Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1124772.1124916acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities

Published: 22 April 2006 Publication History

Abstract

People come to online communities seeking information, encouragement, and conversation. When a community responds, participants benefit and become more committed. Yet interactions often fail. In a longitudinal sample of 6,172 messages from 8 Usenet newsgroups, 27% of posts received no response. The information context, posters' prior engagement in the community, and the content of their posts all influenced the likelihood that they received a reply, and, as a result, their willingness to continue active participation. Posters were less likely to get a reply if they were newcomers. Posting ontopic, introducing oneself via autobiographical testimonials, asking questions, using less complex language and other features of the messages, increased replies. Results suggest ways that developers might increase the ability of online communities to support successful individual-group interactions.

References

[1]
Box, G.E.P., G.M. Jenkins, and G.C. Reinsel. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. 3rd ed. 1994: Prentice Hall.
[2]
Butler, B.S., Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures. Information Systems Research, 2001. 12(4): p. 346--362.
[3]
Butler, B.S., M.A. Smith, and T.C. Turner. Connectivity vs. Coherence: Boundary Tensions in Online Technical Discussion Communities. in Academy of Management Conference. 2004. New Orleans, LA.
[4]
Carvalho, V.R. and W.W. Cohen. Learning to Extract Signature and Reply Lines from Email. Paper presented at the Conference on Email and AntiSpam. 2004. Mountain View, CA.
[5]
Carvalho, V.R. and W.W. Cohen. On the collective classification of email speech acts. Paper presented at the SIGIR, 2005: Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2005. Salvador, Brazil.
[6]
Cohen, W.W., Minorthird: Methods for Identifying Names and Ontological Relations in Text using Heuristics for Inducing Regularities from Data. 2004.
[7]
Galegher, J., L. Sproull, and S. Kiesler, Legitimacy, authority, and community in electronic support groups. Written Communication, 1998. 15(4): p. 493--530.
[8]
Gouldner, A.W., The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 1960. 25(2): p. 161--178.
[9]
Herring, S., Interactional Coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1999. 4(4).
[10]
Jones, Q., S. Rafaeli, and G. Ravid, Information Overload and the Message Dynamics of Online Interaction Spaces: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Exploration. Information Systems Research, 2004. 15(2): p. 194--210.
[11]
Joyce, E. and R.E. Kraut, Loyalty: Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, Under review).
[12]
Karau, S.J. and K.D. Williams, Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1993. 65(4): p. 681--706.
[13]
Katz, M.L. and C. Shapiro, Systems competition and network effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994. 8(2): p. 93--115.
[14]
Kim, A.J., Community Building on the Web: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities. 2000, Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
[15]
Lampe, C. and E. Johnston. Follow the (slash) dot: Effects of feedback on new members in an online community. in Group''05: Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGroup conference on supporting group work. 2005. New York, NY: ACM Press.
[16]
Levine, J.M. and R.L. Moreland, Group socialization: Theory and research, in European review of social psychology, W.S.M. Hewstone, Editor. 1994, John Wiley & Sons: New York. p. 283--308.
[17]
Linde, C., The quantitative study of communicative success: Politeness and accidents in aviation discourse. Language in Society, 1988. 17: p. 375--399.
[18]
Mader, T.E. and D.C. Mader, Understanding one another. 2nd ed. 1993, Madison, Wisconsin: Brown and Benchmark Publishers.
[19]
Markus, L., Towards a "critical mass" theory of interactive media: Universal access, interdependence, and diffusion. Communication Research, 1987. 14: p. 491--511.
[20]
McQuillen, J.S., The Influence of Technology on the Initiation of Interpersonal Relationships. Education, 2003. 123(3): p. 616--624.
[21]
Millen, D.R. and J.F. Patterson. Stimulating Social Engagement in a Community Network. in Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 2002. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA: ACM Press.
[22]
Moreland, R.L. and J.M. Levine, Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations, in Advances in experimental social psychology, L. Berkowitz, Editor. 1982, Academic Press: New York. p. 137--192.
[23]
Oliver, P.E. and G. Marwell, The paradox of group size in collective action: A theory of the critical mass. II. American Sociological Review, 1988. 53(1): p. 1--8.
[24]
Pennebaker, J.W., M.E. Francis, and R.J. Booth, Linguistic inquiry and word count. 2001, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers.
[25]
Pennebaker, J.W., M.R. Mehl, and K.G. Niederhoffer, Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 2003. 54: p. 547--577.
[26]
Porter, M.F., An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 1980. 14(3): p. 130--137.
[27]
Preece, J., ed. Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability. ed. J. Preece. 2000, John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY. 8--19.
[28]
Ridings, C. and D. Gefen, Virtual Community Attraction: Why People Hang Out Online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2004. 10(1).
[29]
Sacks, H., G. Jefferson, and E. Schegloff, A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 1974. 50(4): p. 696--735.
[30]
Sassenberg, K., Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. Group Dynamics: Theory and Practice, 2002. 6(1): p. 27--37.
[31]
Smith, M.A., Measures and Maps of Usenet, in From Usenet to Cowebs: Interacting with Social Information, S.C. Leug and D. Fisher, Editors. 2003, Springer Verlag: Amsterdam, Holland. p. 47--78.
[32]
Smith, M.A., Netscan: A Social Accounting Search Engine (http://netscan.research.microsoft.com). 2004, Community Technologies Group, Microsoft Corporation.
[33]
Whittaker, S., Terveen, L., Hill W., and Cherny, L., The Dynamics of Mass Interaction, in From Usenet to CoWebs: Interacting with Social Information, C. Leug and D. Fisher, Editors. 2003, Springer Verlag: Amsterdam, Holland. p. 79--91.
[34]
Zajonc, R.B., Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1968. 9(2): p. 1--27.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)How to Analyze and Enhance Participation in Electronic Networks of PracticeFoundations of Management10.2478/fman-2024-000716:1(103-126)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Quantifying the Pollan Effect: Investigating the Impact of Emerging Psychiatric Interventions on Online Mental Health DiscourseProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642477(1-22)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)A Game of Love for Women: Social Support in Otome Game Mr. Love: Queen’s Choice in ChinaProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642306(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2006
    1353 pages
    ISBN:1595933727
    DOI:10.1145/1124772
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 April 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. commitment
    2. community success
    3. contribution
    4. language
    5. online communities
    6. responsiveness
    7. text analysis

