Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/2484920acmotherconferencesBook PagePublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
AAMAS '13: Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems
2013 Proceeding
Publisher:
  • International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
  • Richland
  • SC
Conference:
AAMAS '13: International conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems St. Paul MN USA May 6 - 10, 2013
ISBN:
978-1-4503-1993-5
Published:
06 May 2013
Sponsors:
IFAAMAS
In-Cooperation:

Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

The Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS) conference series brings together researchers from around the world to share the latest advances in the field. It provides a highprofile and high-quality forum for research in the theory and practice of autonomous agents and multiagent systems. AAMAS 2002, the first of the series, was held in Bologna, followed by Melbourne (2003), New York (2004), Utrecht (2005), Hakodate (2006), Honolulu (2007), Estoril (2008), Budapest (2009), Toronto (2010), Taipei (2011), and Valencia (2012). You are now about to enter the proceedings of AAMAS 2013, held in Saint Paul, Minnesota, in May 2013.

In addition to the general track for the AAMAS 2013 conference, submissions were invited to four special tracks: robotics, virtual agents, innovative applications, and (new this year) a special challenges and visions track. The aims of these special tracks were to give researchers from these areas a strong focus, to provide a forum for discussion and debate within the encompassing structure of AAMAS, and to ensure that the impact of both theoretical contributions and innovative applications were recognized. The tracks were chaired by leaders in the corresponding fields: Daniele Nardi and Monica Nicolescu for the robotics track, Stefan Kopp and Catherine Pelachaud for the virtual agents track, Bo An and John Thangarajah for the innovative applications track, and Jeff Rosenschein for the challenges and visions track. The special track chairs provided critical input to selection of Program Committee (PC) and Senior Program Committee (SPC) members, and to the reviewer allocation and the review process itself.

Both full paper and extended abstract submissions were solicited for AAMAS 2013. The papers were selected by means of a thorough review and discussion process which included an opportunity for authors to respond to reviewer comments, a discussion phase between SPC members and (track/PC) chairs, after which the program chairs made the final decisions. In the general track, 13 papers were withdrawn that were accepted as extended abstracts. No other papers were withdrawn after notification.

Each full paper was allocated 8 pages in the proceedings, challenges and visions papers were allocated 4 pages, and extended abstracts 2 pages. Oral presentations were allocated 20 minutes in the program. Both full papers and extended abstracts were presented as posters during the conference.

Of the submissions, 383 (64%) were indicated as being student papers, which indicates that AAMAS continues to be a nurturing environment for students. Submissions were assigned keywords, each of which was classified under one of 15 top-level topics (e.g., "Agent Cooperation"). Representation of top-level topics (measured by first keyword) was broad, with top counts in the areas of Economic Paradigms (201 submissions), Agent Cooperation (137), Agent Reasoning (111), Learning and Adaptation (100), and Robotics (94).

SESSION: C2 - social choice II
research-article
Achieving fully proportional representation is easy in practice
Pages 399–406

We provide experimental evaluation of a number of known and new algorithms for approximate computation of Monroe's and Chamberlin-Courant's rules. Our experiments, conducted both on real-life preference-aggregation data and on synthetic data, show that ...

research-article
The complexity of losing voters
Pages 407–414

We consider the scenario of a parliament that is going to vote on a specific important issue. The voters are grouped in parties, and all voters of a party vote in the same way. The expected winner decision is known, because parties declare their ...

research-article
On elections with robust winners
Pages 415–422

We study the sensitivity of election outcomes to small changes in voters' preferences. We assume that a voter may err by swapping two adjacent candidates in his vote; we would like to check whether the election outcome would remain the same given up to ...

research-article
Manipulating two stage voting rules
Pages 423–430

We study the computational complexity of computing a manipulation of a two stage voting rule. An example of a two stage voting rule is Black's procedure. The first stage of Black's procedure selects the Condorcet winner if it exists, otherwise the ...

research-article
Coalitional manipulation for Schulze's rule
Pages 431–438

Schulze's rule is used in the elections of a large number of organizations including Wikimedia and Debian. Part of the reason for its popularity is the large number of axiomatic properties, like monotonicity and Condorcet consistency, which it ...

Contributors
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • Bar-Ilan University
  • Nagoya Institute of Technology
  • Delft University of Technology

Recommendations

Acceptance Rates

AAMAS '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 140 of 599 submissions, 23%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%
YearSubmittedAcceptedRate
AAMAS '1979319324%
AAMAS '1860714925%
AAMAS '1745712728%
AAMAS '1655013725%
AAMAS '1567010816%
AAMAS '1470916924%
AAMAS '1359914023%
AAMAS '0965113220%
Overall5,0361,15523%