Agreement forged in Paris aims to hold warming âwell belowâ 2 °C.
Paris
When the gavel came down for the final time at the climate summit in Paris on 12Â December, representatives from 195 countries erupted into cheers.
They had approved a landmark plan to combat climate change after two weeks of gruelling negotiations. The agreement commits most countries to reduce their greenhouse-gas emissions, while seeking to protect low-lying islands from rising seas and helping poor nations to develop their economies without relying on cheap, dirty fossil fuels.
The accord, years in the making, seeks to hold warming âwell belowâ 2â°C above pre-industrial temperatures. Countriesâ current climate pledges fall short of that goal, but many scientists and governments see the Paris agreement as the last, best hope to set the planet on a course to avoid catastrophic climate change.
âHistory is written by those who commit, not those who calculate,â French president François Hollande told negotiators after the accord was adopted. âToday you have committed.â
The ambitious 32-page package contains a multitude of provisions to accelerate the worldâs transition from fossil fuels to solar, wind, nuclear, hydropower and other clean energy sources.
Nearly every country is asked to play its part in ensuring that greenhouse-gas emissions peak, and then begin to decline, as soon as possible. Countries will assess their progress towards reducing emissions in 2018, and must revisit their climate pledges every five years, beginning in 2020. The aim is that these pledges will become more ambitious over time.
To ensure that countries are keeping to their commitments, the agreement creates a transparent system for measuring, reporting and verifying emissions, while allowing some flexibility for countries that have little capacity to do so. The plan allows for an independent technical review, and all but the smallest, poorest countries will have to report their emissions every two years. But negotiators have left many of the details to be debated at the next major climate talks, in 2016.
âOn transparency, the agreement is a little bit loosey-goosey,â says Michael Oppenheimer, a climate scientist at Princeton University in New Jersey. âIt could be turned into something that is very effective, but the delegates kicked the can down the road.â
Others worry about how developing countries can be helped to build their capaÂcity to monitor emissions. âTransparency and governance are not something you obtain with a decree,â says Joseph Armathé Amougou, director of Cameroonâs National Observatory on Climate Change. He will be responsible for developing and reporting his countryâs greenhouse-gas inventory, but he currently has neither the budget nor the employees to do so.
The Paris agreement includes non-binding language that outlines a plan for wealthy nations to increase their climate aid to poorer nations beyond their current commitment of US$100 billion per year by 2020. And developing nations pushed successfully for the pact to recognize that vulnerable countries will face damage from rising seas, raging storms and other impacts of climate change.
The official recognition of damage was a huge achievement, says Mohamed Adow of Christian Aid, an advocacy group based in London. âWe now have loss and damage as an integral part of the climate regime.â But the pact explicitly bars poorer nations from seeking compensation or from holding wealthy, major polluters liable for these losses.
An arduous journey
Weary negotiators, running on nervous energy and caffeine, approved the Paris agreement a day after their self-imposed deadline â and only after a major push by leaders of the United Nations and the host country.
In a soaring speech, Hollande implored delegates to pass an accord that would send âa message of lifeâ to rebuke the perpetrators of the terrorist attacks that killed 130Â people in Paris on 13Â November.
âI will be delighted, relieved, proud, that it be launched from Paris, because Paris was attacked almost exactly a month ago,â he said. âFrance asks you, calls upon you, to adopt the first universal agreement on climate.â
The long road to the Paris agreement began in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, when nations approved a general âframeworkâ to combat climate change that left the details for later agreements. After 20 annual meetings with little progress to curb ever-soaring emissions, representatives arrived in Paris with pledges from 187 countries that outlined the steps each would take to cut its emissions by 2030.
Never before had so many promises been on the table â but many pledges were hedged with conditions, such as calls for financial aid to build alternative energy plants, save remaining forests or relocate people living in harmâs way. Even if all of the promises were fulfilled, and were followed by substantial additional emissions reductions, the world would warm 2.7â°C by 2100 (see âTight budgetâ). This is deep into the territory that scientists expect would prompt catastrophic, irreversible climate changes.
Yet the Paris agreement seeks to limit planetary warming to well below 2â°C, urging nations to pursue an even stricter target, 1.5â°C. To put this in perspective, the average global temperature has already risen 1â°C since the start of the Industrial Revolution.
Many environmentalists say that the agreement and the goals are strong enough to create momentum and put pressure on governments moving forward. âWe see the key elements that we have always said we need for a good agreement,â says Nathaniel Keohane, who heads the global climate programme for the Environmental Defense Fund in New York City.
Others say that the Paris accord should prod businesses to pursue clean energy and green growth. âMarkets now have the clear signal that they need to unleash the full force of human ingenuity and scale up investments that will generate low-emissions, resilient growth,â said United Nations secretary-general Ban Ki-moon. âWhat was once unthinkable has now become unstoppable.â
Climate scientists who gathered in Paris to observe the negotiations were pleased with the accordâs ultimate goal, but wanted more details about how nations would achieve significant emissions reductions. âThis does not send a clear signal about the level and timing of emission cuts, and does not provide a useful yardstick against which to measure progress,â says Steffen Kallbekken, research director at the Center for International Climate and Energy Policy in Oslo. Although the Paris plan is not inconsistent with the science, he says, it does not reflect the best available research.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has concluded that holding warming to 2â°C will probably require emissions to be cut by 40â70% by 2050 compared with 2010 levels, Kallbekken notes. Achieving the 1.5â°C target would require substantially larger emissions cuts â of the order of 70â95% by 2050.
The Paris agreement directs the IPCC to study scenarios for limiting warming to 1.5â°C, and to deliver a report to nations by 2018 to help them determine how much to strengthen their climate commitments.
The fact that the accord prominently mentions the 1.5â°C target is a huge victory for vulnerable countries, says Saleemul Huq, director of the International Centre for Climate Change and Development in Dhaka, Bangladesh. âComing into Paris, we had all of the rich countries and all of the big developing countries not on our side,â says Huq, an adviser to a coalition of least-developed nations. âIn the 14 days that we were here, we managed to get all of them on our side.â
Additional information
Related video
Paris climate talks: An agreement is reachedAfter two weeks of intense negotiations, nations agreed to a global climate deal. Nature Video reports from the heart of the conference.
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
France tries to bridge divide in climate talks 2015-Dec-10
UN climate chief on her plans to save the world 2015-Dec-09
Global greenhouse-gas emissions set to fall in 2015 2015-Dec-07
Is the 2â°C world a fantasy? 2015-Nov-24
The fragile framework 2015-Nov-24
Green Climate Fund faces slew of criticism 2015-Nov-20
Combined climate pledges of 146 nations fall short of 2â°C target 2015-Oct-30
Nature special: 2015 Paris climate talks
Related external links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tollefson, J., Weiss, K. Nations approve historic global climate accord. Nature 528, 315â316 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/528315a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/528315a
This article is cited by
-
Music and the twenty-first century eco-warrior
SN Social Sciences (2021)
-
Dichotomous analysis of gaseous emissions as influenced by the impacts of COVID-19 in Brazil: São Paulo and Legal Amazon
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (2021)
-
Thinking about water and air to attain Sustainable Development Goals during times of COVID-19 Pandemic
Journal of Earth System Science (2020)
-
Development of a metabolic pathway transfer and genomic integration system for the syngas-fermenting bacterium Clostridium ljungdahlii
Biotechnology for Biofuels (2019)
-
The current and future global distribution and population at risk of dengue
Nature Microbiology (2019)