Abstract
Online advertising is the main source of revenue for many Internet firms; thus designing effective mechanisms for selecting and pricing ads become an important research question. In this paper, we seek to design truthful mechanisms for online advertising that satisfy Revenue Monotonicity (RM) - a natural property which states that the revenue of a mechanism should not decrease if the number of participants increase or if a participant increases her bid. In a recent work [5], it was argued that RM is a desired goal for proper functioning of an online advertising business. Since popular mechanisms like VCG are not revenue-monotone, they introduced the notion of Price of Revenue Monotonicity (PoRM) to capture the loss in social welfare of a revenue-monotone mechanism. [5] then studied the price of revenue-monotonicity of Combinatorial Auction with Identical Items(CAII). In CAII, there are k identical items to be sold to a group of bidders, where bidder i wants either exactly d i ∈ {1, …, k} number of items or nothing. CAII generalizes important online advertising scenarios such as image-text and video-pod auctions. In an image-text auction we want to fill an advertising slot with either k text-ads or a single image-ad. In video-pod auction we want to fill a video advertising break of k seconds with video-ads of possibly different durations. [5] showed that no deterministic RM mechanism can attain PoRM of less than ln (k) for CAII, i.e., no deterministic mechanism can attain more than \(\frac{1}{\ln(k)}\) fraction of the maximum social welfare. [5] also design a mechanism with PoRM of O(ln 2(k)) for CAII.
In this paper, first we overcome the impossibility result of [5] for deterministic mechanisms by using the power of randomization. We show that by using randomization, one can attain a constant PoRM; in particular, we design a randomized RM mechanism with PoRM of 3 for CAII. Then, we study a more general Multi-group Combinatorial Auction with Identical Items (MCAII). In MCAII, the bidders are partitioned into multiple groups, and the set of winners are constrainted to be from a single group. The motivation for MCAII is from scenarios where the set of selected ads may be required to have the same format. We give a randomized mechanism which satisfies RM and IC and has PoRM of O(ln k). This is in contrast to log2(k) deterministic mechanism that follows from [5].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ausubel, L.M., Milgrom, P.: Ascending auctions with package bidding. Frontiers of Theoretical Economics 1(1), 1–42 (2002)
Bikhchandani, S., Chatterji, S., Lavi, R., Mu’alem, A., Nisan, N., Sen, A.: Weak monotonicity characterizes deterministic dominant-strategy implementation. Econometrica 74(4), 1109–1132 (2006)
Day, R., Milgrom, P.: Core-selecting package auctions. International Journal of Game Theory 36(3-4), 393–407 (2008)
Dughmi, S., Roughgarden, T., Sundararajan, M.: Revenue submodularity. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 243–252. ACM (2009)
Goel, G., Khani, M.R.: Revenue monotone mechanisms for online advertising. In: International World Wide Web Conference, WWW (2014), https://www.cs.umd.edu/~khani/papers/rm.pdf
Goldberg, A.V., Hartline, J.D., Wright, A.: Competitive auctions and digital goods. In: Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 735–744 (2001)
Goldberg, A.V., Hartline, J.D., Karlin, A.R., Saks, M., Wright, A.: Competitive auctions. Games and Economic Behavior 55(2), 242–269 (2006)
Lavi, R., Mu’Alem, A., Nisan, N.: Towards a characterization of truthful combinatorial auctions. In: Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 574–583 (2003)
Myerson, R.B.: Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6(1), 58–73 (1981)
Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., Vazirani, V.V.: Algorithmic game theory. Cambridge University Press (2007)
Rastegari, B., Condon, A., Leyton-Brown, K.: Stepwise randomized combinatorial auctions achieve revenue monotonicity. In: Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 738–747 (2009)
Rastegari, B., Condon, A., Leyton-Brown, K.: Revenue monotonicity in deterministic, dominant-strategy combinatorial auctions. Artificial Intelligence 175(2), 441–456 (2011)
Roberts, K.: The characterization of implementable choice rules. Aggregation and Revelation of Preferences 12(2), 321–348 (1979)
Rochet, J.-C.: A necessary and sufficient condition for rationalizability in a quasi-linear context. Journal of Mathematical Economics 16(2), 191–200 (1987)
Saks, M., Yu, L.: Weak monotonicity suffices for truthfulness on convex domains. In: Electronic Commerce, pp. 286–293 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Goel, G., Hajiaghayi, M., Khani, M.R. (2014). Randomized Revenue Monotone Mechanisms for Online Advertising. In: Liu, TY., Qi, Q., Ye, Y. (eds) Web and Internet Economics. WINE 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8877. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13129-0_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13129-0_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13128-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13129-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)