Abstract
The objective of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of YouTube as a tool for documentary research among higher education students. The study follows a quantitative and quasi-experimental approach, selecting 20 videos on “Machine Learning” and “Deep Learning” and evaluating them in terms of technical quality, information accuracy, and conceptual effectiveness. The videos were rated, and those with the highest and lowest scores were applied to an experimental group, while a control group did not use these videos. The results showed that the higher-rated videos led to a significant increase in students’ academic performance. Specifically, the experimental group that used videos with higher ratings in accuracy and technical quality showed a 20% increase in their evaluation scores compared to the control group. This increase was reflected across all assessed dimensions: knowledge and understanding, application and analysis, and synthesis and evaluation. Additionally, information accuracy was key, with 90% of the videos on “Machine Learning” meeting accuracy criteria, compared to only 30% of the videos on “Deep Learning.” The research also proposes a specific rubric for evaluating educational videos on YouTube, which can standardize and improve the process of selecting audiovisual content. In conclusion, although YouTube has potential as a resource for documentary research, its effectiveness largely depends on the correct selection and evaluation of content. The proposed rubric is presented as a valuable tool for researchers and educators who wish to incorporate YouTube videos into their academic practices, ensuring that the material used is of high quality and reliable.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
We, the authors, declare that we have the availability of the data.
References
Cuthrell K. YouTube: Educational potentials and pitfalls. J Media Lit Educ. 2021;3(2):25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2011.553149.
Maraza-Quispe B, Alejandro-Oviedo O, Fernández-Gambarini W, Cisneros-Chavez B. Choquehuanca-Quispe. Análisis De YouTube como herramienta de investigación documental en estudiantes de educación superior. PUBLICACIONES. 2020;50(2):133–47. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v50i2.13949.
Azer SA, Algrain HA, AlKhelaif RA, AlEshaiwi SM. Evaluation of the educational value of YouTube videos about physical examination of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11):e241. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2728. PMID: 24225171; PMCID: PMC3841366.
Ramírez García A. YouTube y el desarrollo de competencias básicas. Una experiencia de investigación en el aula. En Congreso Euro-Iberoamericano de Alfabetización Mediática y Culturas Digitales Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla. 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/11441/56507
Tamayo M. La investigación. Colombia: ICESI. ISBN: 958-9279-13-9. 2020. https://academia.utp.edu.co/grupobasicoclinicayaplicadas/files/2013/06/2.-La-Investigaci%C3%B3n-APRENDER-A-INVESTIGAR-ICFES.pdf
Hernández R, Graw M. Desarrollo De La Perspectiva teórica: revisión de la literatura y construcción del marco teórico. Corteidh; 2021. pp. 52–73. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/marco.pdf.
Siemens G. Conectivismo: Una teoría de aprendizaje para la era digital. México: Elearnspace. 2014. https://ateneu.xtec.cat/wikiform/wikiexport/_media/cursos/tic/s1x1/modul_3/conectivismo.pdf
Cheng X, Cameron D, Jiangchuan L. Understanding the characteristics of internet short video sharing: YouTube as a case study. 2007. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.0707.3670
Alzate-Medina GM. Peña-Borrero. La tutoría entre iguales: una modalidad para El Desarrollo de la escritura en la educación superior. Universitas Physiol. 2010;9(1):123–38. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy9-1.timd.
Maraza-Quispe B, Alejandro-Oviedo OM, Choquehuanca-Quispe W, Huallpa-Gonzalez F, Quispe-Flores LM. & S. A. Choquehuayta-Palomino. Hacia el desarrollo del Pensamiento Computacional en los estudiantes de educación superior. 2023. https://ijetel.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/V2-N1-01.pdf
Tan E, Pearce N. Open education videos in the classroom: exploring the opportunities and barriers to the use of YouTube in teaching introductory sociology. Routledge; 2021. pp. 125–33. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19s1/7783.
M. I. Ramírez-Ochoa. Youtube´s educational possibilities use. Redalyc.org. 2016. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/461/46148194036.pdf
Huang C, Chen H. Text-based video content classification for online video‐sharing sites. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2010;61(5):891–906. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21291.
Fadhil A, Ali Q. Investigating the effectiveness of YouTube as a learning tool among EFL students at Baghdad University. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL. 2020 July(6). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3676002
Miles J. Herold. Teaching difficult history with YouTube videos. The Routledge companion to history and the moving image. London: Routledge; 2023. pp. 298–313. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003263234-24.
Kousha K, Thelwall M, Abdoli M. The role of online videos in research communication: a content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2012;63(9):1710–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22717.
Day D, Abbasi E, Liang B, Bhat S, DeMeo S, Garofano J, Broadbridge C. The effectiveness of multimedia and activity-based supplemental teaching resources in Materials Science education. Materials Research Society Symposia Proceedings. Materials Research Society, 1472(mrss12-1472-zz03-04). 2012. https://doi.org/10.1557/opl.2012.1209.
Cayari C. The YouTube effect: how YouTube has provided new ways to consume, create, and share music. Int J Educ Arts, 12(6). 2011. http://www.ijea.org/v12n6
Lin C. Polaniecki. From media consumption to MediaProduction: applications of YouTubeTM in an eighth-grade video documentary project. J Visual Lit. 2009;28(1):92–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2009.11674661.
Anisa Y, Hafiz M. Azmi. The potential of YouTube as a source of mathematics learning education. Asian Res J Math. 2023;19(12):1–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/arjom/2023/v19i12767.
Dogan F. Scale development and validation study on the using YouTube as a learning environment in secondary education according to the technology acceptance model. Afr Educational Res J. 2023;11(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.111.22.061.
Soycan M. A review of YouTube channels that provide flute education. Int J Technol Educ Sci (IJTES). 2023;7(3):331–51. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.485.
Galatsopoulou F, Kenterelidou C, Kotsakis R, Matsiola M. Examining students’ perceptions towards video-based and video-assisted active learning scenarios in journalism and communication courses. Educ Sci. 2022;12(2):74. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020074.
Guo PJ, Kim J, Rubin R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239
Yadav DN. The impact of digital learning on education. Int J Multidisciplinary Res Arts Sci Technol. 2024;2(1):24–34. https://doi.org/10.61778/ijmrast.v2i1.34.
Lim Fat MJ, Doja A, Barrowman N. Sell. YouTube videos as a teaching tool and patient resource for infantile spasms. J Child Neurol. 2021;26(7):804–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073811402345.
Santos Espino JM, Afonso MD, Suárez, González-Henríquez JJ. Video for teaching: classroom use, instructor self-production and teachers’ preferences in presentation format. Technol Pedagogy Educ. 2020;29(2):147–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1726805.
Funding
No funding was received for the development of the research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Benjamín Maraza-Quispe: Research background. Victor Hugo Rosas-Iman: Methodology. Lita Marianela Quispe-Flores: Research background. Pedro Pablo Nina-Mita: Discussion of results. Giuliana Feliciano-Yucra: Discussion of results. Atilio Cesar Martinez-Lopez: Development of the Theoretical Framework. Walter Choquehuanca-Quispe: Data analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Informed Consent
Informed consent has been developed for all those who participated in the surveys and interviews.
Research Involving Human and /or Animals
The research involved human subjects, for which informed consent was obtained from the participants, in addition to receiving approval from the ethics committee of the National University of San Agustín de Arequipa.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in relation to the research carried out.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Maraza-Quispe, B., Rosas-Iman, V.H., Quispe-Flores, L.M. et al. Evaluating the Effectiveness of YouTube as a Tool for Research in Higher Education Students: An Experimental Approach. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 905 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03258-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03258-6