Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- List of Contributors
- Collective Guilt
- Section 1 Defining the nature of collective guilt
- Section 2 The Relationship Between Group Identification and Collective Guilt
- 6 Consequences of National Ingroup Identification for Responses to Immoral Historical Events
- 7 Refining the Meaning of the “Collective” in Collective Guilt: Harm, Guilt, and Apology in Australia
- 8 Exonerating Cognitions, Group Identification, and Personal Values as Predictors of Collective Guilt among Jewish-Israelis
- 9 It Depends on Your Point of View: Implications of Perspective-Taking and National Identification for Dutch Collective Guilt
- 10 Collective Guilt, National Identity, and Political Processes in Contemporary Germany
- Section 3 Consequences for Intergroup Relations
- Section 4 Commentary on the Volume
- Index
- References
10 - Collective Guilt, National Identity, and Political Processes in Contemporary Germany
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- List of Contributors
- Collective Guilt
- Section 1 Defining the nature of collective guilt
- Section 2 The Relationship Between Group Identification and Collective Guilt
- 6 Consequences of National Ingroup Identification for Responses to Immoral Historical Events
- 7 Refining the Meaning of the “Collective” in Collective Guilt: Harm, Guilt, and Apology in Australia
- 8 Exonerating Cognitions, Group Identification, and Personal Values as Predictors of Collective Guilt among Jewish-Israelis
- 9 It Depends on Your Point of View: Implications of Perspective-Taking and National Identification for Dutch Collective Guilt
- 10 Collective Guilt, National Identity, and Political Processes in Contemporary Germany
- Section 3 Consequences for Intergroup Relations
- Section 4 Commentary on the Volume
- Index
- References
Summary
The Holocaust against the Jews of Europe is internationally recognized as a modern genocide that changed the world. It has become a universal moral paradigm in democratic societies and continues to have a significant impact on world politics and international law. Its remembrance provides an ethical background for democratic decision-making and its institutionalization today.
In Germany, the memory and legacy of this past has special implications. The much-lamented burden of guilt has been influential in post-Holocaust German society; Germany's national guilt has deeply affected both collective memory and national identity since the end of the war (Fulbrook, 1999; Rosenthal, 1998). In subtle ways, guilt plays a key role in many facets of contemporary German social and political life (Safran, 2000). Germany, therefore, provides a central arena for analyzing the impact of collective guilt.
How has Germany's guilt been processed on the individual and political levels? More precisely, what is the emotional, cognitive, behavioral, and political impact of this negative legacy on cohorts who share a German identity but are free of personal guilt for any criminal action? Further, how does this affect the cognitive and affective identification with a group identity that is both part of one's self-image and, at the same time, the source of guilt feelings?
How Germany's guilt and the emotional processing of its collective responsibility influences collective identification in contemporary Germany touches on the very core of German social identity.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Collective GuiltInternational Perspectives, pp. 169 - 190Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004
References
Adorno, T. W. (1975). Schuld und Abwehr: Eine qualitative Analyse zum Gruppenexperiment. In T. W. Adorno (Ed.), Gesammelte Schriften Vol. 9.2 (pp. 121–324). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp
Adorno, T. W. (1998). The meaning of working through the past. In T. W. Adorno (Ed.), Critical models: Interventions and catchwords (pp. 89–104). New York: Columbia Universitiy Press
(2000). The post-Holocaust Jew and the instrumentalization of philo-semitism. Patterns of Prejudice, 34, 41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Archetypes and the German-Jewish dialogue: Reflections occasioned by the Goldhagen affair. German History, 15, 240–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlheim, K., & Heger, B. (2002). Die unbequeme Vergangenheit: NS-Vergangenheit, Holocaust und die Schwiergkeiten des Erinnerns. Schwalbach: Wochenschau Verlag
(1997). American and German perspectives on the Goldhagen debate: History, identity, and the media. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 11, 396–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, E. (2000). The guilt of nations: Restitution and negotiating historical injustices. New York: W. W. Norton
Baumeister, R. W., & Hastings, S. (1997). Distortions of collective memory: How groups flatter and deceive themselves. In J. W. Pennebaker, D. Paez, & B. Rimé (Eds.), Collective memory and political events: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 277–93). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Benz, W. (1994). Kollektivschuld. In W. Benz (Ed.), Legenden, Lügen, Vorurteile: Ein Wörterbuch zur Zeitgeschichte (pp. 117–19). Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag
Bergmann, W. (1997). Antisemitism and xenophobia in Germany since unification. In H. Kurthen, W. Bergmann & R. Erb (Eds.), Antisemitism and xenophobia in Germany after unification (pp. 21–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Bergmann, W., & Erb, R. (1991). Antisemitismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Ergebnisse der empirischen Forschung 1946–1989. Opladen: Leske & BudrichCrossRef
(2000). Die Walser-Bubis-Debatte. Aggression als Element öffentlicher Auseinandersetzung. Psyche, 54, 203–33Google Scholar
(1994). Die Holocaustrezeption der Enkelgeneration im Spannungsfeld von Abwehr und Traumatisierungen. Jahrbuch für Antisemitismusforschung, 3, 303–40Google Scholar
Brusten, M. (1997). Knowledge, feelings, and attitudes of German university students toward the Holocaust. In H. Kurthen, W. Bergmann & R. Erb (Eds.), Antisemitism and xenophobia in Germany after unification (pp. 88–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press
(2001). To be German and proud: Patriotism versus the past. The New York Times, 10 JanuaryGoogle Scholar
, , , & (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckitt, J. (2000). Culture, personality and prejudice. In S. A. Renshon & J. Duckitt (Eds.), Political psychology: Cultural and crosscultural foundations (pp. 89–107). Houndmills, England: MacmillanCrossRef
Frei, N. (2000). Von deutscher Erfindungskraft oder: Die Kollektivschuldthese in der Nachkriegszeit. In G. Smith (Ed.), Hannah Arendt Revisited: ‘Eichmann in Jerusalem’ und die Folgen (pp. 163–76). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp
Friedlander, S. (1993). Reflections of Nazism: An essay on kitsch and death. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Fulbrook, M. (1999). German national identity after the Holocaust. Oxford: Blackwell
Geyer, M., & Hansen, M. (1994). German-Jewish Memory and National Consciousness. In G. Hartman (Ed.), Holocaust Remembrance: The Shapes of Memory (pp. 175–90). Oxford: Blackwell
Goldhagen, D. J. (1996). Hitler's willing executioners: Ordinary Germans and the holocaust. New York: Knopf
Golub, J. (1994). Current German Attitudes towards Jews and other minorities. New York: The American Jewish Committee
(1999). Academic and public discourses on the Holocaust: The Goldhagen debate in Germany. German Politics & Society, 17, 35–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). Legacies of divided memory for German debates about the Holocaust in the 1990s. German Politics & Society, 17, 9–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jodice, D. A. (1991). United Germany and Jewish Concerns. Attitudes towards Jews, Israel, and the Holocaust. New York: The American Jewish Committee
(1999). Identität durch Normalität: Der Konflikt um Martin Walsers Friedenspreisrede. Leviathan, 27, 309–53Google Scholar
Kött, M. (1999). Goldhagen in der Qualitätspresse: Eine Debatte über “Kollektivschuld” und “Nationalcharakter” der Deutschen. Konstanz: UVK.