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    CHI06
    Sponsor:
    CHI06: CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 22 - 27, 2006
    Québec, Montréal, Canada

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)182
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)How to Analyze and Enhance Participation in Electronic Networks of PracticeFoundations of Management10.2478/fman-2024-000716:1(103-126)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Quantifying the Pollan Effect: Investigating the Impact of Emerging Psychiatric Interventions on Online Mental Health DiscourseProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642477(1-22)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)A Game of Love for Women: Social Support in Otome Game Mr. Love: Queen’s Choice in ChinaProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642306(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)How Founder Motivations, Goals, and Actions Influence Early Trajectories of Online CommunitiesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642269(1-11)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Exploring user reactions to luxury brand videos on YouTube: a comparative study of influencers and brand-official channelsInternational Journal of Advertising10.1080/02650487.2024.2367316(1-23)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2024
    • (2024)How self-disclosure builds cancer communities through authentic stories on YouTubeComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108226156:COnline publication date: 9-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Do users adopt extremist beliefs from exposure to hate subreddits?Social Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/s13278-023-01184-814:1Online publication date: 11-Jan-2024
    • (2024)“People are Way too Obsessed with Rank”: Trust System in Social Virtual RealityComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)10.1007/s10606-024-09498-7Online publication date: 4-May-2024
    • (2023)Effects of Search Strategies on Collective Problem-SolvingMathematics10.3390/math1122464211:22(4642)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2023
    • (2023)User Features and Gendered Patterns in Repeat Online Advice-Seeking BehaviorSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4616409Online publication date: 2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media