Digital mammography: a weak continuity texture representation for detection of microcalcifications

Barbara Caputo; Giovanni E. Gigante

doi:10.1117/12.431057

3 July 2001 Digital mammography: a weak continuity texture representation for detection of microcalcifications

Barbara Caputo, Giovanni E. Gigante

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 4322, Medical Imaging 2001: Image Processing; (2001) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.431057
Event: Medical Imaging 2001, 2001, San Diego, CA, United States

Abstract

This paper proposes a Weak Continuity Texture Representation (WCTR) method for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms. This technique is compared with other texture-analysis methods (Co-occurrence Matrices, Gabor Energy Mask, and Wavelet Filter). The WCTR is a new method for texture representation, based on the characterization of textures using statistics of their coarseness. Form edge maps, obtained by a weak membrane at different noise levels, density values are computed which are representative of the texture coarseness. We chose six different noise levels; each texture class is then represented by six edge-density values. Textural features extracted using the four methods are used to discriminate between positive ROI's containing clustered microcalcifications and negative ROI's containing normal tissue; a three-layer backpropagation neural network is employed as a classifier. A ROC analysis is used to evaluate the classification performance. From an original database of 151 ROIs two different combinations of training and testing sets are used: 50/70 training cases and 101/81 testing cases. The best performance is obtained with the WCTR method in both cases (92% and 93% respectively). These results show the effectiveness of WCTR for the detection of microcalcifications in mammographic images.

Citation Download Citation

Barbara Caputo and Giovanni E. Gigante "Digital mammography: a weak continuity texture representation for detection of microcalcifications", Proc. SPIE 4322, Medical Imaging 2001: Image Processing, (3 July 2001); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.431057

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

;

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE