Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

The pendulum swings back: individual acceptance of re-centralized application platforms

Published: 19 September 2006 Publication History

Abstract

After two decades of actively distributing computing power to individual users in the form of desktop and notebook PCs, IT executives are now being drawn back to the benefits of centralized computing platforms, as evidenced by the emergence of thin client technology and the application service provider (ASP) business model. But will individual users embrace this "re-centralization?" This study examines major influencing factors on end-user use of centralized application platforms using the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Two new perceived behavioral control factors are identified: (1) relative functional advantage of the local PC versus the central server, and (2) response promptness of the central server. Data were collected using a paper-and-pencil survey of twenty-six users who had access to a centralized application platform. The two new measures demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity, and both were strong predictors of intention to use the centralized platform and actual usage. Results also suggest that TPB has strong predictive power for individual use of centralized application platforms.

References

[1]
Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R., and Todd, P.A. (1992). "Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication," MIS Quarterly, Vol.16, No.2, p. 227--248.
[2]
Agarwal, R. (2000). "Individual Acceptance of Information Technologies," in Zmud, R. (Ed.), Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past, Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex Education Resources, pp. 85--104.
[3]
Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1999). "Are Individual Differences Germane to The Acceptance of New Information Technologies?" Decision Sciences, Vol.30, p. 361--391.
[4]
Ajzen, I. (1985). "From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior," in Kuhl, J., and Beckmann, J. (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 11--39.
[5]
Ajzen, I. (1991). "The Theory of Planned Behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.50, pp.179--211.
[6]
Ajzen, I. and Madden, T.J. (1986). "Prediction of Goal-Directed Behavior: Attitudes, Intentions and Perceived Behavioral Control," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.22, No.5, pp.453--474.
[7]
Anthes, G. (1998). "TCO Tales," Computerworld, March 2, 1998, www.computerworld. com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47_STO30015,00.html (accessed October 2003)
[8]
Barclay, D., Higgins, C., and Thompson, R. (1995). "The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling, Personal Computer Adoption and Use As an Illustration," Technology Studies, Vol.2, No.2, pp. 285--309.
[9]
Baroudi, J.J. and Orlikowski, W.J. (1989). "The Problem of Statistical Power in MIS Research," MIS Quarterly, Vol.13, No.1, p. 87.
[10]
Benbasat, I. and Zmud, B. (2003). "The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties," MIS Quarterly, Vol.27, No.2, pp. 183--194.
[11]
Brown, S., Massey, A., Montoya-Weiss, M., and Burkman, J. (2002). "Do I Really Have to? User Acceptance of Mandated Technology," European Journal of Information Systems, Vol.11, pp. 283--295.
[12]
Chin, W.W. (1997). "Overview of the PLS Method," http://disc-nt.cba.uh.edu/chin/PLSINTRO.HTM (accessed October 2003)
[13]
Chin, W.W. (2001). "PlS-Graph User's Guide, Version 3.0," (User's manual that accompanies PLS-GRAPH version 3.00 build 279 provided by Wynn Chin)
[14]
Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., and Warshaw, P. (1989). "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, Vol.35, No.8, pp. 982--1003.
[15]
Davis, F.D. (1993). "User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts," International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol.38, pp. 475--487.
[16]
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
[17]
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981). "Evaluation Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error". Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.18, pp. 39--50.
[18]
Gartner Research. (2002). "Gartner Predicts 2002: Top Predictions," http://www4.gartner.com/1_researchanalysis/focus/predictions2002.html (accessed October 2003)
[19]
Heart, T. and Pliskin, N. (2001). "Is E-Commerce of IT Application Services (Asp) Alive and Well?" The Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, Vol.3, No.4, p. 33.
[20]
Jöreskog, K.G., and Wold, H. (1982). "The ML and PLS Techniques for Modeling with Latent Variables: Historical and Comparative Aspects," in Joreskog, K.G., and Wold, H. (Eds.), Systems Under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction, Vol.1, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 263--270.
[21]
