Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Sensitivity of Wardrop Equilibria

  • Conference paper
Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4997))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study the sensitivity of equilibria in the well-known game theoretic traffic model due to Wardrop. We mostly consider single-commodity networks. Suppose, given a unit demand flow at Wardrop equilibrium, one increases the demand by ε or removes an edge carrying only an ε-fraction of flow. We study how the equilibrium responds to such an ε-change.

Our first surprising finding is that, even for linear latency functions, for every ε> 0, there are networks in which an ε-change causes every agent to change its path in order to recover equilibrium. Nevertheless, we can prove that, for general latency functions, the flow increase or decrease on every edge is at most ε.

Examining the latency at equilibrium, we concentrate on polynomial latency functions of degree at most p with nonnegative coefficients. We show that, even though the relative increase in the latency of an edge due to an ε-change in the demand can be unbounded, the path latency at equilibrium increases at most by a factor of (1 + ε)p. The increase of the price of anarchy is shown to be upper bounded by the same factor. Both bounds are shown to be tight.

Let us remark that all our bounds are tight. For the multi-commodity case, we present examples showing that neither the change in edge flows nor the change in the path latency can be bounded.

Supported by DFG grant WE 2842/1 and by the DFG GK/1298 “AlgoSyn”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beckmann, M., McGuire, C.B., Winston, C.B.: Studies in the Economics of Transportation. Yale University Press, New Haven (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Braess, D.: Über ein Paradoxon aus der Verkehrsplanung. Unternehmensforschung 12, 258–268 (1968)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dafermos, S., Nagurney, A.: Sensitivity Analysis for the Asymmetric Network Equilibrium Problem. Mathematical Programming 28, 174–184 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dafermos, S., Sparrow, F.T.: The Traffic Assignment Problem for a General Network. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards 73(2), 91–118 (1969)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisk, C.: More Paradoxes in the Equilibrium Assignment Problem. Transportation Research, Series B 13(4), 305–309 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hall, M.A.: Properties of the Equilibrium State in Transportation Networks. Transportation Science 12, 208–216 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Josefsson, M., Patriksson, M.: Sensitivity Analysis of Separable Traffic Equilibria with Application to Bilevel Optimization in Network Design. Transportation Research Series B 41(1), 4–31 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koutsoupias, E., Papadimitriou, C.: Worst-Case Equilibria. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds.) STACS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1563, pp. 404–413. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Patriksson, M.: Sensitivity Analysis of Traffic Equilibria. Transportation Research 38, 258–281 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pigou, A.C.: The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roughgarden, T., Tardos, É.: How Bad is Selfish Routing. Journal of the ACM 49(2), 236–259 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Roughgarden, T.: How Unfair is Selfish Routing. In: Roughgarden, T. (ed.) Proc. of th 13th Annual Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 203–204 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roughgarden, T.: The Price of Anarchy is Independent of the Network Topology. In: Proc. of th 34th Annual Symposium on Theory of Computing Discrete Algorithms (STOC), pp. 428–437 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roughgarden, T.: On the Severity of Braess’s Paradox: Designing Networks for Selfish Users is Hard. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 72(5), 922–953 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Wardrop, J.G.: Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research. In: Proc. of the Institute of Civil Engineers Pt. II, pp. 325–378 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Englert, M., Franke, T., Olbrich, L. (2008). Sensitivity of Wardrop Equilibria. In: Monien, B., Schroeder, UP. (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. SAGT 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4997. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79309-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79309-0_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79308-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79309-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics