Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-9nwgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-25T17:15:12.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to the special issue on scientific networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2023

Dmitry G. Zaytsev Open the ORCID record for Dmitry G. Zaytsev [Opens in a new window]  and
Noshir S. Contractor Open the ORCID record for Noshir S. Contractor [Opens in a new window]
Dmitry G. Zaytsev*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame at Tantur, Jerusalem, Israel
Noshir S. Contractor
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: zaytsevdi2@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

collaborationscientific networksinnovationbibliometric networksERGM
Type
Introduction
Information
Network Science , Volume 11 , Special Issue 1: Scientific Networks , March 2023 , pp. 1 - 4
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crane, D. (1969). Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the, invisible college. hypothesis American Sociological Review, 34(3), 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgerton, J. F., Cranmer, S. J., & Finomore, V. (2022). How teams adapt to exogenous shocks: Experimental evidence with node knockouts of central members. Network Science, 10(3), 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. A., & Aceves, P. (2016). Machine translation: Mining text for social theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 42(1), 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S. … Barabási, A.-L. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379), doi: 10.1126/science.aao0185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollway, J., Lomi, A., Pallotti, F., & Stadtfeld, C. (2017). Multilevel social spaces: The network dynamics of organizational fields. Network Science, 5(2), 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1968). Criticism and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol. 69, (pp. 149–186). Aristotelian Society, Oxford University Press on behalf of Wiley, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
Wagner, C. S., & Jonkers, K. (2017). Open countries have strong science. Nature, 550(7674), 32–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, D., & Barabási, A. L. (2021). The science of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, D., Song, C., & Barabási, A. L. (2013). Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science, 342(6154), 127–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed