Abstract
Our study documents how a Spanish-English bilingual elementary teacher learned computational thinking while working to incorporate it into mathematics and language arts lessons in a bilingual classroom. We classified the elements of the teacher’s process into two practices: intentional and unintentional use of computational thinking. Intentional use of computational thinking included the teacher’s explicit incorporation of any of the four computational thinking elements (abstraction, algorithms, decomposition, and patterns) into her teaching practice. The unintentional use of computational thinking included those instances where the teacher used computational thinking as a means for teaching content not specifically oriented toward computational thinking. In addition, our work identifies how this bilingual teacher’s instructional dynamics integrated computational thinking and Spanish in a nearly inseparable manner. With this work we intend to contribute to the emergent scholarship committed to understanding the promotion of learning computing in K-5 settings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Aguirre, J., Mayfield-Ingram, K., & Martin, D. (2013). The impact of identity in K–8 mathematics learning and teaching: Rethinking equity-based practices. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community. Acm Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
Bui, Y. N., & Fagan, Y. M. (2013). The effects of an integrated reading comprehension strategy: A culturally responsive teaching approach for fifth-grade students’ reading comprehension. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 57(2), 59–69.
Cateté, V., Lytle, N., Dong, Y., Boulden, D., Akram, B., Houchins, J., Barnes, T., Wiebe, E., Lester, J., Mott, B., & Boyer, K. (2018). Infusing computational thinking into middle grade science classrooms. In Proceedings of the 13th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education.
Cavazos, A. G. (2009). Reflections of a Latina student-teacher: Refusing low expectations for Latina/o students. American Secondary Education, 37(3), 70–79. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/41406317
Celedón-Pattichis, S., Musanti, S. I., & Marshall, M. E. (2010). Bilingual elementary teachers’ re-flections on using students’ native language and culture to teach mathematics. In M. Q. Foote (Ed.), Mathematics teaching and learning in K–12: Equity and professional development (pp. 7–24). Palgrave Macmillan.
Colegrove, K. S.-S., & Krause, G. H. (2017). “Lo hacen tan complicado”: Bridging the perspectives and expectations of mathematics instruction of Latino immigrant parents. Bilingual Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2017.1310679
Dong, Y., Catete, V., Jocius, R., Lytle, N., Barnes, T., Albert, J., Joshi, D., Robinson, R., & Andrews, A. (2019). PRADA: A practical model for integrating computational thinking in K-12 education. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 906–912). https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287431
García, O., & Sylvan, C. E. (2011). Pedagogies and practices in multilingual classrooms: Singularities in pluralities. The Modern Language Journal, 95(iii), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01208.x
García, O., & Kleyn, T. (2016). Translanguaging theory in education. In O. García & T. Kleyn (Eds.), Translanguaging with multilingual students: Learning from classroom moments (pp. 9–33). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781315695242
García, O., & Li, W. (2014). Language, bilingualism and education. In Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education (pp. 46–62). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137385765_4
Goode, J. (2008). Increasing Diversity in K-12 Computer Science: Strategies from the Field. In 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 362–366).
Gutiérrez, R. (2002). Beyond essentialism: The complexity of language in teaching mathematics to Latina/o students. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 1047–1088.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.
Hsu, Y. C., Irie, N. R., & Ching, Y. H. (2019). Computational thinking educational policy initiatives (CTEPI) across the globe. TechTrends, 63(3), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00384-4
Israel, M., Pearson, J., Tapia, T., Wherfel, Q., & Reese, G. (2015). Supporting all learners in school-wide computational thinking: A cross-case qualitative analysis. Computers & Education, 82, 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.022
Ketelhut, D. J., Mills, K., Hestness, E., Cabrera, L., Plane, J., & McGinnis, J. R. (2019). Teacher change following a professional development experience in integrating computational thinking into elementary science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09798-4
Krause, G., & Maldonado, L. A. (2019). Our Linguistic and Cultural Resources: The Experiences of Bilingual Prospective Teachers with Mathematics Autobiographies. In T. G. Bartell, C. Drake, A. R. McDuffie, J. M. Aguirre, E. E. Turner, & M. Q. Foote (Eds.), Transforming Mathematics Teacher Education (pp. 161–176). Springer International Publishing.
