Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1145581.1145642acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicweConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A survey of issue resolution on the incremental refinement of the system scope in web system development

Published: 11 July 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Increasingly, IT systems and Web systems in particular, fall into the class of applications where the scope of the application to be developed cannot be clearly articulated a priori. This is for a range of reasons, but is at least in part due to the complex inter-dependencies which exist between different aspects of the problem domain. While Whereas the core system requirements might be clear, the domain inter-dependencies lead to ancillary requirements which are only identified as the emerging system and its relationship to the domain are understood. A key mechanism in supporting the development of this understanding is the exploration of application pilots or prototypes, and the subsequent identification of solution or problem domain issues. The resolution of these issues will often play a crucial role in supporting the development of domain understanding and hence project scope. In this paper we explore this phenomenon by analysing issue handling across a range of case studies. We describe a model of the issue resolution process and highlight those issues which are most likely to assist in clarification of project scope.

References

[1]
Chin, G. Agile Project Management: How to succeed in the face of changing project requirements, AMACOM Publisher, New York, USA, 2003.
[2]
Dhar. V and Ramesh, B. Supporting systems development by capturing deliberations during requirements engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 18(6), 498--510, 1992.
[3]
Dutoit, A. Bruegge. B. and Coyne, R. Using an issue-based model in a team-based software engineering course, 6th Working Conference in SE Education & Practice, Dunedin, New Zealand, 1996.
[4]
France, R.B. and Horton, T.B. Applying domain analysis and modeling: an industrial experience, Proceedings of the 1995 Symposium on Software reusability, 206--214, 1995.
[5]
Heller, D., Krenzelok, L and Orr, J. Webtop: realities in designing a Web-application platform, Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences, Pleasonton, CA, 1--15, 2003.
[6]
Hitchins, D. K. In Systems Integration: Principles and Practice, IEE Colloquium, 3/1-3/12, 1990.
[7]
Isenmann, S. and Reuter, W.D. IBIS'a convincing concept&but a lousy instrument?, Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, 163--172, 1997.
[8]
Kuntz, W. and Rittel, H. Issues as elements of information systems, Working Paper No. 131, Inst. Of Urban and Regional Development, UC at Berkeley, California, 1997.
[9]
Lehman, M.M, Rules and Tools for Software Evolution Planning and Management, Annals of Software Engineering, 11(1). 15--44, 2001.
[10]
Lowe, D. Web Requirements An Overview, Requirements Engineering Journal, 8, (2), 102-113, 2003.
[11]
Lowe, D.B. and Eklund, J. Client needs and the design process in web projects', Journal of Web Engineering, 1(1), 23--36, 2002.
[12]
Michael, S. and Lewis, B. Research practice: International handbooks of quantitative application in social sciences, Sage, 1994.
[13]
Ramler, R., Wolmaier, K. and Weippl, E. From Maintenance to Evolutionary Development of Web Applications: A Pragmatic Approach, Proceedings of ICWE 2004, Lecture Notes in Computing Science 3140, 287--299, 2004.
[14]
Schneiderman, B., Nielsen, J., Levi. M., Conrad, F. Is the Web really different from everything else?, Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 92--93, 1998.
[15]
Software Engineering Institute (SEI), Available at http://www.sei.cmu/productlines/frame_report/productLS.htm {Accessed 25th March 2005}.
[16]
Sood, S., Gilligan, R., Chandler, C. and Slack, S. Disneyworld.com redesign, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria, 869--884, 2004.
[17]
Tang, S. M. An impact factor model of Intranet adoption: an exploratory and empirical research', Journal of Systems and Software, 51(3), 157--173, 2000.
[18]
Temponi, C. and Lambert, T. Joint product development implementation: an empirical study in Engineering Management Conference, 2002. IEMC '02. 2002 IEEE International, 2(2), 725--730, 2002.
[19]
Yakemovic, B. and Conklin, J. Report on a development project use of an issue-based information system, Proceedings of the CSCW, Los Angeles, CA, October 7-10, 105--118, 1990.
[20]
Yusop, N., Lowe, D., Zowghi, D. A domain framework for representation of Web system impacts", Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, Brisbane, Australia, Nov 2004.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Design and Implementation of Quality Information Management System for Modular Construction FactoryBuildings10.3390/buildings1205065412:5(654)Online publication date: 13-May-2022
  • (2018)Calculating completeness of software project scope definitionInformation and Software Technology10.5555/3163583.316367494:C(208-233)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2018
  • (2013)The Effects of Project Management Certification on the Triple ConstraintInternational Journal of Information Technology Project Management10.4018/ijitpm.20131001064:4(93-111)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013

Index Terms

  1. A survey of issue resolution on the incremental refinement of the system scope in web system development

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ICWE '06: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Web engineering
    July 2006
    384 pages
    ISBN:1595933522
    DOI:10.1145/1145581
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 11 July 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. business domain issues
    2. issues resolution
    3. project issues
    4. scope refinement
    5. system technical issues
    6. web system

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Design and Implementation of Quality Information Management System for Modular Construction FactoryBuildings10.3390/buildings1205065412:5(654)Online publication date: 13-May-2022
    • (2018)Calculating completeness of software project scope definitionInformation and Software Technology10.5555/3163583.316367494:C(208-233)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2018
    • (2013)The Effects of Project Management Certification on the Triple ConstraintInternational Journal of Information Technology Project Management10.4018/ijitpm.20131001064:4(93-111)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media