., Ho, S., Williams, K., Hashem, T., & Tao, Y. (2023). Spatial data trusts: an emerging governance framework for sharing spatial data. International Journal of Digital Earth, 16(1), 1607--1639.
    [18]
    Health IT Analytics, The Clinical Promise and Ethical Pitfalls of Electronic Phenotyping, https://healthitanalytics.com/features/the-clinical-promise-and-ethical-pitfalls-of-electronic-phenotyping, Last Accessed: 12/05/2023.
    [19]
    Gupta, D., Kayode, O., Bhatt, S., Gupta, M., & Tosun, A. S. (2021, December). Hierarchical federated learning-based anomaly detection using digital twins for smart healthcare. In 2021 IEEE 7th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC) (pp. 16--25). IEEE.
    [20]
    Yu, Z., Wang, K., Wan, Z., Xie, S., & Lv, Z. (2022). FMCPNN in Digital Twins Smart Healthcare. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine.
    [21]
    Liu, Y., Zhang, L., Yang, Y., Zhou, L., Ren, L., Wang, F., ... & Deen, M. J. (2019). A novel cloud-based framework for the elderly healthcare services using digital twin. IEEE Access, 7, 49088--49101.
    [22]
    Elayan, H., Aloqaily, M., & Guizani, M. (2021). Digital twin for intelligent context-aware IoT healthcare systems. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(23), 16749--16757.
    [23]
    Croatti, A., Gabellini, M., Montagna, S., & Ricci, A. (2020). On the integration of agents and digital twins in healthcare. Journal of Medical Systems, 44, 1--8.
    [24]
    Laamarti, F., Badawi, H. F., Ding, Y., Arafsha, F., Hafidh, B., & El Saddik, A. (2020). An ISO/IEEE 11073 standardized digital twin framework for health and well-being in smart cities. IEEE Access, 8, 105950--105961.
    [25]
    Kumi, S., Hilton, M., Snow, C., Lomotey, R. K., & Deters, R. (2023, July). sleepsynth: Evaluating the use of synthetic Data in Health Digital Twins. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Digital Health (ICDH) (pp. 121--130). IEEE.
    [26]
    O'hara, K. (2019). Data Trusts: Ethics, Architecture and Governance for Trustworthy Data Stewardship (WSI White Papers, 1) Southampton. University of Southampton 27pp. (
    [27]
    Mills, S. (2019). Who owns the future? Data trusts, data commons, and the future of data ownership. Data Trusts, Data Commons, and the Future of Data Ownership (September 24, 2019).
    [28]
    Zhang, X. (2021). A commentary of data trusts in MIT Technology Review 2021. Fundamental Research, 1(6), 834--835.
    [29]
    Wong, B., Penner, J., & Lau, J. (2020). The basics of private and public data trusts. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 90--114.
    [30]
    Jang, K., & Lee, S. (2022). A Study on the Introduction of Data Trusts System to Expand the Rights of Privacy Self-Determination. Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, 28(1), 29--43.
    [31]
    Houser, K. A., & Bagby, J. W. (2023). The data trust solution to data sharing problems. Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L., 25, 113.
    [32]
    Olorunju, N., & Adams, R. (2023). African data trusts: new tools towards collective data governance?. Information & Communications Technology Law, 1--14.
    [33]
    Nabben, K. (2021). Decentralised autonomous organisations (daos) as data trusts: A general-purpose data governance framework for decentralised data ownership, storage, and utilisation. Storage, and Utilisation (December 20, 2021).
    [34]
    Fitabase, https://www.fitabase.com/resources/knowledge-base/exporting-data/example-data-sets/

    Index Terms

    1. Synthetic Data Digital Twins and Data Trusts Control for Privacy in Health Data Sharing

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SaT-CPS '24: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Workshop on Secure and Trustworthy Cyber-Physical Systems
        June 2024
        97 pages
        ISBN:9798400705557
        DOI:10.1145/3643650
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 19 June 2024

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. artificial intelligence
        2. data trusts
        3. digital twins
        4. machine learning
        5. middleware
        6. privacy
        7. synthetic health data

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Conference

        CODASPY '24
        Sponsor:

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 22
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
        Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media