Krause, G., Maldonado Rodríguez, L. A., & Adams, M. (2021). Listening to and understanding students’ algorithms. Mathematics Teacher Learning and Teaching PK-12, 114(2), 139–141. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTLT.2020.0089
Luo, F., Israel, M., & Gane, B. (2022). Elementary computational thinking instruction and assessment: A learning trajectory perspective. ACM Trans Comput Educ, 22(2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494579
MacDonald, V. (2004). Latino education in the United States: A narrated history from 1513–2000. Springer.
Margolis, J. (2017). Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. MIT press.
Martínez, R. A., Hikida, M., & Durán, L. (2015). Unpacking ideologies of linguistic purism: How dual language teachers make sense of everyday translanguaging. International Multilingual Research Journal, 9(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2014.977712. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/
Musanti, S. I., Celedón-Pattichis, S., & Marshall, M. E. (2009). Reflections on language and problem solving: A case study of a bilingual first grade teacher. Bilingual Research Journal, 32(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235880902965763
NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by stateshttps://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/18290/next-generation-science-standards-for-states-by-states
Palmer, D. K., Martínez, R. A., & Mateus, S. G. (2014). Reframing the debate on language separation: Toward a vision for translanguaging pedagogies in the dual language classroom. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12121. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/
Parrish, S. (2010). Number talks: Helping children build mental math and computation strategies, grades K-5. Math Solutions.
Qiu, K., Buechley, L., Baafi, E., & Dubow, W. (2013). A curriculum for teaching computer science through computational textiles. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 20–27). https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485787
Remillard, J. T., & Cahnmann, M. (2005). Researching mathematics teaching in bilingual-bicultural classrooms. In T. L. McCarty (Ed.), Language, literacy, and power in schooling (pp. 169–187). Erlbaum.
Rich, K. M., Yadav, A., & Larimore, R. A. (2020). Teacher implementation profiles for integrating computational thinking into elementary mathematics and science instruction. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3161–3188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10115-5
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
Savignon, S. J. (1991). Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL quarterly, 25(2), 261–278.
Scott, K. A., & White, M. A. (2013). COMPUGIRLS’standpoint: Culturally responsive computing and its effect on girls of color. Urban Education, 48(5), 657–681. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0042085913491219
Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J. S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. (2013). Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework. Education and Information Technologies, 18(2), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9240-x
Skuratowicz, E., Vanderberg, M., Hung, E. E., Krause, G., Bradley, D., & Wilson, J. P. (2021). I felt like we were actually going somewhere: Adapting summer professional development for elementary teachers to a virtual experience during COVID-19. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 739–745). https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432482
Sleeter, C. E., Neal, L. I., & Kumashiro, K. K. (2015). Diversifying the teacher workforce: Preparing and retaining highly effective teachers. Routledge.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
Stojic, M. (2009). Rain (M. Stojic, Illus.) [La Lluvia]. Dragonfly Books.
Turner, E., Drake, C., Roth McDuffie, A., Aguirre, J., Bartell, T., & Foote, M. (2012). Promoting equity in mathematics teacher preparation: A framework for advancing teacher learning of children’s multiple mathematics knowledge bases. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15, 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9196-6
Vallejo, R., & de Franco, M. F. (2009). La triangulación como procedimiento de análisis para investigaciones educativas [The triangulation as procedure of analysis for educative investigations]. Redhecs, 7(4), 117–133. http://ojs.urbe.edu/index.php/redhecs/article/download/84/87
VERBI (2020). MAXQDA 2020 [computer software] Berlin, Germany: VERBI Software. Retrieved 2020-02-07 from http://maxqda.com.
Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2015). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Wolz, U., Stone, M., Pulimood, S. M., & Pearson, K. (2010). Computational thinking via interactive journalism in middle school. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 239–243). https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734345
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Krause, G.H., Vanderberg, M., E. Hung, E. et al. Computational thinking in a bilingual kindergarten classroom: Emergent ideas for teaching across content areas. Educ Inf Technol 28, 9767–9782 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11454-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11454-1