Abstract
Formal specifications of standard libraries are necessary when statically verifying software that uses those libraries. Library specifications must be both correct, accurately reflecting library behavior, and useful, describing library behavior in sufficient detail to allow static verification of client programs. Specification and verification researchers regularly face the question of whether the library specifications we use are correct and useful, and we have collectively provided no good answers. Over the past few years we have created and refined a software engineering process, which we call the Formal CTD Process (FCTD ), to address this problem. Although FCTD is primarily targeted toward those who write Java libraries (or specifications for existing Java libraries) using the Java Modeling Language (JML), its techniques are broadly applicable. The key to FCTD is its novel usage of library conformance test suites. Rather than executing the conformance tests, FCTD uses them to measure the correctness and utility of specifications through static verification. FCTD is beginning to see significant use within the JML community and is the cornerstone process of the JML Spec-a-thons, meetings that bring JML researchers and practitioners together for intensive specification writing sessions. This article describes the Formal CTD Process, its use in small case studies, and its broad application to the standard Java class library.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beust, C., Suleiman, H.: Next Generation Java Testing. Addison–Wesley Publishing Company (2007)
Burdy, L., Cheon, Y., Cok, D., Ernst, M., Kiniry, J., Leavens, G.T., Leino, K.R.M., Poll, E.: An overview of JML tools and applications. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer (February 2005)
Chalin, P., Robby, et al.: JMLEclipse: An Eclipse-based JML specification and verification environment (2011), http://jmleclipse.projects.cis.ksu.edu/
Cheon, Y., Leavens, G.T.: A Simple and Practical Approach to Unit Testing: The JML and JUnit Way. In: Magnusson, B. (ed.) ECOOP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2374, pp. 231–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Cok, D.R., et al.: OpenJML (2011), http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/jmlspecs/wiki/OpenJml
Ernst, M.D., Perkins, J.H., Guo, P.J., McCamant, S., Pacheco, C., Tschantz, M.S., Xiao, C.: The Daikon system for dynamic detection of likely invariants. Science of Computer Programming 69(1-3), 35–45 (2007)
Flanagan, C., Leino, K.R.M.: Houdini, an Annotation Assistant for ESC/Java. In: Oliveira, J.N., Zave, P. (eds.) FME 2001. LNCS, vol. 2021, pp. 500–517. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Flanagan, C., Leino, K.R.M., Lillibridge, M., Nelson, G., Saxe, J.B., Stata, R.: Extended static checking for Java. ACM SIGPLAN Notices 37(5), 234–245 (2002)
Free Software Foundation, Inc.: GNU Classpath (2011), http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/
Gamma, E., Beck, K.: JUnit: A regression testing framework (2011), http://www.junit.org/
Hyland, R.: A Process for the Specification of Core JDK Classes. Master’s thesis, University College Dublin (April 2010)
Janota, M., Grigore, R., Moskal, M.: Reachability analysis for annotated code. In: 6th International Workshop on the Specification and Verification of Component-based Systems (SAVCBS 2007), Dubrovnik, Croatia (September 2007)
Kiniry, J.R., Cochran, D., Tierney, P.: A verification-centric realization of e-voting. In: International Workshop on Electronic Voting Technologies (EVT 2007), Boston, Massachusetts (2007)
Cok, D.R., Kiniry, J.R.: ESC/Java2: Uniting eSC/Java and JML. In: Barthe, G., Burdy, L., Huisman, M., Lanet, J.-L., Muntean, T. (eds.) CASSIS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3362, pp. 108–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Kiniry, J.R., Zimmerman, D.M.: Secret Ninja Formal Methods. In: Cuellar, J., Sere, K. (eds.) FM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5014, pp. 214–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Leavens, G.T., Cheon, Y., Clifton, C., Ruby, C., Cok, D.R.: How the Design of JML Accommodates Both Runtime Assertion Checking and Formal Verification. In: de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M., Graf, S., de Roever, W.-P. (eds.) FMCO 2002. LNCS, vol. 2852, pp. 262–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Meyer, B.: Object-Oriented Software Construction, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc. (1988)
Oracle Corporation: JT Harness project (2011), http://jtharness.java.net/
Oracle Corporation: OpenJDK (2011), http://openjdk.java.net/
Oracle Corporation: OpenJDK community TCK license agreement (2011), http://openjdk.java.net/legal/openjdk-tck-license.pdf
The Apache Software Foundation: Apache Harmony - Open Source Java SE (2011), http://harmony.apache.org/
The Eclipse Foundation: The Eclipse project (2011), http://www.eclipse.org/
Zhu, H., Hall, P.A.V., May, J.H.R.: Software unit test coverage and adequacy. ACM Computing Surveys 29(4), 366–427 (1997)
Zimmerman, D.M., Nagmoti, R.: JMLUnit: The Next Generation. In: Beckert, B., Marché, C. (eds.) FoVeOOS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6528, pp. 183–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kiniry, J.R., Zimmerman, D.M., Hyland, R. (2012). Testing Library Specifications by Verifying Conformance Tests. In: Brucker, A.D., Julliand, J. (eds) Tests and Proofs. TAP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7305. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30473-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30473-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30472-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30473-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)