Kurthen, H. (1997). Antisemitism and xenophobia in united Germany: How the burden of the past affects the present. In H. Kurthen, W. Bergmann & R. Erb (Eds.), Antisemitism and xenophobia in Germany after unification (pp. 39–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Löwenthal, L. (1987). An unmastered past. Berkeley: University of California Press
(1998). What does it mean to normalize the past? Official memory in German politics since 1989. Social Science History, 22, 547–71Google Scholar
Ostow, R. (1996). Imperialist agents, anti-fascist monuments, eastern refugees, property claims: Jews as incorporations of East German social trauma, 1945–94. In Y. M. Bodemann (Ed.), Jews, Germans, memory: Reconstructions of Jewish life in Germany (pp. 227–41). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
(1999). Holocaust memory and mass media in contemporary Germany: Reflections on the Goldhagen debate. Patterns of Prejudice, 35, 59–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rensmann, L. (2000). Belated Narratives: New testimonies of ordinary perpetrators in the context of contemporary post-Holocaust Germany. In S. Leder & M. Teichman (Eds.), The burdens of history: Post-Holocaust generations in dialogue (pp. 79–102). Merion Station, PA: Merion Westfield Press
Rosenthal, G. (1998). Der Holocaust im Leben von drei Generation. Familiale Folgen von Überlebenden der Shoah und von Nazi-Tätern. Gießen: Psychosozial Verlag
Rommelspacher, B. (1995). Schuldlos – schuldig? Wie sich junge Frauen mit Antisemitismus auseinandersetzen. Hamburg: Konkret Literatur Verlag
Rommelspacher, B. (2000). Generationenkonflikte und deutsches Selbstverst-ändnis: Sozialpsychologische Aspekte der Goldhagen-Debatte. In H. Kramer (Ed.), Die Gegenwart der NS-Vergangenheit (pp. 314–28). Berlin: Philo Verlag
Ross, M. H. (2000). The relevance of culture for the study of political psychology. In S. A. Renshon & J. Duckitt (Eds.), Political psychology: Cultural and crosscultural foundations (pp. 33–46). Houndmills, England: MacmillanCrossRef
Safran, W. (2000). Germans and Jews since 1945: The politics of absolution, amends, and ambivalence. In A. Del Caro & J. Ward (Eds.), German Studies in the post-Holocaust age: The politics of memory, identity, and ethnicity (pp. 41–51). Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado
Schwan, G. (1997). Politics and guilt: The destructive power of silence [Politik und schuld. Die zerstörerische macht des schweigens]. Frankfurt: Fischer
Shandley, R. R. (Ed.). (1998). Unwilling Germans? The Goldhagen debate. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Silbermann, A., & Stoffers, M. (2000). Auschwitz: Nie davon gehört? Erinnern und Vergessen in Deutschland. Berlin: Rowohlt
Stern, F. (1992). The whitewashing of the yellow badge: Antisemitism and philosemitism in postwar Germany. Oxford: Pergamon Press
Stern, F. (1994). The revival of antisemitism in united Germany: Historical aspects and methodological considerations. In M. Brown (Ed.), Approaches to antisemitism: Context and curriculum (pp. 78–94). New York: The American Jewish Committee
Stern, F. (1996). German-Jewish relations in the postwar period: The ambiguities of antisemitic and philosemitic discourse. In M. Y. Bodemann (Ed.), Jews, Germans, memory: Reconstructions of Jewish life in Germany (pp. 77–98). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Stone, W. F., Lederer, G., & Christie, R. (1993). Strength and weakness: The authoritarian personality today. New York: Springer
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall
Taylor, G. (1985). Pride, shame, and guilt: Emotions of self-assessment. Oxford: Clarendon Press
, & (1997). Goldhagen und die Deutschen: Psychoanalytische Reflexionen über die Resonanz auf ein Buch und seinen Autor in der deutschen Öffentlichkeit. Psyche, 51, 494–569Google Scholar
(2000). Identity creation and the culture of contrition: Recasting ‘normality’ in the Berlin Republic. German Politics, 9, 83–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53
- Cited by