Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Mail and phone interventions for weight loss in a managed-care setting: Weigh-To-Be one-year outcomes

International Journal of Obesity volume 27, pages 1584–1592 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe methods, recruitment success, and 1-y results of a study evaluating the effectiveness of phone- and mail-based weight-loss interventions in a managed care setting.

DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial with three groups, that is, usual care, mail intervention, and phone intervention.

SUBJECTS: In total, 1801 overweight members of a managed-care organization (MCO).

MEASUREMENTS: Height, weight, medical status, and weight-loss history were measured at baseline. Participation in intervention activities was monitored for 12 months in the two active treatment groups. Self-reported weight was obtained at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS: More individuals assigned to mail treatment started it (88%) than did those assigned to phone treatment (69%). However, program completion rates were higher in the phone (36%) than mail (7%) intervention. The mean weight losses were 1.93, 2.38, and 1.47 kg at 6 months in the mail, phone, and usual care groups, respectively. The differences between the phone and usual care groups were statistically significant. The mean weight losses at 12 months did not differ by treatment group (2.28 kg mail, 2.29 kg phone, and 1.92 kg usual care). Greater weight loss was seen in men, older participants, and those with no prior experience in a weight-loss program. Heavier participants and those who reported current treatment for depression lost less weight.

CONCLUSION: Although mail- and phone-based weight-loss programs can be delivered to large numbers of people in an MCO setting, additional work is needed to enhance their clinical efficacy as well as to assess their costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL . Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 2002; 288: 1723–1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mokdad AH, Bowman BA, Ford ES, Vinicor F, Marks JS, Koplan JP . The continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States. J Am Med Assoc 2001; 286: 1195–1200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jeffery RW, Drewnowski A, Epstein LH, Stunkard AJ, Wilson GT, Wing RR, Hill R . Long-term maintenance of weight loss: current status. Health Psychol 2000; 19 (Suppl): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  4. French SA, Jeffery RW, Murray D . Is dieting good for you? Prevalence, duration and associated weight and behaviour changes for specific weight loss strategies over four years in US adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999; 23: 320–327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hellerstedt WL, Jeffery RW . The effects of a telephone-based intervention on weight loss. Am J Health Promot 1997; 11: 177–182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cameron R, MacDonald MA, Schlegel RP, Young CI, Fisher SE, Killen JD, Rogers T, Horlick L, Schepel LF . Toward the development of self-help health behaviour change programs: weight loss by correspondence. Can J Public Health 1990; 81: 275–279.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeffery RW, Danaher BG, Killen J, Farquhar JW, Kinnier R . Self-administered programs for health behavior change: smoking cessation and weight reduction by mail. Addict Behav 1982; 7: 57–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeffery RW, Gerber WM . Group and correspondence treatments for weight reduction used in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Behav Ther 1982; 13: 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Black DR, Threlfall WE . A stepped approach to weight control: a minimal intervention and a bibliotherapy problem-solving program. Behav Ther 1986; 17: 144–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferstl VR, Jokusch U, Brengelmann JC . Die verhaltensterapeutische behandlund des ubergewichts. Int J Health Educ 1975; 18: 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marston AR, Marston MR, Ross J . A correspondence course behavioral program for weight reduction. Obes/Bariatric Med 1977; 6: 140–147.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brownell KD, Heckerman CL, Westlake RJ . Therapist and group contact as variables in the behavioral treatment of obesity. J Consult Clin Psychol 1978; 46: 593–594.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Linstrom LL, Balch P, Reese S . In person versus telephone treatment for obesity. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiat 1976; 7: 367–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marrs RW . A meta-analysis of bibliotherapy studies. Am J Commun Psychol 1995; 23: 843–870.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harvey EL, Glenny A-M, Kirk SFL, Summerbell CD . Improving health professionals' management and the organization of care for overweight an obese people (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pronk NP, Boucher JL, Gehling E, Boyle RG, Jeffery RW . A platform for population-based weight management: description of a health plan-based integrated systems approach. Am J Manag Care 2002; 8: 847–857.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jeffery RW, Hellerstedt WL, Schmid TL . Correspondence programs for smoking cessation and weight control: a comparison of two strategies in the Minnesota Heart Health Program. Health Psychol 1990; 9: 585–598.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tell GS, Jeffery RW, Kramer FM, Snell MK . Can self-reported body weight be used to evaluate long-term follow-up of a weight-loss program? J Am Diet Assoc 1987; 87: 1198–1201.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Grant DK53826 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    R W Jeffery & K Brelje

  2. HealthPartners, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    N E Sherwood, N P Pronk, R Boyle, J L Boucher & K Hase

Authors
  1. R W Jeffery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N E Sherwood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K Brelje
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N P Pronk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R Boyle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J L Boucher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. K Hase
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R W Jeffery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeffery, R., Sherwood, N., Brelje, K. et al. Mail and phone interventions for weight loss in a managed-care setting: Weigh-To-Be one-year outcomes. Int J Obes 27, 1584–1592 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802473

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802473

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links