Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

An Ontological and Semantic Approach for the Construction Risk Inferring and Application

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Construction risk and safety management is a knowledge-intensive task. In addition to the construction risk knowledge itself, construction process knowledge is also important to the construction safety, since the different construction objects and processes selection often imply different potential risks may occur. However, most of construction risk management systems only focused on the construction risk knowledge itself. The process management and risk management usually are handled separately. In this paper, we explore to combine the construction process knowledge reuse methodology with the ontological modeling and semantic inferring approach to facilitate considering the risk issue during construction process reuse to directly improve the construction risk and safety management level. A meta ontology model is proposed to integrate risk knowledge domain with the risk monitor object domain. The meta model can be instantiated with the domain specific terms and relations and finally results into the specific domain model for specific application. The domain risk model for the deep foundation pit excavation using support systemcontiguous bored pile retaining wall system is shown as an illustrative example, in which the construction risk path knowledge is extracted via Fault Tree Analysis (FTA). In order to represent the construction risk knowledge in a computer-interpretable and semantically inferable way, the semantic web technique is used to represent the knowledge into OWL axioms and SWRL rules. Finally, based on the ontological model, the semantic inferring and application mechanism of construction risk knowledge are discussed and illustrated in the Protg platform. The proposed approach enables the construction risk knowledge to be presented in a computer-interpretable and semantically inferable way. The risk-oriented ontology model can be used as the basic structure of knowledge-based risk management system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Han, S.H., Kim, D.Y., Kim, H., et al.: A web-based integrated system for international project risk assessment. Autom. Constr. 17(3), 342–356 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akintoye, A.S., MacLeod, M.J.: Risk analysis and management in construction. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 15(1), 31–38 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kartam, N.A., Kartam, S.A.: Risk and its management in the Kuwaiti construction industry: A contractors’ perspective. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 19(6), 325–335 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ping Tserng, H., Yin Samuel, Y.L., Dzeng, R.J., et al.: A study of ontology-based risk management framework of construction projects through project life cycle. Autom. Constr. 18(7), 994–1008 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Molag, M., Trijssenaar-Buhre, I.J.M.: Risk assessment guidelines for tunnels, pp. 1–10. Safe & Reliable Tunnels, Lausanne (2006)

  6. Chinese Civil Engineering Society, Guideline of Risk Management for Construction of Subway and Underground Works, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing (2007)

  7. Benevolenskiy, A., Roos, K., Katranuschkov, P., et al.: Construction processes configuration using process patterns. Adv. Eng. Inform. 26(4), 727–736 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kiviniemi, M., Sulankivi, K., Khknen, K., et al.: BIM-based safety management and communication for building construction. VTT Tiedotteita Research Notes, 2597, 2011 (2011)

  9. Loosemore, M., Raftery, J., Reilly, C., Higgon, D.: Risk management in projects. Taylor & Francis Group, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dikmen, I., Birgonul, M.T., Anac, C., et al.: Learning from risks: a tool for post-project risk assessment. Autom. Constr. 18(1), 42–50 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamardeen, I.: Web-based safety knowledge management system for builders: A conceptual framework. In: Australia CIB W099 Conference (2009)

  12. Gruber, T.R.: Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing, formal ontology in conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Deventer (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anumba, C.J., Issa, R.R.A., Pan, J.Y., et al.: Ontology-based information and knowledge management in construction. Constr. Innov. 8(3), 218–239 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. El-Diraby, T.E., Zhang, J.: A semantic framework to support corporate memory management in building construction. Autom. Constr. 15, 504–521 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mutis, I., Raja, R.: Semantic tags for interoperable construction workflow. In: ASCE Conference Proceedings Computing in Civil Engineering, pp. 623–632 (2009)

  16. Svetel, I., Pejanovi, M: The Role of the semantic web for knowledge management in the construction industry. Information 34, 331–336 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tah, J.H.M., Carr, V.: Knowledge-based approach to construction project risk management. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 15(3), 170–177 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. El-Gohary, N.M., El-Diraby, T.E.: Domain ontology for processes in infrastructure and construction. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 136(7), 730–744 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fidan, G., Dikmen, I., Tanyer, A., Birgonul, M.: Ontology for relating risk and vulnerability to cost overrun in international projects. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 25(4), 302–315 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, H.H., Boukamp, F., Elghamrawy, T.: An ontology-based approach to context representation and reasoning for managing context-sensitive construction information. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 25(5), 331–346 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, H.H., Boukamp, F.: Ontology-based representation and reasoning framework for supporting job hazard analysis. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 25(4), 442–456 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, D., Dong, M., Miao, R.: Development of a product configuration system with an ontology-based approach. Comput. Aided Des. 40, 863–878 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lu, S.R., Wu, I.C., Hsiung, B.C.: Applying building information modeling in environmental impact assessment for urban deep excavation projects. Gerontechnology 11(2), 182 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Web Ontology Language: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/OWL Working Group, Accessed July 2010

  25. buildingSMART. Industry Foundation Classes (IFC): http://www.iai-tech.org/

  26. UGent MultiMediaLab, IFC-to-RDF Converter Service: http://ninsuna.elis.ugent.be/IfcRDFService/8 Accessed 9 July 2011

  27. Ding, L.Y., Yu, H.L., Li, H, et al.: Safety risk identification system for metro construction on the basis of construction drawings. Autom. Constr. 27, 120–137 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pauwels, P., Van Deursen, D., Verstraeten, R., et al.: A semantic rule checking environment for building performance checking. Autom. Constr. 20, 506–518 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. World Wide Web Consortium, SWRL: a Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML: http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-SWRL-20040521 Accessed 20 Jan 2010

  30. Yurchyshyna, A., Zarli, A.: An ontology-based approach for formalization and semantic organization of conformance requirements in construction. Autom. Constr. 18(8), 1084–1098 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, The Protg Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System: http://protege.stanford.edu/

  32. Schevers, H., Mitchell, H., Akhurst, P., et al.: Towards digital facility modeling for Sydney opera house using IFC and semantic web technology, vol. 12, pp 347–362. ITcon (2007)

  33. Fault Tree Analysis Made Easy: http://www.itsmsolutions.com/newsletters/DITYvol4iss47.htm Accessed 23 Jan 2011

  34. Krummenacher, R., Strang, T.: Ontology-based context modeling. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Context Awareness for Proactive Systems, Guildford (2007)

  35. Zhou, H., Zhang, H.: Risk assessment methodology for a deep foundation pit construction project in Shanghai, China. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 137(12), 1185–1194 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gangolells, M., Casals, M., Forcada, N., Roca, X., Fuertes, A.: Mitigating construction safety risks using prevention through design. J. Saf. Res. 41, 107–122 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gambatese, J.A.: Research issues in prevention through Design. J. Saf. Res. 39(2), 153–156 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Forcada, N., Casals, M., Fuertes A.: The basis of a decision making tool for risks evaluation based on ontologies. In: 3rd International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management - Helping the Practitioner in Planning and Building (CIB), pp. 235–243 (2007)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhong, B., Li, Y. An Ontological and Semantic Approach for the Construction Risk Inferring and Application. J Intell Robot Syst 79, 449–463 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-014-0107-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-014-0107-9

Keywords