Keil, M., Mann, J., and Rai, A. (2000). "Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models," MIS Quarterly, Vol.24, No.4, pp. 631--664.
[22]
Leonard-Barton, D. and Deschamps, I. (1988). "Managerial Influence in the Implementation of New Technology," Management Science, Vol.34, No.10, pp. 1252--1265.
[23]
Marakas, G.M. and Elam, J. (1998). "Semantic Structuring in Analyst Acquisition and Representation of Facts in Requirements Analysis," Information Systems Research, Vol.9, No.1, pp. 37--63.
[24]
Mathieson, K. (1991). "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior." Information Systems Research, Vol.2, No.3, pp. 173--191.
[25]
Mitev, N.N. (1996). "More Than a Failure? The Computerized Reservation Systems at French Railways," Information Technology & People, Vol.9, No.4, pp. 8--19.
[26]
Robey, D., and Boudreau, M.C. (2000). Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Dealing with Diversity In Empirical Research: Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future through the Past, Cincinnati: Pinnalfex.
[27]
Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R.L. (1991). Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis (2nd ed.), Boston: McGraw-Hill.
[28]
Schuff, D.S. and Robert, L. (2001). "Centralization Vs. Decentralization of Application Software," Communication of The ACM, Vol.44, No.6, pp. 88--94.
[29]
Tabachnick, B., and Fidell, L. (1989). Using Multivariate Statistics, New York: Harper Collins.
[30]
Taylor, S. and Todd, P.A. (1995). "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, Vol.6, No.2, pp. 144--176.
[31]
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., and Davis, F.D. (2003). "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View," MIS Quarterly, Vol.27, No.3, pp. 425--478.
[32]
Wheatley, M. (1998). "Every Last Dime", CIO Magazine; http://www.cio.com/archive/111500_dime.html (accessed October 2003)
[33]
Wold, H. (1985). Systems Analysis by Partial Least Squares, in Jijkamp, H., and Wrigley, N. (Eds.), Measuring the Unmeasurable, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 221--252.
[34]
Wold, H. (1989). "Introduction to the Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis," in Wold, H. (Ed.), Theoretical empiricism, New York: Paragon House, pp. xii--xl.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Intention in information systems adoption and use: Current state and research directionsInternational Journal of Information Management10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.10268073(102680)Online publication date: Dec-2023
  • (2021)Rethinking the intention to behavior link in information technology use: Critical review and research directionsInternational Journal of Information Management10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.10234559(102345)Online publication date: Aug-2021
  • (2012)Consumer electronics acceptance based on innovation attributes and switching costsElectronic Commerce Research and Applications10.1016/j.elerap.2011.12.00511:3(218-228)Online publication date: 1-May-2012
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems  Volume 37, Issue 2-3
Spring-Summer 2006
178 pages
ISSN:0095-0033
EISSN:1532-0936
DOI:10.1145/1161345
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 September 2006
Published in SIGMIS Volume 37, Issue 2-3

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. distributed applications
  2. distributed systems
  3. human factors
  4. user issues

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Intention in information systems adoption and use: Current state and research directionsInternational Journal of Information Management10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.10268073(102680)Online publication date: Dec-2023
  • (2021)Rethinking the intention to behavior link in information technology use: Critical review and research directionsInternational Journal of Information Management10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.10234559(102345)Online publication date: Aug-2021
  • (2012)Consumer electronics acceptance based on innovation attributes and switching costsElectronic Commerce Research and Applications10.1016/j.elerap.2011.12.00511:3(218-228)Online publication date: 1-May-2012
  • (2009)The Influence of Attitude on the Acceptance and Use of Information SystemsInformation Resources Management Journal10.4018/irmj.200904010222:2(22-49)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2009
  • (2009)Effect of individual components on system's reliabilityInternational Journal of Quality & Reliability Management10.1108/0265671091096615626:6(614-628)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2009
  • (2008)The Delphi method as a tool for analysing technology evolution: Case open source thin computing2008 4th IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology10.1109/ICMIT.2008.4654590(1476-1481)Online publication date: Sep-2008

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media