Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
Volume 27, Issue 1Mar 2025Current Issue
Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025Bibliometrics
Skip Table Of Content Section
research-article
Nullius in Explanans: an ethical risk assessment for explainable AI: Nullius in Explanans
Abstract

Explanations are conceived to ensure the trustworthiness of AI systems. Yet, relying solemnly on algorithmic solutions, as provided by explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), might fall short to account for sociotechnical risks jeopardizing ...

research-article
Mind the gap: bridging the divide between computer scientists and ethicists in shaping moral machines
Abstract

This paper examines the ongoing challenges of interdisciplinary collaboration in Machine Ethics (ME), particularly the integration of ethical decision-making capacities into AI systems. Despite increasing demands for ethical AI, ethicists often ...

research-article
Procedural fairness in algorithmic decision-making: the role of public engagement
Abstract

Despite the widespread use of automated decision-making (ADM) systems, they are often developed without involving the public or those directly affected, leading to concerns about systematic biases that may perpetuate structural injustices. ...

research-article
Urban Digital Twins and metaverses towards city multiplicities: uniting or dividing urban experiences?
Abstract

Urban Digital Twins (UDTs) have become the new buzzword for researchers, planners, policymakers, and industry experts when it comes to designing, planning, and managing sustainable and efficient cities. It encapsulates the last iteration of the ...

research-article
AI responsibility gap: not new, inevitable, unproblematic
Abstract

Who is responsible for a harm caused by AI, or a machine or system that relies on artificial intelligence? Given that current AI is neither conscious nor sentient, it’s unclear that AI itself is responsible for it. But given that AI acts ...

research-article
Leading good digital lives
Abstract

The paper develops a conception of the good life within a digitalized society. Martha Nussbaum’s capability theory offers an adequate normative framework for that purpose as it systematically integrates the analysis of flourishing human lives with ...

research-article
Robots, institutional roles and joint action: some key ethical issues
Abstract

In this article, firstly, cooperative interaction between robots and humans is discussed; specifically, the possibility of human/robot joint action and (relatedly) the possibility of robots occupying institutional roles alongside humans. The ...

research-article
Dating apps as tools for social engineering
Abstract

In a bid to boost their below-replacement fertility levels, some countries, such as China, India, Iran, and Japan, have launched state-sponsored dating apps, with more potentially following. However, the use of dating apps as tools for social ...

research-article
Possibilities and challenges in the moral growth of large language models: a philosophical perspective: Possibilities and challenges in the moral growth of large…
Abstract

With the rapid expansion of parameters in large language models (LLMs) and the application of Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF), there has been a noticeable growth in the moral competence of LLMs. However, several questions warrant ...

research-article
LLMs beyond the lab: the ethics and epistemics of real-world AI research
Abstract

Research under real-world conditions is crucial to the development and deployment of robust AI systems. Exposing large language models to complex use settings yields knowledge about their performance and impact, which cannot be obtained under ...

Comments