Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Unified Framework to Identify and Extract Uncertainty Cues, Holders, and Scopes in One Fell-Swoop

  • Conference paper
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9041))

Abstract

We present a unified framework based on supervised sequence labelling methods to identify and extract uncertainty cues, holders, and scopes in one-fell swoop with an application on Arabic tweets. The underlying technology employs Support Vector Machines with a rich set of morphological, syntactic, lexical, semantic, pragmatic, dialectal, and genre-specific features, and yields an average F1 score of 0.759.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diab, M., Levin, L., Mitamura, T., Rambow, O., Prabhakaran, V., Guo, W.: Committed Belief Annotation and Tagging. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Linguistic Annotation Workshop, Suntec, Singapore, pp. 68–73 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Palmer, F.R.: Mood and Modality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aikhenvald, A.Y.: Evidentiality. Oxford University Press, UK (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saurí, R., Pustejovsky, J.: FactBank: A Corpus Annotated with Event Factuality. Language Resources and Evaluation 43, 227–268 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Díaz, N.: Detecting Negated and Uncertain Information in Biomedical and Review Texts. In: Proceedings of the Student Research Workshop Associated with RANLP 2013, Hissar, Bulgaria, pp. 45–50 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Marneffe, M., Manning, C., Potts, C.: Did it Happen? The Pragmatic Complexity of Veridicality Assessment. Computational Linguistics 38, 301–333 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Qazvinian, V., Rosengren, E., Radev, D., Mei, Q.: Rumor has it: Identifying Misinformation in Microblogs. In: Procedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, pp. 1589–1599 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Marneffe, M., Grimm, S., Potts, C.: Not a Simple Yes or No: Uncertainty in Indirect Answers. In: Proceedings of SIGDIAL 2009: the 10th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group in Discourse and Dialogue, pp. 136–143. Queen Mary University of London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Information Credibility on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, Heydrabad, India, pp. 675–684 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Soni, S., Mitra, T., Gilbert, E., Eisenstein, J.: Modeling Factuality Judgments in Social Media Text. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Short Papers), Baltimore, Maryland, USA, pp. 415–420 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wagner, C., Liao, V., Pirolli, P., Nelson, L., Strohmaier, M.: It’s not in their Tweets: Modeling Topical Expertise of Twitter Users. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ASE/IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, SocialCom/PASSAT, Washington DC, USA, pp. 91–100 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mowery, D.L., Velupillai, S., Chapman, W.: Medical Diagnosis Lost in Translation: Analysis of Uncertainty and Negation Expressions in English and Swedish Clinical Texts. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing (BioNLP 2012), Montreal, Canada, pp. 56–64 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baker, K., Bloodgood, M., Dorr, B.J., Callison-Burch, C., Filardo, N.W., Piatko, C., Levin, L., Miller, S.: Modality and Negation in SIMT. Computational Linguistics 38(2), 411–438 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wiegand, M., Klakow, D.: Prototypical Opinion Holders: What We can Learn from Experts and Analysts. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2011), Missar, Bulgaria, pp. 282–288 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Orelid, L., Velldal, E., Oepen, S.: Syntactic Scope Resolution in Uncertainty Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2010), Beijin, China, pp. 1379–1387 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prabhakaran, V.: Uncertainty Learning Using SVMs and CRFs. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 132–137 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Prabhakaran, V., Bloodgood, M., Diab, M., Dorr, B., Levin, L., Piatko, C., Rambow, O., Van Durme, B.: Statistical Modality Tagging from Rule-based Annotations and Crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Extra-Propositional Aspects of Meaning in Computational Linguistics, Jeju, Republic of Korea, pp. 57–64 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tjong, E., Sang, K.: A Baseline Approach for Detecting Sentences Containing Uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 148–150 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Szarvas, G., Vincze, V., Farkas, R., Möra, G., Gurevych, I.: Cross-Genre and Cross-Domain Detection of Semantic Uncertainty. Computational Linguistics 38(2), 335–367 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vincze, V.: Uncertainty Detection in Hungarian Texts. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2014): Technical Papers, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 1844–1853 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kilicoglu, H., Bergler, S.: Recognizing Speculative Language in Biomedical Research Articles: A Linguistically Motivated Perspective. In: Proceedings of BioNLP 2008: Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing, Ohio, USA, pp. 46–53 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou, H., Li, X., Huang, D., Li, Z., Yang, Y.: Exploiting Multi-Features to Detect Hedges and Their Scope in Biomedical Texts. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 106–113 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vincze, V., Szarvas, G., Móra, G., Ohta, T., Farkas, R.: Linguistic Scope-Based and Biological Event-Based Speculation and Negation Annotations in the BioScope and Genia Event Corpora. Journal of Biomedical Semantics 2(5), 1–11 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Szarvas, G., Gurevych, I.: Uncertainty Detection for Natural Language Watermarking. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (IJCNLP 2013), Nagoya, Japan, pp. 1188–1194 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vincze, V.: Weasels, Hedges and Peacocks: Discourse-Level Uncertainty in Wikipedia Articles. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (IJCNLP 2013), Nagoya, Japan, pp. 383–391 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wei, Z., Chen, J., Gao, W., Li, B., Zhou, L., He, Y., Wong, W.: An Empirical Study on Uncertainty Identification in Social Media Context. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia, Bulgaria, pp. 58–62 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shaalan, K., Abo Bakr, H., Ziedan, I.: A Hybrid Approach for Building Arabic Diacritizer. In: Proceedings of the EACL 2009 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Semitic Languages, Athens, Greece, pp. 27–35 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Habash, N., Roth, R.: Using Deep Morphology to Improve Automatic Error Detection in Arabic Handwriting Recognition. