Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Open Access

Interference effect in lepton number violating and conserving meson decays for a left-right symmetric model

Rohini M. Godbole, Siddharth P. Maharathy, Sanjoy Mandal, Manimala Mitra, and Nita Sinha
Phys. Rev. D 104, 095009 – Published 11 November 2021

Abstract

We study the effect of interference on the lepton number violating (LNV) and lepton number conserving (LNC) three-body meson decays M1+li+lj±π that arise in a TeV-scale left-right symmetric model (LRSM) with degenerate or nearly degenerate right-handed (RH) neutrinos. The LRSM contains three RH neutrinos and a RH gauge boson. The RH neutrinos with masses in the range of MN (MeV–few GeV) can give resonant enhancement in the semileptonic LNV and LNC meson decays. In the case where only one RH neutrino contributes to these decays, the predicted new physics branching ratios of semileptonic LNV and LNC meson decays M1+li+lj+π and M1+li+ljπ+ are equal. We find that with at least two RH neutrinos contributing to the process, the LNV and LNC decay rates can differ. Depending on the neutrino mixing angles and CP-violating phases, the branching ratios of LNV and LNC decay channels mediated by the heavy neutrinos can be either enhanced or suppressed, and the ratio of these two rates can differ from unity.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
5 More
  • Received 19 April 2021
  • Accepted 14 September 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.095009

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Particles & Fields

Authors & Affiliations

Rohini M. Godbole1,*, Siddharth P. Maharathy2,3,†, Sanjoy Mandal4,‡, Manimala Mitra2,3,§, and Nita Sinha3,5,∥

  • 1Centre for High Energy Physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru—560012, India
  • 2Institute of Physics, Sachivalaya Marg, Bhubaneswar 751005, India
  • 3Homi Bhabha National Institute, BARC Training School Complex, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai 400094, India
  • 4AHEP Group, Institut de Física Corpuscular, CSIC/Universitat de València, Parc Científic de Paterna. C/ Catedrático José Beltrán, 2 E-46980 Paterna (Valencia), Spain
  • 5The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, C.I.T Campus, Taramani, Chennai 600 113, India

  • *rohini@iisc.ac.in
  • siddharth.m@iopb.res.in
  • smandal@ific.uv.es
  • §manimala@iopb.res.in
  • nita@imsc.res.in

Article Text

Click to Expand

References

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 104, Iss. 9 — 1 November 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Feynman diagrams for LNV meson decays. See text for details.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Feynman diagram for LNC meson decay, mediated via the RH neutrino.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Left: variation of the decay widths of the RH neutrino states N1,2 with the masses of RH neutrinos for different values of θ and RH gauge boson mass MWR. Right: variation of the decay widths of N1,2 with θ. For MN1,2=0.38(2)GeV, we consider MWR=22(5)TeV, respectively.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Variation of the ratio of LNV and LNC branching ratios of K+e+e±π with the mixing angle θ. The red solid, blue dash-double-dotted, green dash-dotted, and black dashed lines represent four different δM/Γ ratios (0, 0.5, 1, 10). The RH neutrino mass has been set at MN0.38GeV. The left panel represents only the RH-neutrino-mediated contribution. In the right panel we present a conservative estimate by including the “polluting” SM contribution maximally.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Branching ratio of LNV meson decay to same-flavor (e+,e+) and different-flavor (e+,μ+) final states along with a pion (π+). The plot in the left panel is for the kaon (K+) decay, and the plot in the right panel is for B-meson (B+) decay. The branching ratio is not constant; rather, it exhibits constructive and destructive interference effects for different values of θ and ϕ. The dotted line and solid line correspond to the e+e+ and e+μ+ mode, respectively. For K+ decay we consider MN0.38GeV and MWR=22TeV, and for B+-meson decay we consider MN2GeV and MWR=5TeV.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Left: variation of the branching ratio of LNV kaon decay K+e+ μ+π with the variation of the angle and phase (θ,ϕ). The final-state leptons have the same charge and different flavors. Right: the same but for final states with same-charge and same-flavor leptons, K+e+ e+π. The masses of the RH neutrino and RH gauge bosons are MN1MN20.38GeV and MWR=22TeV, respectively. The maximum values of the branching ratios are O(1010), consistent with the current experimental bounds.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Left: branching ratios of K+e+μ+π and e+μπ+ vs angle θ for nondegenerate RH neutrino masses considering δMΓN10. Right: variation of the ratio of the two branching ratios vs mixing angle θ. The results for B+ decays are similar, and hence we do not show them explicitly.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    Sensitivity of the RH neutrino mass MN and the RH gauge boson mass MWR from the LNV processes K+e+e+π, K+e+μ+π (left panel) and B+e+μ+π, e+e+π (right panel). For the K+ decay mode in the upper panel, the red solid line corresponds to the one-generation scenario, while the blue dashed line represents the two-generation scenario with constructive interference, θ=π/4, ϕ0,π/2. The blue solid line represents the two-generation scenario with destructive interference. The black solid and dashed lines represent Br1012. The figure in the right panel indicates the future sensitivity of LNV B+ meson decay with Br1012.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9

    Variation of ACP as a function of δMΓN, for θ=π4 and ϕ=π4. The red solid line represents the e+e+ or μ+μ+ channel, whereas the black dashed line represents the e+μ+ channel. For this figure, we consider K+ as the parent meson. For the B+ meson the figure is similar, and hence we do not show this explicitly.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 10
    Figure 10

    Variation of R˜eμ with the variation of angle and phase (θ,ϕ). R˜ varies between [1:1].

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 11
    Figure 11

    Left: variation of the branching ratio of the K+μ+μ+π decay mode with the variation of the CP-violating phase δ. The Majorana phases α1 are varied in the denoted range. The shaded region is disallowed from the recent results from T2K. Note that the excluded region from T2K for δ is given with the convention [π:π], which we have translated into the range [0:2π] to be consistent with our convention. See text for more details. Right: variation of the branching ratio of the K+e+e+π decay mode with the variation of the Majorana phase α1. The red solid, blue dash-double-dotted, green dash-dotted, and black dashed lines represent four different δMΓN ratios (0, 0.5, 1, 10).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 12
    Figure 12

    Left: variation of the branching ratio of the K+e+μ+π and K+e+μπ+ decay modes with the variation of the Majorana phase α1 and for different Dirac phases δ=π4 (solid red), π2 (blue dash-double-dotted), and 3π4 (green dash-dotted). Right: the ratio of the LNV and LNC branching ratios in the eμ mode.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

×

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×