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, Oregon, pp. 875–884 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Alkuhlani, S., Habash, N.: Identifying Broken Plurals, Irregular Gender, and Rationality in Arabic Text. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Avignon, France, pp. 675–685 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Al-Sabbagh, R., Girju, R., Diesner, J.: 3arif: A Corpus of Modern Standard and Egyptian Arabic Tweets Annotated for Epistemic Modality Using Interactive Crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2014), Dublin, Ireland, pp. 1521–1532 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pasha, A., Al-Badrashiny, M., Diab, M., Elkholy, A., Eskandar, R., Habash, N., Pooleery, M., Rambow, O., Roth, R.: MADAMIRA: a Fast, Comprehensive Tool for Morphological Analysis and Disambiguation of Arabic. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014), Reykjavik, Iceland, pp. 1094–1101 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Szarvas, G., Vincze, V., Farkas, R., Csirik, J.: The BioScope Corpus: Annotation for Negation, Uncertainty and their Scope in Biomedical Texts. In: Proceedings of BioNLP 2008: Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 38–45 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Diab, M.: Second Generation AMIRA Tools for Arabic Processing: Fast and Robust Tokenization, POS tagging, and Base Phrase Chunking. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Arabic Language Resources and Tools, Cairo, Egypt, pp. 285–288 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Marton, Y., Habash, N., Rambow, O.: Dependency Parsing of Modern Standard Arabic with Lexical and Inflectional Features. Computational Linguistics 39(1), 161–194 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Maamouri, M., Bies, A., Krouna, S., Gaddeche, F., Bouziri, B.: Penn Arabic Treebank Guidelines. In: Linguistic Data Consortium (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Elghamry, K., Al-Sabbagh, R., ElZeiny, N.: Cue-Based Bootstrapping of Arabic Semantic Features. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Statistical Text Analysis, Lyon, France, pp. 85–95 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Alkuhlani, S., Habash, N.: A Corpus for Modeling Morpho-Syntactic Agreement in Arabic: Gender, Number and Rationality. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers, pp. 357–362 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Elfardy, H., Al-Badrashiny, M., Diab, M.: AIDA: Identifying Code Switching in Informal Arabic Text. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Computational Approaches to Code Switching, Doha, Qatar, pp. 94–101 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Al-Sabbagh, R., Girju, R., Diesner, J.: Using the Semantic-Syntactic Interface for Reliable Arabic Modality Annotation. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (IJCNLP 2014), Nagoya, Japan, pp. 410–418 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Al-Sabbagh, R., Girju, R., Diesner, J.: Unsupervised Construction of a Lexicon and a Repository of Variation Patterns for Arabic Modal Multiword Expressions. In: Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Multiword Expressions (MWE), Göthenburg, Sweden, pp. 114–123 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Moncecchi, G., Minel, J., Wonsever, D.: Improving Speculative Language Detection Using Linguistic Knowledge. In: Proceeding of the Workshop on Extra-Propositional Aspects of Meaning in Computational Linguistics, Jeju, Republic of Korea, pp. 37–46. of Korea (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Velupillai, S.: Shades of Certainty: Annotation and Classification of Swedish Medical Records. PhD thesis, Stockholm University (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Verbeke, M., Frasconi, P., Van Asch, V., Morante, R., Daelemans, W., De Raedt, L.: Kernel-Based Logical and Relational Learning with kLog for Hedge Cue Detection. In: Muggleton, S.H., Tamaddoni-Nezhad, A., Lisi, F.A. (eds.) ILP 2011. LNCS, vol. 7207, pp. 347–357. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang, H., De Roeck, A., Gervasi, V., Willis, A., Nuseibeh, B.: Speculative Requirements: Automatic Detection of Uncertainty in Natural Language Requirements. In: Proceedings of 20th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 11–20 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wiegand, M., Klakow, D.: The Role of Predicates in Opinion Holder Extraction. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Extraction and Knowledge Acquisition, Hissar, Bulgaria, pp. 13–20 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lu, B.: Identifying Opinion Holders and Targets with Dependency Parser in Chinese News Texts. In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Student Research Workshop, Los Angeles, California, pp. 46–51 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bethard, S., Yu, H., Thornton, A., Hatzivassiloglou, V., Jurafsky, D.: Extracting Opinion Propositions and Opinion Holders Using Syntactic and Lexical Cues. In: Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications, pp. 125–141. Springer Netherlands (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Apostolova, E., Tomuro, N., Demner-Fushman, D.: Automatic Extraction of Lexico-Syntactic Patterns for Detection of Negation and Speculation Scopes. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers, Portland, Oregon, pp. 283–287 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Velldal, E., Ovrelid, L., Oepen, S.: Resolving Speculation: MaxEnt Cue Classification and Dependency-Based Scope Rules. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 48–55 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhao, Q., Sun, C., Liu, B., Cheng, Y.: Learning to Detect Hedges and their Scope Using CRFs. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 100–105 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics and Beckman Institute, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, USA

    Rania Al-Sabbagh & Roxana Girju

  2. Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, USA

    Jana Diesner

Authors
  1. Rania Al-Sabbagh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roxana Girju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jana Diesner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rania Al-Sabbagh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Centro de Investigación en Computación, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico DF, Mexico

    Alexander Gelbukh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Al-Sabbagh, R., Girju, R., Diesner, J. (2015). A Unified Framework to Identify and Extract Uncertainty Cues, Holders, and Scopes in One Fell-Swoop. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9041. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18111-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18111-0_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18110-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18111-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation